UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(
X ) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 27, 2010
OR
( ) TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from ……………… to ………………
Commission
file number 000-03922
PATRICK INDUSTRIES,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
INDIANA
|
35-1057796
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
107
WEST FRANKLIN STREET, P.O. Box 638, ELKHART, IN
|
46515
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(ZIP
Code)
|
(574) 294-7511
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes
[ ] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer
[ ] Accelerated
filer
[ ] Non-accelerated
filer
[ ] Smaller
reporting company [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No
[X]
As of
July 31, 2010, there were 9,313,189 shares of the registrant’s common stock
outstanding.
PATRICK
INDUSTRIES, INC.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
|
Page
No.
|
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
|
|
June
27, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009
|
3
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
Second
Quarter and Six Months Ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009
|
4
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009
|
5
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
6-12
|
|
|
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
13-23
|
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
23
|
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
23
|
PART II: OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
|
24
|
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
SIGNATURES
|
24
24
|
Exhibit Index:
Exhibit
31.1 - Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
31.2 - Certifications of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32 - Certifications Pursuant to Section 906
|
25
26
27
|
PART
I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PATRICK
INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
|
|
As
of
|
(thousands)
|
|
(Unaudited)
June
27, 2010
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
Trade
receivables, net
|
|
|
26,094 |
|
|
|
12,507 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
24,067 |
|
|
|
17,485 |
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
Assets
held for sale
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
52,280 |
|
|
|
36,858 |
|
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
76,258 |
|
|
|
75,953 |
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
51,186 |
|
|
|
49,520 |
|
|
Net
property, plant and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
25,072 |
|
|
|
26,433 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization
(2010:
$605; 2009: $353)
|
|
|
7,419 |
|
|
|
7,047 |
|
|
Deferred
financing costs, net of accumulated amortization
(2010:
$2,927; 2009: $2,185)
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
3,156 |
|
|
|
3,096 |
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$ |
91,539 |
|
|
$ |
77,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
20,043 |
|
|
$ |
10,359 |
|
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
16,838 |
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
6,864 |
|
|
|
5,275 |
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
64,745 |
|
|
|
35,008 |
|
|
Long-term
debt, less current maturities and discount
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18,408 |
|
|
Deferred
compensation and other
|
|
|
6,105 |
|
|
|
5,963 |
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
72,159 |
|
|
|
60,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
53,666 |
|
|
|
53,588 |
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
(1,181 |
) |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(33,412 |
) |
|
|
(36,206 |
) |
|
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
19,380 |
|
|
|
16,349 |
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
$ |
91,539 |
|
|
$ |
77,037 |
|
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
PATRICK INDUSTRIES,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
27,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
June
27
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(thousands
except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
SALES
|
|
$ |
83,865 |
|
|
$ |
55,878 |
|
|
$ |
147,365 |
|
|
$ |
100,793 |
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
74,129 |
|
|
|
49,761 |
|
|
|
131,151 |
|
|
|
91,084 |
|
GROSS
PROFIT
|
|
|
9,736 |
|
|
|
6,117 |
|
|
|
16,214 |
|
|
|
9,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse
and delivery
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
|
5,774 |
|
|
|
5,187 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
7,405 |
|
|
|
6,624 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(2,820 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
6,836 |
|
|
|
5,540 |
|
|
|
10,611 |
|
|
|
11,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
5,603 |
|
|
|
(2,250 |
) |
Stock
warrants revaluation
|
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
3,437 |
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations before income tax
benefit
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
(1,490 |
) |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
(6,095 |
) |
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
(5,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
487 |
|
Income
from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
796 |
|
NET INCOME
(LOSS)
|
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
|
$ |
(666 |
) |
|
$ |
2,794 |
|
|
$ |
(4,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.62 |
) |
Discontinued
operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - Basic
|
|
|
9,331 |
|
|
|
9,167 |
|
|
|
9,301 |
|
|
|
9,141 |
|
- Diluted
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
9,167 |
|
|
|
9,882 |
|
|
|
9,141 |
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
PATRICK
INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
(thousands)
|
|
June
27, 2010
|
|
|
June
28, 2009
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
2,794 |
|
|
$ |
(4,812 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used
in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Deferred
compensation expense
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
(2,820 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Stock
warrants revaluation
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
(Increase)
decrease in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
Deferred
financing amortization
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
Interest
paid-in-kind
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
Gain
on divestitures
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
Amortization
of loss on interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Change
in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
(13,587 |
) |
|
|
(8,606 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
(5,912 |
) |
|
|
3,116 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
12,184 |
|
|
|
5,191 |
|
Payments
on deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(3,537 |
) |
|
|
(950 |
) |
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of property, equipment and facilities
|
|
|
8,304 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Proceeds
from sale of American Hardwoods operation and facility
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
Acquisition
of Quality Hardwoods
|
|
|
(2,014 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds
from life insurance
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Insurance
premiums paid
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
5,410 |
|
|
|
4,352 |
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
borrowings (payments), net
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
(790 |
) |
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(9,117 |
) |
|
|
(4,064 |
) |
Payment
of deferred financing/debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,581 |
) |
|
|
(5,174 |
) |
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(1,772 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
PATRICK
INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
In the
opinion of Patrick Industries, Inc. (“Patrick” or the “Company”), the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present
fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 27, 2010 and December 31,
2009, and its results of operations for the three and six months ended June 27,
2010 and June 28, 2009, and cash flows for the six months ended June 27, 2010
and June 28, 2009.
Patrick’s
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) and in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP). The preparation of the consolidated financial statements
in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules
or regulations. For a description of significant accounting policies
used by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements,
please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009. Operating results for the second quarter and six months ended
June 27, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
the year ending December 31, 2010.
Certain
amounts in the prior year financial statements and footnotes have been
reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
2.
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Inventories are stated
at the lower of cost (First-In, First-Out (FIFO) Method) or market and consist
of the following classes:
(thousands)
|
|
June
27, 2010
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$ |
15,672 |
|
|
$ |
11,152 |
|
Work
in process
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
Total
manufactured goods
|
|
|
18,377 |
|
|
|
13,681 |
|
Materials
purchased for resale (distribution products)
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
Total
inventories
|
|
$ |
24,067 |
|
|
$ |
17,485 |
|
Approximately
$1.6 million of carrying value pertaining to the Company’s owned facility
located in Fontana, California and approximately $3.2 million of carrying value
pertaining to the Company’s owned facility in Woodburn, Oregon was classified as
held for sale of December 31, 2009. These assets were included on a
separate line in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position at
the lower of their carrying value or their estimated fair value.
In
February 2010, the Company completed the sale of the Oregon facility for $4.2
million and is currently operating in the same facility under a license
agreement with the purchaser for the use of a portion of the square footage
previously occupied. Approximately $4.0 million of the net proceeds
from the sale of the Oregon facility was used to pay down principal on the
Company’s term loan in the first quarter of 2010. A pretax gain on
the sale of approximately $0.8 million was recorded in the first quarter 2010
operating results.
On March
26, 2010, the Fontana, California facility was sold for $4.9 million and the
Company is operating in the same facility under a lease agreement with the
purchaser for the use of a portion of the square footage previously
occupied. Net cash proceeds of approximately $4.3 million from the
sale were received by the Company on March 29, 2010 (the beginning of the second
fiscal quarter) and were immediately used to pay down principal on the Company’s
term loan. The total pretax gain on the sale of the California
facility was $2.7 million of which approximately $2.0 million was recognized in
the first quarter 2010 operating results. Because the Company is
currently operating in the same facility under a lease agreement with the
purchaser, the remaining $0.7 million of the pretax gain was deferred and is
being offset against future lease payments as required by U.S. GAAP beginning in
the second quarter of 2010.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The
Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets at June 27, 2010 are related to
its Manufacturing segment. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets are not amortized but are subject to an annual (or under certain
circumstances more frequent) impairment test based on their estimated fair
value. Finite-lived intangible assets that meet certain criteria
continue to be amortized over their useful lives and are also subject to an
impairment test based on estimated undiscounted cash flows when impairment
indicators exist. The Company performs the required impairment
test of goodwill in the fourth quarter or more frequently if events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may exceed the fair value. No impairment was
recognized during the second quarter and six months ended June 27,
2010.
In
January 2010, the Company acquired certain assets of the cabinet door business
of Quality Hardwoods Sales, a limited liability company. The purchase
was determined to be a business combination and the intangible assets recorded
as a result of the acquisition included (in thousands): customer relationships -
$433; non-compete agreements - $190; and goodwill - $721.
As of
June 27, 2010, the remaining intangible assets balance of $7.4 million is
comprised of $1.4 million of trademarks which have an indefinite life, and
therefore, no amortization expense has been recorded, and $6.0 million
pertaining to customer relationships and non-compete agreements which are being
amortized over periods ranging from 3 to 19 years.
3.
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
American
Hardwoods
In
January 2009, the Company completed the sale of certain assets and the business
of American Hardwoods Inc. (“American Hardwoods”) for cash consideration of $2.0
million, and recorded a net pretax gain on the sale of approximately $0.5
million for the first quarter ended March 29, 2009.
In
conjunction with the sale, the Company entered into a separate real estate
purchase agreement with the buyer to sell the building that housed this
operation for a purchase price of $2.5 million. The building and
property were sold in June 2009 for $2.5 million, net of selling expenses, and
proceeds from the sale were used to pay down approximately $2.5 million in
senior debt. There was no gain or loss recognized on the sale of the
building in 2009. Financial results for American Hardwoods were
previously included in the Distribution segment.
Aluminum
Extrusion Operation
In July
2009, the Company completed the sale of certain assets of its aluminum extrusion
operation. Previously, the financial results of this
operation had comprised the entire Engineered Solutions segment. The
purchase price consisted of (i) net cash proceeds of $7.4 million and (ii) the
assumption by the buyer of approximately $2.2 million of certain accounts
payable and accrued liabilities pursuant to the definitive purchase agreement,
of which $4.2 million pertained to the sale of equipment and the facility and
$5.4 million pertained to the sale of trade receivables and
inventory.
In the
third quarter of 2009, approximately $4.4 million of the net cash proceeds were
used to pay down an additional $1.1 million in principal on the Company’s term
loan and pay off the remaining $3.3 million of principal on the industrial
revenue bonds related to this facility. The remaining $3.0 million of
proceeds were used to reduce borrowings under the Company’s revolving line of
credit.
The
operating results for American Hardwoods and for the aluminum extrusion
operation are classified as discontinued operations.
|
|
Second
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
June
27,
2010
|
|
|
June
28,
2009
|
|
|
June
27,
2010
|
|
|
June
28,
2009
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Hardwoods
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
Aluminum
extrusion operation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,319 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,282 |
|
Total
net sales
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,319 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
13,731 |
|
Pretax
income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
Hardwoods
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Aluminum
extrusion operation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
822 |
|
Total
pretax income on operations
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
803 |
|
Gain
on sale of American Hardwoods
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
480 |
|
Total
pretax income
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
After-tax
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
Gain
on sale
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Total
after-tax income
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
The
after-tax income from discontinued operations for the second quarter and six
months ended June 28, 2009 reflects certain intra-period adjustments to income
tax expense related to taxable income from discontinued operations.
4.
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the fair value
recognition provisions required by U.S. GAAP. The Company recorded
compensation expense of $78,000 and $51,000 for the six months ended June 27,
2010 and June 28, 2009, respectively, for its stock-based compensation plans on
the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The
Company estimates the fair value of all stock option awards and stock grants as
of the grant date by applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
Board of Directors approved the following share grants in 2009 and 2010: 117,500
shares on May 21, 2009; 3,500 shares on June 22, 2009; 10,000 shares on
September 21, 2009; 20,000 shares on October 1, 2009; and 131,000 shares on May
20, 2010. In addition, the Board of Directors approved the grant of
495,000 shares related to stock options on May 21, 2009.
As of
June 27, 2010, there was approximately $0.5 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to stock-based compensation arrangements granted under
incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 25 months.
5.
INCOME PER
COMMON SHARE
Basic net
income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net
income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, plus the dilutive effect
of stock options and warrants. The dilutive effect of stock options and warrants
is calculated under the treasury stock method using the average market price for
the period. Certain common stock equivalents related to options
and warrants were not included in the computation of diluted net income per
share because those options’ and warrants’ exercise prices were greater than the
average market price of the common shares.
Basic and
diluted earnings per common share for the second quarter and six months periods
were calculated using the weighted average shares as follows:
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
27,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
June
27,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
9,331 |
|
|
|
9,167 |
|
|
|
9,301 |
|
|
|
9,141 |
|
Effect
of potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
9,167 |
|
|
|
9,882 |
|
|
|
9,141 |
|
For both
the second quarter and six months ended June 28, 2009, there is no difference in
basic and diluted earnings per share since a net loss was recorded in each of
those periods resulting in all common stock equivalents having no dilutive
effect. Potentially dilutive securities totaling approximately 47,700
shares related to stock options in second quarter 2009 were excluded from
diluted earnings per common share because of their anti-dilutive
effect. For six months 2009, there were no potentially dilutive
securities excluded from the diluted earnings per common share
computation.
6.
GAIN ON SALE OF
FIXED ASSETS
In the
fourth quarter of 2009, the Company entered into a listing agreement to sell its
manufacturing and distribution facility in Woodburn,
Oregon. Approximately $3.2 million of carrying value for this
facility was classified as assets held for sale as of December 31,
2009. In the first quarter of 2010, this facility was sold resulting
in a pretax gain on sale of approximately $0.8 million.
During
the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company entered into a listing agreement to sell
its remaining manufacturing and distribution facility in Fontana,
California. Approximately $1.6 million of carrying value for this
facility was classified as assets held for sale as of December 31,
2009. In the first quarter of 2010, this facility was sold resulting
in a total pretax gain on sale of approximately $2.7
million. Approximately $2.0 million of the total pretax gain on
sale was recognized in the Company’s first quarter 2010 operating
results. Because the Company is currently operating in the same
facility under a lease agreement with the purchaser, the remaining $0.7 million
of the pretax gain was deferred and is being offset against future lease
payments as required by U.S. GAAP beginning in the second quarter of
2010. The deferred gain recognized during the second quarter and six
months ended June 27, 2010 was $0.1 million.
7.
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
The
changes in the components of comprehensive income (loss) are as
follows:
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
|
(thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$ 1,884
|
$ (666)
|
$ 2,794
|
$ (4,812)
|
|
Amortization
of unrealized losses on discontinued cash flow hedges
|
80
|
80
|
159
|
159
|
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ 1,964
|
$ (586)
|
$ 2,953
|
$ (4,653)
|
|
As of
June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009, the accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
of tax, relating to unrealized losses on discontinued cash flow hedges and
changes in accumulated pension benefit was $1.0 million and $1.3 million,
respectively.
8.
DERIVATIVE
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
Company enters into certain derivative financial instruments, on a
cost-effective basis, to mitigate its risk associated with changes in interest
rates. All derivatives are recognized on the condensed consolidated
statements of financial position at their fair value. Changes in fair value are
recognized periodically in earnings or accumulated other comprehensive income
within shareholders' equity, depending on the intended use of
the
derivative and whether the derivative has been designated by management as an
ineffective hedging instrument. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments
not designated as effective hedging instruments are recognized in earnings in
the current period.
Interest
Rate Swap Agreements
Effective
with the Second Amendment on December 11, 2008 (the “Second Amendment”) to the
Credit Agreement dated May 18, 2007 (the “Credit Agreement”), the interest rates
on the obligation were adjusted and the Company determined that its two swap
agreements were ineffective as hedges against changes in interest rates and, as
a result, the swaps were de-designated. Losses on the swaps included
in other comprehensive income as of the de-designation date are being amortized
into net income (loss) over the life of the swaps utilizing the straight-line
method which approximates the effective interest method. All future
changes in the fair value of the de-designated swaps will be recorded within
earnings on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
For both
the second quarter ended June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009 and for the comparable
six months periods, amortized losses of $80,000 and $159,000, respectively, were
recognized in interest expense on the condensed consolidated statements of
operations. In addition, the change in the fair value of the de-designated swaps
for the six months ended June 27, 2010 resulted in a charge to interest expense
and the corresponding liability of $6,000. For the six months ended
June 28, 2009, the change in the fair value of the de-designated swaps resulted
in a reduction to interest expense and the corresponding liability of $0.4
million.
The
absolute value of the notional amounts of derivative contracts for the Company
approximated $17.6 million at June 27, 2010. Gains and losses related
to the derivative instruments are expected to be largely offset by gains and
losses on the original underlying asset or liability. The Company
does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
Warrants
Subject to Revaluation
In
conjunction with the Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Company
issued a series of warrants to its lenders to purchase 474,049 shares of the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The
Company accounts for these warrants as derivative financial instruments. The
calculated fair value of the warrants is classified as a liability and is
periodically remeasured with any changes in value recognized in the stock
warrants revaluation line on the condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
Pursuant
to the anti-dilution provisions, the number of shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrants was increased to an aggregate of 483,742 shares
and the exercise price was adjusted to $0.98 per share as a result of the
issuance on May 21, 2009 and on June 22, 2009, pursuant to the
Company’s 1987 Stock Option Program, as amended, of restricted shares
at a price less than, and options to purchase common stock with an exercise
price less than, the warrant exercise price then in effect.
The fair
value of the warrants as of June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009 is as
follows:
(thousands)
|
|
June
27, 2010
|
|
|
June
28, 2009
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
1,031 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
Change
in fair value, included in earnings
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
408 |
|
Balance
at end of period
|
|
$ |
966 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
The
Company’s warrants were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June
27, 2010 and were valued using Level 2 valuation methodologies. The Company
utilizes inputs such as its stock trading value, price volatility, risk-free
interest rate and the warrants expected life for valuation
purposes.
9.
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
|
As of
June 27, 2010 and June 28, 2009, liabilities of $1.5 million and $1.8 million,
respectively, have been recognized in deferred compensation and other on the
condensed consolidated statements of financial
position
for the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements. These liabilities
fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 represents
financial instruments lacking quoted prices (unadjusted) from active market
exchanges, including over-the-counter exchange-traded financial instruments.
The prices for the financial instruments are determined using prices for
recently traded financial instruments with similar underlying terms as well as
directly or indirectly observable inputs. Financial instruments
included in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy include the Company’s interest
rate swap agreements and warrants. The interest rate swaps are valued
based on the LIBOR yield curve and the fair market values are provided by the
Company’s lending institution.
10. LONG-TERM
DEBT
The
Company has the intent and believes it has the ability to refinance or replace
its existing credit facility which is scheduled to expire on January 3,
2011. Because the Company did not enter into a financing agreement
with its bank lenders before the issuance of the statement of financial position
for the second quarter of 2010, U.S. GAAP requires that all of the Company’s
outstanding long-term indebtedness as of June 27, 2010 be classified
as a current liability until such time as the refinancing or replacement of the
current credit facility is completed.
11. INCOME
TAXES
The
Company had a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets net of deferred tax
liabilities expected to reverse of approximately $19.1 million at June 27,
2010. Deferred tax assets will continue to require a tax valuation
allowance until the Company can demonstrate their realizability through
sustained profitability and/or from other factors. The tax valuation
allowance does not impact the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating
loss carryforwards to offset taxable earnings in the future. The
effective tax rate for 2010 and 2009 is zero due to the utilization of federal
and state tax loss carryforwards and the aforementioned valuation allowance on
the net deferred tax assets.
A tax
benefit from continuing operations of $0.3 million and $0.5 million related to
the utilization of a net operating loss carryforward to offset the gain
recognized from discontinued operations was recognized in the second quarter and
six months of 2009, respectively. As a result, the effective tax rate
on continuing operations (exclusive of the valuation allowance and the
intra-period tax adjustment in 2009) was 0% for both the second quarter and six
months of 2010 and 2009.
12. SEGMENT
INFORMATION
Patrick
has determined that its reportable segments are those based on the Company’s
method of internal reporting, which segregates its businesses by product
category and production/distribution process. In
accordance with changes made to the Company’s internal reporting structure, the
Company changed its segment reporting from three reportable segments to two
reportable segments effective January 1, 2010. Operations previously
included in the Other Component Manufactured Products segment were consolidated
with the operations in the Primary Manufactured Products segment to form one new
segment called Manufacturing. The other reportable segment,
Distribution, remained the same as reported in prior periods.
Prior
year results were reclassified to reflect the current year presentation. In
addition, certain segment information in the prior periods’ consolidated
financial statements has been reclassified to reflect sold businesses reported
as discontinued operations.
A
description of the Company’s reportable segments based on continuing operations
is as follows:
Manufacturing - Utilizes
various materials, including gypsum, particleboard, plywood, and fiberboard,
which are bonded by adhesives or a heating process to a number of products,
including vinyl, paper, foil, and high pressure laminate. These products are
utilized to produce furniture, shelving, wall, counter, and cabinet products
with a wide variety of finishes and textures. This segment also
includes a cabinet door division and a vinyl printing division.
Distribution - Distributes
pre-finished wall and ceiling panels, drywall and drywall finishing
products,
electronics,
adhesives, cement siding, interior passage doors, roofing products, laminate
flooring, and other miscellaneous products.
The
Company sold certain assets and the business of its American Hardwoods operation
in January 2009 and sold the building that housed this operation in June
2009. Results relating to this operation, which were previously
reported in the Distribution segment, were classified as discontinued operations
for all periods presented.
The
Company sold certain assets and the business of its aluminum extrusion operation
in July 2009. Results relating to this operation, which comprised the
entire Engineered Solutions segment, were
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The table
below presents unaudited information about the sales and operating income (loss)
of those segments.
Second Quarter Ended June 27,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
Manufacturing
|
Distribution
|
Total
|
Net
outside sales
|
$ 69,505
|
$
14,360
|
$ 83,865
|
Intersegment
sales
|
3,794
|
8
|
3,802
|
Operating
income
|
4,157
|
467
|
4,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter Ended June 28,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
Manufacturing
|
Distribution
|
Total
|
Net
outside sales
|
$ 44,919
|
$
10,959
|
$ 55,878
|
Intersegment
sales
|
2,410
|
-
|
2,410
|
Operating
income
|
2,014
|
273
|
2,287
|
Six Months Ended June 27,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
Manufacturing
|
Distribution
|
Total
|
Net
outside sales
|
$
122,392
|
$
24,973
|
$
147,365
|
Intersegment
sales
|
6,505
|
19
|
6,524
|
Operating
income
|
6,096
|
566
|
6,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 28,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(thousands)
|
Manufacturing
|
Distribution
|
Total
|
Net
outside sales
|
$ 79,586
|
$
21,207
|
$
100,793
|
Intersegment
sales
|
4,094
|
1
|
4,095
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
953
|
(219)
|
734
|
Reconciliation
of segment operating income to consolidated operating income
(loss):
|
|
Second Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
27,
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
|
June
27.
|
|
|
June
28,
|
|
(thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating
income for reportable segments
|
|
$ |
4,624 |
|
|
$ |
2,287 |
|
|
$ |
6,662 |
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
Corporate
incentive agreements
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Unallocated
corporate expenses
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,925 |
) |
|
|
(4,331 |
) |
|
|
(3,818 |
) |
Amortization
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
Consolidated
operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
5,603 |
|
|
$ |
(2,250 |
) |
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
This
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the Company’s
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 1
of this Report. In addition, this MD&A contains certain
statements relating to future results which are forward-looking statements as
that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. See “Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” on page
23 of this Report. The Company undertakes no obligation to update
these forward-looking statements.
The
MD&A is divided into seven major sections:
OVERVIEW
OF MARKETS AND RELATED INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE
REVIEW
OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
General
Second
Quarter and Six Months Ended June 27, 2010 Compared to 2009
REVIEW
BY BUSINESS SEGMENT
General
Second
Quarter and Six Months Ended June 27, 2010 Compared to 2009
Unallocated
Corporate Expenses
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
Flows
Capital
Resources
Summary
of Liquidity and Capital Resources
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
OTHER
Seasonality
Inflation
INFORMATION
CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
OVERVIEW OF MARKETS AND
RELATED INDUSTRY PERFORMANCE
While
uncertainty surrounding the future course of the global economy helped fuel the
decline in our sales to the recreational vehicle (“RV”), manufactured housing
(“MH”), and industrial markets in prior periods, we have seen improvement in two
of the primary markets that we serve. The RV industry, which
represented 59% of the Company’s six months 2010 sales, continued to strengthen
in the first half of 2010 as evidenced by higher production levels and wholesale
unit shipments versus the prior period. According to the Recreational
Vehicle Industry Association (“RVIA”), the RV industry experienced an increase
in wholesale unit shipments of approximately 80% for the quarter compared to the
prior year, reflecting the third consecutive quarter over quarter increase in
shipments following declines in the previous 11 fiscal quarters. On a
year-to-date basis, unit shipment levels increased 87% versus the comparable
prior year period. Additionally, many of our existing customers have
increased production and capacity as well as added to their workforce in 2010
compared to 2009.
Long-term
demographic trends favor RV industry growth fueled by the anticipated positive
impact that aging baby boomers are estimated to have on the industry once the
industry fully recovers from the recent economic recession. In
addition, federal economic credit and stimulus packages, which include
provisions to stimulate RV lending and provide favorable tax treatment for new
RV purchases, may help promote sales and aid in the RV industry’s economic
recovery. Demographic trends point to positive conditions for this
particular market sector in the long-term. As a result of the recent
short-term demand strength, the RVIA is predicting a 39% increase in full year
2010 unit shipments compared to the full year 2009 level.
Although
RV market conditions have improved in the first half of 2010, we anticipate that
the residual effects of the recession will potentially continue for the
remainder of 2010 and result in softening market conditions for the latter half
of the year in this market as consumers remain cautious when deciding whether or
not to purchase discretionary items such as RVs.
The
industrial market sector, which is tied to the residential housing market and
accounted for approximately 14% of the Company’s sales in the first six months
of 2010, also showed signs of improvement in the first half of
2010. New housing starts for the first six months of 2010 increased
approximately 14% from the comparable period in 2009 (as reported by the U.S.
Department of Commerce). We estimate that approximately 60% of our
industrial revenue base is linked to the residential housing market, and we
believe that there is a direct correlation between the demand for our products
in this market and new residential housing construction. Our sales to
this market generally lag new residential housing starts by six to twelve
months. While the National Association of Homebuilders (as of July
23, 2010) has forecasted a 14% increase in total housing starts and a 4%
increase in existing single-family home sales for the full year 2010 compared to
2009, we remain cautious about further growth in the industrial sector due to
current uncertainty related to general economic conditions and the large numbers
of repossessed homes in the marketplace. In the long-term,
residential expenditure growth will be based on job growth, affordable interest
rates, and continuing government incentives to stimulate housing demand and
reduce surplus inventory due to foreclosures.
The MH
industry on the other hand, which represented approximately 27% of the Company’s
sales in the first six months of 2010, continues to be negatively impacted by a
lack of financing and the availability of credit, job losses, and excess
residential housing foreclosure inventories. However, we did see seasonal signs
of improvement during the second quarter as wholesale unit shipments in the MH
industry were up approximately 16% from the second quarter of
2009. This improvement marked the first quarter-over-quarter increase
in unit shipments since 2006. On a year-to-date basis, unit shipment
levels increased 8% versus the comparable prior year period. Factors
that may favorably impact production levels in this industry include credit
quality standards in the residential housing market, improved job growth,
favorable changes in financing laws, new tax credits for new home buyers and
other government incentives, and rising residential housing interest
rates. The Company currently estimates MH unit shipments for full
year 2010 to be up by approximately 1% compared to full year 2009
levels.
In
addition, higher energy costs continue to affect the costs of raw
materials. The Company continues to explore alternative sources of
raw materials and components, both domestically and from overseas. In
the past year, there have been concerns about the allegedly defective drywall
manufactured in China and sold in the U.S. We do not believe that we
have had any exposure to such products because we purchase our drywall materials
from domestic suppliers that have certified to us that their products were not
manufactured in China.
We
believe we are well positioned to increase revenues in all of the markets that
we serve as the overall economic environment improves. As we navigate
through the remainder of 2010 in anticipation of sustainable improvement in
market conditions in the RV industry, we will continue to review our operations
on a regular basis, balance appropriate risks and opportunities, and maximize
efficiencies to support the Company’s long-term strategic growth
goals. The management team remains focused on keeping costs aligned
with revenue, maximizing efficiencies, and the execution of our organizational
strategic agenda, and will continue to size the operating platform according to
the revenue base. Key focus areas for the remainder of our 2010
fiscal year include earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (“EBITDA”) , cash flow, liquidity maximization, debt reduction, and
the renewal of our credit facility. Additional key focus areas
include:
·
|
additional
market share penetration;
|
·
|
sales
into commercial/institutional markets to diversify revenue
base;
|
·
|
further
improvement of operating efficiencies in all manufacturing operations and
corporate functions;
|
·
|
acquisition
of businesses/product lines that meet established
criteria;
|
·
|
aggressive
management of inventory quantities and pricing, and the addition of select
key commodity suppliers;
and
|
·
|
ongoing
development of existing product lines and the addition of new product
lines.
|
In
conjunction with our organizational strategic agenda, we will continue to make
targeted capital investments to support new business and leverage our operating
platform, and work to more fully integrate sales efforts to broaden customer
relationships and meet customer demands. In the first six months of
2010, capital expenditures were approximately $0.9 million based on our capital
needs and cash management priorities. The capital plan for full year
2010 includes estimated expenditures of up to $1.6 million.
REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED
OPERATING RESULTS
General
The
following consolidated and business segment discussions of operating results
pertain to continuing operations.
Second
Quarter and Six Months Ended June 27, 2010 Compared to 2009
The
following table sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of certain
items on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of
operations:
|
Second
Quarter Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
Net
sales
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
88.4
|
89.1
|
89.0
|
90.4
|
Gross
profit
|
11.6
|
10.9
|
11.0
|
9.6
|
Warehouse
and delivery
|
3.7
|
4.4
|
3.9
|
5.1
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
4.3
|
5.3
|
5.0
|
6.5
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
-
|
-
|
(1.9)
|
-
|
Operating income
(loss)
|
3.4
|
1.0
|
3.8
|
(2.2)
|
Stock
warrants revaluation
|
(0.4)
|
0.8
|
-
|
0.4
|
Interest
expense, net
|
1.6
|
2.9
|
1.9
|
3.4
|
Income
tax benefit
|
-
|
(0.6)
|
-
|
(0.5)
|
Income
(loss) from continuing operations
|
2.2
|
(2.1)
|
1.9
|
(5.5)
|
Net Sales. Net sales increased $28.0
million or 50.1%, to $83.9 million in second quarter 2010 from $55.9 million in
the comparable prior year period. For the six months ended June 27, 2010, net
sales increased $46.6 million or 46.2%, to $147.4 million from $100.8 million in
the prior year period. The increase in net sales for both the quarter
and year-to-date periods primarily reflects improving conditions in the RV
industry, which represented approximately 57% and 59% of the Company’s sales in
the second quarter and six months of 2010, respectively. According to
industry associations, wholesale unit shipments in the RV industry increased
approximately 80% and 87% in the second quarter and six months of 2010,
respectively, compared to 2009.
The MH
industry represented approximately 29% and 27% of the Company’s sales in the
second quarter and six months of 2010, respectively. This industry
began to show signs of improvement as unit shipments were up approximately 16%
for the quarter from the prior year period, marking the first
quarter-over-quarter increase in unit shipments since 2006. On a
year-to-date basis, MH unit shipments were up approximately 8% from
2009.
The
industrial market sector accounted for approximately 14% of the Company’s second
quarter and six months 2010 sales. We estimate that approximately 60%
of our industrial revenue base is linked to the residential housing market,
which saw an increase in new housing starts of approximately 14% for the first
six months of 2010 (as reported by the U.S. Department of
Commerce). The increase in new housing starts is not expected to
impact the Company’s industrial revenue base until late in 2010 and into 2011 as
our sales to this market generally lag new residential housing starts by six to
twelve months. Although improvements were seen in both the RV and MH
industries during the first half of 2010, the Company anticipates that it will
still
face
challenges in these industries due to the lingering impact of continuing tight
credit markets, high unemployment and significant increases in raw materials
costs.
Cost of Goods
Sold. Cost of goods sold increased $24.3 million or 49.0%, to
$74.1 million in second quarter 2010 from $49.8 million in 2009. For the six months ended
June 27, 2010, cost of goods sold increased $40.1 million or 44.0%, to $131.2
million from $91.1 million in the prior year period. The increase was
principally due to the impact of higher sales volumes.
As a
percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold decreased during the quarter to
88.4% from 89.1%. For the first six months of 2010, cost of goods
sold as a percentage of net sales decreased to 89.0% from 90.4%. Cost
of goods sold benefited in both the second quarter and six months of 2010 from
the absorption of fixed manufacturing costs over a larger sales base, operating
efficiencies and our ongoing efforts to keep operating costs aligned with our
sales base and operating needs.
Gross Profit. Gross
profit increased $3.6 million or 59.2%, to $9.7 million in second quarter 2010
from $6.1 million in 2009. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit
increased to 11.6% in 2010 from 10.9% in the same period in 2009. For
the six months, gross profit increased $6.5 million or 67.0%, to $16.2 million
in 2010 from $9.7 million in 2009. As a percentage of net sales,
gross profit increased to 11.0% for the six months of 2010 from 9.6% in the same
period in 2009. The change in gross profit for both the quarter and
year-to-date periods is attributable to the factors described
above.
Warehouse and Delivery
Expenses. Warehouse and delivery expenses increased $0.6
million or 25.1%, to $3.1 million in second quarter 2010 from $2.5 million in
2009, primarily reflecting the impact of additional incremental common carrier
expenses, fuel costs, and freight charges due to higher sales
volumes. As a percentage of net sales, warehouse and delivery
expenses were 3.7% and 4.4% in second quarter 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Warehouse
and delivery expenses increased $0.6 million or 11.3%, to $5.8 million in the
first six months of 2010 from $5.2 million in 2009. As a
percentage of net sales, warehouse and delivery expenses were 3.9% for 2010 and
5.1% for 2009. The decrease as a percentage of net sales for the
second quarter and first half of 2010 reflects declines in certain fixed costs
such as building charges, fleet rental and group insurance costs despite the
increase in sales volumes.
Selling, General and Administrative
(SG&A) Expenses. SG&A expenses increased $0.6
million or 21.6%, to $3.6 million in second quarter 2010 from $3.0 million in
2009. For the six months, SG&A expenses increased $0.8 million or
11.8%, to $7.4 million in 2010 from $6.6 million in 2009. The
increase in SG&A expenses for the current year periods included higher
compensation levels for salaried and hourly employees, which reflected the
partial reinstatement on January 1, 2010 of the base compensation reductions
that were taken by all hourly and salaried employees in the first quarter of
2009, and to a lesser extent, increased headcount that was related to higher
sales volumes. The increase in SG&A expenses was partially offset
by a reduction in bad debt expense of approximately $0.5 million and $0.7
million in the second quarter and six months of 2010, respectively, compared to
the prior year. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses
improved to 4.3% in the quarter from 5.3% in 2009, and were 5.0% in six months
2010 compared to 6.5% in 2009, reflecting certain non-compensation related fixed
costs that remained relatively constant despite the increase in net sales in the
second quarter and six months of 2010.
Amortization of Intangible
Assets. In conjunction with the acquisition of a cabinet
door business in January 2010, the Company recognized $0.6 million in certain
finite-lived intangible assets which are being amortized over periods ranging
from 3 to 5 years. As a result, amortization expense increased
$38,000 and $76,000 in the second quarter and six months of 2010, respectively,
compared to the prior year.
Gain on Sale of Fixed
Assets. During the first quarter of 2010, the
Company sold the facilities housing its manufacturing and distribution
operations in Oregon and California and recorded a pretax gain on sale of
approximately $0.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Because
the Company is currently operating in the same facility in California under a
lease agreement with the purchaser, an additional $0.7 million of a pretax gain
on the sale was deferred during the first quarter of 2010 and is being offset
against future lease
payments
that are included in cost of goods sold as required by U.S. GAAP. See
Note 6 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
details.
Operating Income
(Loss). Operating income was $2.9 million in
second quarter 2010 compared to $0.6 million in 2009. For the six
months, operating income was $5.6 million in 2010 compared to an operating loss
of $2.2 million in 2009. The increase in operating income from period
to period is primarily attributable to an increase in sales volumes, the gain on
sale of fixed assets, and other items as discussed above.
Stock Warrants
Revaluation. The stock warrants revaluation credit
of $0.3 million in
second quarter 2010 and expense of $0.5 million in the comparable prior year
period represents non-cash charges/credits related to mark-to-market accounting
for common stock warrants issued to certain of the Company’s senior lenders in
conjunction with the December 2008 amendment to the Company’s Credit Agreement
dated May 18, 2007 (the “Credit Agreement”). For the first six months
of 2010, the stock revaluation credit was $65,000 compared to a charge of $0.4
million in 2009. See Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (“Warrants Subject to Revaluation”) for further details.
Interest Expense,
Net. Interest expense decreased $0.2 million and $0.6 million
in the second quarter and six months of 2010, respectively, compared to the
prior year. The decrease primarily reflects a net reduction in total
debt outstanding due to scheduled principal payments on the Company’s senior
notes and the industrial and economic development revenue bonds, and the
application of the net proceeds from the sale of American Hardwoods and the
aluminum extrusion operations in 2009 and the sales of certain manufacturing and
distribution facilities in 2009 and in the first quarter of 2010.
Income Tax Benefit–Continuing
Operations. The Company had a tax valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets net of deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2009 and
June 27, 2010. Deferred tax
assets will continue to require a tax valuation allowance until the Company can
demonstrate their realizability through sustained profitability and/or from
other factors. The tax valuation allowance does not impact the
Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards to offset
taxable earnings in the future. The effective tax rate varies from
the expected statutory rate primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of the
deferred tax asset resulting from the utilization of federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards, and in 2009, the tax valuation allowance that has
been placed on the deferred tax assets that offset the tax benefit of the net
loss for 2009. A tax benefit from continuing operations of $0.3
million and $0.5 million related to the utilization of a net operating loss
carryforward to offset the gain recognized from discontinued operations was
recognized in the second quarter and six months of 2009,
respectively. As a result, the effective tax rate on continuing
operations (exclusive of the valuation allowance and the intra-period tax
adjustment in 2009) was 0% for both the second quarter and six months of 2010
and 2009. At June 27, 2010, the Company’s federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards exceeded potential taxable income for
2010.
Income From Discontinued Operations,
Net of Tax. Discontinued operations in 2009 included the operating results
for American Hardwoods (through its sale in January 2009) and for the aluminum
extrusion operation (through its sale in July 2009). After-tax income
from discontinued operations in second quarter 2009 was $0.5 million or $0.06
per diluted share. For the six months of 2009, after-tax income from
discontinued operations of $0.8 million or $0.09 per diluted share included
income from operations of $0.5 million and a gain on sale related to American
Hardwoods of approximately $0.3 million. See Note 3 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
Net Income
(Loss). Net income was $1.9 million or $0.19 per diluted share
for second quarter 2010 compared to a net loss of $0.7 million or $0.07 per
diluted share for 2009. For the six months, net income was $2.8
million or $0.28 per diluted share in 2010 compared to a net loss of $4.8
million or $0.53 per diluted share for 2009. The changes in the net
income (loss) reflect the impact of the items previously discussed.
REVIEW BY BUSINESS
SEGMENT
General
In
accordance with changes made to the Company’s internal reporting structure,
which segregates businesses by product category and production/distribution
process, the Company changed its segment reporting from three reportable
segments to two reportable segments effective January 1,
2010. Operations previously included in the Other Component
Manufactured Products segment were consolidated with the operations in the
Primary Manufactured Products segment to form one new segment called
Manufacturing. The other reportable segment, Distribution, remained
the same as reported in prior periods. Prior year results were
reclassified to reflect the current year presentation. The Company
regularly evaluates the performance of each segment and allocates resources to
them based on a variety of indicators including sales, cost of goods sold, and
operating income.
The
Company’s reportable business segments based on continuing operations are as
follows:
·
|
Manufacturing -
Utilizes various materials, including gypsum, particleboard, plywood, and
fiberboard, which are bonded by adhesives or a heating process to a number
of products, including vinyl, paper, foil, and high pressure laminate.
These products are utilized to produce furniture, shelving, wall, counter,
and cabinet products with a wide variety of finishes and
textures. This segment also includes a cabinet door division
and a vinyl printing division.
|
·
|
Distribution -
Distributes pre-finished wall and ceiling panels, drywall and drywall
finishing products, electronics, adhesives, cement siding, interior
passage doors, roofing products, laminate flooring, and other
miscellaneous products. Previously, this segment included
the American Hardwoods operation that was sold in January 2009 and was
classified as a discontinued operation for all periods
presented.
|
Second
Quarter and Six Months Ended June 27, 2010 Compared to 2009
Manufacturing
Sales. Sales
increased $26.0 million or 54.9%, to $73.3 million in second quarter 2010 from
$47.3 million in the prior year quarter. In the first six months of
2010, sales increased $45.2 million or 54.0%, to $128.9 million from $83.7
million in 2009. This segment accounted for approximately 83% of the
Company’s consolidated net sales for both the second quarter and six months of
2010. An increase in wholesale unit shipments in the RV industry of 80%
and 87% in the second quarter and six months of 2010 and the acquisition of a
cabinet door business in January 2010 positively impacted sales in the quarter
and the six months.
Gross Profit. Gross
profit increased $3.1 million to $7.6 million in second quarter 2010 from $4.5
million in 2009. As a percentage of sales, gross profit
increased to 10.4% in second quarter 2010 from 9.4% in the prior
year. Gross profit increased $6.5 million to $12.6 million in
the first six months of 2010 from $6.1 million in the prior year. As
a percentage of sales, gross profit increased to 9.8% in 2010 from 7.3% in
2009.
The
increase in gross profit primarily reflects the impact of higher sales volumes
and manufacturing overhead costs remaining near prior year
levels. Increases in wages, payroll taxes, operating supplies and
repairs and maintenance were offset by reductions in depreciation, rent and
insurance costs.
Gross
profit was negatively impacted during the quarter as RV production levels were
higher than anticipated resulting in inefficiencies attributable to labor and
manufacturing capacity at our cabinet door facility. As a result,
gross margins on the cabinet door business were lower than expected during the
quarter. The Company has since reduced its reliance on contract labor
and added certain manufacturing equipment in the cabinet door facility to
alleviate process flow issues, and expects gross margins to improve in future
periods in the cabinet door business, barring any unforeseen
circumstances.
Operating
Income. Operating income increased $2.2 million to $4.2
million in second quarter 2010 compared to $2.0 million in the prior
year. For six months 2010, operating income increased $5.1
million to $6.1 million
from $1.0
million in 2009. Higher sales volumes and improved fixed cost
absorption positively impacted operating income in the quarter and the six
months.
Distribution
Sales. Sales
increased $3.4 million or 31.1%, to $14.4 million in second quarter 2010 from
$11.0 million in the prior year, primarily reflecting increased sales in a
majority of the Company’s distribution facilities. In the first six
months of 2010, sales increased $3.8 million or 17.8%, to $25.0 million from
$21.2 million in 2009. This segment accounted for approximately 17%
of the Company’s consolidated net sales for both the second quarter and six
months of 2010. The electronics division accounted for approximately
$1.4 million and $3.5 million of the sales increase during the second quarter
and six months of 2010, respectively, compared to the prior year
periods. The strength of the RV industry in the first half of 2010
(which the electronics division principally distributes to), and the previously
mentioned increase in MH unit shipments (which the other distribution divisions
supply), contributed to the sales volume increase in both the quarter and the
six months.
Gross Profit. Gross
profit increased $0.4 million or 24.9%, to $2.0 million in second quarter 2010
from $1.6 million in 2009. As a percentage of sales, gross profit was
13.8% in second quarter 2010 compared to 14.5% in 2009. The decrease
in gross profit as a percentage of sales for the second quarter of 2010 is
primarily attributable to higher initial margins in 2009 in the newly formed
electronics division, which were driven by attractive initial pricing on
acquired inventory.
For the
six months, gross profit increased $0.8 million or 29.5%, to $3.5 million in
2010 from $2.7 million in 2009. As a percentage of
sales, gross profit increased to 13.9% from 12.6%. The increase in
gross profit as a percentage of sales for the six months of 2010 is attributable
to a mix shift to less direct shipment sales from the Company’s vendors to its
customers.
Operating
Income. Operating income in the second quarter of 2010
increased $0.2 million or 71.1%, to $0.5 million from $0.3 million in
2009. For six months 2010, operating income increased $0.8 million to
$0.6 million from an operating loss of $0.2 million in 2009. Higher
sales volumes in both the quarter and six months of 2010, and a $0.2 million
decrease in warehouse and delivery expenses in the six months of 2010, primarily
related to the electronics division, contributed to the operating income
improvement. The electronics division, which accounted for
approximately 89% of the distribution sales increase in the six months of 2010,
incurred lower warehouse and delivery charges than our other distribution
facilities.
Unallocated Corporate
Expenses
Unallocated
corporate expenses increased $0.5 million to $4.3 million in six months 2010
from $3.8 million in 2009. As discussed above, the increase primarily
reflected the partial reinstatement on January 1, 2010 of the base compensation
reductions taken by salaried and hourly employees in the first quarter of 2009
as a result of extremely soft market conditions.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Cash
Flows
Operating
Activities
Cash
flows from operations represent the net income we earned or the net loss
sustained in the reported periods adjusted for non-cash charges and changes in
operating assets and liabilities. Our primary sources of liquidity
have been cash flows from operating activities and borrowings under our Credit
Facility (as defined herein). Our principal uses of cash have been to
support seasonal working capital demands, meet debt service requirements and
support our capital expenditure plans.
Net cash
used in operating activities was $3.5 million in the first six months of 2010
compared to $0.9 million in six months 2009. Trade receivables
increased $13.6 million in the first six months of 2010 from year end 2009,
compared to an increase of $8.6 million in the first six months of 2009,
reflecting a stronger demand cycle due to an increase in wholesale unit
shipments of approximately 87% in the RV industry in the first half of 2010
compared to the first half of 2009. Additionally, inventories
increased approximately $5.9 million in
the first
half of 2010 from December 2009, compared to a decrease of $3.1 million in the
2009 period, primarily resulting from the increase in sales to the RV
industry. The Company continues to focus on aggressively
managing inventory turns by closely following customer sales levels and
increasing or reducing purchases correspondingly, while working together with
key suppliers to reduce lead-time and minimum quantity
requirements.
The $12.2
million net increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the first
six months of 2010 compared to the $5.2 million net increase in the prior year
period reflected seasonal demand cycles and ongoing operating cash
management.
Investing
Activities
Investing
activities provided cash of $5.4 million in the first six months of 2010
compared to $4.4 million in 2009. Net proceeds from the sale of
property, equipment and facilities included $4.0 million and $4.3 million from
the sale of the Oregon and California facilities in February 2010 and March
2010, respectively. Cash outflows in 2010 included the acquisition of
the cabinet door business of Quality Hardwoods for $2.0
million. Approximately $2.0 million was received from the sale of the
American Hardwoods operation in January 2009 and an additional $2.5 million from
the June 2009 sale of the building that housed this operation.
Capital
expenditures in the first six months of 2010 were $0.9 million versus $0.1
million in the prior year. The capital plan for full year 2010
includes expenditures of up to $1.6 million.
Financing
Activities
Net cash
flows used in financing activities were approximately $1.6 million in the first
six months of 2010 compared to $5.2 million in 2009. For the
first six months of 2010, the Company increased borrowings on its revolving line
of credit by $7.5 million. In accordance with its scheduled debt
service requirements, the Company paid down approximately $0.8 million in
principal on its term loan in the second quarter of 2010 and $0.8 million in
principal on June 30, 2010 (beginning of third quarter
2010). Additionally, the Company utilized the proceeds received from
the sale of its Oregon and California facilities to pay down approximately $8.3
million in principal on long-term debt. On August 2, 2010, the
remaining principal of $0.5 million was paid on the State of North Carolina
Economic Development Revenue bonds as planned.
For the
first six months of 2009, the Company paid down approximately $4.1 million in
principal on its long-term debt, of which $2.5 million was over and above its
debt service requirements. The debt repayments were funded by the net
proceeds from the sale of the American Hardwoods building and by utilizing cash
on hand.
Capital
Resources
In May
2007, the Company entered into an eight-bank syndication agreement led by
JPMorgan Securities Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. for a $110 million
senior secured credit facility (the "Credit Facility") comprised of revolving
credit availability for $35 million and a term loan of $75 million.
Subsequently, the Company entered into four amendments to this Credit Facility,
the latest of which occurred on December 11, 2009.
The
Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on January 3, 2011. The
interest rates for borrowings under the revolving line of credit are the
Alternate Base Rate (the "ABR") plus 3.50%, or the London InterBank Offer Rate
("LIBOR") plus 4.50%. For term loans, interest is at the ABR plus
6.50%, or LIBOR plus 7.50%. The fee payable by the Company on unused but
committed portions of the revolving loan facility was amended to 0.50%. The
Company has the option to defer payment of any interest on term loans in excess
of 4.50% ("PIK interest") until the term maturity date. Since January
2009, the Company has elected the PIK interest option. As a result, the
principal amount outstanding under the term loan increased by $1.4 million from
January 2009 through June 27, 2010. Approximately $0.3 million of the
term loan increase related to PIK interest is reflected in the operating results
for the six months ended June 27, 2010. PIK interest is reflected as
a non-cash charge adjustment in operating cash flows under the caption “Interest
paid-in-kind”.
Financial
covenants were modified to establish new quarterly minimum EBITDA requirements
beginning with the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2010. Further, the
definition of Consolidated EBITDA was amended to (i)
exclude
the effects of non-cash gains and losses, non-cash impairment charges, and
certain non-recurring items; (ii) add back non-cash stock compensation expenses;
(iii) exclude losses and gains due to discontinued operations and restructuring
charges, subject to approval of the administrative agent; and (iv) exclude the
impact of certain closed operations. For the first quarter of 2010, the minimum
Consolidated EBITDA was ($584,000) versus actual Consolidated EBITDA for the
same period of $1,489,000. For the second quarter of 2010, the
minimum Consolidated EBITDA was $2,204,000 versus actual Consolidated EBITDA for
the same period of $4,273,000.
In
addition, the monthly borrowing limits under the revolving commitments are
subject to a borrowing base, up to a maximum borrowing limit of $28.0 million
for the fiscal year 2010. The Company’s ability to access these
borrowings is subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of the Credit
Facility including the financial covenants. Our current Credit
Facility allows us to borrow funds based on certain percentages of accounts
receivable (80% of eligible accounts) and inventories (50% of eligible
inventory), less outstanding letters of credit. As of June 27, 2010,
the Company had $21.0 million outstanding and $4.4 million available under its
revolving line of credit. Finally, capital expenditures were limited
to $2.25 million for any fiscal year.
In
addition, effective with the second amendment to the Credit Agreement, the
interest rates on the obligation were adjusted and the Company determined that
its two swap agreements were ineffective as hedges against changes in interest
rates and, as a result, the swaps were de-designated. Losses on the
swaps included in other comprehensive income as of the de-designation date are
being amortized into net income (loss) over the life of the swaps utilizing the
straight-line method which approximates the effective interest
method. All future changes in the fair value of the de-designated
swaps will be recorded within earnings on the consolidated statements of
operations. For both the second quarter ended June 27, 2010 and
June 28, 2009 and for the comparable six months periods, amortized losses of
$80,000 and $159,000, respectively, were recognized in interest expense on the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the
change in the fair value of the de-designated swaps for the six months ended
June 27, 2010 resulted in a charge to interest expense and the corresponding
liability of $6,000. For the six months ended June 28, 2009, the
change in the fair value of the de-designated swaps resulted in a reduction to
interest expense and the corresponding liability of $0.4 million.
In
connection with the second amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Company issued
warrants to the lenders to purchase an aggregate of 474,049 shares of common
stock, subject to adjustment related to anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise
price per share of $1 (the “Warrants”). The Warrants are immediately
exercisable, subject to anti-dilution provisions and expire on December 11,
2018. Pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions, the number of shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants was increased to an
aggregate of 483,742 shares and the exercise price was adjusted to $0.98 per
share as a result of the issuance on May 21, 2009 and on June 22, 2009, pursuant
to the Company’s 1987 Stock Option Program, as amended, of restricted shares at
a price less than, and options to purchase common stock with an exercise price
less than, the warrant exercise price then in effect. See Note 8 to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further
details.
Summary
of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our
primary capital requirements are to meet seasonal working capital demands, meet
debt service requirements, and support our capital expenditure
plans. We also have a substantial asset collateral base, which we
believe if sold in the normal course, is sufficient to cover our outstanding
senior debt. We obtain additional liquidity through selling our
products and collecting receivables. We use the funds collected to
pay creditors and employees and to fund working capital needs. The
Company has another source of cash through the cash surrender value of life
insurance policies. We believe that cash generated from operations,
borrowings under our current Credit Facility, and additional liquidity if needed
from life insurance policies, will be sufficient to fund our working capital
requirements and capital expenditure programs as currently
contemplated.
We are
subject to market risk primarily in relation to our cash and short-term
investments. The interest rate we may earn on the cash we invest in
short-term investments is subject to market fluctuations. While we
attempt to minimize market risk and maximize return, changes in market
conditions may significantly affect
the
income we earn on our cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments. In addition, a portion of our debt obligations under our
Credit Facility is currently subject to variable rates of interest based on
LIBOR.
Cash,
cash equivalents, and borrowings available under our Credit Facility are
expected to be sufficient to finance the known and/or foreseeable liquidity and
capital needs of the Company for the remainder of the 2010 fiscal
year. Our working capital requirements vary from period to period
depending on manufacturing volumes related to the RV and MH industries, the
timing of deliveries and the payment cycles of our customers. In the
event that our operating cash flow is inadequate and one or more of our capital
resources were to become unavailable, we would seek to revise our operating
strategies accordingly.
We expect
to maintain compliance with the revised minimum quarterly Consolidated EBITDA
covenant based on the Company’s 2010 operating plan, notwithstanding continued
uncertain and volatile market conditions. Management has also
identified other actions within its control that could be implemented, if
necessary, to help the Company reduce its leverage position. These
actions include the exploration of asset sales, divestitures and other types of
capital raising alternatives. However, there can be no assurance that
these actions will be successful or generate cash resources adequate to retire
or sufficiently reduce the Company’s indebtedness under the Credit Agreement
prior to its expiration.
Our
Credit Facility is scheduled to expire on January 3, 2011. We
currently have the intent and we believe we have the ability to refinance the
Credit Facility during 2010. Beginning in the third quarter of 2010,
we commenced discussions with existing and other lenders regarding the
refinancing of our Credit Facility. We expect to complete the
refinancing in the fourth quarter of 2010. In order to classify
our outstanding indebtedness as a long-term liability as of June 27, 2010, the
following two criteria were required: (1) the Company must have the intent to
refinance, and (2) the Company must have the ability to consummate the
refinancing. The ability to consummate the refinancing can be
satisfied by either: (a) the issuance of a long-term obligation after the date
of the Company‘s statement of financial position but before that statement is
issued; or (b) entrance into a financing agreement before the statement of
financial position is issued that clearly permits it to refinance the short-term
obligation on a long-term basis on terms that are readily determinable, and
certain conditions are being satisfied. The refinancing was not
completed by the time we issued our statement of financial position for the
second quarter of 2010, nor was a financing agreement relating to the
refinancing entered into before such time. Based on the above
criteria, our outstanding long-term indebtedness as of June 27, 2010 was
classified as a current liability until such time as the refinancing or
replacement of our Credit Facility is completed.
If we
fail to comply with the covenants under our amended Credit Agreement, there can
be no assurance that a majority of the lenders that are party to our Credit
Agreement will consent to a further amendment of the Credit
Agreement. In this event, the lenders could cause the related
indebtedness to become due and payable prior to maturity or it could result in
the Company having to refinance this indebtedness under unfavorable
terms. If our debt were accelerated, our assets might not be
sufficient to repay our debt in full should they be required to be sold outside
of the normal course of business, such as through forced liquidation or
bankruptcy proceedings. Further, if current unfavorable credit market
conditions were to persist throughout the remainder of 2010, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to refinance any or all of this
indebtedness.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
There
have been no material changes to our significant accounting policies which are
summarized in the MD&A and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
OTHER
Seasonality
Manufacturing
and distribution operations in the RV and MH industries historically have been
seasonal and are generally at the highest levels when the climate is
moderate. Accordingly, the Company’s sales and profits are generally
highest in the second and third quarters. However, depressed economic
conditions in both industries distorted the historical trends in
2009.
Inflation
The
Company does not believe that inflation had a material effect on results of
operations for the periods presented.
INFORMATION CONCERNING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
Company makes forward-looking statements with respect to financial condition,
results of operations, business strategies, operating efficiencies or synergies,
competitive position, growth opportunities for existing products, plans and
objectives of management, markets for the common stock of Patrick Industries,
Inc. and other matters from time to time and desires to take advantage of the
“safe harbor” which is afforded such statements under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 when they are accompanied by meaningful cautionary
statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The
statements contained in the foregoing “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, as well as other statements
contained in the quarterly report and statements contained in future filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and publicly disseminated
press releases, and statements which may be made from time to time in the future
by management of the Company in presentations to shareholders, prospective
investors, and others interested in the business and financial affairs of the
Company, which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those set forth in the forward-looking
statements. Any projections of financial performance or statements
concerning expectations as to future developments should not be construed in any
manner as a guarantee that such results or developments will, in fact,
occur. There can be no assurance that any forward-looking statement
will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly different from
that set forth in such forward-looking statement. Factors that may
affect the Company’s operations and prospects are discussed in Item 1A of this
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2010 and in the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The Company does not undertake to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or
events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made, except
as required by law.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Not
applicable.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation
of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the Evaluation
Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the
information relating to the Company, including consolidated subsidiaries,
required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and
forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in internal control over
financial reporting. There have been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second
quarter ended June 27, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II: OTHER INFORMATION
Items 1,
2, 3, 4 and 5 of Part II are not applicable and have been omitted.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
There
have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
|
31.1
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief
Executive Officer.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief
Financial Officer.
|
|
32
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
PATRICK
INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: August 10,
2010 By: /s/Todd M. Cleveland
Todd
M. Cleveland
Chief
Executive Officer
Date: August 10, 2010
By: /s/Andy L.
Nemeth
Andy
L. Nemeth
|
Executive
Vice President-Finance
and
Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: August 10,
2010 By: /s/Darin R. Schaeffer
Darin
R. Schaeffer
|
Vice
President and Corporate Controller
|
|
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|