S-4: Registration of securities, business combinations
Published on September 23, 2026
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2026
No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana | 3714 | 35-1057796 |
(State of incorporation) | (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
107 W. Franklin St.
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
(574) 294-7511
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Joel D. Duthie
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin St.
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
(574) 294-7511
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
With a copy to:
Heidi J. Steele McDermott Will & Schulte LLP 444 West Lake Street Suite 4000 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 372-2000 | Hilary R. Johnson Kelly M. Stanley Executive Vice Presidents, Co-Chief Legal Officers LCI Industries 3501 County Road 6 East Elkhart, Indiana 46514 (574) 535- 1125 | Robert M. Hayward, P.C. Lanchi D. Huynh Kirkland & Ellis LLP 333 West Wolf Point Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60654 (312) 862-2000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective and the consummation of
the merger described in the enclosed joint proxy statement/prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G,
check the following box. ¨
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ¨
If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:
Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer) ¨
Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer) ¨
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further
amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this
registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
PRELIMINARY—SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 2026

JOINT LETTER TO
SHAREHOLDERS OF PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC. AND
STOCKHOLDERS OF LCI INDUSTRIES
To the Shareholders of Patrick Industries, Inc. and the Stockholders of LCI Industries:
Patrick Industries, Inc. (which we refer to as “Patrick”) and LCI Industries (which we refer to as “LCI”) have entered into an
agreement and plan of merger (which, as it may be further amended from time to time, we refer to as the “merger agreement”),
pursuant to which they agreed to combine their respective businesses. The combined company will be a premier component
solutions provider serving the global outdoor recreation, housing and transportation markets. Pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement, Planet First Merger Sub Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as “First Merger Sub”)
will merge with and into LCI (which we refer to as the “first merger”), with LCI surviving as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Patrick (which we refer to as the “initial surviving entity”), and, immediately following the first merger, and as part of the same
overall transaction as the first merger, the initial surviving entity will merge with and into Planet Second Merger Sub LLC, a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as “Second Merger Sub”), with Second Merger Sub surviving the
second merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as the “second merger”). We collectively refer to
the first merger and the second merger as the “merger.”
Upon successful completion of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of LCI common stock will be converted into
the right to receive 1.2440 shares of Patrick common stock (which ratio we refer to as the “exchange ratio”), together with cash in
lieu of any fractional shares (collectively, the “merger consideration”), as further described in the joint proxy statement/prospectus
The information in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be issued until the registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission is effective. The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and does not constitute the solicitation of offers to buy these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
accompanying this notice. This exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted for changes in the market price of either Patrick
common stock or LCI common stock between the dates of signing of the merger agreement and completion of the merger. The
market value of the merger consideration will fluctuate with the price of Patrick common stock. Based on the closing price of
Patrick common stock on [ ], 2026, the last practicable date before the date of the joint proxy statement/prospectus
accompanying this notice, the value of the per-share merger consideration payable to holders of LCI common stock upon
completion of the merger was approximately $[ ]. Patrick shareholders will continue to own their existing Patrick shares.
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, based on the estimated number of shares of Patrick common stock and LCI
common stock that will be outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger, we estimate that Patrick shareholders
will own approximately 52% and LCI stockholders will own approximately 48% of the issued and outstanding shares of the
combined company immediately following the completion of the merger. Patrick common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market (the “Nasdaq”) under the symbol “PATK,” and LCI common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol “LCII.” Patrick common stock, including the shares of Patrick common stock to be issued to LCI stockholders
as merger consideration, will continue to be listed on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “PATK.” If the proposal to amend
Patrick’s articles of incorporation is approved, Patrick’s corporate name will be changed to “[ ]” in connection with the
completion of the merger. We encourage you to obtain updated quotes for the Patrick common stock and the LCI common stock.
Patrick and LCI will each hold virtual special meetings of their respective shareholders and stockholders in connection with
the proposed merger, which are referred to as the Patrick special meeting and the LCI special meeting, respectively.
At the Patrick special meeting, Patrick shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on: (1) a proposal to approve the
issuance of shares of common stock, no par value per share, of Patrick (which we refer to as “Patrick common stock”) to LCI
stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement (which we refer to as the “Patrick share issuance proposal”); (2) a proposal to
adopt and approve an amendment to Patrick’s articles of incorporation, as amended, to increase the number of authorized shares
of Patrick common stock (which we refer to as the “Patrick authorized stock increase proposal”); (3) a proposal to adopt and
approve the amendment and restatement of Patrick’s articles of incorporation as set forth in Annex B to this joint proxy statement/
prospectus (which we refer to as the “Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal”); and (4) a proposal to approve one or
more adjournments of the Patrick special meeting to a later date or time, if necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to
permit the solicitation of additional votes or proxies, if there are not sufficient votes cast at the Patrick special meeting to approve
the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal (which we refer to as the “Patrick
adjournment proposal”).
At the LCI special meeting, LCI stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon: (1) a proposal to adopt the merger
agreement and approve the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby (which we refer to as the “LCI merger proposal”);
(2) a proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, certain compensation that may be paid or become payable to LCI’s named
executive officers relating to the merger (which we refer to as the “LCI advisory compensation proposal”); and (3) a proposal to
approve the adjournment of the LCI special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes at the time of the LCI special meeting to approve the LCI merger proposal (which we refer to as the “LCI adjournment
proposal”).
The Patrick board of directors, after considering the factors more fully described in the enclosed joint proxy
statement/prospectus, has unanimously: (1) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger, the issuance of shares of Patrick common stock in connection with the first merger and the proposed
amendments to Patrick’s articles of incorporation in connection with the merger, are advisable and in the best interests of
Patrick and its shareholders; (2) approved and declared advisable the merger agreement, the issuance of Patrick common
stock in connection with the first merger and the proposed amendments to Patrick’s articles of incorporation; and (3)
recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick share issuance proposal, “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock
increase proposal, “FOR” the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal and “FOR” the Patrick adjournment
proposal.
The LCI board of directors: (1) has unanimously determined that it is fair to, and in the best interests of, LCI and its
stockholders, and declared it advisable, that LCI enter into the merger agreement and consummate the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; (2) has unanimously approved and declared advisable the merger
agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger; and
(3) unanimously recommends that LCI stockholders vote “FOR” the LCI merger proposal, “FOR” the LCI advisory
compensation proposal and “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal.
We cannot complete the merger unless the LCI stockholders approve the LCI merger proposal and the Patrick shareholders
approve both the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal. Your vote on these matters is
very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you plan to attend your respective shareholder or
stockholder meeting in person, please promptly complete and return the applicable enclosed proxy card or submit your proxy
by phone or the internet. Submitting a proxy now will not prevent you from being able to vote at the relevant company’s
special meeting.
If you support the consummation of the merger, as a Patrick shareholder you should vote “FOR” both the Patrick
share issuance proposal, the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal and the Patrick articles amendment and restatement
proposal, and as an LCI stockholder you should vote “FOR” the LCI merger proposal.
The joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice is also being delivered to LCI stockholders as Patrick’s
prospectus for its offering of shares of Patrick common stock in connection with the merger.
The obligations of Patrick and LCI to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth
in the merger agreement, a copy of which is included as part of the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus. The
accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus provides you with detailed information about the shareholder and stockholder special
meetings, the merger, and the proposals. You are encouraged to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and
in its entirety. In particular, you should carefully read the section titled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 38 of the
accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus for a discussion of risks you should consider in evaluating the merger and the
issuance of shares of Patrick common stock in connection with the merger and how they will affect you.
Sincerely, | Sincerely, |
Andy L. Nemeth Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Board Patrick Industries, Inc. | John A. Sirpilla Interim Chief Executive Officer LCI Industries |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued under the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus, the merits or fairness of the merger, or
passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this document. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated [ ], 2026 and is first being mailed to Patrick shareholders and
LCI stockholders on or about [ ], 2026.

107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
NOTICE OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
PATRICK INDUSTRIES, INC.
TO BE HELD VIRTUALLY ON [ ], 2026
To the Shareholders of Patrick Industries, Inc.,
You are cordially invited to attend a virtual-only special meeting of shareholders (which we refer to as the
“Patrick special meeting”) of Patrick Industries, Inc. (which we refer to as “Patrick”) to be held on [ ], 2026,
at [ ], Eastern Time, via live webcast at [ ] (which we refer to as the “Patrick special meeting
website”), to consider and vote on:
•a proposal to approve the issuance of shares of common stock, no par value per share, of Patrick (which we
refer to as “Patrick common stock”) to the stockholders of LCI Industries (which we refer to as “LCI”),
pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2026 (which, as it may be further
amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, we refer to as the “merger agreement”), by and
among Patrick, LCI, Planet First Merger Sub Inc., a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we
refer to as “First Merger Sub”), and Planet Second Merger Sub LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Patrick (which we refer to as “Second Merger Sub”) (which we refer to as the “Patrick share issuance
proposal”);
•a proposal to adopt and approve an amendment to Patrick’s articles of incorporation, as amended, to
increase the number of authorized shares of Patrick common stock (which we refer to as the "Patrick
authorized stock increase proposal”);
•a proposal to adopt and approve the amendment and restatement of Patrick’s articles of incorporation as set
forth in Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus (which we refer to as the “Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal”); and
•a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Patrick special meeting to a later date or time, if
necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit the solicitation of additional votes or proxies, if
there are not sufficient votes to approve the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock
increase proposal (which we refer to as the “Patrick adjournment proposal” and, together with the Patrick
share issuance proposal, Patrick authorized stock increase proposal and Patrick articles amendment and
restatement proposal, the “Patrick proposals”).
Patrick will transact no other business at the Patrick special meeting. The Patrick board of directors (which
we refer to as the “Patrick board”) has set the record date for the Patrick special meeting as [ ], 2026. Only
holders of Patrick common stock (which we refer to as “Patrick shareholders”) of record as of the close of business
on such record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Patrick special meeting (via the Patrick special
meeting website or by proxy) and any adjournment or postponement of the Patrick special meeting. For additional
information regarding the Patrick special meeting, see the section titled “Special Meeting of Patrick Shareholders”
beginning on page 54 of the joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice.
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick
share issuance proposal, “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, “FOR” the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal and “FOR” the Patrick adjournment proposal.
The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus describes the Patrick proposals in more detail. Please
refer to the attached documents, including the merger agreement and the related plan of merger and the other
annexes and any documents incorporated by reference, for further information with respect to the business to be
transacted at the Patrick special meeting. You are encouraged to read the entire document carefully before voting. In
particular, see the section titled “The Merger” beginning on page 72 of the joint proxy statement/prospectus
accompanying this notice for a description of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
Patrick share issuance proposal, the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, the Patrick articles amendment and
restatement proposal and the Patrick adjournment proposal, and the section titled “Risk Factors” beginning on
page 38 of the joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice for an explanation of the risks associated
with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the Patrick share issuance proposal, the
Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal and the Patrick
adjournment proposal.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares of Patrick common stock you own.
We cannot complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement without approval of the Patrick share
issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal. Assuming a quorum is present, the approval of
the Patrick share issuance proposal, Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal and Patrick adjournment
proposal require the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast on such proposal, and the approval of the Patrick
authorized stock increase proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Patrick shares entitled to vote on
the proposal. A failure to vote your shares, or to provide instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee
as to how to vote your shares, is the equivalent of a vote against the Patrick authorized stock increase
proposal.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Patrick special meeting via the Patrick special meeting
website, we urge you to please submit a proxy to vote your shares as promptly as possible by (1) visiting the
internet site listed on the Patrick proxy card, (2) calling the toll-free number listed on the Patrick proxy card
or (3) submitting your Patrick proxy card by mail by using the provided postage-paid envelope. If your
shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting
instruction form furnished by the broker, bank or other nominee. Submitting a proxy now will not prevent you
from being able to vote at the Patrick special meeting, but it will help to secure a quorum and avoid added
solicitation costs. Any eligible holder of Patrick common stock who is present at the Patrick special meeting may
vote at the Patrick special meeting via the Patrick special meeting website, thereby revoking any previously
submitted proxy. In addition, a proxy may be revoked in writing before the Patrick special meeting in the manner
described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.
If you have any questions concerning the Patrick proposals, the merger or the accompanying joint proxy statement/
prospectus, would like additional copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your shares of
Patrick common stock, please contact Patrick by writing to:
Patrick Industries, Inc. 107 W. Franklin Street Elkhart, Indiana 46516 Attention: Office of the Secretary irrequests@patrickind.com |
Before voting your shares, we urge you to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus
carefully, including its annexes and the documents incorporated by reference in the document. Your prompt
attention is greatly appreciated.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, | |
Joel D. Duthie | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | |
Patrick Industries, Inc. |
![]() | ![]() |
3501 County Road 6 East
Elkhart, Indiana 46514
NOTICE OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS OF LCI INDUSTRIES
TO BE HELD VIRTUALLY ON [ ], 2026
To the Stockholders of LCI Industries,
You are cordially invited to attend a virtual-only special meeting of stockholders (which we refer to as the
“LCI special meeting”) of LCI Industries (which we refer to as “LCI”) to be held on [ ], 2026, at [ ],
Eastern Time, via live webcast at [ ] (which we refer to as the “LCI special meeting website”),to consider
and vote on:
•a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2026 (which, as it may be
further amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, we refer to as the “merger agreement”), a
copy of which is attached as Annex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus of which this notice is a part,
by and among Patrick Industries, Inc. (which we refer to as “Patrick”), Planet First Merger Sub Inc., a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as “First Merger Sub”), Planet Second Merger
Sub LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as “Second Merger Sub”), and
LCI, pursuant to which each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of LCI (which
we refer to as “LCI common stock”), excluding shares of LCI common stock held by LCI, Patrick or any of
their respective subsidiaries, will be converted into the right to receive 1.2440 shares of common stock, no
par value per share, of Patrick, with cash to be paid in lieu of fractional shares (which we refer to as the
“LCI merger proposal”);
•a proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become
payable to LCI’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the mergers contemplated
by the merger agreement (which we refer to as the “LCI advisory compensation proposal”); and
•a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the LCI special meeting to a later date or time, if
necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit the solicitation of additional votes or proxies if
there are not sufficient votes to approve the LCI merger proposal (which we refer to as the “LCI
adjournment proposal” and, together with the LCI merger proposal and the LCI advisory compensation
proposal, the “LCI proposals”).
The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus describes the proposals listed above and the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby in more detail. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the merger agreement, (i) First Merger Sub will merge with and into LCI (which we refer to as the “first
merger”), with LCI surviving as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as the “initial
surviving entity”), and (ii) immediately following the first merger, and as part of the same overall transaction as the
first merger, the initial surviving entity will merge with and into Second Merger Sub (which we refer to as the
“second merger” and, together with the first merger, the “merger”), with Second Merger Sub surviving the second
merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick.
You should carefully read and consider the entire joint proxy statement/prospectus and the accompanying
annexes, including the merger agreement attached as Annex A, along with all of the documents incorporated by
reference, as they contain important information about, among other things, the merger and how it affects you. In
particular, see the section titled “The Merger” beginning on page 72 of the joint proxy statement/prospectus
accompanying this notice for a description of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the section
titled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 38 of the joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice for an
explanation of the risks associated with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
The LCI board of directors (which we refer to as the “LCI board”) has unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger. The LCI board unanimously
recommends that LCI stockholders vote “FOR” the LCI merger proposal, “FOR” the LCI advisory
compensation proposal and “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal.
The LCI board has set the record date for the LCI special meeting as [ ], 2026. Only holders of LCI
common stock (which we refer to as “LCI stockholders”) of record as of the close of business on such record date
are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the LCI special meeting (via the LCI special meeting website or by proxy)
and any adjournment or postponement of the LCI special meeting. For additional information regarding the LCI
special meeting, see the section titled “Special Meeting of LCI Stockholders” beginning on page 63 of the joint
proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares of LCI common stock you own. We cannot
complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement unless LCI stockholders vote to approve the LCI
merger proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock
entitled to vote on the LCI merger proposal is required to approve such proposal. A failure to vote your shares, or to
provide instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee as to how to vote your shares, is the equivalent of a vote
against the LCI merger proposal.
Whether or not you plan to attend the LCI special meeting via the LCI special meeting website, we urge you to
please submit a proxy to vote your shares as promptly as possible by (1) visiting the internet site listed on the LCI
proxy card, (2) calling the toll-free number listed on the LCI proxy card or (3) submitting your LCI proxy card by
mail by using the provided postage-paid envelope. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other
nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction form furnished by the broker, bank or other
nominee. Submitting a proxy now will not prevent you from being able to vote at the LCI special meeting, but it will
help to secure a quorum and avoid added solicitation costs. Any eligible holder of LCI common stock who is present
at the LCI special meeting may vote at the LCI special meeting via the LCI special meeting website, thereby
revoking any previously submitted proxy. In addition, a proxy may be revoked in writing before the LCI special
meeting in the manner described in the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus.
If you have any questions concerning the LCI proposals, the merger or the accompanying joint proxy statement/
prospectus, would like additional copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus or need help voting your shares of
LCI common stock, please contact LCI’s proxy solicitor:
D.F. King & Co, Inc. 28 Liberty Street, Floor 53 New York, NY 10005 Call Toll-Free: (800) 859-8509 Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 448-4476 Email: LCII@dfking.com |
Before voting your shares, we urge you to read the accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully,
including its annexes and the documents incorporated by reference in the document. Your prompt attention is greatly
appreciated.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, | |
Hilary R. Johnson | |
Executive Vice President, Co-Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary | |
LCI Industries |
REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference important business and financial information
about Patrick Industries, Inc. (which we refer to as “Patrick”) and LCI Industries (which we refer to as “LCI”) from
other documents that are not included in or delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including
documents that Patrick and LCI have filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to as
the “SEC”). For a listing of documents incorporated by reference herein, see the section titled “Where You Can Find
More Information.” This information is available for you to review through the SEC’s website at https://
www.sec.gov.
You may request copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and any of the documents incorporated by
reference herein or other information concerning Patrick or LCI, without charge. To receive a copy of any such
documents, please contact the appropriate company or its proxy solicitor at the following addresses and telephone
numbers:
For Patrick Shareholders: | For LCI Stockholders: | |
Patrick Industries, Inc. 107 W. Franklin Street Elkhart, Indiana 46516 Attention: Office of the Secretary irrequests@patrickind.com | LCI Industries 3501 County Road 6 East Elkhart, Indiana 46514 Attention: Investor Relations investors@LCI1.com |
Proxy Solicitor: | ||
D.F. King & Co, Inc. 28 Liberty Street, Floor 53 New York, NY 10005 Call Toll-Free: (800) 859-8509 Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 448-4476 Email: LCII@dfking.com |
If you would like to request any of the documents that are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, please do so by [ ], 2026, which is five business days prior to the date of the Patrick
special meeting (as defined in the section titled “Questions and Answers About the Merger and the Special
Meetings”) and the LCI special meeting (as defined in the section titled “Questions and Answers About the Merger
and the Special Meetings”), in order to receive them before the applicable meeting.
ABOUT THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
This document, which forms part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC by Patrick (File
No. 333-[ ], constitutes a prospectus of Patrick under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (which
we refer to as the “Securities Act”), with respect to the shares of common stock of Patrick, no par value per share
(which we refer to as “Patrick common stock”), to be issued to LCI stockholders pursuant to the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of June 30, 2026 (which, as it may be further amended, modified or supplemented from
time to time, we refer to as the “merger agreement”), among LCI, Patrick, Planet First Merger Sub Inc. (which we
refer to as “First Merger Sub”) and Planet Second Merger Sub LLC (which we refer to as “Second Merger Sub”).
This document also constitutes a notice of meeting and proxy statement of each of Patrick and LCI under
Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which we refer to as the “Exchange Act”).
Patrick has supplied all information contained or incorporated by reference herein relating to Patrick, and LCI
has supplied all information contained or incorporated by reference herein relating to LCI. Patrick and LCI have
both contributed to the information relating to the merger agreement contained in this joint proxy statement/
prospectus.
Neither Patrick nor LCI has authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other
than those contained in or incorporated by reference herein (including the annexes hereto) in connection with any
vote, the giving or withholding of any proxy or any investment decision in connection with the merger agreement.
Patrick and LCI take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other
information that others may give you. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated [ ], 2026, and you should
not assume that the information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other
than such date unless otherwise specifically provided herein. Further, you should not assume that the information
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of the
incorporated document. Neither Patrick nor LCI assumes any obligation to update the information contained in this
document (whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise), except as required by applicable law.
Neither the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Patrick shareholders or LCI stockholders nor the
issuance by Patrick of shares of Patrick common stock pursuant to the merger agreement will create any implication
to the contrary.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any
securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction in which or from any person to whom it is unlawful to
make any such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction.
All currency amounts referenced in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are in U.S. dollars.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ii
iii
1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETINGS
The following are answers to certain questions that you may have regarding the Patrick and LCI special
meetings. Patrick and LCI urge you to read carefully the remainder of this document because the information in this
section may not provide all the information that might be important to you in determining how to vote. Additional
important information is also contained in the annexes to, and the documents incorporated by reference in, this
document.
Q:Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus?
A:You are receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus because Patrick, LCI, First Merger Sub and Second
Merger Sub have entered into the merger agreement, providing for, on the terms and subject to the
conditions included in the merger agreement, the business combination of Patrick and LCI through the
merger of First Merger Sub with and into LCI (which we refer to as the “first merger”), with LCI surviving
as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as the “initial surviving entity”),
immediately followed by the merger of the initial surviving entity with and into Second Merger Sub (which
we refer to as the “second merger” and, together with the first merger, the “merger”), with Second Merger
Sub surviving the second merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as the
“final surviving entity”). Your vote is required in connection with the merger. The merger agreement,
which governs the terms and conditions of the merger, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
as Annex A.
Patrick. In order to consummate the merger, holders of Patrick common stock (which we refer to as the
“Patrick shareholders”) must approve (i) the issuance of shares of Patrick common stock to LCI
stockholders in connection with the merger (which we refer to as the “Patrick share issuance proposal”) in
accordance with the rules of the Nasdaq Global Select Market (the “Nasdaq”) and (ii) an amendment to
Patrick’s articles of incorporation, as amended, to increase the number of authorized shares of Patrick
common stock (which we refer to as the “Patrick authorized stock increase proposal”), in accordance with
the Indiana Business Corporation Law (which we refer to as the “IBCL”) and Patrick’s organizational
documents. In order to ensure that the merger is consummated, the Patrick board of directors (which we
refer to as the “Patrick board”) unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” both the
Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal. Patrick shareholders are
also being asked to adopt and approve the amendment and restatement of Patrick’s articles of incorporation
as set forth in Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus (which we refer to as the “Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal”), which would govern the combined company if the merger is
consummated. The Patrick board also unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the
Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal. Patrick is holding a virtual special meeting of its
shareholders (which we refer to as the “Patrick special meeting”) to obtain these approvals. Your vote is
very important. We encourage you to submit a proxy to have your shares of Patrick common stock voted as
soon as possible.
LCI. In order to consummate the merger, holders of LCI common stock (as defined below) (which we refer
to as “LCI stockholders”) must adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger and the other
transactions contemplated thereby (which we refer to as the “LCI merger proposal”) in accordance with the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (which we refer to as the “DGCL”) and LCI’s
organizational documents. In order to ensure that the merger is consummated, the LCI board of directors
(which we refer to as the “LCI board”) unanimously recommends that LCI stockholders vote “FOR” the
LCI merger proposal. LCI is holding a virtual special meeting of its stockholders (which we refer to as the
“LCI special meeting”) to obtain approval of the LCI merger proposal. Your vote is very important. We
encourage you to submit a proxy to have your shares of LCI common stock voted as soon as possible.
Q:When and where will the special meetings take place?
A:Patrick. The Patrick special meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on [ ], 2026, at [ ],
Eastern Time. Patrick shareholders will be able to attend the Patrick special meeting online and vote their
2
shares electronically during the meeting by visiting [ ] (which we refer to as the “Patrick special
meeting website”). Because the Patrick special meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via live
webcast, Patrick shareholders will not be able to attend the meeting in person.
LCI. The LCI special meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on [ ], 2026, at [ ],
Eastern Time. LCI stockholders will be able to attend the LCI special meeting online and vote their shares
electronically during the meeting by visiting [ ] (which we refer to as the “LCI special meeting
website”). Because the LCI special meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via live webcast,
LCI stockholders will not be able to attend the meeting in person.
Q:What matters will be considered at the special meetings?
A:Patrick. The Patrick shareholders are being asked to consider and vote on:
•a proposal to approve the issuance of shares of Patrick common stock to LCI stockholders in connection
with the merger;
•a proposal to adopt and approve an amendment to Patrick’s articles of incorporation, as amended, to
increase the number of authorized shares of Patrick common stock;
•a proposal to adopt and approve the amendment and restatement of Patrick’s articles of incorporation as set
forth in Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus (which we refer to as the “Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal”); and
•a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the Patrick special meeting to a later date or time, if
necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit the solicitation of additional votes or proxies, if
there are not sufficient votes cast at the Patrick special meeting to approve the Patrick share issuance
proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal (which we refer to as the “Patrick adjournment
proposal”).
LCI. The LCI stockholders are being asked to consider and vote on:
•a proposal to adopt the merger agreement, providing for the business combination of LCI and Patrick
through the merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby;
•a proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become
payable to LCI’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger (which we
refer to as the “LCI advisory compensation proposal”); and
•a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the LCI special meeting to a later date or time, if
necessary or appropriate, including adjournments to permit the solicitation of additional votes or proxies if
there are not sufficient votes cast at the LCI special meeting to approve the LCI merger proposal (which we
refer to as the “LCI adjournment proposal”).
Q:Is my vote important?
A:Yes, your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares that you own, and you are encouraged
to submit your proxy as soon as possible. The merger cannot be completed unless the Patrick share issuance
proposal and Patrick authorized stock increase proposal are approved by Patrick shareholders and the LCI
merger proposal is approved by LCI stockholders (in each case, assuming satisfaction of all other
conditions to closing). The merger will not be consummated unless (i) the Patrick share issuance proposal
and Patrick authorized stock increase proposal are approved by Patrick shareholders and (ii) the LCI merger
proposal is approved by LCI stockholders.
3
Q:How do I vote my shares of Patrick common stock if I am the shareholder of record?
A:Patrick shareholders of record may vote their shares via the Patrick special meeting website at the Patrick
special meeting or by proxy. To vote by proxy, you must select one of the following options:
•Vote online:
◦Access the website listed in the proxy card you received.
◦Have your proxy card in hand.
◦Follow the instructions provided on the website.
◦Submit the electronic proxy before the required deadline [ ], 2026 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time).
•Vote by telephone:
◦Call the numbers listed in the proxy card you received.
◦Have your proxy card in hand.
◦Follow and comply with the recorded instructions by the deadline [ ], 2026 at 11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time).
•Vote by proxy card:
◦Complete all the required information on the proxy card.
◦Sign and date the proxy card.
◦Return the proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided. We must receive the proxy card no later
than [ ], 2026 for your vote to be counted.
Q:If my shares of Patrick common stock or LCI common stock are held in “street name” by my broker,
bank or other nominee, will my broker, bank or other nominee automatically vote those shares for
me?
A:If your shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial holder”
of the shares held for you in what is known as “street name.” The “record holder” of such shares is your
broker, bank or other nominee, and not you. If this is the case, this joint proxy statement/prospectus has
been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee. You must provide the record holder of
your shares with instructions on how to vote your shares. Otherwise, your broker, bank or other
nominee cannot vote your shares on the proposals to be considered at the Patrick special meeting or the LCI
special meeting, as applicable.
A “broker non-vote” occurs with respect to a particular proposal when a broker, bank or other nominee of
record that holds shares for a beneficial owner (a) does not receive any voting instructions from the
beneficial owner with respect to such shares, (b) does not have discretionary authority to vote on that
particular proposal and (c) does have discretionary authority to vote on, and returns a valid proxy with
respect to, another proposal presented on the same proxy.
Under the rules applicable to brokers, banks and other nominees who hold shares in “street name” for their
customers, such brokers, banks and other nominees have authority to vote on “routine” and “discretionary”
proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, brokers, banks and
other nominees are generally prohibited from exercising their voting discretion with respect to non-routine
and non-discretionary matters. All of the proposals currently expected to be voted on at the Patrick special
meeting and the LCI special meeting are non-routine and non-discretionary. As a result, absent specific
instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, brokers, banks and other nominees will not be
4
permitted to vote such shares. Failure to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your
shares will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick share issuance proposal, the Patrick
articles amendment and restatement proposal, the Patrick adjournment proposal, the LCI advisory
compensation proposal or the LCI adjournment proposal. Failure to instruct your broker, bank or other
nominee on how to vote your shares will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Patrick authorized
stock increase proposal and the LCI merger proposal.
Q:What Patrick shareholder vote is required for the approval of the Patrick share issuance proposal,
the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, the Patrick articles amendment and restatement
proposal and the Patrick adjournment proposal?
A:The Patrick share issuance proposal. The Patrick share issuance proposal requires approval by a majority
of the votes cast on the proposal at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions,
failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick
share issuance proposal.
The Patrick authorized stock increase proposal. The Patrick authorized stock increase proposal requires
approval by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the proposal at the Patrick special meeting,
assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have the
same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal.
The Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal. The Patrick articles amendment and restatement
proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the Patrick special meeting,
assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have no
effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal.
The Patrick adjournment proposal. The Patrick adjournment proposal requires approval by a majority of
the votes cast at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote
and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick adjournment
proposal.
Q:What LCI stockholder vote is required for the approval of the LCI merger proposal, the LCI
advisory compensation proposal and the LCI adjournment proposal?
A:The LCI merger proposal. Approval of the LCI merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the shares of LCI common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the proposal.
Abstentions and broker non-votes (if any) will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI merger
proposal. Failure to vote on the LCI merger proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the
LCI merger proposal.
The LCI advisory compensation proposal. Approval of the LCI advisory compensation proposal requires
the affirmative vote of the majority of voting power of capital stock present in person or represented by
proxy at the LCI special meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Broker non-votes are not treated as
votes either cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” the LCI advisory compensation proposal. Abstentions will have
the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI advisory compensation proposal. Any failure by an LCI
stockholder to vote will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the LCI advisory compensation
proposal.
The LCI adjournment proposal. Approval of the LCI adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of
the majority of voting power of capital stock present in person or represented by proxy at the LCI special
meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal. Broker non-votes are not treated as votes either cast “FOR” or
“AGAINST” the LCI adjournment proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST”
the LCI adjournment proposal. Any failure by an LCI stockholder to vote will have no effect on the
outcome of the vote on the LCI adjournment proposal.
5
Q:What will happen if LCI stockholders approve the LCI merger proposal?
A:The directors on the LCI board unanimously recommend that LCI stockholders vote to approve the LCI
merger proposal because they believe that the benefits of the merger are expected to generate significant
value for LCI stockholders.
If the LCI merger proposal is approved and the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized
stock increase proposal is approved by Patrick shareholders, assuming satisfaction of all other conditions to
closing, the merger will be consummated.
If the merger is completed, LCI’s existing credit facility will be paid off. LCI’s outstanding 3.00%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2030 will remain issued and outstanding and will represent the right to
convert into shares of Patrick common stock. For additional information regarding why the LCI board
recommends that LCI stockholders approve the LCI merger proposal, see the section titled “The Merger—
Recommendation of the LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger.”
Q:Who will count the votes?
A:The votes at the Patrick special meeting will be counted by an independent inspector of elections appointed
by the Patrick board. The votes at the LCI special meeting will be counted by an independent inspector of
elections appointed by the LCI board.
Q:What will LCI stockholders receive if the merger is completed?
A:As a result of the merger, each share of LCI common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time of the first merger (which we refer to as the “first effective time”) (other than shares of LCI
common stock that are owned by Patrick or LCI or any wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick or LCI (or are
held in treasury by LCI)) will be automatically converted into the right to receive 1.2440 fully paid and
nonassessable shares of Patrick common stock (as may be adjusted pursuant to the merger agreement,
which ratio we refer to as the “exchange ratio”), together with cash in lieu of fractional shares of Patrick
common stock, without interest (such shares, together with such cash in lieu of fractional shares, the
“merger consideration”). We refer to such shares of LCI common stock eligible to receive the merger
consideration as “eligible shares.”
If you receive the merger consideration and would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share of
Patrick common stock, you will receive cash in lieu of such fractional share, and you will not be entitled to
dividends, voting rights or any other rights in respect of such fractional share. For additional information
regarding the merger consideration, see the sections titled “The Merger—Merger Consideration to LCI
Stockholders” and “The Merger Agreement—Merger Consideration.”
Based on the closing price of shares of Patrick common stock on the Nasdaq, on [ ], 2026, the most
recent practicable date, the merger consideration represented approximately $[ ] in value for each share
of LCI common stock. The value of the merger consideration will fluctuate between the date of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and the completion of the merger based on the market value of shares of Patrick
common stock. Because Patrick will issue a fixed fraction of a share of Patrick common stock in exchange
for each share of LCI common stock, the value of the merger consideration will depend on the market price
of shares of Patrick common stock at the time the merger is completed. The market price of shares of
Patrick common stock when LCI stockholders receive those shares after the merger is completed could be
greater than, less than or the same as the market price of shares of Patrick common stock on the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus or at the time of the LCI special meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
6
Q:How will LCI equity and equity-based awards be affected by the merger?
A:Pursuant to the merger agreement, LCI equity and equity-based awards (which we refer to as “LCI equity
awards”) that are outstanding as of immediately prior to the first effective time will be treated as follows:
•At the first effective time, each restricted stock unit award denominated in shares of LCI common stock
that is subject only to time- or service-vesting conditions and granted under the LCI 2018 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (which award we refer to as an “LCI RSU Award” and which equity plan we refer to as the
“LCI equity plan”), whether vested or unvested, shall cease to represent an award of restricted stock units
denominated in shares of LCI common stock and shall be automatically converted into a number of
restricted stock units denominated in shares of Patrick common stock (which we refer to as an “Assumed
RSU Award”) equal to the product (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number of shares of
LCI common stock subject to such LCI RSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time,
multiplied by (ii) the exchange ratio. Immediately following the first effective time, each such Assumed
RSU Award will generally remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including those related to
vesting, forfeiture and dividend or dividend equivalent rights) as were applicable to the corresponding LCI
RSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except that any amounts relating to dividend
or dividend equivalent rights that are accrued or credited but unpaid as of the first effective time will be
carried over and payable in accordance with the terms and conditions applicable to such LCI RSU Award
as of immediately prior to the first effective time.
•At the first effective time, each restricted stock unit award denominated in shares of LCI common stock
that is subject to performance-vesting conditions and granted under the LCI equity plan (which award we
refer to as an “LCI PSU Award”), whether vested or unvested, shall cease to represent an award of
restricted stock units denominated in shares of LCI common stock and shall be automatically converted into
an Assumed RSU Award equal to the product (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number
of shares of LCI common stock subject to such LCI PSU Award as of immediately prior to the first
effective time (which shall be determined based on the greater of (A) the target level of performance and
(B) actual performance through the first effective time and extrapolated through the end of the performance
period), multiplied by (ii) the exchange ratio. Immediately following the first effective time, each such
Assumed RSU Award will generally remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including those
related to vesting, forfeiture and dividend or dividend equivalent rights) as were applicable to the
corresponding LCI PSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except that (1) the
performance-vesting conditions shall no longer apply to such Assumed RSU Award, and such Assumed
RSU Award shall be subject solely to service-based vesting; (2) such Assumed RSU Award shall not be
subject to pro-ration upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the
holder for “good reason” that occurs within the 24-month period following the first effective time; and (3)
any amounts relating to dividend or dividend equivalent rights that are accrued or credited but unpaid as of
the first effective time will be carried over and payable in accordance with the terms and conditions
applicable to such LCI PSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time.
•At the first effective time, each LCI cash-settled deferred stock unit award granted under the LCI equity
plan (which award we refer to as an “LCI DSU Award”), whether vested or unvested, will be automatically
cancelled and converted into the holder’s right to receive (without interest) (i) a cash payment equal to the
product of (A) the number of shares of LCI common stock underlying such LCI DSU Award, multiplied by
(B) the closing price of a share of LCI common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) on
the last trading day immediately prior to the closing date, plus (ii) any amounts relating to any dividend or
dividend equivalent rights in respect of such LCI DSU Award that are accrued or credited and unpaid as of
the first effective time, less applicable withholding taxes. Such amounts will be paid in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the merger agreement.
For additional information regarding the treatment of LCI equity-based awards, see the section titled “The
Merger—Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of LCI Equity-Based
Awards” beginning on page 135 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
7
Q:What equity stake will LCI stockholders hold in Patrick immediately following the merger?
A:Based on the exchange ratio of 1.2440 shares of Patrick common stock to be issued for each share of LCI
common stock and the estimated number of fully diluted shares of Patrick common stock and LCI common
stock expected to be outstanding immediately before the first merger, Patrick shareholders are expected to
own approximately 52% and former LCI stockholders are expected to own approximately 48% of the
outstanding shares of the combined company immediately following completion of the merger. The actual
ownership percentages will depend on the number of shares and equity awards of Patrick and LCI
outstanding immediately before the first merger.
Q:What will Patrick shareholders receive in the merger?
A:If the merger is completed, Patrick shareholders will not receive any consideration, and their shares of
Patrick common stock will remain outstanding and will constitute shares of Patrick common stock
following the merger. Following the merger, shares of Patrick common stock will continue to be traded on
the Nasdaq.
Q:Will Patrick equity and equity-based awards be affected by the merger?
A:Pursuant to the merger agreement, Patrick equity and equity-based awards (which we refer to as “Patrick
equity awards”) that are outstanding as of immediately prior to the first effective time will be treated as
follows:
•Each option to purchase shares of Patrick common stock granted under the Patrick 2009 Omnibus Incentive
Plan (which option we refer to as a “Patrick Option” and which equity plan we refer to as the “Patrick
equity plan”), whether vested or unvested, will remain outstanding and will generally remain subject to the
same terms and conditions (including those related to vesting, forfeiture and exercise) that applied to such
Patrick Option as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except that each such Patrick Option will
be eligible to vest upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the holder
for “good reason” that occurs, in each case, within the 24-month period following the first effective time.
•Each share of Patrick common stock subject only to time- or service-vesting conditions or other transfer
restrictions and granted under the Patrick equity plan (which we refer to as a “Patrick Restricted Share”)
will remain outstanding and will generally remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including those
related to vesting, forfeiture and dividend or dividend equivalent rights) that applied to such Patrick
Restricted Share as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except that each such Patrick Restricted
Share will be eligible to vest in full and without pro-ration upon the holder’s termination of employment by
Patrick without “cause” or by the holder for “good reason” that occurs, in each case, within the 24-month
period following the first effective time.
•Each share of Patrick common stock subject to performance-vesting conditions or other transfer restrictions
and granted under the Patrick equity plan (which we refer to as a “Patrick Performance Share”) will remain
outstanding and will generally remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including those related to
vesting, forfeiture and dividend or dividend equivalent rights) that applied to such Patrick Performance
Share as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except that (i) the performance-vesting conditions
shall be deemed achieved at the greater of (A) the target level of performance and (B) actual performance
through the first effective time and extrapolated through the end of the performance period, as reasonably
determined by the Patrick board or a committee thereof, and such Patrick Performance Share will be subject
solely to service-based vesting; and (ii) such Patrick Performance Share will be eligible to vest in full and
without pro-ration upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the
holder for “good reason” that occurs, in each case, within the 24-month period following the first effective
time.
•Each award of stock appreciation rights corresponding to shares of Patrick common stock granted under the
Patrick equity plan (which we refer to as a “Patrick SARs Award”), whether vested or unvested, will
remain outstanding and will generally remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including those
8
related to vesting, forfeiture and exercise) that applied to such Patrick SARs Award as of immediately prior
to the first effective time, except that each such Patrick SARs Award will be eligible to vest upon the
holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the holder for “good reason” that
occurs, in each case, within the 24-month period following the first effective time.
For additional information regarding the treatment of Patrick equity-based awards, see the section titled
“The Merger—Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of Patrick
Equity-Based Awards” beginning on page 129 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:What will the combined company be named?
A:If the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal is approved by Patrick shareholders, Patrick’s
articles of incorporation will be amended in connection with the completion of the merger to change
Patrick’s corporate name to “[ ].”
Q:What will be the composition of the board of directors and management of the combined company
following the closing of the merger?
A:The combined company board will consist of 12 directors: six Patrick designees and six LCI designees. The
Patrick designees will consist of Andy L. Nemeth, Todd M. Cleveland and four other members of the then-
current Patrick board immediately before closing. The LCI designees will consist of John A. Sirpilla and
five other members of the then-current LCI board immediately before closing.
Andy L. Nemeth, the current Chief Executive Officer of Patrick, has been designated to continue to serve
as the chief executive officer of the combined company. Todd M. Cleveland, a current director on the
Patrick board, has been designated, as of the first effective time, to serve as the Chairman of the combined
company board. John A. Sirpilla, the current Interim Chief Executive Officer of LCI and a current director
on the LCI board, has been designated, effective as of the first effective time, to serve as the Vice Chairman
of the combined company board. The Patrick board will appoint, or cause to be appointed, certain
individuals agreed at signing between the parties to leadership positions, effective as of the first effective
time.
The combined company board will have four standing committees, consisting of (a) the Audit Committee,
(b) the Compensation Committee, (c) the Nominating and Governance Committee, and (d) the Capital
Allocation and Strategy Committee. Each Committee will consist of four (4) directors comprised of two (2)
Patrick designees and two (2) LCI designees (unless a greater number of directors is mutually agreed by the
parties), subject to applicable law and applicable stock exchange listing standards (including applicable
independence requirements). The chairperson of each of the Audit Committee and the Compensation
Committee will be a Patrick designee and the chairperson of each of the Capital Allocation and Strategy
Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee will be an LCI Designee. The Capital
Allocation and Strategy Committee will oversee the integration initiatives arising out of the merger.
For additional information, please see “The Merger—Governance of the Combined Company Following
the Consummation of the Merger—Board of Directors of the Combined Company.”
Q:How do the Patrick and LCI boards recommend that I vote?
A:Patrick. The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick
share issuance proposal, “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, “FOR” the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal and “FOR” the Patrick adjournment proposal. For additional
information regarding how the Patrick board recommends that Patrick shareholders vote, see the section
titled “The Merger—Recommendation of the Patrick Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger.”
LCI. The LCI board unanimously recommends that LCI stockholders vote “FOR” the LCI merger
proposal, “FOR” the LCI advisory compensation proposal and “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal. For
additional information regarding how the LCI board recommends that LCI stockholders vote, see the
section titled “The Merger—Recommendation of the LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger.”
9
Q:Do Patrick directors and executive officers and LCI directors and executive officers have interests
that may differ from those of other Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders?
A:Yes. In considering the proposals to be voted on at the Patrick and LCI special meetings, Patrick
shareholders and LCI stockholders should be aware and take into account the fact that certain Patrick and
LCI directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition
to, the interests of Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders.
The Patrick board and the LCI board were aware of and carefully considered these interests, among other
matters, in evaluating the terms and structure and overseeing the negotiation of the merger, in approving the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and in recommending
that the Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders approve the applicable proposals. For additional
information, see the sections titled “The Merger—Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in
the Merger” and “The Merger—Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning
Q:Why are LCI stockholders being asked to vote on executive officer compensation?
A:The SEC has adopted rules that require LCI to seek a non-binding, advisory vote on certain compensation
that may be paid or become payable to LCI’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates
to the merger. LCI urges its stockholders to read the sections titled “The Merger—Interests of LCI
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 134 of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus.
Q:What happens if the LCI advisory compensation proposal to approve, on a non-binding, advisory
basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to LCI’s named executive officers in
connection with the consummation of the merger is not approved?
A:Approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation that may be paid or become payable to the
LCI named executive officers in connection with the consummation of the merger is not a condition to
consummation of the merger. The vote on the LCI advisory compensation proposal is a non-binding,
advisory vote. If the merger is completed, LCI will be obligated to pay all or a portion of this compensation
to its named executive officers in connection with the consummation of the merger or certain terminations
of employment that could occur following the merger, even if LCI stockholders fail to approve the LCI
advisory compensation proposal.
Q:Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting?
A:Patrick special meeting. The Patrick board has fixed [ ], 2026 as the record date for the Patrick
special meeting. All holders of record of shares of Patrick common stock as of the close of business on the
record date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Patrick special meeting (or any
postponement or adjournment of the Patrick special meeting) via the Patrick special meeting website or by
proxy, provided that those shares remain outstanding on the date of the Patrick special meeting. As of the
record date, there were [ ] shares of Patrick common stock outstanding. Attendance at the Patrick
special meeting via the Patrick special meeting website is not required to vote. Instructions on how to vote
your shares without virtually attending the Patrick special meeting are provided in this section below.
LCI special meeting. The LCI board has fixed [ ], 2026 as the record date for the LCI special
meeting. All holders of record of shares of LCI common stock as of the close of business on the record date
are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the LCI special meeting (or any postponement or
adjournment of the LCI special meeting) via the LCI special meeting website or by proxy, provided that
those shares remain outstanding on the date of the LCI special meeting. As of the record date, there were
[ ] shares of LCI common stock outstanding. Attendance at the LCI special meeting via the LCI
special meeting website is not required to vote. Instructions on how to vote your shares without virtually
attending the LCI special meeting are provided in this section below.
10
Q:How many votes do I have?
A:Patrick shareholders. Each Patrick shareholder of record is entitled to one vote for each share of Patrick
common stock held of record by such shareholder as of the close of business on the record date.
LCI stockholders. Each LCI stockholder of record is entitled to one vote for each share of LCI common
stock held of record by such stockholder as of the close of business on the record date.
Q:What constitutes a quorum for each of the Patrick and LCI special meetings?
A:Quorum for the Patrick special meeting. In order for business to be conducted at the Patrick special
meeting, a quorum must be present. A quorum at the Patrick special meeting requires the presence in
person (by participation at the virtual meeting) or by proxy of the holders of record of a majority of the
shares entitled to vote.
Quorum for the LCI special meeting. In order for business to be conducted at the LCI special meeting, a
quorum must be present. A quorum at the LCI special meeting requires the presence in person (by
participation at the virtual meeting) or by proxy of the holders of record of a majority of the shares of LCI
common stock entitled to vote.
Q:What will happen to LCI as a result of the merger?
A:If the merger is completed, First Merger Sub will merge with and into LCI, with LCI surviving as the initial
surviving entity, immediately followed by a second merger of the initial surviving entity with and into
Second Merger Sub, with Second Merger Sub surviving the second merger as the final surviving entity. As
a result of the merger, the separate corporate existence of First Merger Sub and LCI will cease, and Second
Merger Sub will continue as the surviving company of the merger and as a direct wholly owned subsidiary
of Patrick. If the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal is approved, Patrick’s articles of
incorporation will be amended in connection with the completion of the merger to change its corporate
name to “[ ].”
Furthermore, upon the completion of the merger, shares of LCI common stock will be delisted from the
NYSE and will no longer be publicly traded. Following the merger, Patrick common stock will continue to
be traded on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “PATK” and under the new corporate name “[ ].”
Q:I own shares of LCI common stock. What will happen to those shares as a result of the merger?
A:If the merger is completed, each of your shares of LCI common stock will be converted into the right to
receive 1.2440 shares of Patrick common stock. All such shares of LCI common stock, when so converted,
will cease to be outstanding and will automatically be canceled. Each holder of a share of LCI common
stock that was outstanding immediately prior to the first effective time will cease to have any rights with
respect to shares of LCI common stock, except the right to receive the merger consideration, any dividends
or distributions made with respect to shares of Patrick common stock with a record date after the first
effective time, and any cash to be paid in lieu of any fractional shares of Patrick common stock, in each
case to be issued or paid upon the exchange of any book-entry shares of LCI common stock for merger
consideration. For additional information, see the sections titled “The Merger—Merger Consideration to
LCI Stockholders,” “The Merger Agreement—Closing and Effectiveness of the Merger” and “The Merger
Agreement—Merger Consideration.”
Q:Where will the Patrick common stock that LCI stockholders receive in the merger be publicly
traded?
A:Assuming the merger is completed, the shares of Patrick common stock issued to LCI stockholders in
connection with the merger will be listed and traded on the Nasdaq under Patrick’s existing ticker symbol,
“PATK.” If the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal is approved, Patrick’s corporate name
will be changed to “[ ].”
11
Q:What happens if the merger is not completed?
A:If (a) the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal are not
approved by Patrick shareholders, (b) the LCI merger proposal is not approved by LCI stockholders or
(c) the merger is not completed for any other reason, LCI stockholders will not receive any merger
consideration in connection with the merger, and their shares of LCI common stock will remain
outstanding. LCI will remain an independent public company and LCI common stock will continue to be
listed and traded on the NYSE. If the merger agreement is terminated under specified circumstances, either
LCI or Patrick (depending on the circumstances) may be required to (i) pay the other party a termination
fee of $94,200,000. For a more detailed discussion of the termination-related fees, see “The Merger
Agreement—Termination.”
Q:What is a proxy and how can I vote my shares without attending the special meetings?
A:A proxy is a legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own on your behalf.
We recommend that you promptly submit your vote by proxy even if you currently plan to attend the
Patrick special meeting or the LCI special meeting. Voting in advance by proxy does not preclude your
opportunity to attend the special meeting and vote again via the special meeting website.
Patrick. If you are a shareholder of record of Patrick common stock as of the close of business on [ ],
2026, the record date, you can vote your proxy by phone, the internet or mail by following the instructions
provided in the enclosed proxy card. Please note that if you are a beneficial owner, you may vote by
submitting voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, or otherwise by following
instructions provided by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee. Phone and internet voting may be
available to beneficial owners. Please refer to the vote instruction form provided by your broker, bank,
trustee or other nominee.
LCI. If you are a stockholder of record of LCI common stock as of the close of business on [ ], 2026,
the record date, you can vote your proxy by phone, the internet or mail by following the instructions
provided in the enclosed proxy card. Please note that if you are a beneficial owner, you may vote by
submitting voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, or otherwise by following
instructions provided by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee. Phone and internet voting may be
available to beneficial owners. Please refer to the vote instruction form provided by your broker, bank,
trustee or other nominee.
Q:Can I vote my shares via the Patrick special meeting website or the LCI special meeting website?
A:Patrick. Shares of Patrick common stock held directly in your name as the shareholder of record as of the
close of business on [ ], 2026, the record date, may be voted at the Patrick special meeting via the
Patrick special meeting website. Please note that attendance alone at the Patrick special meeting via the
Patrick special meeting website will not cause the voting of your shares; you must affirmatively vote by
proxy or via the Patrick special meeting website. If you choose to attend the Patrick special meeting and
vote your shares via the Patrick special meeting website, you will need the control number included on your
proxy card. If you are a beneficial owner of Patrick common stock but not the shareholder of record of such
shares of Patrick common stock, you will need to obtain a control number from your broker, bank, trustee
or other nominee holder of record giving you the right to vote the shares.
LCI. Shares of LCI common stock held directly in your name as the stockholder of record as of the close of
business on [ ], 2026, the record date, may be voted at the LCI special meeting via the LCI special
meeting website. Please note that attendance alone at the LCI special meeting via the LCI special meeting
website will not cause the voting of your shares; you must affirmatively vote by proxy or via the LCI
special meeting website. If you choose to attend the LCI special meeting and vote your shares via the LCI
special meeting website, you will need the control number included on your proxy card. If you are a
beneficial owner of LCI common stock but not the stockholder of record of such shares of LCI common
12
stock, you will need to obtain a control number from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee holder of
record giving you the right to vote the shares.
Q:What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder or stockholder of record and as a
beneficial owner?
A:Patrick. If your shares of Patrick common stock are registered directly in your name with Patrick’s transfer
agent, Computershare, you are considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares, and access
to proxy materials is being provided directly to you. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or
by a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, then you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares,
which are considered to be held in “street name.” Access to proxy materials is being provided to you by
your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee who is considered the shareholder of record with respect to
those shares.
LCI. If your shares of LCI common stock are registered directly in your name with LCI’s transfer agent,
Equiniti Trust Company, LLC, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares,
and access to proxy materials is being provided directly to you. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage
account or by a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, then you are considered the beneficial owner of
those shares, which are considered to be held in “street name.” Access to proxy materials is being provided
to you by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee who is considered the stockholder of record with
respect to those shares.
Q:Can I vote my shares at the special meeting if I am only a beneficial owner and not a shareholder or
stockholder of record?
A:If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Patrick common stock or LCI common stock, you are also invited
to attend the Patrick special meeting or the LCI special meeting, respectively. However, because you are
not the Patrick shareholder of record or LCI stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares at the
Patrick special meeting or the LCI special meeting, respectively, unless you request and obtain a “legal
proxy” issued in your own name from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee.
You may vote your shares of Patrick common stock held in “street name” electronically at the Patrick
special meeting if you register in advance to virtually attend the Patrick special meeting. To register to vote
shares held in “street name,” you must email proof of your legal proxy, along with your name and mailing
address, to Computershare at legalproxy@computershare.com using the subject “Legal Proxy.”
Computershare must receive your legal proxy no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on [ ], 2026. You
will receive a confirmation of your registration and a unique control number by email after Computershare
receives your registration materials.
You may vote your shares of LCI common stock held in “street name” electronically at the LCI special
meeting by joining the LCI special meeting as an authenticated LCI stockholder. To join the meeting as an
authenticated stockholder, you will need a valid control number, which can be found on the voting
instruction form provided to you by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee or can otherwise be
obtained from them. Anyone may enter the LCI virtual meeting website as a “guest” and no control number
will be required; however, only authenticated LCI stockholders may submit their votes at the LCI special
meeting.
Q:What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials?
A:You may receive more than one set of voting materials for the Patrick special meeting or the LCI special
meeting, including multiple copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and multiple proxy cards or
voting instruction forms. For example, if you hold your shares of Patrick common stock or LCI common
stock in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate voting instruction form for each
brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a holder of record and your shares are registered in
more than one name, you will receive more than one proxy card. Please submit each separate proxy or
voting instruction form that you receive by following the instructions set forth in each separate proxy or
13
voting instruction form. If you fail to submit each separate proxy or voting instruction form that you
receive, not all of your shares will be voted.
Q:I hold shares of both Patrick and LCI common stock. Do I need to vote separately for each company?
A:Yes. You will need to separately follow the applicable procedures described in this joint proxy statement/
prospectus both with respect to the voting of shares of Patrick common stock and with respect to the voting
of shares of LCI common stock in order to effectively vote the shares of common stock you hold in each
company.
Q:If a Patrick shareholder or LCI stockholder gives a proxy, how will the shares of Patrick or LCI
common stock, as applicable, covered by the proxy be voted?
A:If you provide a proxy, regardless of whether you provide that proxy by phone, the internet or completing
and returning the applicable enclosed proxy card, the individuals named on the enclosed proxy card will
vote your shares of Patrick common stock or your shares of LCI common stock, as applicable, in the way
that you indicate when providing your proxy in respect of the shares of common stock you hold in such
company. When completing the phone or internet processes or the proxy card, you may specify whether
your shares of Patrick or LCI common stock, as applicable, should be voted for or against, or abstain from
voting on, all, some or none of the specific items of business to come before the Patrick special meeting or
the LCI special meeting, as applicable.
Q:How will my shares of Patrick or LCI common stock, as applicable, be voted if I return a blank
proxy?
A:Patrick. If you return a properly executed proxy and do not indicate how you want your shares of Patrick
common stock to be voted, then your shares of Patrick common stock will be voted “FOR” the Patrick
share issuance proposal, “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, “FOR” the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal and “FOR” the Patrick adjournment proposal.
LCI. If you sign, date and return your proxy and do not indicate how you want your shares of LCI common
stock to be voted, then your shares of LCI common stock will be voted “FOR” the LCI merger proposal,
“FOR” the LCI advisory compensation proposal and “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal.
Q:Can I change my vote after I have submitted my proxy?
A:Patrick. Yes. If you are a shareholder of record of Patrick common stock as of the close of business on the
record date, whether you vote by phone, the internet or mail, you can change or revoke your proxy before it
is voted at the Patrick special meeting in one of the following ways:
•complete, properly execute and return a new proxy card or voting instruction form with a later date;
•vote again by phone or the internet;
•give written notice of the change of your voting instructions or revocation prior to the Patrick special
meeting to the Office of the Secretary at Patrick at 107 W. Franklin Street, Elkhart, Indiana 46516 USA; or
•attend the Patrick special meeting online and vote your shares via the Patrick special meeting website.
Please note that your attendance at the meeting via the Patrick special meeting website will not alone serve
to revoke your previously submitted proxy; instead, you must vote your shares via the Patrick special
meeting website in order to do so.
If you are a beneficial owner of Patrick common stock as of the close of business on the record date, you
must follow the instructions of your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee to revoke or change your voting
instructions.
14
LCI. Yes. If you are a stockholder of record of LCI, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any
time before the polls close at the LCI special meeting by:
•voting again by telephone or through the internet;
•requesting, completing and mailing in a new paper proxy card;
•giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary, which must be received before the LCI
special meeting, by mail to Corporate Secretary, 3501 County Road 6 East, Elkhart, Indiana 46514; or
•attending the LCI special meeting online and voting your shares electronically (merely attending the LCI
special meeting will not revoke a prior submitted proxy).
If you are a street name stockholder, you must follow the instructions to revoke your proxy, if any,
provided by your broker, bank or other nominee.
Q:Will Patrick and LCI be required to submit their respective proposals to their shareholders or
stockholders even if the Patrick board or the LCI board has withdrawn, modified or qualified its
recommendation?
A:Yes. Unless the merger agreement is terminated before the Patrick special meeting or the LCI special
meeting, as applicable, Patrick is required to submit the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick
authorized stock increase proposal to Patrick shareholders, and LCI is required to submit the LCI merger
proposal to LCI stockholders, in each case even if the Patrick board or the LCI board, as applicable, has
withdrawn, modified or qualified its recommendation.
Q:Where can I find the voting results of the special meetings?
A:The preliminary voting results for the Patrick special meeting and the LCI special meeting are expected to
be announced at the applicable special meeting. In addition, within four business days following the special
meeting, Patrick and LCI each intend to file the final voting results (or, if the final results have not yet been
certified, the preliminary voting results) of its respective special meeting with the SEC on a Current Report
on Form 8-K.
Q:Are Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders entitled to appraisal rights or dissenters’ rights in
connection with the merger?
A:Patrick shareholders. Under Indiana law, Patrick shareholders are not entitled to appraisal rights or
dissenters’ rights in connection with the merger.
LCI stockholders. Under Delaware law, LCI stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights or dissenters’
rights in connection with the merger.
For more information, see the section titled “The Merger—No Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 127 of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:Are there any risks that I should consider as a Patrick shareholder and/or LCI stockholder in
deciding how to vote?
A:Yes. You should read and carefully consider the risk factors set forth in the section titled “Risk Factors”
beginning on page 38 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You also should read and carefully consider
the risk factors of Patrick and LCI contained in the documents that are incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:What happens if I sell my shares before the special meeting?
A:Patrick shareholders. The record date for Patrick shareholders entitled to vote at the Patrick special
meeting is earlier than the date of the Patrick special meeting. If you transfer your shares of Patrick
15
common stock after the record date but before the Patrick special meeting, you will, unless special
arrangements are made, retain your right to vote at the Patrick special meeting.
LCI stockholders. The record date for LCI stockholders entitled to vote at the LCI special meeting is earlier
than the date of the LCI special meeting. If you transfer your shares of LCI common stock after the record
date but before the LCI special meeting, you will, unless special arrangements are made, retain your right to
vote at the LCI special meeting but will have transferred the right to receive the merger consideration to the
person to whom you transferred your shares of LCI common stock (assuming such holder continues to hold
such shares until the first effective time).
Q:What will happen to LCI’s outstanding indebtedness as a result of the merger?
A:As of June 30, 2026, LCI had approximately $853 million of outstanding indebtedness, consisting primarily
of amounts outstanding under its 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030 (which we refer to as the “2030
Notes”) and its secured term loan (which we refer to as the “LCI term loan”).
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the LCI term loan and LCI’s secured revolving credit
facility (which, together with the LCI term loan, we refer to as the “LCI credit facility”) will be paid off and
terminated substantially concurrently with the closing of the merger. In addition, LCI’s 2030 Notes are
expected to remain issued and outstanding following the closing but will become convertible into shares of
Patrick common stock, and the merger agreement requires that Patrick and LCI use their reasonable best
efforts to obtain the consent of the relevant dealer or other counterparties to supplement, amend or modify
the terms of the related call options and warrants to reflect the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, and such consents may not be obtained on favorable terms or at all. Failure to obtain such
consents could result in economic inefficiencies in the combined company’s capital structure or require the
expenditure of additional resources to resolve such issues, which could adversely affect the combined
company’s results of operations or financial condition.
For more information, see “The Merger—Treatment of LCI Indebtedness” beginning on page 141 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to LCI stockholders?
A:The parties intend that the merger qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we refer to as the “Code”). Accordingly, LCI
stockholders generally will not recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes on the
exchange of their LCI common stock for Patrick common stock in the first merger, except for any gain or
loss that may result from the receipt of cash instead of a fractional share of Patrick common stock as
described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 168 of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Tax matters can be complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to any particular holder will
depend on that holder’s particular facts and circumstances. In addition, holders may be subject to U.S.
federal non-income, state, local or non-U.S. tax laws that are not discussed in this joint proxy statement/
prospectus. Accordingly, you are urged to consult your own tax advisors for a full understanding of the tax
consequences to you of the merger. For a further discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the merger, see “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger”
beginning on page 168 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:What conditions must be satisfied to complete the merger?
A:Patrick and LCI are not required to complete the merger unless a number of conditions are satisfied or
waived. These closing conditions include, among others:
•the approval of (a) the LCI merger proposal by LCI stockholders (which we refer to as the “LCI
stockholder approval”) and (b) the Patrick share issuance proposal and Patrick authorized stock
increase proposal by Patrick shareholders (which we refer to as the “Patrick shareholder approval”);
16
•the receipt of the required regulatory approvals;
•the absence of any legal restraint in effect that prevents, enjoins or prohibits the consummation of the
merger;
•the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a
part and the absence of any stop order suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement, and
no proceedings for such purpose having been initiated or threatened by the SEC;
•the approval for listing on the Nasdaq, subject to official notice of issuance, of the shares of Patrick
common stock to be issued as merger consideration;
•the representations and warranties of the other party (or parties, with respect to LCI) contained in the
merger agreement being true and correct as of the date on which the merger agreement was entered
into and as of the date on which the merger is completed, subject to the materiality standards provided
in the merger agreement (and the receipt of a certificate duly executed by an executive officer of LCI
or Patrick, as applicable, to such effect);
•performance by Patrick, First Merger Sub, Second Merger Sub or LCI, as applicable, in all material
respects of all obligations required to be performed by them at or prior to the closing under the merger
agreement (and the receipt of a certificate duly executed by an executive officer of LCI or Patrick, as
applicable, to such effect); and
•the receipt by LCI of an opinion of tax counsel to the effect that the first merger and the second
merger, taken together, will be treated as a single integrated transaction that will qualify as a
“reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
For a more complete summary of the closing conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to the completion of
the merger, please read the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger”
beginning on page 162of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:When is the merger expected to be completed?
A:Patrick and LCI are working to complete the merger as quickly as possible. Subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of the conditions described in the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing
of the Merger” beginning on page 162of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the merger is expected to
close in the first half of 2027. However, neither Patrick nor LCI can predict the actual date on which the
merger will be completed, nor can the parties provide assurance that the merger will be completed, because
completion is subject to conditions beyond either party’s control. In addition, if the merger is not completed
by March 30, 2027 (unless otherwise agreed by the parties), either Patrick or LCI may choose not to
proceed with the merger by terminating the merger agreement, provided that, under certain circumstances
related to obtaining regulatory approvals, such date will be automatically extended to June 30, 2027 or
further extended to September 30, 2027, as described in the section titled “The Merger Agreement—
Termination of the Merger Agreement” beginning on page 163 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:If I am an LCI stockholder, how will I receive the merger consideration to which I am entitled?
A:If you are a holder of book-entry shares representing eligible shares of LCI common stock (which we refer
to as “LCI book-entry shares”) which are held through the Depository Trust Company (which we refer to as
“DTC”), the exchange agent will transmit to DTC or its nominees as soon as reasonably practicable on or
after the first effective time of the merger, the merger consideration, cash in lieu of any fractional shares of
Patrick common stock and any dividends and other distributions on the shares of Patrick common stock
issuable as merger consideration, in each case, that DTC has the right to receive.
If you are a holder of record of LCI book-entry shares which are not held through DTC, the exchange agent
will deliver to you, as soon as practicable after the first effective time of the merger, (a) a notice advising
you of the effectiveness of the merger, (b) a statement reflecting the aggregate whole number of shares of
17
Patrick common stock (which will be in uncertificated book-entry form) that you have a right to receive
pursuant to the merger agreement and (c) a check in the amount equal to the cash payable in lieu of any
fractional shares of Patrick common stock and dividends and other distributions on the shares of Patrick
common stock issuable to you as merger consideration.
No interest will be paid or accrued on any amount payable for shares of LCI common stock eligible to
receive the merger consideration pursuant to the merger agreement.
For additional information on the exchange of LCI common stock for the merger consideration, see the
section titled “The Merger Agreement—Exchange Fund.”
Q:If I am a holder of LCI common stock, will the shares of Patrick common stock issued in the merger
receive a dividend?
A:After the consummation of the merger, the shares of Patrick common stock issued in connection with the
merger will carry with them the right to receive the same dividends on shares of Patrick common stock as
all other holders of shares of Patrick common stock, for any dividend the record date of which occurs after
the merger is completed.
Q:Who will solicit and pay the cost of soliciting proxies?
A:Patrick. Patrick will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies from Patrick shareholders.
LCI. LCI has retained D.F. King & Co, Inc. to assist in the solicitation process. LCI will pay D.F. King &
Co, Inc. an estimated fee of $25,000 as well as reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses. LCI
also has agreed to indemnify D.F. King & Co, Inc. against various liabilities and expenses that relate to or
arise out of its solicitation of proxies (subject to certain exceptions).
Q:What should I do now?
A:You should read this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its entirety, including the annexes,
and return your completed, signed and dated proxy card by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or
submit your voting instructions by phone or the internet as soon as possible so that your shares of Patrick
common stock and/or LCI common stock will be voted in accordance with your instructions.
Q:Who can answer my questions about the Patrick and/or LCI special meeting or the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement?
A:Patrick shareholders. If you have any questions about the Patrick special meeting or the information
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or desire additional copies of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus or additional proxies, contact Patrick by writing to:
Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Attention: Office of the Secretary
LCI stockholders. If you have questions about the LCI special meeting or the information contained in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, or desire additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or
additional proxies, contact LCI’s proxy solicitor:
D.F. King & Co, Inc. 28 Liberty Street, Floor 53 New York, NY 10005 Call Toll-Free (800) 859-8509 Banks and Brokers Call (212) 448-4476 Email: LCII@dfking.com |
18
Q:Where can I find more information about Patrick, LCI and the merger?
A:You can find out more information about Patrick, LCI and the merger by reading this joint proxy statement/
prospectus and, with respect to Patrick and LCI, from various sources described in the section titled “Where
You Can Find More Information.”
19
SUMMARY
This summary highlights select information included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and does not
contain all of the information that may be important to you. You should read this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and its annexes carefully and in its entirety and the other documents to which Patrick and LCI refer before you
decide how to vote with respect to the proposals to be considered and voted on at the special meeting for your
company. In addition, Patrick and LCI incorporate by reference important business and financial information about
Patrick and LCI into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, as further described in the section titled “Where You
Can Find More Information” beginning on page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You may obtain the
information incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus without charge by following the
instructions in the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information.” Each item in this summary includes a
page reference directing you to a more complete description of that item in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Information About the Companies (page 52)
Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Phone: (574) 294-7511
Patrick is a leading component solutions provider serving original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket
customers in the Recreational Vehicle (“RV”), Marine, Powersports and Housing markets. Since 1959, Patrick has
empowered manufacturers and outdoor enthusiasts to achieve next-level recreation experiences. Patrick’s customer-
focused approach brings together design, manufacturing, distribution, and transportation in a full solutions model
that defines it as a trusted partner. Patrick is home to more than 85 leading brands, all united by a commitment to
quality, customer service, and innovation. Headquartered in Elkhart, IN, Patrick employs approximately 10,000
skilled team members throughout the United States. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, Patrick had
consolidated net sales of $3,951 million. Patrick’s 2025 operating income was $276 million and net income was
$135 million.
Patrick is a Indiana corporation and its common stock is listed on the Nasdaq, trading under the symbol
“PATK.”
For additional information about Patrick and its subsidiaries, see the documents incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus in the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on
page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
LCI Industries
3501 County Road 6 East
Elkhart, Indiana 46514
Phone: (574) 535-1125
LCI Industries, through its wholly owned subsidiary Lippert Components, Inc. and its subsidiaries, is a global
leader in supplying engineered components to the outdoor recreation, transportation, marine and housing industries.
In addition to serving original equipment manufacturers, LCI also caters to aftermarket needs, selling through retail
dealers, wholesale distributors and service centers, as well as direct-to-consumer sales through online platforms. As
of June 30, 2026, LCI operated over 100 manufacturing facilities located throughout North America and Europe. For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, LCI had consolidated net sales of $4,122 million. LCI’s 2025 operating
profit was $279.9 million and net income was $188.3 million.
LCI Industries is a Delaware corporation, and its common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
“LCII.”
20
For additional information about LCI Industries and its subsidiaries, see the documents incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information”
beginning on page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Planet First Merger Sub Inc.
c/o Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
First Merger Sub is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Upon the completion of the first merger, First
Merger Sub will cease to exist. First Merger Sub was incorporated in Delaware on June 29, 2026 for the sole
purpose of effecting the merger.
Planet Second Merger Sub LLC
c/o Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Second Merger Sub is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Upon the completion of the second merger,
Second Merger Sub will survive as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Second Merger Sub was formed in
Indiana on June 29, 2026 for the sole purpose of effecting the merger.
The Merger and the Merger Agreement (page 142)
The terms and conditions of the merger are contained in the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Patrick and
LCI encourage you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its entirety, as it is the legal document that governs
the merger.
The Patrick board and the LCI board each have unanimously approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions included in
the merger agreement, the business combination of Patrick and LCI will be effected through the merger of First
Merger Sub with and into LCI (which we refer to as the “first merger”), with LCI surviving as a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of Patrick (which we refer to as the “initial surviving entity”), immediately followed by the merger
of the initial surviving entity with and into Second Merger Sub (which we refer to as the “second merger”), with
Second Merger Sub surviving the second merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick.
Merger Consideration to LCI Stockholders (page 89)
If the merger is completed, at the first effective time, each share of LCI common stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the first effective time (other than shares of LCI common stock held by LCI, Patrick or any of
their respective subsidiaries immediately prior to the first effective time) will be converted into the right to receive
1.2440 shares of Patrick common stock, with cash to be paid in lieu of fractional shares of Patrick common stock
that LCI stockholders would otherwise be entitled to receive in the first merger.
Risk Factors (page 38)
The merger and an investment in Patrick common stock involve risks, some of which are related to the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. You should carefully consider the information about these risks
set forth in the section titled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 38 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, together
with the other information included or incorporated by reference herein, particularly the risk factors contained in the
Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed by each of Patrick and LCI. Patrick
shareholders should carefully consider those risk factors before deciding how to vote with respect to the Patrick
share issuance proposal, the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, the Patrick articles amendment and
restatement proposal, and the Patrick adjournment proposal to be considered and voted on at the Patrick special
21
meeting, and LCI stockholders should carefully consider those risk factors before deciding how to vote with respect
to the LCI merger proposal, the LCI advisory compensation proposal, and the LCI adjournment proposal to be
considered and voted on at the LCI special meeting. For additional information, see “Where You Can Find More
Information” beginning on page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Treatment of LCI Equity and Equity-Based Awards (page 135)
At the first effective time, each LCI RSU Award, whether vested or unvested, shall cease to represent an award
of restricted stock units denominated in shares of LCI common stock and shall be automatically converted into a
number of restricted stock units denominated in shares of Patrick common stock (which we refer to as an “Assumed
RSU Award”) equal to the product (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number of shares of LCI
common stock subject to such LCI RSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time, multiplied by (ii)
the exchange ratio. Immediately following the first effective time, each such Assumed RSU Award will generally
remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including those related to vesting, forfeiture and dividend or
dividend equivalent rights) as were applicable to the corresponding LCI RSU Award as of immediately prior to the
first effective time, except that any amounts relating to dividend or dividend equivalent rights that are accrued or
credited but unpaid as of the first effective time will be carried over and payable in accordance with the terms and
conditions applicable to such LCI RSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time.
At the first effective time, each LCI PSU Award, whether vested or unvested, shall cease to represent an award
of restricted stock units denominated in shares of LCI common stock and shall be automatically converted into an
Assumed RSU Award equal to the product (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number of shares of
LCI common stock subject to such LCI PSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time (which shall
be determined based on the greater of (A) the target level of performance and (B) actual performance through the
first effective time and extrapolated through the end of the performance period), multiplied by (ii) the exchange ratio.
Immediately following the first effective time, each such Assumed RSU Award will generally remain subject to the
same terms and conditions (including those related to vesting, forfeiture and dividend or dividend equivalent rights)
as were applicable to the corresponding LCI PSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except
that (1) the performance-vesting conditions shall no longer apply to such Assumed RSU Award, and such Assumed
RSU Award shall be subject solely to service-based vesting; (2) such Assumed RSU Award shall not be subject to
pro-ration upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the holder for “good
reason” (which we refer to as a “qualifying termination of employment”) that occurs within the 24-month period
following the first effective time; and (3) any amounts relating to dividend or dividend equivalent rights that are
accrued or credited but unpaid as of the first effective time will be carried over and payable in accordance with the
terms and conditions applicable to such LCI PSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time.
At the first effective time, each LCI DSU Award, whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding as of
immediately prior to the first effective time, will be automatically cancelled and converted into the holder’s right to
receive (without interest) (i) a cash payment equal to the product of (A) the number of shares of LCI common stock
underlying such LCI DSU Award, multiplied by (B) the closing price of a share of LCI common stock on the NYSE
on the last trading day immediately prior to the closing date, plus (ii) any amounts relating to any dividend or
dividend equivalent rights in respect of such LCI DSU Award that are accrued or credited and unpaid as of the first
effective time, less applicable withholding taxes. Such amounts will be paid in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement.
Prior to the first effective time, the LCI board will adopt resolutions providing for the treatment of the LCI RSU
Awards, LCI PSU Awards and LCI DSU Awards as set forth in the merger agreement and summarized above, and
the LCI board will take all actions necessary to cause the treatment of such LCI equity awards to be effectuated as
such, including actions necessary under the LCI equity plan and applicable award agreements.
For additional information regarding the treatment of LCI equity awards, see the section titled “The Merger
Agreement—Treatment of LCI Equity-Based Awards” beginning on page 144 of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus.
22
Treatment of Patrick Equity and Equity-Based Awards (page 129)
Each option to purchase shares of Patrick common stock granted under the Patrick 2009 Omnibus Incentive
Plan (which option we refer to as a “Patrick Option” and which equity plan we refer to as the “Patrick equity plan”),
whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding as of immediately prior to the first effective time will remain
outstanding and will generally remain subject to the same terms and conditions (including those related to vesting,
forfeiture and exercise) that applied to such Patrick Option as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except
that each such Patrick Option will be eligible to vest upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick
without “cause” or by the holder for “good reason” that occurs, in each case, within the 24-month period following
the first effective time.
Each share of Patrick common stock subject only to time- or service-vesting conditions or other transfer
restrictions and granted under the Patrick equity plan (which we refer to as a “Patrick Restricted Share”) that is
outstanding as of immediately prior to the first effective time will remain outstanding and will generally remain
subject to the same terms and conditions (including those related to vesting, forfeiture and dividend or dividend
equivalent rights) that applied to such Patrick Restricted Share as of immediately prior to the first effective time,
except that each such Patrick Restricted Share will be eligible to vest in full and without pro-ration upon the holder’s
termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the holder for “good reason” that occurs, in each case,
within the 24-month period following the first effective time.
Each share of Patrick common stock subject to performance-vesting conditions or other transfer restrictions and
granted under the Patrick equity plan (which we refer to as a “Patrick Performance Share”) that is outstanding as of
immediately prior to the first effective time will remain outstanding and will generally remain subject to the same
terms and conditions (including those related to vesting, forfeiture and dividend or dividend equivalent rights) that
applied to such Patrick Performance Share as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except that (i) the
performance-vesting conditions shall be deemed achieved at the greater of (A) the target level of performance and
(B) actual performance through the first effective time and extrapolated through the end of the performance period,
as reasonably determined by the Patrick board or a committee thereof, and such Patrick Performance Share will be
subject solely to service-based vesting; and (ii) such Patrick Performance Share will be eligible to vest in full and
without pro-ration upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the holder for
“good reason” that occurs, in each case, within the 24-month period following the first effective time.
Each award of stock appreciation rights corresponding to shares of Patrick common stock granted under the
Patrick equity plan (which we refer to as a “Patrick SARs Award”), whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding
as of immediately prior to the first effective time will remain outstanding and will generally remain subject to the
same terms and conditions (including those related to vesting, forfeiture and exercise) that applied to such Patrick
SARs Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time, except that each such Patrick SARs Award will be
eligible to vest upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the holder for “good
reason” that occurs, in each case, within the 24-month period following the first effective time.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Patrick shall take all actions necessary to cause the foregoing treatment of
each Patrick Option, Patrick RSA, Patrick PSA and Patrick SARs Award that is outstanding as of immediately prior
to the first effective time, and the Patrick board shall adopt resolutions providing for such treatment. The Patrick
board has adopted resolutions pursuant to which the Patrick board affirmatively determined that neither the
execution, delivery nor performance of the merger agreement, nor consummation of the transactions contemplated
thereby, will constitute a “change of control” (as defined under the Patrick equity plan or any applicable award
agreement).
For additional information regarding the treatment of Patrick equity-based awards, see the section titled “The
Merger Agreement—Treatment of Patrick Equity-Based Awards” beginning on page 129 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Recommendation of the Patrick Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger (page 92)
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick share issuance
proposal, “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, “FOR” the Patrick articles amendment and
23
restatement proposal and “FOR” the Patrick adjournment proposal. For the factors considered by the Patrick board
in reaching this decision and additional information on the recommendation of the Patrick board, see the section
titled “The Merger—Recommendation of the Patrick Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger.”
Recommendation of the LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger (page 109)
The LCI board unanimously recommends that LCI stockholders vote “FOR” the LCI merger proposal, “FOR”
the LCI advisory compensation proposal and “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal. For the factors considered by
the LCI board in reaching this decision and additional information on the recommendation of the LCI board, see the
section titled “The Merger—Recommendation of the LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger.”
Opinions of Financial Advisors (page 96)
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Patrick’s Financial Advisor
At the meeting of the Patrick board on June 29, 2026, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan”) rendered its
oral opinion to the Patrick board to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to the assumptions
made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by J.P. Morgan in
preparing its opinion, the exchange ratio in the proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick.
J.P. Morgan confirmed its June 29, 2026 oral opinion by delivering its written opinion, dated June 30, 2026, to the
Patrick board that, as of such date, the exchange ratio in the proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to Patrick.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, dated June 30, 2026, which sets forth, among other things,
the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by J.P.
Morgan in preparing its opinion, is attached as Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated
herein by reference. The summary of the opinion of J.P. Morgan set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. Patrick’s shareholders are urged to read the
opinion in its entirety. J.P. Morgan’s opinion was addressed to the Patrick board (in its capacity as such) in
connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the proposed merger, and was limited to the fairness, from
a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to Patrick in the proposed merger. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion
as to the fairness of the exchange ratio in the proposed merger to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or
other constituencies of Patrick or as to the underlying decision by Patrick to engage in the proposed merger. The
issuance of J.P. Morgan’s opinion was approved by a fairness opinion committee of J.P. Morgan. The opinion does
not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of Patrick as to how such shareholder should vote with respect
to the proposed merger or any other matter.
For a description of the opinion that the Patrick board received from J.P. Morgan, see the section titled “The
Merger—Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors—Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC” beginning on page
96and for the full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, see Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Opinion of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Patrick’s Financial Advisor
On June 29, 2026, Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (“Baird”), rendered its oral opinion to the Patrick board
(which was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of Baird’s written opinion addressed to the Patrick board
dated June 30, 2026) as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Patrick of the exchange ratio provided for
in the merger pursuant to the merger agreement. Baird’s opinion was directed to the Patrick board (in its capacity as
the Patrick board) and only addressed the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Patrick of the exchange ratio
provided for in the merger pursuant to the merger agreement and did not address any other aspect or implication of
the merger or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding.
The full text of the written opinion of Baird, dated June 30, 2026, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Baird in
preparing its opinion, is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by
reference. The summary of the opinion of Baird set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. Patrick’s shareholders are urged to read the opinion in its
24
entirety. However, neither Baird’s opinion nor the summary of its opinion and the related analyses set forth in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus are intended to be, and do not constitute, advice or a recommendation to Patrick
board, any security holder of Patrick or any other person as to how to act or vote with respect to any matter relating
to the merger.
For a description of the opinion that the Patrick board received from Baird, see the section titled “The Merger—
Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors—Opinion of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated” beginning on page 101
and for the full text of the written opinion of Baird, see Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP, LCI’s Financial Advisor
LCI has engaged Perella Weinberg Partners LP (“PWP”) as a financial advisor in connection with the proposed
merger. In connection with this engagement, PWP delivered a written opinion, dated June 30, 2026, to the LCI
board as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of the opinion, of the merger consideration
to be received by the holders of outstanding shares of LCI common stock pursuant to the merger agreement.
For a description of the opinion that the LCI board received from PWP, see the section titled “The Merger—
Opinion of LCI’s Financial Advisor—Opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP” beginning on page 115 and for the
full text of the written opinion of PWP, see Annex F to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Special Meeting of Patrick Shareholders (page 54)
Date, Time, Place and Purpose of the Patrick Special Meeting
The Patrick special meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on [ ], 2026, at [ ], Eastern
Time. Because the Patrick special meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via live webcast, Patrick
shareholders will not be able to attend the Patrick special meeting in person. To enter the Patrick special meeting,
shareholders, or their proxyholder, may participate, vote, and ask questions at the Patrick special meeting by visiting
[ ] and using the control number found on their proxy card or instruction form. Patrick intends to mail this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy to its shareholders entitled to vote (in person
virtually or by proxy) at the Patrick special meeting on or about [ ], 2026.
The purpose of the Patrick special meeting is to consider and vote on (i) the Patrick share issuance proposal,
(ii) the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, (iii) the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal, and
(iv) the Patrick adjournment proposal. Approval of the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized
stock increase proposal by the Patrick shareholders are conditions to the consummation of the merger. Approval of
the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal and the Patrick adjournment proposal are not conditions to
the consummation of the merger.
Record Date and Outstanding Shares of Patrick Common Stock
Only holders of record of shares of Patrick common stock as of the close of business on [ ], 2026, the
record date for the Patrick special meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Patrick special meeting or any
adjournment or postponement of the Patrick special meeting.
As of the close of business on the record date, there were [ ] shares of Patrick common stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote at the Patrick special meeting. Patrick shareholders may cast one vote for each share
of Patrick common stock held by them as of the close of business on the record date.
Quorum; Abstentions, Failure to Vote and Broker Non-Votes
In order for business to be conducted at the Patrick special meeting, a quorum must be present. A quorum at the
Patrick special meeting requires the presence in person (by participation at the virtual meeting) or by proxy of the
holders of record of a majority of the shares entitled to vote. Shares that are represented at the Patrick special
meeting but abstain from voting or withhold their votes on any or all matters will be counted as shares present and
entitled to vote in determining the presence of a quorum. If a quorum is not present at the time the Patrick special
meeting is convened, Patrick may adjourn or postpone the Patrick special meeting until such time that a quorum is
25
present. Once a share of Patrick common stock is represented for any purpose at the Patrick special meeting, it is
deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the Patrick special meeting and for any adjournment of the
Patrick special meeting unless a new record date is or must be set for the adjourned meeting.
If your properly executed proxy does not contain voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote
your shares in accordance with the voting recommendations of the Patrick board.
A “broker non-vote” occurs with respect to a particular proposal when a broker, bank or other nominee of
record that holds shares for a beneficial owner (a) does not receive any voting instructions from the beneficial owner
with respect to such shares, (b) does not have discretionary authority to vote on that particular proposal and (c) does
have discretionary authority to vote on, and returns a valid proxy with respect to, another proposal presented on the
same proxy.
Under applicable stock exchange rules, brokers, banks and other nominees do not have discretionary authority
to vote on any of the Patrick proposals and will not be able to vote on any of the Patrick proposals absent
instructions from the beneficial owner. Because none of the proposals currently scheduled to be voted on at the
Patrick special meeting are routine matters for which brokers may have discretionary authority to vote, Patrick does
not expect there to be any broker non-votes at the Patrick special meeting. Accordingly, a beneficial owner who fails
to provide voting instructions to its broker, bank, or other nominee will not be considered present at the Patrick
special meeting and whose shares (i) will not count toward the presence of a quorum, (ii) will have the same effect
as a vote “AGAINST” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal and (iii) will have no effect on the outcome of
the vote on the Patrick share issuance proposal, the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal or the
Patrick adjournment proposal.
Methods of Voting (Shareholders of Record)
If you are a Patrick shareholder of record, then you can vote any one of four ways: (i) via the internet prior to
the Patrick special meeting, (ii) by telephone, (iii) by mail and (iv) via the internet during the Patrick special
meeting.
•By Internet. You may submit a proxy electronically on the internet by following the instructions provided
on the enclosed proxy card. Please have your proxy card in hand when you log onto the website. If you
submit your proxy to vote over the internet, you do not have to mail in a proxy card. If you choose to
submit your vote via proxy over the internet, you must do so prior to [ ], Eastern Time, on
[ ], 2026.
•By Telephone. You may submit a proxy by telephone by calling (from the U.S. and Canada) the toll-free
number listed on the enclosed proxy card. Please have your proxy card in hand when you call. If you
submit your proxy by telephone, you do not have to mail in a proxy card. If you choose to submit your vote
via proxy by telephone, you must do so prior to [ ], Eastern Time, on [ ], 2026. Patrick
shareholders voting by telephone should remember that the shareholder must bear costs associated with
electronic access, such as usage charges from telephone companies.
•By Mail. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you may indicate your vote by
completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid reply
envelope. Patrick shareholders who vote this way should mail the proxy card early enough so that it is
received prior to the closing of the polls at the Patrick special meeting.
•At the Meeting. You may attend the Patrick special meeting virtually and vote electronically during the
meeting by visiting [ ] and entering the unique control number on the enclosed proxy card.
If your properly executed proxy does not contain voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote
your shares in accordance with the voting recommendations of the Patrick board. We recommend that you promptly
submit your vote by proxy even if you currently plan to attend the Patrick special meeting. Voting in advance by
proxy does not preclude your opportunity to attend the special meeting and vote again via the special meeting
website.
26
Methods of Voting (Shares Held in Street Name)
If you hold your shares of Patrick common stock in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, you
will receive a voting instruction form seeking instruction from you as to how your shares should be voted. Your
broker, bank or other nominee will vote your shares only if you provide specific instructions on how to vote by
following the instructions provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee. Please check the voting
instruction form used by your broker, bank or other nominee.
If you hold shares in BOTH street name and as a shareholder of record, YOU MUST VOTE SEPARATELY
for each set of shares.
Patrick Share Issuance Proposal
The Patrick share issuance proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the Patrick share
issuance proposal at the Patrick special meeting. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have
no effect on the Patrick share issuance proposal.
The Patrick share issuance proposal is described in the section titled “Patrick Proposals” beginning on page 59
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Required Vote to Approve the Patrick Authorized Stock Increase Proposal
The Patrick authorized stock increase proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast at
the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if
any) will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal.
The Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is described in the section titled “Patrick Proposals” beginning
on page 59 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Required Vote to Approve the Patrick Articles Amendment and Restatement Proposal
The Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on
the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is
present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on
the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal.
The Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal is described in the section titled “Patrick Proposals”
beginning on page 59 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Required Vote to Approve the Patrick Adjournment Proposal
The Patrick adjournment proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the Patrick adjournment
proposal at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-
votes (if any) will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick adjournment proposal.
The Patrick adjournment proposal is described in the section titled “Patrick Proposals” beginning on page 59 of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Vote of Patrick’s Directors and Executive Officers
As of [ ], 2026, Patrick directors and executive officers, and their affiliates, as a group, owned and were
entitled to vote [ ] shares of Patrick common stock, or approximately [ ]% of the total outstanding shares of
Patrick common stock as of [ ], 2026.
Patrick currently expects that all of its directors and executive officers will vote their shares “FOR” the Patrick
share issuance proposal, “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, “FOR” the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal and “FOR” the Patrick adjournment proposal.
27
Adjournment
If a quorum is not present at the Patrick special meeting, Patrick may adjourn the Patrick special meeting from
time to time until a quorum is obtained. If a quorum is present but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
Patrick special meeting to approve the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase
proposal, then Patrick shareholders may be asked to vote on the Patrick adjournment proposal and thereby adjourn
the Patrick special meeting to a later time and place.
In addition, the merger agreement provides that if on a date that is two business days prior to the date the
Patrick special meeting is scheduled (the “Patrick Original Date”), (i) Patrick has not received proxies sufficient to
obtain approval by Patrick shareholders of the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock
increase proposal, whether or not a quorum is present, or (ii) it is necessary to ensure that any required supplement
or amendment to the joint proxy statement/prospectus is delivered to Patrick shareholders within a reasonable
amount of time in advance of the Patrick special meeting, Patrick may, or if LCI so requests, shall, postpone or
adjourn, or make one or more successive postponements or adjournments of, the Patrick special meeting, as long as
the Patrick special meeting is not postponed or adjourned more than 10 business days in connection with any one
postponement or adjournment or more than an aggregate of 20 business days from the Patrick Original Date, in each
case, excluding any adjournments or postponements required by applicable law or consented to in advance in
writing by LCI. The merger agreement further provides that in the event that LCI postpones or adjourns the LCI
special meeting in accordance with the merger agreement, Patrick may postpone or adjourn the Patrick special
meeting in order for the Patrick special meeting and the LCI special meeting to be scheduled on the same date.
At any subsequent reconvening of the Patrick special meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may
be transacted that might have been transacted at the original meeting, and all proxies will be voted in the same
manner as they would have been voted at the original convening of the Patrick special meeting, except for any
proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn prior to the time the proxy is voted at the reconvened
meeting.
Special Meeting of LCI Stockholders (page 63)
Date, Time, Place and Purpose of the LCI Special Meeting
The LCI special meeting will be held virtually on [ ], 2026, at [ ] a.m., Eastern Time. Because
the LCI special meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via live webcast, LCI stockholders will not be
able to attend the meeting in person. LCI stockholders will be able to attend the LCI special meeting online and vote
their shares electronically during the meeting by visiting [ ], which is the LCI special meeting website.
If you join the virtual LCI special meeting as an authenticated LCI stockholder by visiting the LCI special
meeting website, you will be able to attend and participate in the LCI special meeting, submit your questions during
the meeting and vote your shares online. In order to join the meeting as an authenticated stockholder and vote online
during the virtual meeting, you will need a valid control number. Your control number can be found on the proxy
card, voting instruction form, notice or email distributed to you.
The purpose of the LCI special meeting is to consider and vote on (i) the LCI merger proposal, (ii) the LCI
advisory compensation proposal, and (iii) the LCI adjournment proposal. Approval of the LCI merger proposal is a
condition to consummation of the merger. Approval of the LCI advisory compensation proposal and approval of the
LCI adjournment proposal are not conditions to the consummation of the merger.
Record Date and Outstanding Shares of LCI Common Stock
Only holders of record of shares of LCI common stock as of the close of business on [ ], 2026, the
record date for the LCI special meeting (which we refer to as the “LCI record date”), are entitled to receive notice of,
and to vote the shares of LCI common stock that they held on the LCI record date at, the LCI special meeting and
any postponement or adjournment of the LCI special meeting.
28
As of the close of business on the LCI record date, there were [ ] shares of LCI common stock
outstanding and entitled to be voted at the LCI special meeting. Each share of LCI common stock entitles its holder
of record to one vote on each matter considered at the LCI special meeting.
A list of LCI stockholders of record entitled to vote at the LCI special meeting will be available for inspection
by LCI stockholders for any purpose germane to the LCI special meeting at LCI’s principal place of business, which
is located at 3501 County Road 6 East, Elkhart, Indiana 46514, during ordinary business hours for a period of no
less than ten days before the LCI special meeting.
Quorum
In order for business to be conducted at the LCI special meeting, a quorum must be present. A quorum at the
LCI special meeting requires the presence in person (by participation at the virtual meeting) or by proxy of the
holders of record of a majority of the shares of LCI common stock entitled to vote.
As of the LCI record date, [ ] shares of LCI common stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at
the LCI special meeting; accordingly, the presence, in person (virtually) or by proxy, at the LCI special meeting of at
least [ ] shares of LCI common stock entitled to vote at the LCI special meeting is necessary to constitute a
quorum.
Methods of Voting (Stockholders of Record)
LCI stockholders of record may vote their shares electronically during the virtual LCI special meeting by
attending the meeting and following the voting instructions provided during the meeting or submit a proxy to have
their shares voted by internet, telephone or by mail.
•By Internet. You may submit a proxy electronically on the internet by following the instructions provided
on the enclosed proxy card. Please have your proxy card in hand when you log onto the website. If you
submit your proxy to vote over the internet, you do not have to mail in a proxy card. If you choose to
submit your vote via proxy over the internet, you must do so prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on
[ ], 2026.
•By Telephone. You may submit a proxy by telephone by calling (from the U.S. and Canada only) the toll-
free number listed on the enclosed proxy card and following the recorded instructions. Please have your
proxy card in hand when you call. If you submit your proxy by telephone, you do not have to mail in a
proxy card. If you choose to submit your vote via proxy by telephone, you must do so prior to 11:59 p.m.,
Eastern Time, on [ ], 2026.
•By Mail. You may submit a proxy by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning
it by mail in the enclosed postage-paid reply envelope. The envelope requires no additional postage if
mailed in the United States. If you intend to submit your proxy by mail, your completed proxy card must be
received prior to the LCI special meeting.
•Attending and Voting at the Meeting. If you join the virtual LCI special meeting as an authenticated LCI
stockholder by visiting the LCI special meeting website, you will be able to vote your shares online during
the meeting. In order to join the meeting as an authenticated stockholder and vote online during the virtual
meeting, you will need a valid control number, which can be found on the proxy card, voting instruction
form, notice or email distributed to you
If you submit a proxy, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions.
If your properly executed proxy does not contain voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote your
shares in accordance with the voting recommendations of the LCI board.
Methods of Voting (Shares Held in Street Name)
If your shares are held in street name (that is, in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee), you should
receive a voting instruction form seeking instruction from you as to how your shares should be voted. Your broker,
29
bank or other nominee will vote your shares only if you provide specific instructions on how to vote by following
the instructions provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee. Please check the voting instruction form
used by your broker, bank or other nominee.
Street name stockholders may generally vote their shares or submit a proxy to have their shares voted by one of
the following methods:
•By the Methods Listed on the Voting Instruction Form: Please refer to the voting instruction form or other
information forwarded by your broker, bank or other nominee to determine whether you may submit a
proxy by telephone or on the internet and follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other
nominee.
•Electronically at the Special Meeting. You may vote electronically at the LCI special meeting. To
participate in the virtual LCI special meeting, you will need the control number included in your voting
instruction form.
If your shares are held in street name and you wish to revoke a proxy, you should contact your broker, bank or
other nominee and follow its procedures for changing your voting instructions.
If you hold shares in BOTH street name and as a stockholder of record, YOU MUST VOTE
SEPARATELY for each set of shares.
Required Vote to Approve the LCI Merger Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock entitled to vote
on the LCI merger proposal is required to approve such proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and failures by LCI
stockholders to vote on the LCI merger proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI merger
proposal.
The LCI merger proposal is described in the section titled “LCI Proposals” beginning on page 69 of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Required Vote to Approve the LCI Advisory Compensation Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock which are
present in person (virtually) or represented by proxy at the LCI special meeting and entitled to vote on the LCI
advisory compensation proposal is required to approve such proposal on an advisory basis. Abstentions will have the
same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI advisory compensation proposal. Broker non-votes and failures by LCI
stockholders to vote on the LCI advisory compensation proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on
the LCI advisory compensation proposal.
The LCI advisory compensation proposal is described in the section titled “LCI Proposals” beginning on page
69 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Required Vote to Approve the LCI Adjournment Proposal
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock which are
present in person (virtually) or represented by proxy at the LCI special meeting and entitled to vote on the LCI
adjournment proposal is required to approve such proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
“AGAINST” the LCI adjournment proposal. Broker non-votes and failures by LCI stockholders to vote on the LCI
adjournment proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the LCI adjournment proposal.
The LCI adjournment proposal is described in the section titled “LCI Proposals” beginning on page 69 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
30
Vote of LCI’s Directors and Executive Officers
As of the LCI record date, LCI’s directors and executive officers, and their affiliates, as a group, beneficially
owned and were entitled to vote [ ] shares of LCI common stock, or approximately [ ]% of the total
outstanding shares of LCI common stock as of the LCI record date.
LCI’s directors and executive officers have informed LCI that they intend to vote their shares “FOR” each of
the LCI proposals, although none of them are obligated to do so.
Adjournment
In accordance with the amended and restated bylaws of LCI (the “LCI bylaws”), whether or not a quorum is
present, the LCI special meeting may be adjourned from time to time by the Chairperson of the LCI board, the Vice
Chairperson of the LCI board, LCI’s Chief Executive Officer (if also a member of the LCI board) or the chairperson
of the LCI special meeting selected by the LCI board, to reconvene at the same or some other place (if any), for the
purpose of, among other things, soliciting additional proxies. If the LCI special meeting is adjourned, LCI
stockholders who have already submitted their proxies will be able to revoke them at any time prior to their use. At
any subsequent reconvening of the LCI special meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as the manner
in which such proxies would have been voted at the original convening of the LCI special meeting, except for any
proxies that have been validly revoked or withdrawn prior to the subsequent meeting.
The merger agreement provides that if on a date that is two business days prior to the date the LCI special
meeting is scheduled (the “LCI Original Date”), (i) LCI has not received proxies sufficient to obtain approval by
LCI stockholders of the LCI merger proposal, whether or not a quorum is present, or (ii) it is necessary to ensure
that any required supplement or amendment to the joint proxy statement/prospectus is delivered to LCI stockholders
within a reasonable amount of time in advance of the LCI special meeting, LCI may, or if Patrick so requests, shall,
postpone or adjourn, or make one or more successive postponements or adjournments of, the LCI special meeting, as
long as the LCI special meeting is not postponed or adjourned more than 10 business days in connection with any
one postponement or adjournment or more than an aggregate of 20 business days from the LCI Original Date, in
each case, excluding any adjournments or postponements required by applicable law or consented to in advance in
writing by Patrick. The merger agreement further provides that in the event that Patrick postpones or adjourns the
Patrick special meeting in accordance with the merger agreement, LCI may postpone or adjourn the LCI special
meeting in order for the LCI special meeting and the Patrick special meeting to be scheduled on the same date.
Board of Directors of the Combined Company Following the Consummation of the Merger (page 91)
The combined company board will have 12 members, comprised of (a) six directors from among the members
of the Patrick board as of immediately prior to the first effective time, four of which will be designated by the
Patrick board prior to the first effective time and two of which will be Andy L. Nemeth, the current Chief Executive
Officer of Patrick and Chairman of the Patrick board, and Todd M. Cleveland, a current director on the Patrick
board, and (b) six directors from among the members of the LCI board as of immediately prior to the first effective
time, five of which will be designated by the LCI board prior to the first effective time and one of which will be
John A. Sirpilla, the current Interim Chief Executive Officer of LCI, provided that, in each case, the individuals are
members of their respective company’s board immediately prior to the first effective time.
From the closing of the merger until the second anniversary of the closing, any vacancy on the board of
directors of the combined company may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in
office and shall be based upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board.
Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger (page 128)
In considering the recommendation of the Patrick board with respect to the Patrick share issuance proposal, the
Patrick authorized stock increase proposal and the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal, and the
Patrick adjournment proposal, Patrick shareholders should be aware that the directors and executive officers of
Patrick have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Patrick
shareholders, generally. The members of the Patrick board were aware of and considered these interests, among
31
other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement, in approving the merger agreement and in
determining to recommend that Patrick shareholders approve the Patrick share issuance proposal, the Patrick
authorized stock increase proposal and the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal and the Patrick
adjournment proposal. These interests include:
•the potential continued employment of certain executive officers of Patrick in the combined company and
the potential appointment of certain Patrick directors and executive officers as directors of the combined
company, as further described in “The Merger—Governance of the Combined Company Following the
Consummation of the Merger” beginning on page 90 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus;
•rights to continuing indemnification and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance;
•Todd M. Cleveland, a director on the Patrick board, is affiliated with two companies that engage in
ordinary course business with LCI;
•M. Scott Welch, a director on the Patrick board, is affiliated with two companies that hold an aggregate
15,700 shares of LCI common stock, and one of such companies engages in ordinary course business with
LCI;
•the treatment of Patrick equity awards provided for under the merger agreement as further described in the
section titled “The Merger—Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—
Treatment of Patrick Equity-Based Awards”; and
•certain cash severance entitlements and other benefits payable and/or provided in the event of certain
qualifying terminations of employment following the closing of the merger, as further described in “The
Merger—Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 128 of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger (page 134)
In considering the recommendation of the LCI board with respect to the LCI merger proposal, the LCI advisory
compensation proposal and the LCI adjournment proposal, LCI stockholders should be aware that the directors and
executive officers of LCI have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of
LCI stockholders generally. The members of the LCI board were aware of and considered these interests, among
other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement, in approving the merger agreement and in
determining to recommend that LCI stockholders approve the LCI merger proposal, the LCI advisory compensation
proposal and the LCI adjournment proposal. These interests include, among others:
•the potential continued employment of certain executive officers of LCI in the combined company, the
potential appointment of certain LCI directors and executive officers as directors of the combined
company;
•rights to continuing indemnification and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance;
•certain vested payments or benefits becoming payable in connection with the closing of the first merger;
•the treatment of LCI equity awards provided for under the merger agreement as further described in the
section titled “The Merger—Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of
LCI Equity-Based Awards” beginning on page 135 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus; and
•certain severance and other benefits payable in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment
following the closing of the merger, as further described in the section titled “The Merger—Interests of LCI
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to
LCI’s Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 133of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
32
Conditions to the Closing of the Merger (page 162)
The respective obligations of each party to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver on or prior
to the closing of the following conditions:
•the approval of (a) the LCI merger proposal by LCI stockholders and (b) the Patrick share issuance
proposal and Patrick authorized stock increase proposal by Patrick shareholders;
•the receipt of the required regulatory approvals;
•the absence of any legal restraint in effect that prevents, enjoins or prohibits the consummation of the
merger;
•the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part
and the absence of any stop order suspending the effectiveness of the registration statement, and no
proceedings for such purpose having been initiated or threatened by the SEC;
•the approval for listing on the Nasdaq, subject to official notice of issuance, of the shares of Patrick
common stock to be issued as merger consideration;
•the representations and warranties of the other party (or parties, with respect to LCI) contained in the
merger agreement being true and correct as of the date on which the merger agreement was entered into and
as of the date on which the merger is completed, subject to the materiality standards provided in the merger
agreement (and the receipt of a certificate duly executed by an executive officer of LCI or Patrick, as
applicable, to such effect);
•performance by Patrick, First Merger Sub, Second Merger Sub or LCI, as applicable, in all material
respects of all obligations required to be performed by them at or prior to the closing under the merger
agreement (and the receipt of a certificate duly executed by an executive officer of LCI or Patrick, as
applicable, to such effect); and
•the receipt by LCI of an opinion of tax counsel to the effect that the first merger and the second merger,
taken together, will be treated as a single integrated transaction that will qualify as a “reorganization”
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
We cannot be certain when, or if, the conditions to the merger will be satisfied or waived, or that the merger will
be completed.
No Solicitation (page 158)
The merger agreement generally restricts the ability of Patrick or LCI to directly or indirectly solicit takeover
proposals from third parties (including by furnishing non-public information), participate in discussions or
negotiations with third parties regarding any takeover proposal, approve or recommend any takeover proposal or
enter into agreements providing for or relating to any takeover proposal. Under certain circumstances, however, and
in compliance with certain obligations contained in the merger agreement and described in the section titled “The
Merger Agreement—No Solicitation of Alternative Transactions” beginning on page 158 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, each of Patrick and LCI is permitted, prior to receipt of its applicable shareholder or
stockholder approval, to engage in negotiations with, and provide information to, third parties that have made an
unsolicited written takeover proposal after the date of the merger agreement upon the determination by the
respective board, in good faith and after consultation with outside legal counsel and a financial advisor of nationally
recognized reputation, that such takeover proposal constitutes or would reasonably be expected to result in a
superior proposal, that the failure to take such action would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with the
applicable directors’ fiduciary duties pursuant to applicable law and that such takeover proposal did not result from a
breach of the applicable party’s non-solicitation obligations under the merger agreement.
33
Termination (page 163)
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the first effective time, whether before or after
receipt of the LCI stockholder approval or applicable Patrick shareholder approval:
•By the mutual written consent of Patrick and LCI.
•By either Patrick or LCI if:
◦the merger has not been completed on or before March 30, 2027 (which we refer to as the “outside
date”); provided that if the closing has not occurred by the outside date but on that date the only
conditions not satisfied are those related to certain regulatory approvals or the absence of a legal
restraint related to antitrust laws or foreign investment laws, (but all other conditions have been
satisfied or waived), then the outside date will automatically be extended to June 30, 2027, and such
date will be the “outside date” for the purposes of the merger agreement; provided, further, that if the
closing has not occurred by such extended outside date, then the extended outside date will be further
automatically extended to September 30, 2027, and such date will be the “outside date” for the
purposes of the merger agreement; provided, further, that if such failure to close on or before the
outside date, as it may be extended, is the primary result of a party’s failure to perform any of its
material obligations under the merger agreement, then the termination right described in this bullet is
not available to such party (including, in the case of Patrick, First Merger Sub or Second Merger Sub);
◦any legal restraint that enjoins or otherwise prohibits consummation of the merger has become final
and non-appealable; (provided that if the imposition of such legal restraint was primarily due to or
primarily caused by the failure of a party to perform any of its obligations under the merger agreement,
then the termination right described in this bullet is not available to such party);
◦either the approval of the Patrick share issuance proposal or the approval of the Patrick authorized
stock increase proposal has not been obtained at the Patrick special meeting; or
◦the LCI stockholder approval has not been obtained at the LCI special meeting.
•By Patrick if:
◦LCI has breached its representations, warranties or covenants such that a closing condition would not
be satisfied, and such breach is not cured within 30 days following written notice thereof and 3 days
prior to the outside date (provided that Patrick is not then in material breach of its own obligations
under the merger agreement); or
◦prior to the LCI stockholder approval, the LCI board has made an LCI adverse recommendation
change.
•By LCI if:
◦Patrick, First Merger Sub or Second Merger Sub has breached or failed to perform any of its
representations, warranties or covenants such that a closing condition would not be satisfied, and such
breach is not cured within 30 days following written notice thereof and 3 days prior to the outside date
(provided that LCI is not then in material breach of its own obligations under the merger agreement);
or
◦prior to the Patrick shareholder approval, the Patrick board has made a Patrick adverse
recommendation change.
If the merger agreement is terminated, it will become void, without liability on the part of any party, except in
the case of fraud or a willful breach of the merger agreement prior to termination, (which liability may include
damages based on loss of the economic benefit of the merger). Certain provisions will survive termination, including
34
those relating to confidentiality, the effect of termination, payment of termination fees and expenses and governing
law.
Termination Fees; Expenses (page 165)
If the merger agreement is terminated by either Patrick or LCI under certain circumstances, including
circumstances involving takeover proposals and changes in the recommendation of its board, Patrick or LCI may be
required to pay a termination fee to the other equal to $94,200,000.
No Appraisal Rights (page 127)
Under Indiana law, Patrick shareholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger.
Under Delaware law, LCI stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights for their shares of LCI common stock
in connection with the transactions contemplated by the LCI merger proposal or to any similar rights of dissenters
under Delaware law. For more information, see “The Merger—No Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 127 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Regulatory Approvals (page 127)
U.S. Antitrust Clearance
The consummation of the merger is subject to the receipt of antitrust clearance in the United States. Under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (which we refer to as the “HSR Act”), and the
rules promulgated thereunder, the merger may not be completed until notification and report forms have been filed
with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice (which we refer to as the “FTC” and the “DOJ,”
respectively), and the applicable waiting period (or any extensions of such waiting period) has expired or been
terminated. For additional information regarding regulatory approvals in connection with the merger, see the section
titled “The Merger Agreement—Covenants and Agreements—Efforts to Complete the Merger.”
Most transactions notifiable under the HSR Act may not be completed until the expiration of a 30-calendar-day
waiting period following the parties’ filings of their respective HSR notification and report forms. If the Antitrust
Division of the DOJ or the FTC issues a request for additional information and documentary material (which we
refer to as a “second request”) prior to the expiration of the 30-calendar-day waiting period (or after an additional
30-calendar day waiting period if the parties pull and refile their HSR notification period), the transaction cannot
close until the parties observe a second 30-calendar-day waiting period, which would begin to run only after both
parties have substantially complied with the second request, unless such second waiting period is terminated earlier.
On August 5, 2026, Patrick and LCI each filed their respective Premerger Notification and Report Forms
(which we refer to as “HSR Act notifications”) pursuant to the HSR Act with the FTC and the DOJ in connection
with the merger. On September 4, 2026, Patrick and LCI each voluntarily withdrew their respective HSR Act
notifications and, on September 9, 2026, refiled their respective HSR Act notifications with the FTC and the DOJ.
The refilings initiated a new waiting period under the HSR Act.
Non-U.S. Antitrust Clearance and Regulatory Approvals
Patrick and LCI derive revenues, have assets or other presence in jurisdictions outside the United States where
merger control, foreign investment, or foreign subsidies filings or clearances may be necessary or recommended. In
addition to antitrust approval in the United States, Patrick and LCI will seek the receipt of applicable governmental
consents, approvals, and other clearances required to be obtained under the merger agreement. The merger cannot be
consummated until the closing conditions relating to the applicable filings or clearances in the required jurisdictions
have been satisfied or waived.
35
Specific Performance; Remedies (page 166)
The parties to the merger agreement have agreed that each party is entitled to an injunction and specific
performance to prevent breaches of the merger agreement and to enforce its terms, in addition to any other remedy
to which such party may be entitled.
Litigation Related to the Merger (page 141)
Although neither Patrick nor LCI is aware of any pending lawsuits relating to the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, lawsuits arising out of or in connection
with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement could be filed in the future.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (page 168)
The parties intend that the merger be treated as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. It is a condition to LCI’s obligation to complete the merger that LCI receive an opinion from Kirkland & Ellis
LLP (or other tax counsel), dated as of the closing date, to the effect that the first merger and the second merger,
taken together, will be treated as a single integrated transaction that will qualify as a “reorganization” within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. Assuming the merger so qualifies, a U.S. holder (as defined in “Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger”) that exchanges all of its LCI common stock for the merger
consideration in the first merger will not recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for
any gain or loss that may result from the receipt of cash instead of a fractional share of Patrick common stock as
described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.”
You should read the discussion under the section titled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger” for a further discussion of U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the merger. Tax matters can be
complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to any particular holder will depend on that holder’s particular
facts and circumstances. Accordingly, you are urged to consult your own tax advisor to determine the tax
consequences to you of the merger.
Comparison of Shareholders’ / Stockholders’ Rights (page 192)
If the merger is completed, holders of LCI common stock will receive shares of Patrick common stock in
exchange for their shares of LCI common stock. Patrick is incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana and is
subject to the Indiana Business Corporation Law (which we refer to as the “IBCL”). LCI is incorporated under the
laws of the State of Delaware and is subject to the Delaware General Corporation Law (which we refer to as the
“DGCL”). Following completion of the merger and assuming the Patrick shareholders adopt and approve the Patrick
articles amendment and restatement proposal, the combined company will continue to be an Indiana corporation and
will be governed by the IBCL, together with the combined company’s amended and restated articles of
incorporation in the form attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B (which we refer to as the
“combined company articles”) and the combined company’s amended and restated bylaws in the form attached to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C (which we refer to as the “combined company bylaws”). As a
result, upon completion of the merger, former LCI stockholders who receive shares of Patrick common stock will
become shareholders of an Indiana corporation, and their rights will change from being governed by the DGCL and
LCI’s existing certificate of incorporation and bylaws to being governed by the IBCL and the combined company
articles and combined company bylaws. The differences in the rights of each such holder of LCI common stock
receiving shares of Patrick common stock in the merger are described in detail in the section titled “Comparison of
Shareholders’ / Stockholders’ Rights” beginning on page 192 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Listing of Patrick Common Stock; Delisting and Deregistration of LCI Common Stock (page 140)
If the merger is completed, the shares of Patrick common stock to be issued in the merger will be listed for
trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “PATK” and the shares of LCI common stock will be delisted from
the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act and LCI will not be required to file periodic reports with the
SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act.
36
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Market Prices
The Patrick common stock is listed on the Nasdaq under the symbol “PATK.” The LCI common stock is listed
on the NYSE under the symbol “LCII.”
The high and low trading prices for the Patrick common stock on June 29, 2026, the last trading day
immediately before the public announcement of the merger, were $95.01 and $91.25, respectively. The high and low
trading prices for the LCI common stock on June 29, 2026, the last trading day immediately before the public
announcement of the merger, were $100.87 and $94.25, respectively.
As of [ ], 2026, the last date before the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus for which it was
practicable to obtain this information, there were [ ] shares of Patrick common stock outstanding and
[ ] shares of LCI common stock outstanding.
Because the exchange ratio will not be adjusted for changes in the market price of either Patrick common stock
or LCI common stock, the market value of Patrick common stock that LCI stockholders will have the right to
receive on the date the merger is completed may vary significantly from the market value of the Patrick common
stock that LCI stockholders would receive if the merger was completed on the date of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus. As a result, you should obtain recent market prices of Patrick common stock and LCI common stock
prior to voting your shares. For additional information, see the section titled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 38 of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The following table sets forth the closing sale price per share of Patrick common stock as reported on the
Nasdaq and the closing sale price per share of LCI common stock as reported on the NYSE, in each case on June 29,
2026, the last trading day before the public announcement of the parties entering into the merger agreement, and on
[ ], 2026, the last practicable trading day prior to the mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The
table also shows the estimated implied value of the merger consideration proposed for each share of LCI common
stock as of the same two dates. The implied value was calculated by multiplying the Nasdaq closing price of a share
of Patrick common stock on the relevant date by the exchange ratio of 1.2440 shares of Patrick common stock for
each share of LCI common stock.
Patrick Common Stock Closing Price | LCI Common Stock Closing Price | Exchange Ratio | Implied Per Share Value of Merger Consideration | ||||
June 29, 2026 | $93.18 | $100.12 | 1.2440 | $115.92 | |||
[ ], 2026 | $[ ] | $[ ] | 1.2440 | $[ ] |
Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for Patrick
common stock and LCI common stock and to review carefully the other information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or incorporated by reference herein. No assurance can be given concerning the market price of
Patrick common stock before or after the effective date of the merger. For additional information, see the section
titled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Dividends
Patrick currently pays a quarterly dividend on Patrick common stock. Patrick last paid a quarterly dividend of
$0.47 per share of Patrick common stock on September 8, 2026. The terms of the merger agreement limit Patrick’s
ability to declare or pay additional dividends, except for regular quarterly cash dividends in an amount not to exceed
$0.47 per share per quarter declared and paid in respect of the Patrick common stock at such times and in a manner
consistent with Patrick’s historical quarterly dividend practice, prior to the consummation of the merger.
LCI currently pays a quarterly dividend on LCI common stock. LCI last paid a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per
share of LCI common stock on September 4, 2026. The terms of the merger agreement limit LCI’s ability to declare
or pay additional dividends, except for regular quarterly cash dividends in an amount not to exceed $1.15 per share
37
per quarter declared and paid in respect of the LCI common stock at such times and in a manner consistent with
LCI’s historical quarterly dividend practice, prior to the consummation of the merger.
The dividend policies of Patrick or LCI may change at any time at the discretion of the respective company’s
board and without notice to the respective company’s shareholders or stockholders.
38
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained in or incorporated by reference herein, including the matters
addressed in the section titled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page
51 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, you should carefully consider the following risks before deciding how to
vote. You should also consider the other information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the other
documents incorporated by reference herein, particularly the risk factors contained in the Annual Reports on Form
10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed by each of Patrick and LCI. For additional information, see
“Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In
addition to the risks set forth below or referenced above, new risks may emerge from time to time and it is not
possible to predict all risk factors, nor can Patrick or LCI assess the impact of all factors on the merger and the
combined company following the merger or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause
actual results to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statements.
Risks Relating to the Merger
The number of shares of Patrick common stock issuable in the merger in respect of one share of LCI common
stock is fixed and will not be adjusted. Because the market price of Patrick common stock may fluctuate, LCI
stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of the merger consideration they will receive in exchange for
their shares in connection with the merger.
At the time the merger is completed, each issued and outstanding eligible share of LCI common stock will be
converted into the right to receive the merger consideration, which consists of 1.2440 shares of Patrick common
stock. The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect stock price changes of either LCI common stock
or Patrick common stock prior to the closing of the merger. Accordingly, the market value of the merger
consideration that LCI stockholders will receive in the merger will vary based on the price of Patrick common stock
at the time LCI stockholders receive the merger consideration, and, accordingly, LCI stockholders cannot be sure of
the market value of the merger consideration they will receive upon the closing of the merger. The market price of
Patrick common stock has fluctuated since the date on which Patrick and LCI announced they had entered into the
merger agreement and will continue to fluctuate from the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus through the
date the merger is completed, which could occur a considerable amount of time after the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Changes in the price of Patrick common stock may result from a variety of factors, including
general market and economic conditions, changes in Patrick’s and LCI’s businesses, operations and prospects,
changes in market assessments of the likelihood that the merger will be completed or the value that may be
generated by the merger, changes with respect to expectations regarding the timing of the merger and regulatory
considerations. Many of these factors are beyond Patrick’s and LCI’s control.
Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders, in each case as of immediately prior to the merger, will have reduced
ownership in the combined company and less influence over management.
Based on the number of issued and outstanding shares of LCI common stock as of [ ], Patrick
anticipates issuing up to approximately [ ] shares of Patrick common stock pursuant to the merger
agreement. The actual number of shares of Patrick common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger agreement will
be determined at the closing of the merger based on the number of shares of LCI common stock outstanding
immediately prior to the merger. The issuance of these new shares could have the effect of depressing the market
price of Patrick common stock, through dilution of earnings per share or otherwise. Any dilution of, or delay of any
accretion to, Patrick’s earnings per share could cause the price of Patrick common stock to decline or increase at a
reduced rate.
Immediately after the closing of the merger, it is expected that Patrick shareholders as of immediately prior to
the merger will own approximately 52%, and LCI stockholders as of immediately prior to the merger will own
approximately 48%, of the issued and outstanding shares of the combined company’s common stock, in each case
calculated based on the fully diluted market capitalizations of Patrick and LCI as of the date of signing of the merger
agreement. As a result, current Patrick shareholders and current LCI stockholders will have less influence on the
39
management and policies of the combined company than they currently have on the management and policies of
Patrick and LCI, respectively.
Conversion of LCI's 2030 Notes following the merger could result in dilution to combined company
shareholders.
LCI has $460 million in aggregate principal amount of 2030 Notes outstanding. Following the consummation of
the merger, the 2030 Notes are expected to remain outstanding but will, in accordance with the terms of the
indenture governing the 2030 Notes, contain a right of holders to convert into shares of Patrick common stock rather
than shares of LCI common stock. The 2030 Notes are convertible at the option of the holders prior to November 1,
2029 under certain circumstances, including when the trading price of the 2030 Notes falls below a specified
threshold or when the last reported sale price of the underlying common stock exceeds 130% of the conversion price
for a specified period. On or after November 1, 2029, the 2030 Notes are convertible at any time at the option of the
holders regardless of these conditions. The combined company will settle conversions by paying cash up to the
aggregate principal amount of the 2030 Notes being converted and paying or delivering, as the case may be, cash,
shares of Patrick common stock or a combination thereof, at its election, in respect of the remainder, if any, of its
conversion obligation in excess of the aggregate principal amount of the 2030 Notes being converted, based on the
then applicable conversion rate.
Accordingly, if some or all of the 2030 Notes are converted into shares of Patrick common stock following the
merger, existing combined company shareholders would experience dilution to their ownership interest (which, in
the case of pre-merger Patrick shareholders, would represent additional dilution beyond the dilution they will
experience as a result of the issuance of shares as merger consideration at the closing of the merger). The extent and
timing of any such dilution is uncertain and will depend on whether and when 2030 Notes are converted and on the
market price of Patrick common stock at the time of any such conversions. In addition, in connection with the
issuance of the 2030 Notes, LCI entered into convertible note hedge transactions and warrant transactions with
certain financial institutions. The convertible note hedge transactions and warrant transactions, taken together, are
expected generally to reduce the potential equity dilution and/or offset any cash payments the combined company is
required to make, as the case may be, resulting from conversion of the 2030 Notes. The warrants mature over a
period of approximately six months following the maturity date of the 2030 Notes and the bond hedges. As a result,
if the market price per share of Patrick common stock exceeds the strike price of the warrants at their maturity and
the combined company elects to settle the warrants by the delivery of shares of Patrick common stock, such
settlements would have an independent dilutive effect on the combined company’s outstanding common stock.
The merger may not be completed and the merger agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms.
The merger is subject to a number of conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to the closing of the
merger, which are described in the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger”
beginning on page 162 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. These conditions to the consummation of the merger
may not be satisfied or waived in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the merger may be delayed or may not
be completed.
In addition, if the merger is not completed by March 30, 2027 (subject to automatic extensions under certain
circumstances described in the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Termination of the Merger Agreement”
beginning on page 163 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus), either Patrick or LCI may choose not to proceed
with the merger by terminating the merger agreement, and the parties can mutually decide to terminate the merger
agreement at any time, before or after shareholder approval by either Patrick shareholders or LCI stockholders. In
addition, Patrick and LCI may elect to terminate the merger agreement in certain other circumstances as further
detailed in “The Merger Agreement—Termination.”
The merger agreement limits the ability of either Patrick or LCI to pursue alternatives to the merger, may
discourage other companies from making favorable alternative transaction proposals and, in specified
circumstances, could require either Patrick or LCI to pay the other a termination fee.
The merger agreement contains provisions that may discourage a potential third-party acquirer that might have
an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of either Patrick or LCI from considering or submitting to either
40
Patrick or LCI a competing proposal that might result in greater value to their respective shareholders or
stockholders than the merger, or may result in a potential acquirer of Patrick, or a potential competing acquirer of
LCI, proposing to pay a lower price per share to acquire Patrick or LCI, respectively, than it might otherwise have
proposed to pay. These provisions include a general prohibition on Patrick and LCI from soliciting or, subject to
certain exceptions relating to the exercise of fiduciary duties by the Patrick board or the LCI board, as the case may
be, entering into discussions with any third party regarding any competing proposal or offer for a competing
transaction. Furthermore, even if the Patrick board or the LCI board withdraws, qualifies or modifies its
recommendation with respect to the Patrick share issuance proposal and/or the Patrick authorized stock increase
proposal, in the case of the Patrick board, or the LCI merger proposal, in the case of the LCI board, unless the
merger agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, each of Patrick and LCI will still be required to
submit the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, in the case of the
Patrick board, and the LCI merger proposal, in the case of the LCI board, to a vote by the Patrick shareholders and
the LCI stockholders, respectively. The merger agreement further provides that under specified circumstances,
including after a change of recommendation by either party’s board of directors and a subsequent termination of the
merger agreement by the other party in accordance with its terms, Patrick or LCI, as applicable, may be required to
pay the other party a cash termination fee of $94.2 million.
For additional information, see “The Merger Agreement—Covenants and Agreements—No Solicitation” and
“The Merger Agreement—Termination” beginning on pages 158 and 163, respectively, of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus.
Failure to complete the merger, or a delay in the closing of the merger, could negatively impact Patrick’s or
LCI’s respective businesses, results of operations, financial conditions and stock prices.
The merger agreement is subject to a number of conditions that must be fulfilled to complete the merger. Those
conditions include, among others, (i) the approval by Patrick shareholders of the Patrick share issuance proposal and
the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, (ii) the approval by LCI stockholders of the LCI merger proposal,
(iii) the termination or expiration of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of
1976, as amended (and any timing agreement with the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice, as
applicable, shall have terminated or expired), (iv) the receipt by LCI of an opinion of tax counsel to the effect that
the first merger and the second merger, taken together, will be treated as a single integrated transaction that will
qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, and (v) the receipt of any other
regulatory approvals. A number of the conditions are not within the control of Patrick or LCI and may prevent, delay
or otherwise materially adversely affect the closing of the merger. Neither Patrick nor LCI can predict with certainty
whether and when any of the required closing conditions will be satisfied or if another uncertainty may arise, and
neither can assure you that it will be able to timely complete the merger as currently contemplated under the merger
agreement or at all. Patrick’s and LCI’s respective businesses, results of operations, financial conditions or stock
prices could be adversely affected, potentially in a material way, by the failure to complete the merger, or by a delay
in the closing of the merger, and Patrick or LCI may suffer consequences that could adversely affect their respective
businesses, results of operations, financial conditions and stock prices, including the following:
•Patrick and LCI may not realize any or all of the potential benefits of the merger, including any synergies
that could result from combining their financial and business resources;
•matters relating to the merger will require substantial commitments of time and resources by Patrick and
LCI management, which would otherwise have been devoted to day-to-day operations and other
opportunities that may have been beneficial to Patrick or LCI as independent companies;
•Patrick and LCI have each incurred and will incur further substantial expenses in connection with the
merger, including financial advisory, legal, accounting, consulting and other advisory fees, severance/
retention employee benefit-related costs and other regulatory fees and other costs relating to the merger
regardless of whether the merger is completed;
•Patrick or LCI may be subject to legal proceedings related to the potential delay of, or failure to complete,
the merger;
41
•Patrick or LCI may experience disruptions to their respective businesses resulting from the announcement
and pendency of the merger, including adverse changes in relationships with, or loss of, customers,
business partners and employees, which may not be reversible and may continue or even intensify in the
event the merger is delayed or not completed;
•Patrick or LCI may experience negative reactions to the merger, including if the merger is not completed,
from the financial markets, including negative impacts on the market prices of Patrick common stock and
LCI common stock; and
•under the merger agreement, Patrick and LCI are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of their
respective businesses prior to completing the merger, which restrictions could adversely affect their ability
to conduct their respective businesses as they otherwise would have done if not subject to these restrictions.
In addition to the above risks, if the merger agreement is terminated under specified circumstances, either
Patrick or LCI may be required to pay the other a termination fee of $94.2 million. For a description of these
circumstances, see “The Merger Agreement—Termination” beginning on page 163 of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus. For a description of the conditions required to be satisfied or waived to consummate the merger, see
“The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger” beginning on page 162 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Patrick directors and executive officers and LCI directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger
that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders generally.
Certain Patrick directors and executive officers and LCI directors and executive officers may have interests in
the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders
generally. These interests include, among others, the potential continued employment of certain executive officers of
Patrick and LCI in the combined company, the potential appointment or continued service (as applicable) of certain
Patrick and LCI directors and executive officers as directors of the combined company, rights to continuing
indemnification and directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, certain vested payments or benefits becoming
payable in connection with the closing of the merger, the treatment of Patrick and LCI equity awards provided for
under the merger agreement as further described in the sections titled “The Merger—Interests of Patrick Directors
and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of Patrick Equity-Based Awards” and “The Merger—Interests of
LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of LCI Equity-Based Awards” beginning on pages
129 and 135, respectively, of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and certain severance and other benefits payable
in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment following the closing of the merger, as further
described in the sections titled “The Merger—Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger”
and “The Merger—Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on pages 128 and
134, respectively, of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The Patrick board and the LCI board were aware of and
considered, among other matters, the interests of their respective directors and officers when overseeing the
negotiation of and evaluating the terms of the merger agreement and structure of the merger and when determining
their respective recommendations to their respective shareholders or stockholders, as applicable.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information included in this joint proxy statement/
prospectus is based on a number of preliminary estimates and assumptions. After the merger, the future results of
the combined company may differ, possibly materially, from the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information contained in this joint proxy statement/
prospectus is presented for illustrative purposes only, is based on a variety of adjustments, assumptions and
preliminary estimates and may not be an indication of the financial position or results of operations of the combined
company following the merger for several reasons. Specifically, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial information does not reflect the effect of any potential acquisitions, divestitures or restructurings that may
occur prior to or subsequent to the closing of the merger or integration costs in connection with any such
acquisitions. In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared with
the assumption that Patrick will be identified as the acquirer under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
42
(which we refer to as “GAAP”) and reflects adjustments based upon preliminary estimates of the fair value of assets
to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed. For additional information, see “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Combined Financial Information” beginning on page 172 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, the
merger and post-merger integration process may give rise to unexpected liabilities and costs, including costs
associated with the defense and resolution of transaction-related litigation or other claims. Unexpected delays in
completing the merger or in connection with the post-merger integration process may significantly increase the
related costs and expenses incurred by the combined company. The actual financial position and results of
operations of the combined company following the merger may not be consistent with, or evident from, the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In
addition, the assumptions used in preparing the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information
included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus may not prove to be accurate and may be affected by other factors,
including the risk factors described in the sections titled “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Patrick’s Business” and
“Risk Factors—Risks Relating to LCI’s Business” below. Any potential decline in the financial condition or results
of operations of the combined company may cause significant variations in the price of Patrick common stock. For
additional information, see “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.”
The opinions of Patrick’s and LCI’s respective financial advisors do not reflect changes in circumstances
between the signing of the merger agreement and the closing of the merger.
Patrick and LCI have received opinions from their respective financial advisors in connection with the signing
of the merger agreement but have not obtained updated opinions from their respective financial advisors as of the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Changes in the operations and prospects of Patrick or LCI, general
market and economic conditions and other factors that may be beyond the control of Patrick or LCI, and on which
the opinions of Patrick’s and LCI’s financial advisors were based, may significantly alter the value of Patrick or LCI
or the prices of the shares of Patrick common stock or LCI common stock by the time the merger is completed. The
opinions do not speak as of the time the merger will be completed or as of any date other than the date of such
opinions. Because Patrick and LCI do not currently anticipate asking their respective financial advisors to update
their opinions, the opinions do not address the fairness of the exchange ratio from a financial point of view at the
time the merger is completed. The Patrick board’s recommendation that Patrick shareholders vote in favor of the
proposals on the agenda for the Patrick special meeting and the LCI board’s recommendation that LCI stockholders
vote in favor of the proposals on the agenda for the LCI special meeting, however, are made as of the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. For a description of the opinions that Patrick and LCI received from their
respective financial advisors, see “The Merger—Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors” and “The Merger—
Opinion of LCI’s Financial Advisor” beginning on pages 96 and 115, respectively, of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus. A copy of each of the opinions of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated,
financial advisors to Patrick, are attached as Annex D and Annex E, respectively, to this joint proxy statement/
prospectus, and a copy of the opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP, financial advisor to LCI, is attached as
Annex F to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and each such opinion is incorporated by reference herein in its
entirety.
The forecasted financial information relating to Patrick and LCI prepared in connection with the merger is based
on various estimates and assumptions that may not be realized, which may adversely affect the market price of
the combined company common stock following the closing of the merger.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus includes certain financial information considered by Patrick and LCI in
connection with their respective businesses. The forecasted financial information prepared by Patrick or LCI was not
prepared with a view towards public disclosure or with a view toward compliance with the published guidelines of
the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or any other
regulatory or professional body for preparation or presentation of prospective financial information. The forecasted
financial information is inherently based on various estimates and assumptions that are subject to the judgment of
those preparing them. These forecasts are also subject to significant economic, competitive, industry and other
uncertainties and contingencies, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of which are beyond the
control of Patrick and LCI. Important factors that may affect the actual results of Patrick and LCI and cause the
forecasted financial information to not be achieved include risks and uncertainties relating to Patrick’s and LCI’s
respective businesses, industry performance, the regulatory environment, general business and economic conditions
43
and other factors described in the section titled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”
beginning on page 51 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In view of these uncertainties, the inclusion of
forecasted financial information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is not and should not be viewed as a
representation that the forecasted results will necessarily reflect actual future results.
The forecasted financial information has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, Patrick management and
LCI management, as applicable. The independent registered public accounting firms of Patrick and LCI have not
audited, reviewed, examined, compiled or performed any procedures with respect to the accompanying forecasted
financial information and, accordingly, the independent registered public accounting firms of Patrick and LCI do not
express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto or its achievability, and assume no
responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the forecasted financial information. The reports of the
independent registered public accounting firms of Patrick and LCI incorporated by reference herein relate to the
respective company’s previously issued financial statements. They do not extend to the forecasted financial
information and should not be read to do so. In addition, the forecasted financial information reflects estimates and
assumptions based on the experience of Patrick and LCI management as of the date on which they were made,
which are subject to change and do not reflect revised prospects for Patrick’s and LCI’s respective businesses,
changes in general business or economic conditions or any other transaction or event that has occurred or that may
occur and that was not anticipated at the time the forecasted financial information was prepared. Furthermore, any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and neither Patrick nor LCI undertakes
any obligation, other than as required by applicable law, to update the forecasted financial information to reflect
events or circumstances after the dates as of which the forecasted financial information were prepared or to reflect
the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances. In addition, since such forecasted financial
information covers multiple years, and the underlying information by its nature becomes less predictive with each
successive year, there can be no assurance that Patrick’s, LCI’s or the combined company’s financial condition or
results of operations will be consistent with those set forth in such forecasted financial information.
Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause a loss of management personnel and other key employees at
either Patrick or LCI, which could adversely affect the future business and operations of the combined company
following the merger.
Each of Patrick and LCI depends on the experience and industry knowledge of its management personnel and
other key employees to execute its business plans. The success of the combined company after the merger will
depend in part on its ability to retain or attract key management personnel and other key employees. During the
pendency or following the closing of the merger, Patrick’s and LCI’s respective current and prospective employees
may experience uncertainty or have concerns regarding their roles within the combined company, the timing and
closing of the merger or the operations of the combined company, any of which may have an adverse effect on
Patrick’s and LCI’s ability to retain, attract or motivate key management and other key personnel. If Patrick and LCI
are unable to retain or motivate personnel, including key management personnel, who are critical to the future
operations of the combined company, then Patrick, LCI or the combined company could face disruptions in their
respective operations, loss of existing customers, loss of key information, expertise or know-how and unanticipated
additional recruitment, training and retention costs. In addition, the loss of key Patrick or LCI personnel could
diminish the anticipated benefits of the merger. No assurance can be given that the combined company will be able
to retain or attract key management personnel and other key employees of Patrick or LCI to the same extent that
Patrick and LCI have previously been able to retain or attract their own employees.
The merger may result in a loss of customers, distributors, suppliers, vendors, landlords, joint venture partners
and other business partners and may result in the modification or termination of existing contracts.
Following the merger, some of the customers, distributors, suppliers, vendors, landlords, joint venture partners
and other business partners of Patrick or LCI may modify, terminate or scale back their current or prospective
business relationships with the combined company. Some customers may not wish to source a larger percentage of
their needs from a single company or may feel that the combined company is too closely allied with one of their
competitors. In addition, Patrick and LCI have contracts with customers, distributors, suppliers, vendors, landlords,
joint venture partners and other business partners that may require Patrick or LCI to obtain consents from these other
parties in connection with the merger, which may not be obtained on favorable terms or at all. If relationships with
44
customers, distributors, suppliers, vendors, landlords, joint venture partners and other business partners are adversely
affected by the merger, or if the combined company loses the benefits of the contracts of Patrick or LCI, the
combined company’s business and financial performance could suffer.
Consummation of the merger may trigger change-in-control or other provisions in certain agreements to which
Patrick or LCI is a party.
The consummation of the merger may trigger change-in-control or other provisions in certain agreements to
which Patrick or LCI or their respective subsidiaries are a party. If Patrick and LCI are unable to obtain the
counterparties’ consents or waivers of those provisions, the counterparties may exercise their rights and remedies
under the applicable agreements, including in some instances potentially terminating the agreements or seeking
monetary damages. Even if Patrick and LCI are able to negotiate waivers, the counterparties may require a fee for
such waivers or seek to renegotiate the agreements on terms less favorable to the combined company.
In addition, in connection with the merger, Patrick and LCI have agreed that the merger will constitute a
“change in control,” or term of similar import, under certain LCI compensation and benefit arrangements, which
may result in additional payments and benefits to directors and executive officers, as further described in more detail
in the section titled “The Merger—Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on
page 134 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The merger will not constitute a “change in control,” or term of
similar import, under Patrick compensation and benefit arrangements.
The merger is subject to the receipt of governmental and regulatory approvals, and governmental authorities
could delay or prevent completion of the merger or require Patrick and LCI to accept conditions that could
adversely affect the combined company.
Patrick and LCI are required to obtain the approvals of certain regulatory agencies before completing the
merger, as detailed in the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Efforts to Complete the Merger.” Patrick and LCI
cannot provide assurance that these approvals will be obtained on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all.
Reviewing governmental authorities may request additional information, including by issuing a second request
under the HSR Act, which the parties are required to certify substantial compliance with no later than six months
after the request date, and responding could be costly and could substantially delay completion of the merger.
Governmental authorities may also seek to block, prohibit, or restrict the merger through litigation or administrative
proceedings, which Patrick and LCI are required to oppose using reasonable best efforts, subject to the limitations in
the merger agreement.
To resolve regulatory objections, Patrick and LCI may be required to accept divestitures, hold-separate
arrangements, consent decrees, or other structural or behavioral remedies affecting their businesses. Neither party is
required to accept a remedy that would constitute a “Burdensome Condition,” which generally means a remedy
affecting operations, assets, or businesses that generated more than 7% of the parties’ combined revenue in fiscal
year 2025, or that relates to certain businesses identified in the parties’ confidential disclosure letters. Accordingly,
Patrick and LCI may be required to accept remedies that are substantial but fall short of that threshold, which could
impose additional costs, reduce revenues, or otherwise diminish the anticipated benefits of the merger, and the
combined company's businesses and operations could differ materially from those contemplated when the merger
agreement was signed.
The merger must close by March 30, 2027, subject to automatic extension to June 30, 2027, and then September
30, 2027, if regulatory approvals remain outstanding but all other closing conditions are satisfied. If the required
approvals are not obtained by the applicable date, either party may terminate the merger agreement, and the merger
may not be completed even if Patrick's and LCI's shareholders have approved the merger-related proposals.
In addition, closing of the merger is conditioned on the approval by the Nasdaq of the listing of the shares of
Patrick common stock to be issued in the merger, subject to official notice of issuance. Although Patrick has agreed
to take all actions reasonably necessary to obtain the requisite stock exchange approval, there can be no assurance
that such approval will be obtained.
45
Patrick or LCI may waive one or more of the closing conditions without re-soliciting shareholder or stockholder
approval, as applicable.
Patrick or LCI may determine to waive, in whole or in part, one or more of the conditions to closing the merger
prior to Patrick or LCI, as the case may be, being obligated to complete the merger. Each of Patrick and LCI
currently expects to evaluate the materiality of any waiver and its effect on its respective shareholders and
stockholders in light of the facts and circumstances at the time to determine whether any amendment of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or any re-solicitation of proxies is required in light of such waiver. Any determination
whether to waive any condition to the merger, to re-solicit shareholder or stockholder approval, as applicable, or to
amend or supplement this joint proxy statement/prospectus as a result of a waiver will be made by Patrick or LCI at
the time of such waiver based on the facts and circumstances as they exist at that time.
The merger agreement subjects Patrick and LCI to restrictions on their respective business activities prior to the
first effective time of the merger.
The merger agreement restricts Patrick and LCI from entering into certain corporate transactions and taking
other specified actions without the consent of the other party, and generally requires each party to continue its
operations in the ordinary course, until the closing of the merger. These restrictions could be in place for an
extended period of time if the closing of the merger is delayed and, if the other party’s consent is not received, could
prevent Patrick or LCI from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the closing of the
merger. For a description of the restrictive covenants to which Patrick and LCI are subject, see “The Merger
Agreement—Covenants and Agreements—Conduct of Business Prior to Closing” beginning on page 151 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Patrick and LCI will incur significant costs in connection with the merger, which may be in excess of those
anticipated by Patrick or LCI.
Each of Patrick and LCI has incurred and expects to continue to incur a number of non-recurring costs
associated with negotiating and completing the merger and combining the operations of the two companies. These
expenses have been, and will continue to be, substantial. The substantial majority of non-recurring expenses will
consist of transaction costs related to the merger, including, among other things, fees paid to financial, legal and
accounting advisors, employee retention, severance and benefits costs, filing fees and potential debt restructuring
costs. Many of these costs will be borne by Patrick or LCI, as applicable, even if the merger is not completed.
Patrick and LCI also expect to incur transaction-related costs in connection with the formulation and
implementation of integration plans, including the costs of consolidating facilities and systems and other
employment-related costs. Patrick and LCI will continue to assess the magnitude of these costs. Additional
unanticipated costs may be incurred in connection with the merger and the integration of the two companies’
businesses. Although Patrick and LCI each expect that the elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the realization
of other efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses, should allow the benefits of combining the
businesses to offset the costs of integration over time, this net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, or at all.
For additional information, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the Combined Company Following Consummation
of the Merger—The failure to integrate the businesses and operations of Patrick and LCI successfully in the
expected time frame may adversely affect the future results of the combined company” below.
The costs described above, as well as other unanticipated costs and expenses, could have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition, cash flows and operating results of the combined company following the closing of
the merger.
Litigation relating to the merger, if any, could result in an injunction preventing the closing of the merger and/or
substantial costs to Patrick and LCI.
Securities and fiduciary lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have entered into acquisition,
merger or other business combination agreements like the merger agreement. Even if such lawsuits are without
merit, defending against these claims can result in substantial costs and divert management time and resources. An
adverse judgment could result in monetary damages, which could have a negative impact on Patrick’s and LCI’s
46
respective liquidity and financial conditions. Lawsuits that may be brought against Patrick, LCI or their respective
directors and officers could also seek, among other things, injunctive relief or other equitable relief, including a
request to rescind parts of the merger agreement already implemented and to otherwise enjoin the parties from
consummating the merger. One of the conditions to the consummation of the merger is the absence of any law or
judgment from a governmental authority that enjoins or otherwise prohibits the closing of the merger. Consequently,
if a plaintiff is successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the closing of the merger, that injunction may delay
or prevent the merger from being completed within the expected timeframe, or at all, which may adversely affect
Patrick’s and LCI’s respective businesses, financial conditions, cash flows or results of operations. In addition,
either Patrick or LCI may terminate the merger agreement if any legal restraint that enjoins or otherwise prohibits
closing of the merger has become final and non-appealable; provided that if the imposition of such legal restraint is
the proximate result of a breach of the merger agreement, then this termination right is not available to such
breaching party. There can be no assurance that any of the defendants would be successful in the outcome of any
potential future lawsuits. The defense or settlement of any lawsuit or claim that remains unresolved at the time the
merger is completed may adversely affect Patrick’s or LCI’s businesses, financial conditions, cash flows or results
of operations.
Risks Relating to the Combined Company Following Consummation of the Merger
If the merger is completed, the combined company may not perform as Patrick, LCI or the market expects and
may fail to realize the projected benefits and cost savings of the merger, which could adversely affect the value of
the Patrick common stock held by Patrick shareholders immediately prior to the merger or received by LCI
stockholders in connection with the merger.
The success of the combined company will depend, in part, on the ability of the combined company to realize
the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining Patrick’s and LCI’s respective businesses, including
operational and other synergies that Patrick and LCI believe the combined company will be able to achieve. The
anticipated benefits and cost savings of the merger may not be realized fully or at all, may take longer to realize than
expected or could have other adverse effects that Patrick and LCI do not currently foresee. Risks that may be
associated with the combined company include, among others, the risks related to market fluctuations, failure of
integration, unforeseen liabilities, employee and customer retention and increased indebtedness described in this
section.
The market price of the combined company’s common stock will continue to fluctuate after the merger.
Upon the closing of the merger, LCI stockholders who receive merger consideration will become holders of
shares of common stock of the combined company (which we refer to as “combined company common stock”). The
market price of combined company common stock may fluctuate significantly following the closing of the merger
and holders of combined company common stock could lose some or all of the value of their investment. In
addition, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in recent times which, if they
continue to occur, could have a material adverse effect on the market for, or liquidity of, combined company
common stock, regardless of the combined company’s actual operating performance.
The market price of combined company common stock after the closing of the merger may be affected by factors
different from those that historically have affected or currently affect Patrick common stock or LCI common
stock.
Upon the closing of the merger, LCI stockholders who receive the merger consideration will become holders of
Patrick common stock. The combined company’s financial position after the closing of the merger may differ from
Patrick’s financial position before the closing of the merger, and the results of operations or cash flows of the
combined company after the closing of the merger may be affected by factors different from those currently
affecting the financial position or results of operations or cash flows of Patrick and LCI, respectively. Accordingly,
the market price and performance of the combined company common stock after the closing of the merger likely
will be different from the performance of Patrick common stock or LCI common stock in the absence of the merger.
In addition, general fluctuations in stock markets could have a material adverse effect on the market for, or liquidity
of, the combined company common stock, regardless of its actual operating performance. For a discussion of the
47
businesses of Patrick and LCI and of some important factors to consider in connection with those businesses, see
“Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Patrick’s Business” and “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to LCI’s Business” below.
The failure to integrate the businesses and operations of Patrick and LCI successfully in the expected time frame
may adversely affect the future results of the combined company.
Patrick and LCI have operated and, until the closing of the merger, will continue to operate independently.
Following the closing of the merger, their respective businesses may not be integrated successfully. It is possible
that the integration process could result in the loss of key Patrick employees or key LCI employees, the loss of
customers, suppliers, service providers, vendors or other business counterparties, the disruption of either company’s
or both companies’ ongoing businesses, inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies, potential
unknown liabilities and unforeseen expenses, delays or regulatory conditions associated with and following the
closing of the merger or higher-than-expected integration costs and an overall post-closing integration process that
takes longer than originally anticipated. Specifically, the following challenges, among others, must be addressed in
integrating the operations of Patrick and LCI in order to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger:
•combining the companies’ operations and corporate functions and the resulting difficulties associated with
managing a larger, more diversified business;
•combining the businesses of Patrick and LCI in a manner that permits the combined company to achieve
the cost savings and operating synergies anticipated to result from the merger;
•avoiding delays in connection with the merger or the integration process;
•integrating personnel from the two companies and minimizing the loss of key employees;
•identifying and eliminating redundant functions and assets;
•harmonizing the companies’ operating practices, employee development, benefits and compensation
programs, internal controls, compliance and other policies, procedures and processes;
•maintaining existing agreements with customers, suppliers, vendors and other business counterparties and
avoiding delays in entering into new agreements with prospective customers, suppliers, vendors and other
business counterparties;
•coordinating geographically separate organizations;
•addressing possible differences in business backgrounds, corporate cultures and management philosophies;
and
•consolidating the companies’ operating, administrative and information technology infrastructure and
financial systems.
Many of these factors will be outside of the control of Patrick and LCI, and any one of them could result in
delays, increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and other adverse impacts, which could
materially affect the combined company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. If the combined
company is unable to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the
anticipated benefits, including synergies, cost savings, innovation opportunities and operational efficiencies, may not
be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, and the value of the combined company’s
common stock may decline.
In addition, at times, the attention of certain members of either company’s or both companies’ management and
other resources may be focused on the closing of the merger and the integration of the two businesses and as such
diverted from day-to-day business operations or other opportunities that may be beneficial to either company, which
may disrupt either company’s ongoing operations and the operations of the combined company.
48
The indebtedness of the combined company following consummation of the merger will be substantially greater
than Patrick’s indebtedness on a standalone basis or LCI’s indebtedness on a standalone basis, in each case,
existing prior to the consummation of the merger. The indebtedness of the combined company could adversely
affect its business flexibility.
As of June 28, 2026, Patrick had approximately $1.4 billion of outstanding indebtedness, consisting primarily of
amounts outstanding under Patrick’s outstanding senior notes (which we refer to as the “Patrick notes”) and its
revolving credit and term loan facilities. As of June 30, 2026, LCI had approximately $853 million of outstanding
indebtedness, consisting primarily of amounts outstanding under the 2030 Notes and the LCI term loan.
The combined company’s substantial indebtedness may reduce its flexibility to respond to changing business
and economic conditions, and could have adverse effects on its financial condition, cash flows or results of
operations, including by:
•imposing additional cash requirements on the combined company in order to support interest payments,
which would reduce the amount available to fund its operations and other business activities;
•increasing the combined company’s borrowing costs and the risk of default on debt obligations of the
combined company;
•increasing the vulnerability of the combined company to adverse changes in general economic and industry
conditions, economic downturns and adverse developments in its business;
•limiting the ability of the combined company to sell assets, engage in strategic transactions, declare and pay
dividends or obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general
corporate and other purposes;
•limiting the flexibility of the combined company in planning for or reacting to changes in its business and
the industry in which it operates;
•increasing the exposure of the combined company to a rise in interest rates, which would generate greater
interest expense to the extent the combined company does not have applicable interest rate fluctuation
hedges; and
•reducing funds available to engage in investments in product development, capital expenditures, dividend
payments, share repurchases and other activities, thereby creating competitive disadvantages for the
combined company relative to other companies with lower debt levels.
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the LCI credit facility will be paid off and terminated
substantially concurrently with the closing of the merger. In addition, LCI’s 2030 Notes are expected to remain
issued and outstanding following the closing but will become convertible into shares of Patrick common stock, and
the merger agreement requires that Patrick and LCI use their reasonable best efforts to obtain the consent of the
relevant dealer or other counterparties to supplement, amend or modify the terms of the related call options and
warrants to reflect the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and such consents may not be obtained
on favorable terms or at all. Failure to obtain such consents could result in economic inefficiencies in the combined
company’s capital structure or require the expenditure of additional resources to resolve such issues, which could
adversely affect the combined company’s results of operations or financial condition.
Patrick’s ability to arrange additional financing or refinancing of this existing debt will depend on, among other
factors, its financial condition and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions and other factors beyond its
control. There can be no assurance that the combined company will be able to obtain additional financing or
refinance existing debt on favorable terms or at all, including in connection with any change of control offer.
For more information, see “The Merger—Treatment of LCI Indebtedness” beginning on page 141 of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
49
Declaration, payment and amounts of dividends, if any, distributed to the combined company shareholders will be
uncertain.
Although each of Patrick and LCI has paid cash dividends on its respective shares of common stock in the past,
the combined company board may determine not to declare dividends in the future or may reduce the amount of
dividends paid in the future. Decisions on whether, when and in which amounts to declare and pay any future
dividends will remain in the discretion of the full combined company board (as constituted following the merger).
Any dividend payment amounts will be determined by the combined company board on a quarterly basis, and it is
possible that the combined company board may increase or decrease the amount of dividends paid in the future, or
determine not to declare dividends in the future, at any time and for any reason. Patrick and LCI expect that any
such decisions will depend on the combined company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash balances,
cash requirements, future prospects, the outlook for commodity prices and other considerations that the combined
company board deems relevant, including, but not limited to: whether the combined company has enough cash to
pay such dividends due to its cash requirements, capital spending plans, cash flows or financial position; the
combined company’s desire to maintain or improve the credit ratings on its debt; and applicable restrictions under
Indiana law. Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders should be aware that they have no contractual or other legal
right to dividends that have not been declared. For additional information, see “Comparative Per Share Market
Price and Dividend Information” beginning on page 36 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The combined company may record goodwill and other intangible assets that could become impaired and result
in material non-cash charges to the results of operations of the combined company in the future.
In accordance with ASC 805 (as defined below), the merger will be accounted for as an acquisition by Patrick
pursuant to the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Under the acquisition method of
accounting, Patrick will record the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities of LCI and its
subsidiaries as of the closing of the merger, at their respective fair values. The reported financial condition and
results of operations of the combined company for periods after the closing of the merger will reflect LCI balances
and results after the closing of the merger but will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial
position or results of operations of LCI and its subsidiaries for periods prior to the merger. For additional
information, see “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” beginning on page 172 of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase price will be allocated to LCI’s tangible assets
and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair values as of the date of the closing of the merger,
with any excess purchase price allocated to goodwill. To the extent the value of goodwill or intangibles, if any,
becomes impaired in the future, the combined company may be required to recognize material non-cash charges
relating to such impairment. The combined company’s operating results may be significantly impacted from both the
impairment and the underlying trends in the business that triggered the impairment.
Shares of Patrick common stock received by LCI stockholders as a result of the merger will have different rights
from shares of LCI common stock.
Upon the closing of the merger, LCI stockholders will no longer be stockholders of LCI, and LCI stockholders
who receive merger consideration will become holders of the combined company common stock. There will be
important differences between the current rights of LCI stockholders and the rights to which such stockholders will
be entitled as shareholders of the combined company. For a discussion of the different rights associated with shares
of Patrick common stock, see “Comparison of Shareholders’ / Stockholders’ Rights” beginning on page 192 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The market price of combined company common stock may decline in the future as a result of the sale of shares
of combined company common stock held by former LCI stockholders or current Patrick shareholders.
Based on the number of shares of LCI common stock outstanding as of [ ], 2026, Patrick anticipates
issuing up to approximately [ ] shares of Patrick common stock pursuant to the merger agreement.
Following their receipt of shares of Patrick common stock as merger consideration in the merger, former LCI
stockholders may seek to sell the shares of combined company common stock delivered to them, and the merger
50
agreement contains no restriction on the ability of former LCI stockholders to sell such shares following the closing
of the merger. Other Patrick shareholders may also seek to sell shares of combined company common stock held by
them following the closing of the merger. These sales (or the perception that these sales may occur), coupled with
the increase in the outstanding number of shares of Patrick common stock, may affect the market for, and the market
price of, combined company common stock in an adverse manner.
Risks Relating to Patrick’s Business
In addition to the risk factors described above relating to the combined company, you should read and consider
risk factors specific to Patrick’s business that will also affect the combined company. These risks are described in
Part I, Item 1A of Patrick’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and in other
documents that are incorporated by reference herein. For the location of information incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 208 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Risks Relating to LCI’s Business
In addition to the risk factors described above relating to the combined company, you should read and consider
risk factors specific to LCI’s businesses that will also affect the combined company. These risks are described in
Part I, Item 1A of LCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and in other
documents that are incorporated by reference herein. For the location of information incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 208 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Risks Relating to Tax Matters
You should read the discussion under the section titled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger” for a further discussion of U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the merger.
The parties intend that the merger qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. It is a condition to LCI’s obligation to complete the merger that LCI receive an opinion from Kirkland & Ellis
LLP (or other tax counsel), dated as of the closing date, to the effect that the first merger and the second merger,
taken together, will be treated as a single integrated transaction that will qualify as a “reorganization” within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
Assuming, as the parties intend, that the merger is treated as a “reorganization” for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, a U.S. holder (as defined in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger”) will not
recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes on the exchange of their LCI common stock for
Patrick common stock in the first merger, except for any gain or loss that may result from the receipt of cash instead
of a fractional share of Patrick common stock as described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of
the Merger.”
Notwithstanding the above, no assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service will not assert, or that a
court would not sustain, that the merger does not qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code. If the merger were to fail to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code,
a U.S. holder of LCI common stock generally would recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes
upon the exchange of LCI common stock for Patrick common stock in the merger.
51
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, other than statements of historical facts, may constitute
forward-looking statements, for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and involve a number of risks
and uncertainties. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the benefits of the proposed
transaction between LCI and Patrick, including future financial and operating results (including the anticipated
impact of the transaction on LCI’s and Patrick’s respective earnings), statements related to the expected timing of
the completion of the transaction, the combined company’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, and other
statements that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements may be identified by terminology such as “may,”
“will,” “should,” “targets,” “scheduled,” “plans,” “intends,” “goal,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “forecasts,”
“outlook,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue” or negatives of such terms or other comparable terminology, but
not all forward-looking statements include such identifying terminology.
All forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements of LCI or Patrick to differ materially from any results expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, (1) the risk that the cost savings and any
revenue synergies from the transaction may not be fully realized or may take longer than anticipated to be realized,
(2) disruption to each party’s business as a result of the announcement and pendency of the transaction, (3) the risk
that the integration of each party’s operations will be materially delayed or will be more costly or difficult than
expected or that the parties are otherwise unable to successfully integrate as a result of unexpected factors or events,
(4) the failure to obtain the necessary approvals by the stockholders of LCI or Patrick, (5) the ability by each of LCI
and Patrick to obtain required governmental approvals of the transaction on the timeline expected, or at all, and the
risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined
company or the expected benefits of the transaction, (6) reputational risk and the reaction of each party’s customers,
suppliers, employees or other business partners to the transaction, (7) the failure of the closing conditions in the
merger agreement to be satisfied, or any unexpected delay in closing the transaction or the occurrence of any event,
change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement, (8) the possibility that
the transaction may be more expensive to complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected factors or
events, (9) risks related to management and oversight of the expanded business and operations of the combined
company due to the increased size and complexity, (10) the possibility of increased scrutiny by, and/or additional
regulatory requirements of, governmental authorities as a result of the transaction or the size, scope and complexity
of the combined company’s business operations, (11) the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings that may
be currently pending or later instituted against LCI, Patrick or the combined company before or after the transaction,
and (12) general competitive, economic, political and market conditions and other factors that may affect future
results of LCI and Patrick. Additional factors which could affect future results of LCI and Patrick can be found in
LCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on
February 26, 2026, under the captions “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors”
and LCI’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and Patrick’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which was filed with the SEC on February 19, 2026, under the
captions “Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” and Patrick’s Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, in each case filed with the SEC and available on the
SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. LCI and Patrick disclaim any obligation and do not intend to update or revise
any forward-looking statements contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, which speak only as of the date
hereof, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by federal securities
laws.
52
INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANIES
Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Phone: (574) 294-7511
Patrick is a leading component solutions provider serving original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket
customers in the Recreational Vehicle (“RV”), Marine, Powersports and Housing markets. Since 1959, Patrick has
empowered manufacturers and outdoor enthusiasts to achieve next-level recreation experiences. Patrick’s customer-
focused approach brings together design, manufacturing, distribution, and transportation in a full solutions model
that defines it as a trusted partner. Patrick is home to more than 85 leading brands, all united by a commitment to
quality, customer service, and innovation. Headquartered in Elkhart, IN, Patrick employs approximately 10,000
skilled team members throughout the United States. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, Patrick had
consolidated net sales of $3,951 million. Patrick’s 2025 operating income was $276 million and net income was
$135 million.
Patrick is a Indiana corporation, and its common stock is listed on the Nasdaq, trading under the symbol
“PATK.”
For additional information about Patrick and its subsidiaries, see the documents incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus in the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on
page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
LCI Industries
3501 County Road 6 East
Elkhart, Indiana 46514
Phone: (574) 535-1125
LCI Industries, through its wholly owned subsidiary Lippert Components, Inc. and its subsidiaries, is a global
leader in supplying engineered components to the outdoor recreation, transportation, marine and housing industries.
In addition to serving original equipment manufacturers, LCI also caters to aftermarket needs, selling through retail
dealers, wholesale distributors and service centers, as well as direct-to-consumer sales through online platforms. As
of June 30, 2026, LCI operated over 100 manufacturing facilities located throughout North America and Europe. For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, LCI had consolidated net sales of $4,122 million. LCI’s 2025 operating
profit was $279.9 million and net income was $188.3 million.
LCI Industries is a Delaware corporation, and LCI common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
“LCII.”
For additional information about LCI Industries and its subsidiaries, see the documents incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information”
beginning on page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Planet First Merger Sub Inc.
c/o Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
First Merger Sub is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Upon the completion of the first merger, First
Merger Sub will cease to exist. First Merger Sub was incorporated in Delaware on June 29, 2026 for the sole
purpose of effecting the merger.
53
Planet Second Merger Sub LLC
c/o Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Second Merger Sub is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Upon the completion of the second merger,
Second Merger Sub will survive as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Second Merger Sub was formed in
Indiana on June 29, 2026 for the sole purpose of effecting the merger.
54
SPECIAL MEETING OF PATRICK SHAREHOLDERS
Date, Time and Place
The Patrick special meeting will be held virtually via live webcast on [ ], 2026, at [ ], Eastern
Time. Because the Patrick special meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via live webcast, Patrick
shareholders will not be able to attend the Patrick special meeting in person. To enter the Patrick special meeting,
shareholders, or their proxyholder, may participate, vote, and ask questions at the Patrick special meeting by visiting
[ ] and using the control number found on their proxy card or instruction form. Patrick intends to mail this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy to its shareholders entitled to vote (in person
virtually or by proxy) at the Patrick special meeting on or about [ ], 2026.
Purpose of the Patrick Special Meeting
The purpose of the Patrick special meeting is to consider and vote on the following proposals:
•the Patrick share issuance proposal;
•the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal;
•the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal; and
•the Patrick adjournment proposal.
Patrick will transact no other business at the Patrick special meeting.
Recommendation of the Patrick Board of Directors
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote:
•“FOR” the Patrick share issuance proposal;
•“FOR” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal;
•“FOR” the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal; and
•“FOR” the Patrick adjournment proposal.
For additional information on the recommendation of the Patrick board, see the section titled “The Merger—
Recommendation of the Patrick Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger.”
Record Date and Outstanding Shares of Patrick Common Stock
Only holders of record of shares of Patrick common stock as of the close of business on [ ], 2026, the
record date for the Patrick special meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Patrick special meeting or any
adjournment or postponement of the Patrick special meeting.
As of the close of business on the record date, there were [ ] shares of Patrick common stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote at the Patrick special meeting. Patrick shareholders may cast one vote for each share
of Patrick common stock held by them as of the close of business on the record date.
A list of Patrick shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Patrick special meeting will be available for
inspection by Patrick shareholders of record or their agent authorized in writing at Patrick’s principal place of
business, which is located at 107 W. Franklin Street, Elkhart, Indiana 46516, during ordinary business hours for a
period of no less than five business days before the Patrick special meeting and available online during the meeting.
55
Vote of Patrick’s Directors and Executive Officers
As of [ ], 2026, Patrick directors and executive officers, and their affiliates, as a group, owned and were
entitled to vote [ ] shares of Patrick common stock, or approximately [ ]% of the total outstanding shares of
Patrick common stock as of [ ], 2026.
Patrick currently expects that all of its directors and executive officers will vote their shares “FOR” each of the
Patrick proposals.
Quorum; Abstentions, Failure to Vote and Broker Non-Votes
In order for business to be conducted at the Patrick special meeting, a quorum must be present. A quorum at the
Patrick special meeting requires the presence in person (by participation at the virtual meeting) or by proxy of the
holders of a majority of the shares of Patrick common stock entitled to vote. Shares that are represented at the
Patrick special meeting but abstain from voting or withhold their votes on any or all matters will be counted as
shares present and entitled to vote in determining the presence of a quorum. If a quorum is not present at the time the
Patrick special meeting is convened, Patrick may adjourn or postpone the Patrick special meeting until such time
that a quorum is present. Once a share of Patrick common stock is represented for any purpose at the Patrick special
meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the Patrick special meeting and for any
adjournment of the Patrick special meeting unless a new record date is or must be set for the adjourned meeting.
If your properly executed proxy does not contain voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote
your shares in accordance with the voting recommendations of the Patrick board.
A “broker non-vote” occurs with respect to a particular proposal when a broker, bank or other nominee of
record that holds shares for a beneficial owner (a) does not receive any voting instructions from the beneficial owner
with respect to such shares, (b) does not have discretionary authority to vote on that particular proposal and (c) does
have discretionary authority to vote on, and returns a valid proxy with respect to, another proposal presented on the
same proxy.
Under applicable stock exchange rules, brokers, banks and other nominees do not have discretionary authority
to vote on any of the Patrick proposals and will not be able to vote on any of the Patrick proposals absent
instructions from the beneficial owner. Because none of the proposals currently scheduled to be voted on at the
Patrick special meeting are routine matters for which brokers may have discretionary authority to vote, Patrick does
not expect there to be any broker non-votes at the Patrick special meeting. Accordingly, a beneficial owner who fails
to provide voting instructions to its broker, bank, or other nominee will not be considered present at the Patrick
special meeting and whose shares (i) will not count toward the presence of a quorum, (ii) will have the same effect
as a vote “AGAINST” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal and (iii) will have no effect on the outcome of
the vote on the Patrick share issuance proposal, the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal or the
Patrick adjournment proposal.
Required Vote
The votes required for each Patrick proposal are as follows:
•The Patrick share issuance proposal. The Patrick share issuance proposal requires approval by a majority
of the votes cast on the Patrick share issuance proposal at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is
present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the outcome of
the vote on the Patrick share issuance proposal.
•The Patrick authorized stock increase proposal. The Patrick authorized stock increase proposal requires
approval by a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is
present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have the same effect as a vote
“AGAINST” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal.
•The Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal. The Patrick articles amendment and restatement
proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the Patrick articles amendment and
56
restatement proposal at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to
vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal.
•The Patrick adjournment proposal. The Patrick adjournment proposal requires approval by a majority of
the votes cast on the Patrick adjournment proposal at the Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is
present. Abstentions, failures to vote, and broker non-votes (if any) will have no effect on the outcome of
the vote on the Patrick adjournment proposal.
The Patrick share issuance proposal, the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal and the Patrick adjournment proposal are described in the sections titled
“Patrick Proposals—The Patrick Share Issuance Proposal,” “Patrick Proposals—The Patrick Authorized Stock
Increase Proposal,” “Patrick Proposals—The Patrick Articles Amendment and Restatement Proposal” and
“Patrick Proposals—The Patrick Adjournment Proposal,” respectively.
Methods of Voting
Shareholders of Record
Patrick shareholders of record as of the Patrick special meeting record date may vote in the following ways:
•By Internet. You may submit a proxy electronically on the internet by following the instructions provided
on the enclosed proxy card. Please have your proxy card in hand when you log onto the website. If you
submit your proxy to vote over the internet, you do not have to mail in a proxy card. If you choose to
submit your vote via proxy over the internet, you must do so prior to [ ], Eastern Time, on
[ ], 2026.
•By Telephone. You may submit a proxy by telephone by calling (from the U.S. and Canada) the toll-free
number listed on the enclosed proxy card. Please have your proxy card in hand when you call. If you
submit your proxy by telephone, you do not have to mail in a proxy card. If you choose to submit your vote
via proxy by telephone, you must do so prior to [ ], Eastern Time, on [ ], 2026. Patrick
shareholders voting by telephone should remember that the shareholder must bear costs associated with
electronic access, such as usage charges from telephone companies.
•By Mail. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you may indicate your vote by
completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid reply
envelope. Patrick shareholders who vote this way should mail the proxy card early enough so that it is
received prior to the closing of the polls at the Patrick special meeting.
•At the Meeting. You may attend the Patrick special meeting virtually and vote electronically during the
meeting by visiting [ ] and entering the unique control number on the enclosed proxy card.
If your properly executed proxy does not contain voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote
your shares in accordance with the voting recommendations of the Patrick board. We recommend that you promptly
submit your vote by proxy even if you currently plan to attend the Patrick special meeting. Voting in advance by
proxy does not preclude your opportunity to attend the special meeting and vote again via the special meeting
website.
Street Name Shareholders
If you hold your shares of Patrick common stock in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, you
will receive a voting instruction form seeking instruction from you as to how your shares should be voted. Your
broker, bank or other nominee will vote your shares only if you provide specific instructions on how to vote by
following the instructions provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee. Please check the voting
instruction form used by your broker, bank or other nominee.
57
You may vote your shares held in “street name” electronically at the Patrick special meeting if you register in
advance to virtually attend the Patrick special meeting. To register to vote shares held in “street name,” you must
obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and email proof of your legal proxy, along with your
name and mailing address, to Computershare at legalproxy@computershare.com using the subject “Legal Proxy.”
Computershare must receive your legal proxy no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on [ ], 2026. You will
receive a confirmation of your registration and a unique control number by email after Computershare receives your
registration materials.
If you hold shares in BOTH street name and as a stockholder of record, YOU MUST VOTE SEPARATELY
for each set of shares.
Questions About Voting
If you have any questions about how to vote or direct a vote in respect of your shares of Patrick common stock,
you may contact Patrick by writing to Joel D. Duthie – Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary,
Patrick Industries, Inc., 107 W. Franklin Street, Elkhart, Indiana 46516.
Revocability of Proxies
If you are a shareholder of record of Patrick, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any time before
the polls close at the Patrick special meeting by:
•voting again by telephone or through the internet;
•requesting, completing and mailing in a new paper proxy card;
•giving written notice of revocation bearing a date later than the date of the proxy to Patrick’s Secretary,
which must be received before the Patrick special meeting, by mail at 107 W. Franklin Street, Elkhart,
Indiana 46516, Attention: Office of the Secretary; or
•attending the Patrick special meeting virtually and voting your shares electronically (merely attending the
Patrick special meeting will not revoke a prior submitted proxy).
Adjournments
If a quorum is not present at the Patrick special meeting, Patrick may adjourn the Patrick special meeting from
time to time until a quorum is obtained. If a quorum is present but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
Patrick special meeting to approve the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase
proposal, then Patrick shareholders may be asked to vote on the Patrick adjournment proposal and thereby adjourn
the Patrick special meeting to a later time and place.
In addition, the merger agreement provides that if on a date that is two business days prior to the date the
Patrick special meeting is scheduled (the “Patrick Original Date”), (i) Patrick has not received proxies sufficient to
obtain approval by Patrick shareholders of the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock
increase proposal, whether or not a quorum is present, or (ii) it is necessary to ensure that any required supplement
or amendment to the joint proxy statement/prospectus is delivered to Patrick shareholders within a reasonable
amount of time in advance of the Patrick special meeting, Patrick may, or if LCI so requests, shall, postpone or
adjourn, or make one or more successive postponements or adjournments of, the Patrick special meeting, as long as
the Patrick special meeting is not postponed or adjourned more than 10 business days in connection with any one
postponement or adjournment or more than an aggregate of 20 business days from the Patrick Original Date, in each
case, excluding any adjournments or postponements required by applicable law or consented to in advance in
writing by LCI. The merger agreement further provides that in the event that LCI postpones or adjourns the LCI
special meeting in accordance with the merger agreement, Patrick may postpone or adjourn the Patrick special
meeting in order for the Patrick special meeting and the LCI special meeting to be scheduled on the same date.
At any subsequent reconvening of the Patrick special meeting at which a quorum is present, any business may
be transacted that might have been transacted at the original meeting, and all proxies will be voted in the same
58
manner as they would have been voted at the original convening of the Patrick special meeting, except for any
proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn prior to the time the proxy is voted at the reconvened
meeting.
Proxy Solicitation Costs
The enclosed proxy card is being solicited by Patrick and the Patrick board. Patrick bears all expenses incurred
in connection with the solicitation of the proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, Patrick’s directors, officers and
employees may solicit proxies in person, by phone or by electronic means. These persons will not be specifically
compensated for conducting such solicitation.
Patrick will ask brokers, banks and other nominees to forward the proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial
owners of shares of Patrick common stock held of record by such nominee holders. Patrick will reimburse these
nominee holders for their customary clerical and mailing expenses incurred in forwarding the proxy solicitation
materials to the beneficial owners.
Patrick and LCI will bear equally the cost of filing, printing and mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
No Appraisal Rights
Under Indiana law, Patrick shareholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger.
Assistance
If you need assistance in completing your proxy card or have questions regarding the Patrick special
meeting, contact Patrick by writing to:
Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Attention: Office of the Secretary
irrequests@patrickind.com
PATRICK SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD CAREFULLY READ THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/
PROSPECTUS IN ITS ENTIRETY FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PATRICK
PROPOSALS.
59
PATRICK PROPOSALS
Proposal 1: The Patrick Share Issuance Proposal
Overview
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to you as a shareholder of Patrick as part of the
solicitation of proxies by the Patrick board of directors for use at the Patrick special meeting to consider and vote
upon a proposal to approve the issuance of shares of Patrick common stock to LCI stockholders pursuant to the
merger agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Under Nasdaq rules, a company is required to obtain shareholder approval prior to the issuance of shares of
common stock if the number of shares of common stock to be issued is, or will be upon issuance, equal to or in
excess of 20% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding before the issuance of the shares of common
stock. If the merger is completed pursuant to the merger agreement, Patrick expects to issue a number of shares of
Patrick common stock equal to approximately [ ]% of the number of shares of Patrick common stock
outstanding prior to the share issuance. In the event the Patrick share issuance proposal is not approved by Patrick
shareholders, the merger will not be completed.
Approval of the Patrick share issuance proposal is a condition to the completion of the merger. Additionally, the
completion of the merger is conditioned on the approval of the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal. If the
Patrick share issuance proposal is not approved, either Patrick or LCI may terminate the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding the outcome of the vote on this proposal, the Patrick board will not issue shares of Patrick common
stock to LCI stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement if the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is not
approved by Patrick shareholders or if the merger agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms.
Vote Required for Approval
The Patrick share issuance proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the
Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any)
will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick share issuance proposal.
Recommendation of the Patrick Board
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick share issuance
proposal.
Proposal 2: The Patrick Authorized Stock Increase Proposal
Overview
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to you as a shareholder of Patrick as part of the
solicitation of proxies by the Patrick board of directors for use at the Patrick special meeting to consider and vote
upon a proposal to adopt and approve an amendment to Patrick’s articles of incorporation, as amended, to increase
the number of authorized shares of Patrick common stock. If adopted by the Patrick shareholders, the amendment
would become effective upon filing of an appropriate articles of amendment with the Secretary of State of the State
of Indiana. The proposed amendment would replace Article V of the Patrick articles of incorporation, as amended,
with the following language:
“Authorized Shares: The total number of shares which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is Two
Hundred One Million (201,000,000), consisting of One Million (1,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, without par
value, and Two Hundred Million (200,000,000) shares of Common Stock, without par value.”
Approval of the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is a condition to the completion of the merger and
the merger will not be completed unless the Patrick shareholders approve the Patrick authorized stock increase
proposal. If the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is not approved, either Patrick or LCI may terminate the
merger agreement. Notwithstanding the outcome of the vote on this proposal, the Patrick board will not issue shares
60
of Patrick common stock to LCI stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement if the Patrick share issuance
proposal is not approved by Patrick shareholders or if the merger agreement is terminated for any reason.
The vote on the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is a vote separate and apart from the vote to approve
the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal. Accordingly, a
Patrick shareholder may vote to approve the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal and vote not to approve the
Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal, and vice versa. The
increase in authorized shares of Patrick common stock is required to issue the shares of Patrick common stock that
comprise the merger consideration. The Patrick board also believes that the increased number of authorized shares
of Patrick common stock contemplated by the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is important to the
combined company in order for additional shares to be available for issuance from time to time, without further
action or authorization by the Patrick shareholders (except as required by applicable law or applicable stock
exchange rules), for such corporate purposes as may be determined by the combined company board, including, but
not limited to, financings, potential strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions and business
combinations, grants under equity compensation plans, stock dividends, and stock splits, as well as other general
corporate purposes. The additional shares authorized would be a part of the existing class of Patrick common stock
and, if issued, would have the same rights and privileges as the shares of Patrick common stock presently issued and
outstanding.
Vote Required for Approval
The Patrick authorized stock increase proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority
of the Patrick shares entitled to vote. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any) will have the same
effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal.
Recommendation of the Patrick Board
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock
increase proposal.
Proposal 3: The Patrick Articles Amendment and Restatement Proposal
Overview
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to you as a shareholder of Patrick as part of the
solicitation of proxies by the Patrick board of directors for use at the Patrick special meeting to consider and vote
upon a proposal to adopt and approve the amendment and restatement of Patrick’s articles of incorporation as set
forth in Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. If the Patrick articles amendment and restatement
proposal is approved and the merger is completed, the amended and restated articles of incorporation will govern the
combined company. Patrick shareholders should read the form of amended and restated articles of incorporation in
its entirety.
The key amendments included in the form of amended and restated articles of incorporation are as follows:
•Name: Changes the name of the corporation from “Patrick Industries, Inc.” to “[ ]”; and
•Election of Directors: Changes the voting standard for the election of directors to be a “majority of the
votes cast” in an uncontested election of directors and be a “plurality of the votes cast” in a contested
election of directors (a contested election of directors would occur if the number of persons properly
nominated for election as directors at a meeting of shareholders exceeds the number of directors to be
elected at such meeting).
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, prior to the closing of the merger, Patrick and LCI are required
to mutually agree upon a new corporate name for Patrick, and Patrick shall take all actions necessary to cause such
new name to become effective concurrently with the closing of the merger. Patrick and LCI have mutually agreed to
change the name of Patrick to “[ ].”
61
Patrick believes the change to the voting standard required for the election of directors in contested elections is
necessary to adequately address the needs of the combined company and Patrick and LCI have mutually agreed to
the inclusion of this provision in the proposed amended and restated articles of incorporation.
If this proposal to adopt and approve the Patrick articles amendment and restatement is approved but the Patrick
share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is not approved, or the merger agreement is
terminated for any reason, the Patrick board will abandon the amendments to Patrick’s articles of incorporation
included in this proposal without further action by Patrick shareholders.
In addition to the key amendments listed above, the proposed amended and restated articles of incorporation
include several ministerial and conforming changes to Patrick’s articles of incorporation in an effort to streamline
and modernize the articles of incorporation that will govern the combined company, as Patrick’s existing articles of
incorporation include numerous amendments over the past 50 years and span over 100 pages.
The above summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the proposed amended and restated
articles of incorporation, a copy of which is set forth as Annex B. All Patrick shareholders are encouraged to read
the section titled “Comparison of Shareholders’ / Stockholders’ Rights” and the proposed amended and restated
articles of incorporation in their entirety for a more complete understanding of the proposed changes.
Vote Required for Approval
If either of the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal is not approved,
the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal will not be presented at the special meeting. The Patrick
articles amendment and restatement proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the
Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any)
will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal.
Recommendation of the Patrick Board
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal.
Proposal 4: The Patrick Adjournment Proposal
Overview
The Patrick adjournment proposal, if adopted, will allow the Patrick board to adjourn the Patrick special
meeting, if necessary, to a later date or dates at the determination of the Patrick board, including (i) if there are
insufficient shares of Patrick common stock represented in person or by proxy to constitute a quorum, (ii) to solicit
additional proxies in favor of the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal if
there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Patrick special meeting to approve the Patrick share issuance proposal
or the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, (iii) to ensure that any supplement or amendment to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided to Patrick shareholders or (iv) if required by Patrick under the terms
of the merger agreement or applicable law.
Patrick is asking its shareholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the Patrick board to vote in
favor of any adjournment to the Patrick special meeting (i) to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient
votes to approve the Patrick share issuance proposal or the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, (ii) to ensure
that any supplement to this joint proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided to Patrick shareholders or (iii) if
required by Patrick under the terms of the merger agreement or applicable law.
Vote Required for Approval
The Patrick adjournment proposal requires approval by a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the
Patrick special meeting, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes (if any)
will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Patrick adjournment proposal.
62
Recommendation of the Patrick Board
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick adjournment
proposal.
63
SPECIAL MEETING OF LCI STOCKHOLDERS
General
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to LCI stockholders as part of a solicitation of proxies
by the LCI board for use at the LCI special meeting and at any adjournments or postponements of such special
meeting. This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides LCI stockholders with information about the LCI special
meeting and should be read carefully in its entirety.
Date, Time and Place
The LCI special meeting will be held virtually on [ ], 2026, at [ ] a.m., Eastern Time. Because
the LCI special meeting is completely virtual and being conducted via live webcast, LCI stockholders will not be
able to attend the meeting in person. LCI stockholders will be able to attend the LCI special meeting online and vote
their shares electronically during the meeting by visiting [ ], which is the LCI special meeting website.
If you join the virtual LCI special meeting as an authenticated LCI stockholder by visiting the LCI special
meeting website, you will be able to attend and participate in the LCI special meeting, submit your questions during
the meeting and vote your shares online. In order to join the meeting as an authenticated stockholder and vote online
during the virtual meeting, you will need a valid control number. Your control number can be found on the proxy
card, voting instruction form, notice or email distributed to you.
Anyone may enter the LCI virtual meeting website as a “guest” and no control number will be required;
however, only authenticated LCI stockholders may submit their votes and/or questions during the meeting.
Help and technical support for accessing and participating in the virtual meeting will be available by following
the instructions on the LCI virtual meeting website. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the LCI special
meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the LCI
virtual meeting website login page. Please give yourself sufficient time to log-in and ensure you can hear the
streaming audio before the meeting starts.
Purpose of the LCI Special Meeting
The purpose of the LCI special meeting is to consider and vote on:
•the LCI merger proposal;
•the LCI advisory compensation proposal; and
•the LCI adjournment proposal.
LCI will transact no other business at the LCI special meeting.
Recommendation of the LCI Board of Directors
The LCI board unanimously recommends that LCI stockholders vote:
•“FOR” the LCI merger proposal;
•“FOR” the LCI advisory compensation proposal; and
•“FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal.
For additional information on the recommendation of the LCI board, see the section titled “The Merger—
Recommendation of the LCI Board and Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 109 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
64
Record Date, LCI Stockholders Entitled to Vote and Voting Rights
Only holders of record of shares of LCI common stock as of the close of business on [ ], 2026, the
record date for the LCI special meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote the shares of LCI common stock
that they held on the LCI record date at, the LCI special meeting and any postponement or adjournment of the LCI
special meeting.
As of the close of business on the LCI record date, there were [ ] shares of LCI common stock
outstanding and entitled to be voted at the LCI special meeting. Each share of LCI common stock entitles its holder
of record to one vote on each matter considered at the LCI special meeting.
A list of LCI stockholders of record entitled to vote at the LCI special meeting will be available for inspection
by LCI stockholders for any purpose germane to the LCI special meeting at LCI’s principal place of business, which
is located at 3501 County Road 6 East, Elkhart, Indiana 46514, during ordinary business hours for a period of no
less than ten days before the LCI special meeting.
Voting by LCI’s Directors and Executive Officers
As of the LCI record date, LCI’s directors and executive officers, and their affiliates, as a group, beneficially
owned and were entitled to vote [ ] shares of LCI common stock, or approximately [ ]% of the total
outstanding shares of LCI common stock as of the LCI record date.
LCI’s directors and executive officers have informed LCI that they intend to vote their shares “FOR” of each of
the LCI proposals, although none of them are obligated to do so.
Quorum
In order for business to be conducted at the LCI special meeting, a quorum must be present. A quorum at the
LCI special meeting requires the presence in person (by participation at the virtual meeting) or by proxy of the
holders of record of a majority of the shares of LCI common stock entitled to vote.
As of the LCI record date, [ ] shares of LCI common stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at
the LCI special meeting; accordingly, the presence, in person (virtually) or by proxy, at the LCI special meeting of at
least [ ] shares of LCI common stock entitled to vote at the LCI special meeting is necessary to constitute a
quorum.
Required Vote; Treatment of Abstentions, Broker Non-Votes and Failures to Vote
LCI Merger Proposal
Vote required: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock
entitled to vote on the LCI merger proposal is required to approve such proposal. Approval of the LCI merger
proposal is a condition to the completion of the first merger.
Effect of abstentions, broker non-votes and failures to vote: Abstentions, broker non-votes and failures by LCI
stockholders to vote on the LCI merger proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI merger
proposal.
LCI Advisory Compensation Proposal
Vote required: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock
which are present in person (virtually) or represented by proxy at the LCI special meeting and entitled to vote on the
LCI advisory compensation proposal is required to approve such proposal on an advisory basis. Approval of the LCI
advisory compensation proposal is not a condition to the completion of the first merger.
Effect of abstentions, broker non-votes and failures to vote: Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
“AGAINST” the LCI advisory compensation proposal. Broker non-votes and failures by LCI stockholders to vote
65
on the LCI advisory compensation proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the LCI advisory
compensation proposal.
LCI Adjournment Proposal
Vote required: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock
which are present in person (virtually) or represented by proxy at the LCI special meeting and entitled to vote on the
LCI adjournment proposal is required to approve such proposal. Approval of the LCI adjournment proposal is not a
condition to the completion of the first merger.
Effect of abstentions, broker non-votes and failures to vote: Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
“AGAINST” the LCI adjournment proposal. Broker non-votes and failures by LCI stockholders to vote on the LCI
adjournment proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the LCI adjournment proposal.
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
An abstention occurs when a stockholder attends a meeting, either in person (virtually) or by proxy, but abstains
from voting. At the LCI special meeting, abstentions will be counted as present for purposes of determining whether
a quorum exists. Abstaining from voting will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI merger proposal
and, assuming a quorum is present, no effect on the LCI advisory compensation proposal and the LCI adjournment
proposal.
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not
vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that
proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner with respect to that proposal, but does
have discretionary voting power over other “routine” matters and submits votes for those matters. It is expected that
all proposals to be voted on at the LCI special meeting will be considered “non-routine” matters, and therefore,
brokers, banks and other nominees holding shares in “street name” will not have discretionary voting power with
respect to any of the proposals to be considered at the LCI special meeting. Accordingly, if a beneficial owner of
shares of LCI common stock held in “street name” does not give voting instructions to the broker, bank or other
nominee with respect to an LCI proposal, then those shares will not be counted as present and entitled to vote for
purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the LCI special meeting.
If no instruction as to how to vote is given (including no instruction to abstain from voting) in an executed, duly
returned and not revoked proxy, the proxy will be voted “FOR” the LCI merger proposal, “FOR” the LCI advisory
compensation proposal and “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal.
Methods of Voting
Stockholders of Record
LCI stockholders of record may vote their shares electronically during the virtual LCI special meeting by
attending the meeting and following the voting instructions provided during the meeting or submit a proxy to have
their shares voted by internet, telephone or by mail. In particular, LCI stockholders of record may vote or submit a
proxy to have their shares voted by using one of the following methods:
•By Internet. You may submit a proxy electronically on the internet by visiting the website indicated on the
enclosed proxy card and following the instructions provided on the enclosed proxy card. Please have your
proxy card in hand when you log onto the website. If you submit your proxy to vote over the internet, you
do not have to mail in a proxy card. If you choose to submit your vote via proxy over the internet, you must
do so prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on [ ], 2026.
•By Telephone. You may submit a proxy by telephone by calling (from the U.S. and Canada only) the toll-
free number listed on the enclosed proxy card and following the recorded instructions. Please have your
proxy card in hand when you call. If you submit your proxy by telephone, you do not have to mail in a
proxy card. If you choose to submit your vote via proxy by telephone, you must do so prior to 11:59 p.m.,
Eastern Time, on [ ], 2026.
66
•By Mail. You may submit a proxy by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning
it by mail in the enclosed postage-paid reply envelope. The envelope requires no additional postage if
mailed in the United States.
If you intend to submit your proxy by mail, your completed proxy card must be received prior to the LCI special
meeting.
•Attending and Voting at the Meeting. If you join the virtual LCI special meeting as an authenticated LCI
stockholder by visiting the LCI special meeting website, you will be able to vote your shares online during
the meeting. In order to join the meeting as an authenticated stockholder and vote online during the virtual
meeting, you will need a valid control number, which can be found on the proxy card, voting instruction
form, notice or email distributed to you.
If you submit a proxy, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions.
If your properly executed proxy does not contain voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote your
shares in accordance with the voting recommendations of the LCI board.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you expect to attend the LCI special meeting, we encourage you to
complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card, or vote via the internet or by telephone. This will ensure that
your shares are represented at the meeting. Even if you submit a proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is
voted. If you attend the meeting and wish to vote via the online platform, you will be able to do so even if you have
previously submitted a proxy.
Street Name Stockholders
If your shares are held in street name (that is, in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee), you should
receive a voting instruction form seeking instruction from you as to how your shares should be voted. Your broker,
bank or other nominee will vote your shares only if you provide specific instructions on how to vote by following
the instructions provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee. Please check the voting instruction form
used by your broker, bank or other nominee.
Street name stockholders may generally vote their shares or submit a proxy to have their shares voted by one of
the following methods:
•By the Methods Listed on the Voting Instruction Form. Please refer to the voting instruction form or other
information forwarded by your broker, bank or other nominee to determine whether you may submit a
proxy by telephone or on the internet and follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other
nominee.
•Electronically at the Special Meeting. You may vote electronically at the LCI special meeting. To
participate in the virtual LCI special meeting, you will need the control number included in your voting
instruction form.
If your shares are held in street name and you wish to revoke a proxy, you should contact your broker, bank or
other nominee and follow its procedures for changing your voting instructions.
If you hold shares in BOTH street name and as a stockholder of record, YOU MUST VOTE
SEPARATELY for each set of shares.
Questions About Voting
If you have any questions about how to vote or submit a proxy, you may contact D.F. King & Co, Inc., LCI’s
proxy solicitor, by telephone at (800) 859-8509 (toll-free) or, for brokers and banks, (212) 448-4476 (collect) or by
email at LCII@dfking.com.
67
Revocability of Proxies
If you are a stockholder of record of LCI, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any time before the
polls close at the LCI special meeting by:
•voting again by telephone or through the internet;
•requesting, completing and mailing in a new paper proxy card;
•giving written notice of revocation to LCI’s Corporate Secretary, which must be received before the LCI
special meeting, by mail to Corporate Secretary, 3501 County Road 6 East, Elkhart, Indiana 46514; or
•attending the LCI special meeting online and voting your shares electronically during the meeting (merely
attending the LCI special meeting will not revoke a prior submitted proxy).
If you are a street name stockholder, you must follow the instructions to revoke your proxy, if any, provided by
your broker, bank or other nominee.
Solicitation of Proxies; Proxy Solicitation Costs
LCI is providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the LCI board of proxies to be
voted at the LCI special meeting, and LCI will bear the cost of soliciting such proxies. LCI has engaged D.F. King
& Co, Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies in connection with the LCI special meeting for an estimated fee
of $25,000, plus reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses.
Solicitation initially will be made by mail. Forms of proxies and proxy materials may also be distributed
through brokers, banks and other nominees to the beneficial owners of shares of LCI common stock, in which case
these parties will be reimbursed by LCI for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Proxies may also be solicited in
person or by telephone, electronic mail or other electronic medium by certain of LCI’s directors, officers and other
employees, without additional compensation. LCI stockholders may also be solicited by press releases issued by LCI
and/or Patrick, postings on LCI’s or Patrick’s websites and advertisements in periodicals.
LCI and Patrick will bear equally the cost of filing, printing and mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Adjournment
In accordance with the LCI bylaws, whether or not a quorum is present, the LCI special meeting may be
adjourned from time to time by the Chairperson of the LCI board, the Vice Chairperson of the LCI board, LCI’s
Chief Executive Officer (if also a member of the LCI board) or the chairperson of the LCI special meeting selected
by the LCI board, to reconvene at the same or some other place (if any), for the purpose of, among other things,
soliciting additional proxies. If the LCI special meeting is adjourned, LCI stockholders who have already submitted
their proxies will be able to revoke them at any time prior to their use. At any subsequent reconvening of the LCI
special meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as the manner in which such proxies would have been
voted at the original convening of the LCI special meeting, except for any proxies that have been validly revoked or
withdrawn prior to the subsequent meeting.
The merger agreement provides that if on a date that is two business days prior to the date the LCI special
meeting is scheduled (the “LCI Original Date”), (i) LCI has not received proxies sufficient to obtain approval by
LCI stockholders of the LCI merger proposal, whether or not a quorum is present, or (ii) it is necessary to ensure
that any required supplement or amendment to the joint proxy statement/prospectus is delivered to LCI stockholders
within a reasonable amount of time in advance of the LCI special meeting, LCI may, or if Patrick so requests, shall,
postpone or adjourn, or make one or more successive postponements or adjournments of, the LCI special meeting, as
long as the LCI special meeting is not postponed or adjourned more than 10 business days in connection with any
one postponement or adjournment or more than an aggregate of 20 business days from the LCI Original Date, in
each case, excluding any adjournments or postponements required by applicable law or consented to in advance in
writing by Patrick. The merger agreement further provides that in the event that Patrick postpones or adjourns the
68
Patrick special meeting in accordance with the merger agreement, LCI may postpone or adjourn the LCI special
meeting in order for the LCI special meeting and the Patrick special meeting to be scheduled on the same date.
No Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law, LCI’s stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights for their shares of LCI common
stock in connection with the first merger or to any similar rights of dissenters under Delaware law. For more
information, see the section titled “The Merger—No Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 143 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Assistance
If you need assistance in completing your proxy card, submitting your proxy or have questions regarding the
LCI special meeting, contact:
D.F. King & Co, Inc. 28 Liberty Street, Floor 53 New York, NY 10005 Call Toll-Free: (800) 859-8509 Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 448-4476 Email: LCII@dfking.com |
69
LCI PROPOSALS
The LCI Merger Proposal
Overview
If the merger is completed, at the first effective time, each share of LCI common stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the first effective time (other than shares of LCI common stock held by LCI, Patrick or any of
their respective subsidiaries immediately prior to the first effective time) will be converted into the right to receive
1.2440 shares of Patrick common stock, with cash to be paid in lieu of fractional shares of Patrick common stock
that LCI common stockholders would otherwise be entitled to receive in the first merger, as further described in the
sections titled “The Merger—Merger Consideration to LCI Stockholders” and “The Merger Agreement—
The approval by LCI stockholders of the LCI merger proposal is required by Section 251 of the DGCL and is a
condition to the consummation of the first merger.
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock entitled to vote
on the LCI merger proposal is required to approve such proposal. Abstentions, broker non-votes and failures by LCI
stockholders to vote on the LCI merger proposal will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI merger
proposal.
Recommendation of the LCI Board
The LCI board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the LCI merger proposal.
The LCI Advisory Compensation Proposal
Overview
As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the applicable SEC rules issued thereunder, which were
enacted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, LCI is required to provide its
stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that may be
paid or become payable to LCI’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger, as
described in the section titled “The Merger—Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—
Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to LCI’s Named Executive Officers—Golden Parachute
Compensation.” Accordingly, LCI stockholders are being provided the opportunity to cast a non-binding, advisory
vote on such payments.
As a non-binding, advisory vote, the LCI advisory compensation proposal is not binding upon LCI or the LCI
board or Patrick or the Patrick board, and approval of the LCI advisory compensation proposal is not a condition to
the consummation of the merger and is a vote separate and apart from the LCI merger proposal. Accordingly, LCI
stockholders may vote to approve the LCI merger proposal and vote not to approve the LCI advisory compensation
proposal and vice versa. Because the merger-related executive compensation to be paid in connection with the
merger is based on the terms of the merger agreement as well as the contractual arrangements with LCI’s named
executive officers, such compensation will be payable, regardless of the outcome of this non-binding, advisory vote,
if the LCI merger proposal is approved (subject only to the contractual conditions set forth in the merger agreement
and such contractual arrangements with LCI’s named executive officers). However, LCI seeks the support of its
stockholders and believes that stockholder support is appropriate as its executive compensation programs are
designed to incentivize executives to successfully execute a transaction such as that contemplated by the merger
from its early stages until consummation. Accordingly, LCI stockholders are being asked to vote on the following
resolution:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders of LCI approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation that
may be paid or become payable to the named executive officers of LCI that is based on or otherwise relates to the
70
merger, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K under the heading “The Merger—Interests of LCI
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to LCI’s Named
Executive Officers—Golden Parachute Compensation” in the joint proxy statement/prospectus of Patrick and LCI
with respect to the special meeting of stockholders to be held on [ ], 2026.
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock which are
present in person (virtually) or represented by proxy at the LCI special meeting and entitled to vote on the LCI
advisory compensation proposal is required to approve such proposal on an advisory basis. Abstentions will have the
same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the LCI advisory compensation proposal. Broker non-votes and failures by LCI
stockholders to vote on the LCI advisory compensation proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on
the LCI advisory compensation proposal.
Recommendation of the LCI Board
The LCI board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the LCI advisory compensation proposal.
The LCI Adjournment Proposal
Overview
The LCI special meeting may be adjourned from time to time to another time or place, if necessary or
appropriate, to permit, among other things, further solicitation of proxies if necessary to obtain additional votes in
favor of the LCI merger proposal or to ensure that any supplement or amendment to this joint proxy statement/
prospectus is timely provided to LCI stockholders.
If, at the LCI special meeting, (i) there are insufficient shares of LCI common stock represented (either in
person (via the internet) or by proxy) to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the business of such meeting,
(ii) additional time is required for the filing and mailing of any supplemental or amended disclosure which LCI has
determined is reasonably likely to be required under applicable law and for such supplemental or amended
disclosure to be disseminated and reviewed by LCI stockholders prior to the LCI special meeting, (iii) additional
time is needed to allow for solicitation of additional proxies, if and to the extent LCI reasonably believes the number
of shares of LCI common stock present or represented and voting in favor of the LCI merger proposal is insufficient
to approve such proposal or (iv) if required by law, LCI intends to move to adjourn the LCI special meeting. In that
event, LCI will ask LCI stockholders to vote upon the LCI adjournment proposal, but not the LCI merger proposal
or the LCI advisory compensation proposal.
In this proposal, LCI is asking LCI stockholders to authorize the respective holder of any proxy solicited by the
LCI board, on a discretionary basis, (i) if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the LCI special meeting to
approve the LCI merger proposal or (ii) if necessary or appropriate to ensure that any supplement or amendment to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is timely provided to LCI stockholders, to vote in favor of adjourning the LCI
special meeting to another time.
The approval of the LCI adjournment proposal by LCI stockholders is not a condition to the completion of the
merger. In addition, in accordance with the LCI bylaws, whether or not a quorum is present, the LCI special meeting
may be adjourned from time to time by the Chairperson of the LCI board, the Vice Chairperson of the LCI board,
LCI’s Chief Executive Officer (if also a member of the LCI board) or the chairperson of the LCI special meeting
selected by the LCI board, to reconvene at the same or some other place (if any), for the purpose of, among other
things, soliciting additional proxies.
If the LCI special meeting is adjourned, LCI stockholders who have already submitted their proxies will be able
to revoke them at any time prior to their use. At any subsequent reconvening of the LCI special meeting, all proxies
will be voted in the same manner as the manner in which such proxies would have been voted at the original
convening of the LCI special meeting, except for any proxies that have been validly revoked or withdrawn prior to
the subsequent meeting.
71
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of LCI common stock which are
present in person (virtually) or represented by proxy at the LCI special meeting and entitled to vote on the LCI
adjournment proposal is required to approve such proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
“AGAINST” the LCI adjournment proposal. Broker non-votes and failures by LCI stockholders to vote on the LCI
adjournment proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the LCI adjournment proposal.
Recommendation of the LCI Board
The LCI board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal.
72
THE MERGER
This discussion of the merger is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is attached
to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. You should
read the entire merger agreement carefully as it is the legal document that governs the merger.
Merger Structure
The business combination of Patrick and LCI will be effected through the merger of First Merger Sub with and
into LCI (which we refer to as the “first merger”), with LCI surviving as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick
(which we refer to as the “initial surviving entity”), immediately followed by the merger of the initial surviving
entity with and into Second Merger Sub (which we refer to as the “second merger”), with Second Merger Sub
surviving the second merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick.
Parties to the Merger
Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Phone: (574) 294-7511
Patrick is a leading component solutions provider serving original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket
customers in the Recreational Vehicle (“RV”), Marine, Powersports and Housing markets. Since 1959, Patrick has
empowered manufacturers and outdoor enthusiasts to achieve next-level recreation experiences. Patrick’s customer-
focused approach brings together design, manufacturing, distribution, and transportation in a full solutions model
that defines it as a trusted partner. Patrick is home to more than 85 leading brands, all united by a commitment to
quality, customer service, and innovation. Headquartered in Elkhart, IN, Patrick employs approximately 10,000
skilled team members throughout the United States. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, Patrick had
consolidated net sales of $3,951 million. Patrick’s 2025 operating income was $276 million and net income was
$135 million.
Patrick is a Indiana corporation, and its common stock is listed on the Nasdaq, trading under the symbol
“PATK.”
For additional information about Patrick and its subsidiaries, see the documents incorporated by reference in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus in the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on
page 208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
LCI Industries
3501 County Road 6 East
Elkhart, Indiana 46514
Phone: (574) 535-1125
LCI Industries, through its wholly owned subsidiary Lippert Components, Inc. and its subsidiaries, is a global
leader in supplying engineered components to the outdoor recreation, transportation, marine and housing industries.
In addition to serving original equipment manufacturers, LCI also caters to aftermarket needs, selling through retail
dealers, wholesale distributors and service centers, as well as direct-to-consumer sales through online platforms. As
of June 30, 2026, LCI operated over 100 manufacturing facilities located throughout North America and Europe. For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, LCI had consolidated net sales of $4,122 million. LCI’s 2025 operating
profit was $279.9 million and net income was $188.3 million.
LCI Industries is a Delaware corporation, and LCI common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
“LCII.”
73
For additional information about LCI and its subsidiaries, see the documents incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus in the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page
208 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Planet First Merger Sub Inc.
c/o Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
First Merger Sub is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Upon the completion of the first merger, First
Merger Sub will cease to exist. First Merger Sub was incorporated in Delaware on June 29, 2026 for the sole
purpose of effecting the merger.
Planet Second Merger Sub LLC
c/o Patrick Industries, Inc.
107 W. Franklin Street
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
Second Merger Sub is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Upon the completion of the second merger,
Second Merger Sub will survive as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Second Merger Sub was formed in
Indiana on June 29, 2026 for the sole purpose of effecting the merger.
Background of the Merger
The following chronology summarizes the principal events leading to the execution of the merger agreement.
This chronology does not purport to describe every conversation among representatives of Patrick, LCI and their
respective directors, officers and advisors. Members of LCI management and Patrick management, including Jason
D. Lippert, then President and Chief Executive Officer of LCI and a member of the LCI board, and Andy L.
Nemeth, Chief Executive Officer of Patrick and Chairman of the Patrick board, also interacted occasionally in the
ordinary course of business unrelated to a transaction.
As part of Patrick’s ongoing and ordinary course strategic planning process, the Patrick board and Patrick’s
senior management regularly review Patrick’s operating performance, market conditions, acquisition opportunities,
capital allocation strategy and other strategic alternatives available to Patrick, including opportunities intended to
enhance long-term shareholder value.
As part of LCI’s ongoing and ordinary course strategic planning process, the LCI board and LCI’s senior
management regularly review LCI’s long-term strategic plans and goals, opportunities, overall industry trends, the
competitive and economic environment in which LCI operates and LCI’s short- and long-term performance. As part
of these reviews, the LCI board, with the assistance of LCI’s management team and advisors, has considered
whether various strategic actions, including business combinations, strategic acquisitions and divestitures,
investments and other strategic transactions and opportunities, would be in the best interests of LCI and its
stockholders.
In mid-August 2025, the chief executive officer of a potential strategic counterparty (“Party A”) approached Mr.
Tracy D. Graham, then Chairman of the LCI board, regarding a potential all-stock transaction between the parties,
and verbally proposed an “at-the-market” transaction with no premium to LCI’s stockholders (such proposal, the
“Party A Expression of Interest”). Mr. Graham promptly informed the LCI board of the Party A Expression of
Interest. Mr. Graham, Mr. Lippert, select representatives of LCI management and representatives of Party A held
several discussions from August through November 2025 regarding a potential transaction. In connection with its
review of the Party A Expression of Interest and related strategic opportunities, LCI retained Perella Weinberg
Partners (“PWP”) as its financial advisor and Kirkland & Ellis LLP (“K&E”) as its outside legal counsel. LCI
engaged PWP based on PWP’s qualifications, familiarity with LCI and its industry and experience with merger-of-
74
equals transactions. The engagement with PWP was not specific to a transaction with Party A. On September 17,
2025, pursuant to an engagement letter dated as of that date, LCI formally engaged PWP as its financial advisor.
Between August and October 2025, the LCI board held multiple meetings, including with representatives of
PWP and K&E, to be briefed on the status of discussions with Party A and to discuss and analyze a potential
transaction with Party A, as well as other potential strategic transactions. In addition to reviewing the potential
merits of a transaction with Party A, the representatives of PWP reviewed with the LCI board potential approaches if
the LCI board were to determine to explore other strategic alternatives that may be available to LCI. Representatives
of PWP also reviewed with the LCI board and LCI’s management a preliminary financial analysis regarding a
potential transaction with Party A as well as its review and assessment of potential transactions involving other
potential counterparties, including Patrick.
On September 11, 2025, at the direction of the LCI board, Mr. Lippert contacted Todd M. Cleveland, a member
of the Patrick board, to inquire whether Patrick would consider a potential combination with LCI. Mr. Cleveland
advised Mr. Nemeth of this communication.
In September 2025, at the request of the LCI board, representatives of PWP communicated to representatives of
Party A that in light of the proposed relative pro forma ownership that LCI and Party A stockholders would own in a
combination and the governance arrangements proposed by Party A, the LCI board was not interested in pursuing a
transaction with Party A unless such transaction included a premium for LCI stockholders.
On October 14, 2025, Messrs. Nemeth and Cleveland met with Messrs. Lippert and Graham for a high-level
discussion regarding whether Patrick and LCI should consider exploring a possible strategic combination. No
specific transaction structure, exchange ratio, ownership split, governance arrangements or other definitive
transaction terms were discussed.
From October through November 2025, Mr. Nemeth had individual discussions with several members of the
Patrick board regarding the October 14 meeting and whether to explore a Patrick and LCI business combination.
In mid-November 2025, Mr. Graham reiterated to a representative of Party A that the LCI board was not
interested in pursuing an all-stock transaction with Party A unless such transaction included a premium for LCI
stockholders. Although representatives of Party A had previously indicated that Party A might be willing to consider
a premium, the representative of Party A subsequently confirmed to Mr. Graham that Party A was not able to offer a
premium that would be satisfactory to the LCI board and the parties agreed not to pursue a potential strategic
transaction. Party A did not thereafter submit any proposal to LCI with respect to a potential strategic transaction.
On November 22, 2025, the LCI board held a meeting with representatives of PWP. At this meeting, the LCI
board discussed LCI’s long-term strategic plans and alternatives. While the LCI board determined to not continue to
engage Party A in discussions regarding a potential strategic transaction, the LCI board discussed that other potential
transformational strategic transactions may be worth pursuing. The LCI board directed Mr. Lippert and Mr. Graham
to continue to explore other potential transformational initiatives.
In late November and December 2025, Mr. Lippert, Mr. Graham and representatives of PWP had several
discussions regarding potential strategic alternatives, including a potential business combination with Patrick.
On December 9, 2025, Mr. Lippert held a meeting with representatives of PWP, wherein representatives of
PWP discussed the rationale for strategic opportunities across the broader outdoor enthusiast end market and
highlighted illustrative transaction structures with two counterparties, including a business combination with Patrick
and an acquisition by LCI of another company. Following this meeting, Mr. Lippert and representatives of PWP
discussed with Mr. Graham whether to request a meeting with Patrick to discuss a potential strategic transaction.
In December 2025, Mr. Nemeth met with Mr. Lippert to further their discussion regarding a possible strategic
combination, including potential customer reaction and perception and the possibility that customers could share in
potential synergy savings resulting from a combination. Later in December 2025, Messrs. Nemeth, Graham and
Lippert and Jeffrey M. Rodino, President of Patrick, met and discussed, on a preliminary basis, whether Patrick and
LCI should explore a potential strategic combination structured as an all-stock merger of equals “at the market” with
75
no premium to either party’s shareholders. No specific exchange ratio, ownership split, governance arrangements or
other definitive transaction terms were proposed or agreed at that meeting. They agreed to reconnect after the
holidays if there remained interest in continuing discussions. Mr. Nemeth also consulted with representatives of
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP (“McDermott”), Patrick’s outside legal counsel, regarding process considerations
and the duties of Patrick directors and officers in connection with the evaluation of a potential strategic transaction.
In January 2026, Mr. Nemeth met again with Mr. Lippert to continue discussing the potential transaction,
including potential governance arrangements, anticipated customer reaction and opportunities for customers to share
in potential synergy savings. Following the meeting, Mr. Nemeth spoke individually with each member of the
Patrick board to update them regarding the discussions and obtain their views on whether Patrick should continue
exploring a potential transaction with LCI. Thereafter, and continuing through February 2026, representatives of
Patrick and LCI held additional exploratory discussions regarding the potential strategic rationale for a combination,
including the potential benefits of combining two companies with complementary product portfolios and end
markets, potential operating efficiencies and cost saving synergies. These discussions also addressed, on a
preliminary basis, potential management, leadership and governance arrangements for a combined company.
Throughout this period, representatives of LCI regularly updated the LCI board regarding the status of discussions
with Patrick regarding a potential combination.
At a meeting of the Patrick board held on February 10, 2026 and February 11, 2026, Mr. Nemeth briefed the
Patrick board regarding the preliminary discussions with LCI. Mr. Nemeth described the reasons why a potential
merger with LCI could be beneficial and provided an overview of LCI’s business and its potential strategic fit with
Patrick. Representatives of Baird attended portions of the meeting and discussed the concept of a potential merger of
equals involving Patrick and LCI, including the potential vision for a combination of the two companies and
considerations relevant to effecting a merger of equals. Following the discussion, the Patrick board recommended
that Mr. Nemeth continue engagement with LCI and work with Baird and other potential investment banking
advisors to develop a formal proposal for board consideration. The Patrick board advised Mr. Nemeth that any
potential transaction would need to preserve Patrick’s strategic direction, culture, leadership and succession
planning, including that Mr. Nemeth would serve as chief executive officer of the combined company.
On February 21, 2026, Mr. Nemeth spoke with Mr. Lippert and conveyed the terms on which Patrick would be
prepared to continue discussions. They agreed to reconnect the following week after Mr. Lippert had considered
those points. Mr. Nemeth then updated M. Scott Welch, a member of the Patrick board, and Mr. Cleveland regarding
the conversation.
On February 23, 2026 and February 24, 2026, Messrs. Nemeth, Welch, Graham and Lippert held additional
discussions regarding the terms on which the parties would be prepared to continue to pursue a potential strategic
combination. During those conversations, Messrs. Nemeth and Welch reiterated that the Patrick board would be
prepared to continue discussions only on the basis that Mr. Nemeth would serve as chief executive officer of the
combined company. Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding these discussions.
On March 2, 2026, Mr. Nemeth and Mr. Graham met to discuss a potential transaction between the parties,
including Mr. Nemeth’s vision and strategy for the combined company. Patrick and LCI also entered into a mutual
confidentiality and nondisclosure agreement to facilitate the exchange of nonpublic information in connection with
their evaluation of a potential transaction. The agreement included one-year mutual standstill and employee non-
solicitation provisions, subject to specified customary exceptions.
On March 5, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with representatives of PWP and K&E. Mr. Graham provided
the LCI board with an update on his discussions with Mr. Nemeth. Representatives of PWP provided the LCI board
with an overview of a potential transaction with Patrick, including preliminary valuation perspectives, strategic
rationale, developing a framework to analyze synergy potential, process considerations and potential management
and governance arrangements. The representatives of K&E reviewed the LCI board’s fiduciary duties under
Delaware law with respect to a potential transaction. The LCI board noted Patrick’s positions regarding management
of the combined company, including Patrick’s expectation that Mr. Nemeth would serve as chief executive officer of
the combined company, and discussed its view that the chief executive officer and the chair of the combined
company should be designated by different parties, such that if Mr. Nemeth were to serve as chief executive officer,
76
LCI would be entitled to designate the chair of the combined company board. Following discussion, the LCI board
expressed support for continuing discussions with Patrick and noted that, while it understood Patrick’s expectations
with respect to the chief executive officer of the combined company and was willing to continue discussions on this
basis, it would reserve any final decisions on these matters until transaction discussions progressed.
On March 6, 2026, Mr. Graham communicated to Mr. Nemeth that LCI had noted Patrick’s perspectives
regarding management of the combined company, including Patrick’s expectation that Mr. Nemeth would serve as
chief executive officer of the combined company, and was prepared to continue discussions, without committing to
any particular management or governance arrangement. Mr. Graham also communicated that, if Patrick were to
designate the chief executive officer of the combined company, LCI would expect to designate the chair of the
combined company board. Mr. Graham and Mr. Nemeth discussed a collaborative approach to determining other
management roles in the combined company. Mr. Nemeth communicated that Patrick was in the process of engaging
J.P. Morgan and Baird as financial advisors.
Later on March 6, 2026, Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding his discussions with Mr. Graham.
Representatives of McDermott reviewed with the Patrick board the general process, fiduciary duty and transaction
considerations applicable to a merger of equals transaction, and the anticipated need for antitrust clearance. Mr.
Nemeth also discussed his views regarding a potential organizational structure for the combined company, certain
key leadership roles, areas of risk to be diligenced by a select team of Patrick management and potential engagement
of J.P. Morgan and Baird as Patrick’s financial advisors.
On March 7, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with representatives of PWP and K&E to discuss the potential
transaction with Patrick and receive an update from Mr. Graham on his recent discussions with Mr. Nemeth. Mr.
Graham reported that Mr. Nemeth had again conveyed Patrick’s expectation that Mr. Nemeth would serve as chief
executive officer of the combined company, with other management roles determined collaboratively. Mr. Graham
also reported that Mr. Nemeth had expressed openness to LCI selecting the combined company’s board chair but
expected a board of five directors selected by Patrick and four directors selected by LCI, to which Mr. Graham
responded that LCI expected equal representation. Mr. Lippert then discussed his prior conversation with Mr.
Nemeth regarding Patrick’s expectation that Mr. Lippert would not serve as chief executive officer of the combined
company and then departed the meeting to allow for executive session. Following discussion, the remaining
directors expressed support for continuing to explore the potential transaction and noted that they understood
Patrick’s expectations with respect to the chief executive officer of the combined company and were willing to
continue discussions on this basis although they would reserve any final decisions on these matters until transaction
discussions progressed.
On March 11, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting to discuss the potential transaction. Mr. Nemeth provided
an update on his discussions with Mr. Graham and reported that Mr. Graham expressed willingness to continue
transaction discussions on the basis that Mr. Nemeth would be the chief executive officer of the combined company.
The Patrick board authorized Mr. Nemeth to continue engaging with Mr. Graham and to begin work on a valuation
proposal and term sheet.
On March 14, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of
K&E and PWP. At the meeting, Mr. Graham provided an update to the LCI board on transaction discussions with
Mr. Nemeth. Representatives of PWP provided an overview of certain illustrative valuation information, as well as
an overview of key transaction workstreams and sequencing of these workstreams. Following discussion, the LCI
board reiterated its support for continuing discussions with Patrick.
On March 21, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of
K&E and PWP. Representatives of PWP updated the LCI board on LCI’s and Patrick’s stock performance and the
implied exchange ratio in an “at the market” merger of equals based on current stock prices.
On March 22, 2026, Patrick determined that J.P. Morgan would serve as its lead financial advisor and Baird
would serve as its co-lead financial advisor in connection with the potential transaction. J.P. Morgan and Baird were
selected based on, among other things, their qualifications, expertise, reputation and knowledge of Patrick's business
77
and the industries in which Patrick operates. Patrick formally engaged Baird on April 10, 2026 and J.P. Morgan on
April 18, 2026.
In late March 2026, representatives of McDermott and K&E began discussing antitrust analysis, due diligence
logistics and other legal workstreams. The parties also began preparing for reciprocal diligence, including the
establishment of clean team arrangements to facilitate the review of competitively sensitive information by
designated personnel and outside advisors.
On March 28, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of
K&E and PWP. Members of LCI management reviewed LCI’s long-range plan, which contained certain non-public,
unaudited, standalone financial projections for LCI’s fiscal years 2026 through 2030. Following review of such
projections, the LCI board approved the use of such projections by PWP for the purposes of PWP’s preliminary
financial analysis. Representatives of PWP reviewed a preliminary financial analysis of the transaction, noting that
LCI needed to review Patrick’s five-year plan before coming to a view on an exchange ratio.
On April 4, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting attended by members of Patrick management and
representatives of each of J.P. Morgan, Baird and McDermott. Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding his
discussions with Mr. Graham. Representatives of J.P. Morgan reviewed preliminary perspectives on valuation,
expectations for post-combination governance, the anticipated transaction timeline and immediate next steps, and
representatives of Baird participated in the discussion. The Patrick board also discussed potential synergies,
complementary non-competing products across end markets, integration and management considerations and
expected perspectives of Patrick’s customers and investors, including the risk of vertical integration (i.e. “self-
supply”) initiatives by certain significant customers. Following discussion, the Patrick board approved the
presentation of a term sheet to LCI providing for an all-stock merger of equals, an eleven member combined
company board consisting of six Patrick directors and five LCI directors, with Mr. Cleveland serving as chair, Mr.
Nemeth serving as chief executive officer of the combined company, and no premium consideration to LCI
stockholders.
Later on April 4, 2026, Mr. Nemeth called Mr. Graham to preview that Patrick would be sending a written
indication of interest to LCI which would provide (i) that the combined company board would be comprised of six
designees selected by Patrick and five designees selected by LCI, (ii) that Mr. Nemeth would serve as the combined
company’s chief executive officer and that Mr. Cleveland would serve as chair of the combined company board of
directors and (iii) that the exchange ratio would be based on the 10-day volume-weighted average price of each
party’s stock. Mr. Graham responded that LCI required equal board representation and raised concerns regarding the
proposed allocation of leadership and governance roles in the combined company. Mr. Nemeth also raised the
possibility that Mr. Cleveland could serve as co-chair with Mr. Graham. Mr. Graham did not convey a specific
perspective on the exchange ratio, although he and Mr. Nemeth discussed a potential pro forma ownership split of
approximately 55% for Patrick shareholders and 45% for LCI stockholders based on the then-current 10-day
volume-weighted average prices of the parties’ common stock.
On April 5, 2026, Mr. Nemeth emailed the Patrick board regarding discussions he had had with Mr. Graham
following the April 4 Patrick board meeting. Mr. Nemeth reported that Mr. Graham had indicated that equal
representation on the combined company board and LCI selecting the combined company board chair were
important to LCI. Mr. Nemeth requested the Patrick directors’ views on revising Patrick’s proposed governance
terms to provide for a twelve member combined company board consisting of six directors designated by each party,
with Mr. Graham serving as chair and Mr. Cleveland serving as vice chair. Following an exchange of emails among
the Patrick directors on April 5 and April 6, 2026, the Patrick directors authorized Mr. Nemeth to include those
revised governance terms in Patrick’s proposal to LCI.
On April 6, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting attended by members of LCI management and representatives
of K&E and PWP. Mr. Graham previewed the expected terms of the written indication of interest to come from
Patrick based on his recent conversations with Mr. Nemeth. After discussion, the LCI board determined to
reconvene following receipt of the written indication of interest from Patrick.
78
Later on April 6, 2026, Mr. Nemeth delivered to Mr. Graham a written non-binding indication of interest with
respect to an all-stock strategic combination of the parties (the “April 6 Patrick Proposal”). The April 6 Patrick
Proposal provided for (i) a 12-member combined company board, with six directors designated by each party, (ii)
Mr. Graham as chair of the combined company board of directors, (iii) Mr. Cleveland as vice chair, (iv) Mr. Nemeth
as chief executive officer, (v) a “best athlete” approach for remaining senior leadership positions, (vi) certain
governance arrangements to remain in place for two years following the closing of the transaction, (vii) Elkhart,
Indiana to remain as the combined company headquarters and (viii) an exchange ratio based on the 10-day volume-
weighted average price of each party’s common stock. The April 6 Patrick Proposal also contemplated a transaction
announcement in late April or early May in conjunction with the parties’ first-quarter earnings releases. Mr. Graham
promptly shared the April 6 Patrick Proposal with the LCI board.
On April 7, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting attended by members of LCI management and representatives
of K&E and PWP. At this meeting, the LCI board reviewed the April 6 Patrick Proposal. The LCI board determined
that a 12-member board chaired by Mr. Graham, with Mr. Cleveland serving as vice chair, was acceptable but
determined to propose no post-closing fixed term for the governance arrangements. The LCI board discussed timing,
including the feasibility of Patrick’s proposal to announce contemporaneously with its first-quarter earnings and
determined to leave open the methodology for calculating the exchange ratio and not to agree at that time to the use
of the 10-day volume-weighted average price methodology proposed by Patrick. The LCI board also noted that any
exchange ratio would be subject to LCI’s review of Patrick’s long-range plan. Following discussion, the LCI board
expressed support for continuing transaction discussions and authorized Mr. Graham to convey the positions of the
LCI board discussed at the meeting.
Later on April 7, 2026, Mr. Graham conveyed the positions of the LCI board discussed at the April 7 meeting to
Mr. Nemeth. Between April 7, 2026 and April 11, 2026, Mr. Graham and Mr. Nemeth had several discussions
regarding transaction workstreams, during which Mr. Graham did not commit to Patrick’s proposed exchange ratio
methodology, transaction timing or governance proposals.
On April 8, 2026, representatives of K&E and McDermott discussed the status of the merger agreement, and
K&E indicated that it expected to be in a position to share a draft of the merger agreement during the following
week.
On April 10, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting attended by members of Patrick management at which Mr.
Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding the status of the merger agreement and potential transaction timing. Mr.
Nemeth also reported that members of Patrick management were working on due diligence, communication
planning, synergy identification, valuation modeling and antitrust analysis. Joel D. Duthie, the Chief Legal Officer
of Patrick, and representatives of McDermott also updated the Patrick board regarding governance proposals for the
combined company.
On April 11, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting attended by members of LCI management and representatives
of K&E and PWP. At the meeting, Mr. Graham briefed the LCI board on his discussions with Mr. Nemeth following
the LCI board meeting on April 7, 2026. At this meeting, the LCI board discussed potential signing timelines in the
event the transaction discussions were to progress as well as the methodology for setting the exchange ratio and the
resulting pro forma ownership. The LCI board and LCI management team discussed progress on due diligence,
communication planning, synergy identification, valuation modeling and antitrust analysis. Representatives of K&E
also presented an overview of the key terms of a draft merger agreement to be shared with McDermott, which the
LCI board provided input on. Following discussion, the LCI board instructed Mr. Graham, LCI’s management and
the representatives of K&E to finalize the draft merger agreement and share the initial draft with Patrick.
On April 13, 2026, the J.P. Morgan media desk received calls from Bloomberg and Reuters inquiring about
possible merger discussions between Patrick and LCI (the “Leak”). Patrick and LCI determined not to publicly
confirm the existence of discussions at that time.
On April 14, 2026, members of LCI management and Patrick management held a business plan update call on
the outlook for their end markets in connection with preliminary financial due diligence.
79
Later on April 14, 2026, each of LCI and Patrick opened a virtual data room to facilitate the exchange of
information. From the opening of the parties' data rooms on April 14, 2026 until the parties ceased discussions on
May 3, 2026, LCI, Patrick and their respective advisors conducted reciprocal business, financial, operational, legal
and synergy diligence. The work included in-person management diligence sessions from April 20-24 and functional
diligence calls throughout the month of April. Appropriate regulatory information sharing guardrails were in place
throughout the diligence processes.
On April 15, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting attended by members of Patrick management and
representatives of each of J.P. Morgan, Baird and McDermott. Mr. Nemeth informed the Patrick board of the Leak
and the Patrick board and Patrick’s advisors discussed whether and when the parties should publicly confirm the
existence of discussions and the potential effect of premature disclosure on the companies’ trading prices,
transaction valuation and the parties’ negotiating positions. Members of Patrick management also reviewed with the
Patrick board and representatives of each of J.P. Morgan and Baird Patrick’s updated 2026 forecast and a five-year
forecast (the “Patrick Standalone Projections”) and outlook for the combined company. The Patrick board discussed
the Patrick Standalone Projections and their proposed use by J.P. Morgan and Baird in connection with their
financial analyses.
Following the Leak, the market prices of both Patrick common stock and LCI common stock declined over the
ensuing period, with the market price of Patrick common stock declining more significantly. As a result, the ratio
between the parties’ trading prices changed materially from the pre-Leak April 13 trading levels that had informed
their earlier valuation discussions.
On April 15, 2026, representatives of K&E delivered the initial draft merger agreement (the “April 15 Merger
Agreement”) to representatives of McDermott. The April 15 Merger Agreement provided, among other things, (i) a
“double dummy” transaction structure, (ii) certain treatment of outstanding equity awards, including the conversion
of stock-settled LCI and Patrick equity awards into corresponding holding company awards based on the applicable
exchange ratios, cash settlement of certain LCI deferred stock units and continued service-based treatment for
certain performance awards, (iii) customary closing conditions, including approval by Patrick’s and LCI’s respective
shareholders, (iv) a regulatory efforts covenant requiring the parties to take actions necessary to obtain required
regulatory approvals, including divestitures and other remedies, subject to a to-be-determined limitation, (v) a “force
the vote” construct requiring each party to convene and hold a meeting of its shareholders for the purpose of
obtaining its required shareholder approval, notwithstanding any change in the recommendation by such party’s
board of directors, (vi) a termination fee equal to 3% of LCI’s equity value payable by either party in certain
circumstances, and (vii) that the merger agreement would be governed by Delaware law.
Thereafter, McDermott and K&E negotiated the merger agreement and related transaction documents, including
transaction structure, representations and warranties, interim operating covenants, no-solicitation and fiduciary-out
provisions, shareholder approval requirements, termination rights and fees, regulatory covenants and governance
matters.
The parties and their advisors also considered and discussed possible transaction structures. The parties initially
considered a structure involving a newly formed public holding company, but subsequently determined to pursue a
two-step merger structure in which a wholly-owned subsidiary of Patrick would merge with and into LCI, with LCI
surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Patrick, followed immediately by a merger of LCI with and into another
wholly-owned subsidiary of Patrick, with that subsidiary surviving and Patrick remaining the publicly traded parent.
Among other considerations, the selected structure was intended to avoid triggering change of control provisions
under Patrick’s existing indebtedness and the resulting need to obtain debt financing commitments before execution
of the merger agreement.
On April 17, 2026, Bloomberg informed Patrick and LCI that it intended to publish an article reporting that the
companies were engaged in discussions regarding a potential combination and then subsequently published the
article that same day. Following discussions, and at the direction of their respective boards of directors, Patrick and
LCI determined to publicly confirm that they were engaged in discussions regarding a potential merger of equals.
Later that day, Patrick and LCI each issued a press release confirming that the companies were in discussions
regarding a potential merger of equals, stating that there could be no assurance that any transaction would result
80
from the discussions or what the terms or structure of any transaction might be (collectively, the “Leak
Announcement”).
On April 18, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of
K&E and PWP. Members of LCI management reported that they were in the process of revising LCI’s long-range
plan that was approved by the LCI board on March 28, 2026 (as revised, the “LCI Standalone Projections”), to
reflect more conservative assumptions in light of continued softness in the RV industry, the impact of tariffs and
LCI’s first quarter 2026 performance, and the LCI board discussed that the LCI Standalone Projections, if approved,
would be shared with Patrick and would be used in PWP’s financial analysis. Following discussion of the
assumptions underlying the LCI Standalone Projections, the LCI board directed LCI management to finalize the LCI
Standalone Projections and circulate them to the LCI board for final review and approval, which the LCI board
determined would be obtained by written consent unless further discussion was required. For additional information
regarding the LCI Standalone Projections, see the section of the joint proxy statement titled “Certain Unaudited
Prospective Financial Information.” Representatives of PWP reviewed illustrative signing timelines and reviewed
the relative movements of Patrick’s stock price and LCI’s stock price since the Bloomberg article was published,
potential drivers underlying such movements and the implications of such stock price movements on the implied
exchange ratio and related valuation matters. Representatives of K&E reviewed a preliminary antitrust risk
assessment and discussed the regulatory review process generally.
On April 20, 2026, Mr. Nemeth met with Mr. Graham and advised him that, in light of the material change in
the ratio between the parties’ trading prices following the emergence of market rumors regarding a potential
transaction, Patrick believed that relative valuation should be evaluated by reference to the parties’ pre-Leak April
13, 2026 trading prices, which Patrick viewed as the appropriate unaffected reference point.
On April 21, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting at which Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding
the potential transaction, perceived reception across stakeholders and the status of the parties’ transaction
workstreams, including due diligence, the exchange of the parties’ respective long-range plans and the analysis of
potential synergies. The Patrick board also discussed the relative trading performance of Patrick common stock and
LCI common stock following the emergence of market rumors regarding a potential transaction, including the
greater decline in the market price of Patrick common stock, the resulting material change in the ratio between the
parties’ trading prices and the implications for valuation and potential exchange ratios.
On April 21, 2026, the LCI board, via unanimous written consent, approved the LCI Standalone Projections,
including for use by PWP for all purposes in connection with the evaluation of the transaction, and approved sharing
the LCI Standalone Projections with Patrick. Representatives of PWP subsequently shared the LCI Standalone
Projections with Patrick and its financial advisors.
In April 2026, the chief executive officer of a strategic industry participant and customer of both Patrick and
LCI (“Party B”) contacted Mr. Nemeth and expressed reservations regarding the potential combination of Patrick
and LCI. During that conversation, the chief executive officer of Party B also suggested that Patrick and Party B
consider whether there could be a potential strategic transaction involving Patrick and Party B. Mr. Nemeth
indicated that, if Party B wished to pursue such a transaction, Party B should submit a preliminary proposal for
Patrick to evaluate. Party B did not submit a proposal, and no specific transaction structure, valuation, form of
consideration, governance terms or other material terms were proposed or discussed.
On April 24, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting attended by members of Patrick management and
representatives of each of J.P. Morgan, Baird and McDermott. Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding the
status of due diligence, synergy analysis, merger agreement negotiations, antitrust analysis and timing, and
stakeholder reactions, including customer reactions, following the public confirmation of discussions. The Patrick
board discussed with its advisors preliminary valuation and transaction modeling, including the effect of the change
in the ratio between the parties’ trading prices on implied exchange ratios and relative ownership of the companies’
pre-closing shareholders. Following the departure of representatives of each of J.P. Morgan and Baird from the
meeting, the Patrick board discussed valuation and modeling with members of management. Following the departure
of management, the Patrick board continued to discuss valuation and governance. Mr. Nemeth was then excused,
81
and the Patrick board met in executive session and discussed the merger terms and governance of the potential
combined company.
On April 25, 2026, Messrs. Nemeth, Graham and Lippert met to discuss organizational structure and leadership.
Later that day, Mr. Nemeth and Mr. Graham discussed transaction timing. Mr. Nemeth indicated that, subject to
agreement on valuation, Patrick would be in a position to sign and announce the potential transaction by April 30,
2026. Mr. Graham indicated that valuation remained an open point and that he was doubtful that the parties would
be in a position to sign and announce the potential transaction by April 30, 2026.
On April 25, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of
K&E and PWP. Representatives of PWP updated the LCI board on the status of diligence workstreams and reviewed
LCI management’s preliminary net synergy estimates. The LCI board and members of management and
representatives of PWP also discussed valuation and transaction modeling, including the continuing effect of the
material change in the ratio between the Patrick and LCI common stock prices on implied exchange ratios, relative
ownership of the companies’ pre-closing shareholders, as well as governance matters relating to the potential
combined company.
On April 26, 2026, representatives of McDermott delivered a revised draft of the merger agreement (the “April
26 Merger Agreement”) to representatives of K&E. The April 26 Merger Agreement provided, among other things,
(i) a revised transaction structure whereby LCI would be acquired by Patrick via a reverse triangular merger, (ii)
certain treatment of outstanding equity awards, including the conversion of LCI RSU and PSU awards into
corresponding Patrick equity awards based on the exchange ratio, cash settlement of certain LCI deferred stock units
and the treatment of outstanding Patrick equity awards, which would remain outstanding on their existing terms,
with certain Patrick awards eligible to vest upon a qualifying termination, (iii) that the merger agreement would be
governed by Indiana law, and (iv) a termination fee in an amount equal to 6% of LCI’s equity value payable by
either party in certain circumstances.
On April 26, 2026, representatives of McDermott delivered an initial draft of a governance term sheet (the
“April 26 Governance Term Sheet”) to representatives of K&E. The April 26 Governance Term Sheet provided,
among other things, that (i) the agreed governance terms would continue in effect until the second anniversary of the
closing, at which point they would automatically sunset, (ii) the post-closing company board would consist of 12
directors split equally between Patrick and LCI designees, and the size of the combined company board would
decrease by one director on each of the first three anniversaries of the closing of the transaction, (iii) Mr. Graham
would serve as chair of the combined company board and Mr. Cleveland would serve as vice chair of the combined
company board, (iv) Mr. Nemeth would serve as chief executive officer and president of the post-closing company,
and (v) the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the directors would be required to approve certain specified
governance actions.
On April 28, 2026, representatives of LCI and Patrick conducted a diligence call to discuss the LCI Standalone
Projections, the Patrick Standalone Projections and potential net synergies that could be achieved in connection with
the transaction.
On April 28, 2026, Messrs. Nemeth and Graham met to discuss the potential transaction. Mr. Nemeth reiterated
Patrick’s view that the material change in the ratio between the parties’ trading prices following the emergence of
market rumors regarding a potential transaction was adversely affecting the economics of a potential merger of
equals and that Patrick continued to believe the April 13, 2026 trading prices should serve as the reference point for
relative valuation. Mr. Graham indicated that the LCI board was not prepared at that time to agree to Patrick’s
valuation position.
On April 28, 2026, Mr. Graham and representatives of K&E discussed the April 26 Governance Term Sheet.
Following this discussion, Mr. Graham directed K&E to deliver, and representatives of K&E delivered, a revised
draft of the governance term sheet (the “April 28 Governance Term Sheet”) to representatives of McDermott. The
April 28 Governance Term Sheet provided, among other things, (i) that the agreed governance arrangements would
be implemented as of the closing and, other than the reduction in the size of the post-closing board, would not
82
continue to apply following the closing, and (ii) the size of the post-closing board would be reduced by two seats in
2028 and one seat in 2029.
On April 29, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting attended by representatives of each of J.P. Morgan, Baird
and McDermott. Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding discussions with Mr. Graham concerning
valuation and the status of due diligence. Representatives of J.P. Morgan discussed preliminary valuation
discussions conducted at the direction of the Patrick board that J.P. Morgan had been having with LCI’s financial
advisors, including the parties’ differing perspectives on how the ratio between Patrick’s and LCI’s trading prices
following the Leak should be reflected in the valuation of the two companies in the transaction. Mr. Duthie and
representatives of McDermott then updated the Patrick board regarding the status of the merger agreement and the
governance proposals exchanged by Patrick and LCI. Following discussion, the Patrick board provided direction to
Mr. Duthie and McDermott regarding a governance counterproposal to be delivered to LCI.
On April 30, 2026, Patrick released its first quarter 2026 financial results.
On April 30, 2026, representatives of McDermott delivered a revised draft of the governance term sheet (the
“April 30 Governance Term Sheet”) to representatives of K&E. The April 30 Governance Term Sheet provided,
among other things, (i) certain governance terms would continue in effect until the second anniversary of the
closing, at which point they would automatically sunset, and (ii) prior to the sunset of the governance terms, the
affirmative vote of at least 75% of the directors would be required to remove, replace or appoint a successor to the
chief executive officer of the combined company (the “CEO Supermajority Requirement”).
On May 1, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting attended by members of Patrick management and
representatives of each of J.P. Morgan, Baird and McDermott. Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding the
status of discussions with Mr. Graham, including preliminary valuation discussions, status of negotiations and
potential timing of entering into a definitive agreement with LCI. Representatives of J.P. Morgan reviewed
preliminary relative financial analyses of the potential transaction, including analyses based on then-current and
historical trading prices of Patrick and LCI common stock, the relative values of Patrick and LCI and the basis for
the anticipated J.P. Morgan fairness opinion. The Patrick board continued its discussion of valuation, including how
the material change in the ratio between the parties’ trading prices following the Leak on April 13, 2026 affected
potential exchange ratios and the relative pro forma ownership of pre-closing LCI stockholders and Patrick
shareholders in the combined company.
On May 2, 2026, Messrs. Nemeth and Graham had a call in which they discussed the status of the potential
transaction, including valuation matters.
On May 2, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E
and PWP. Representatives of PWP reported that financial and business diligence was substantially complete.
Representatives of LCI management reported that they were comfortable with the assumptions underlying the
Patrick Standalone Projections. Following discussion, the LCI board approved the use of the Patrick Standalone
Projections in PWP’s preliminary financial analyses. Representatives of K&E reviewed the key terms of the April
26 Merger Agreement, including the termination fee provisions, the regulatory efforts covenant and the treatment of
outstanding equity awards, as well as the two-year governance sunset and the CEO Supermajority Requirement
included in the April 30 Governance Term Sheet. The LCI board provided feedback and direction to the K&E
representatives regarding the terms of the merger agreement and governance term sheet. Representatives of PWP
then reviewed preliminary relative financial analyses of the potential transaction, including analyses based on then-
current and historical trading prices of Patrick and LCI common stock, the LCI Standalone Projections and the
Patrick Standalone Projections. Representatives of PWP noted that, based on recent daily closing prices, an “at-the-
market” transaction implied pro forma ownership levels of approximately 48% for LCI stockholders and
approximately 52% for Patrick shareholders. The LCI board continued its discussion of valuation, including the
effect of the post-Leak Announcement stock price movements on the potential exchange ratio and relative
ownership of LCI’s and Patrick’s pre-closing shareholders.
On May 2, 2026, representatives of K&E delivered a revised draft of the merger agreement (the “May 2 Merger
Agreement”), reflecting the terms discussed and direction received from the LCI board at its meeting earlier that
83
day. The May 2 Merger Agreement, among other things, (i) accepted the reverse triangular merger structure, subject
to inclusion of a closing condition for delivery of a tax opinion to LCI as to the tax-free nature of the transaction for
LCI stockholders, (ii) reduced the termination fee to 3.25% of LCI’s equity value, (iii) proposed a nine-month initial
outside date with two three-month automatic extensions if antitrust clearance was the sole reason the transaction had
not closed, (iv) proposed that the performance criteria for LCI and Patrick PSUs be satisfied at the greater of (A)
target performance and (B) actual performance through the first effective time extrapolated through the end of the
applicable performance period, with each such LCI and Patrick PSU thereafter subject only to time-based vesting,
and (v) provided that the merger agreement would be governed by Delaware law, except for (A) matters relating to
the fiduciary duties of Patrick directors, which would be governed by Indiana law, and (B) to the extent the
provisions of the Indiana Business Corporation Law or the Indiana Business Flexibility Act are mandatorily
applicable to the mergers, such provisions would govern.
On May 3, 2026, Mr. Nemeth and Mr. Graham resumed their discussions, during which Mr. Graham conveyed
the LCI board’s position that LCI stockholders should hold more than the 45% pro forma ownership proposed by
Patrick, but that LCI would not make a specific counterproposal until after its earnings release so that it could
observe post-earnings trading.
Later that day, the Patrick board held a meeting attended by members of Patrick management and
representatives of each of J.P. Morgan, Baird and McDermott. Mr. Nemeth updated the Patrick board regarding the
status of his discussions with Mr. Graham and reported that valuation and timing remained unresolved, including
that Patrick continued to believe relative valuation should be evaluated by reference to the April 13 pre-Leak trading
prices and the parties had not reached agreement on that approach. The Patrick board discussed the material change
in the ratio between the parties’ trading prices following the emergence of market rumors, including the greater
decline in Patrick’s trading price, the potential consequences of further delay and the uncertainty as to whether the
parties could reach acceptable transaction economics on a timely basis given the post-Leak trading of LCI and
Patrick common stock. Following discussion, the Patrick board approved terminating discussions with LCI,
authorized Mr. Nemeth to inform Mr. Graham of that decision and approved issuance of a news release before
market open on May 4, 2026 announcing the termination of discussions.
Following the Patrick board meeting, Mr. Nemeth informed Mr. Graham of Patrick’s decision to terminate
discussions. Mr. Graham promptly informed the LCI board, and the parties coordinated the public announcement of
the termination.
On May 4, 2026, before opening of market, Patrick and LCI publicly announced that the parties had terminated
discussions regarding a potential business combination.
On May 4, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with representatives of K&E and PWP. Mr. Graham reported on
his May 3, 2026 conversation with Mr. Nemeth, and further reported that, prior to the termination of transaction
discussions, he had told Mr. Nemeth that LCI stockholders should hold more than the 45% pro forma ownership
proposed by Patrick, but that LCI would not make a specific counterproposal until after its earnings release so that it
could observe post-earnings trading.
On May 5, 2026, LCI released its first quarter 2026 financial results.
During May 2026 and early June 2026, the LCI board discussed the strategic direction of LCI and leadership of
the LCI board and management, including whether changes to LCI’s board or management team were advisable.
The LCI board determined to defer any further discussions with Patrick until after the LCI board had completed its
review of potential changes to LCI’s board and/or management team in light of the potential impact of any such
changes on a potential transaction with Patrick. At the LCI board’s direction, representatives of PWP conveyed to
representatives of J.P. Morgan that LCI continued to believe in the strategic merits of a transaction and would be
interested in resuming discussions after completing certain near-term priorities.
On June 4, 2026, after the LCI board had completed discussions on a potential leadership transition, Mr. Lippert
announced his retirement as President and Chief Executive Officer and his resignation as a director of the LCI
board, and LCI announced that, as part of its long-term succession planning, Mr. Graham had resigned as Chair and
director of the LCI board. As part of these transitions, the LCI board appointed John A. Sirpilla, a director of LCI, as
84
interim chief executive officer and Virginia L. Henkels, a director of LCI, as chair. Neither Mr. Lippert’s nor Mr.
Graham’s resignation resulted from any disagreement with LCI.
Between May 4, 2026 and the resumption of transaction discussions in June 2026, representatives of LCI
received inbound communications from two parties about potential strategic transactions that would not have
resulted in a change of control of LCI and held conversations with certain other parties regarding potential strategic
alternatives that may be available to LCI. No party submitted a proposal with respect to any such transaction.
On June 6, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E.
Mr. Sirpilla reported that LCI management remained supportive of pursuing a potential transaction with Patrick. The
LCI board discussed the timing of, and process for, a potential re-engagement with Patrick, including the advantages
of proceeding expeditiously in light of the then-current stock price of each company and the risk that Patrick could
pursue alternative opportunities. Following discussion, the LCI board determined to seek to resume discussions with
Patrick regarding a potential transaction and directed LCI’s management and advisors to coordinate with Patrick and
its advisors on next steps.
On June 7, 2026, PWP contacted J.P. Morgan about setting up a meeting between Mr. Nemeth, Ms. Henkels
and Mr. Sirpilla to explore the basis for Patrick and LCI to resume discussions regarding a potential transaction.
On June 7, 2026, the Patrick board met to consider LCI’s renewed outreach. The Patrick board discussed the
basis on which Patrick might be willing to resume discussions with LCI. Following discussion, the Patrick board
authorized Mr. Nemeth to meet with LCI on the basis that Patrick would seek transaction economics based on the
parties’ unaffected pre-Leak trading prices and certain governance changes from the initial discussions based on
recent changes to the Lippert Board and the importance of the RV industry relationships.
On June 10, 2026, Mr. Nemeth met with Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla in Chicago. Mr. Nemeth discussed
Patrick’s reasons for terminating the earlier discussions, including the material change in the ratio between the
parties’ trading prices following the emergence of market rumors and its effect on relative valuation. Mr. Nemeth
advised them that Patrick was prepared to consider resuming negotiations and described Patrick’s proposed
framework, including that Patrick would designate the chair of the combined company board, the board would
initially consist of six Patrick designees and five LCI designees and the starting point for exchange-ratio discussions
would reflect the parties’ unaffected trading prices as of April 13, 2026. Later that day, Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla
informed Mr. Nemeth that LCI was not prepared to accept Patrick’s proposed board leadership arrangement, and
Mr. Nemeth agreed to present LCI’s position to the Patrick board.
On June 12, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting at which Mr. Nemeth briefed the Patrick board regarding his
discussions with Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla and his assessment of the potential terms on which discussions might
resume.
Later that day, Mr. Nemeth spoke with Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla and communicated that the Patrick board
had requested that LCI provide a comprehensive term sheet before the Patrick board would authorize Mr. Nemeth to
reengage in transaction discussions, but that, subject to seeing the terms proposed by LCI, the Patrick board was
open to reengaging with LCI regarding a potential transaction and would want to move quickly. Ms. Henkels and
Mr. Sirpilla highlighted certain proposed governance terms to Mr. Nemeth, including LCI’s right to designate the
board chair of the combined company and the chairs of the Capital Allocation & Strategy and Nominating &
Governance committees. Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla also proposed that the name of the combined company be a
combination of the parties’ existing names.
Later that day, the LCI board held a meeting with representatives of K&E and PWP. Ms. Henkels and Mr.
Sirpilla updated the LCI board on their June 10 and June 12, 2026 discussions with Mr. Nemeth. Representatives of
PWP then reviewed a draft term sheet with the LCI board, which provided for (i) pro forma ownership of 46.5% for
pre-closing LCI stockholders and 53.5% for pre-closing Patrick shareholders, (ii) a twelve member combined
company board of directors with six directors designated by each party, (iii) Ms. Henkels as chair of the combined
company with her replacement designated by LCI, (iv) Mr. Cleveland as vice chair of the combined company, (v)
committee chairs designated by Patrick for the Audit and Compensation committees and by LCI for the Nominating
& Governance and Capital Allocation & Strategy committees, and (vi) the CEO Supermajority Requirement in the
85
first two years following the closing. The LCI board discussed potential synergies and the appropriate amount of net
synergies to be publicly committed to in connection with the announcement of the transaction. Following discussion,
the LCI board approved the delivery of a term sheet reflecting the terms so discussed to Patrick. Ms. Henkels sent
the term sheet (the “LCI June 12 Term Sheet”) to Mr. Nemeth following the meeting.
On June 15, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting to discuss the LCI June 12 Term Sheet and authorized Mr.
Nemeth to present a counterproposal to LCI that contemplated pro forma ownership of the combined company of
53% to be held by pre-closing Patrick shareholders and 47% to be held by pre-closing LCI stockholders, a combined
company board consisting of six Patrick designees and five LCI designees, Mr. Cleveland serving as chair, Mr.
Sirpilla serving as vice chair and Mr. Nemeth serving as chief executive officer. This proposal reflected Patrick’s
view of relative valuation based in part on then-current trading prices of Patrick and LCI common stock.
On June 15, 2026, Mr. Sirpilla spoke to the chief executive officer of Party A, who expressed potential interest
in reopening discussions with LCI and the possibility of Party A acquiring LCI. Following this discussion, no further
discussions regarding a potential business combination were held between LCI and Party A, and Party A did not
submit a proposal with respect to any such potential business combination.
On June 16, 2026, Mr. Nemeth met with Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla. Mr. Nemeth communicated Patrick’s
position and Ms. Henkels observed that Patrick’s position would in her view provide Patrick with disproportionate
governance rights in the combined company and that LCI would need to consider whether additional economic
value, potentially including a premium or other consideration, would be required for LCI to continue engaging on
that basis. Mr. Nemeth also provided his view on the importance of RV-industry relationships with respect to the
chair of the combined company.
On June 16, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with representatives of K&E and PWP. Ms. Henkels and Mr.
Sirpilla updated the LCI board on their discussion with Mr. Nemeth and, in light of Mr. Nemeth’s views regarding
the importance of RV-industry relationships, the LCI board discussed proposing that Mr. Sirpilla be designated as
chair of the combined company instead of Ms. Henkels. Mr. Sirpilla also reported on his June 15, 2026 discussion
with the chief executive officer of Party A. Mr. Sirpilla further reported on the ongoing synergy analysis
workstreams, including LCI management’s current views regarding net synergy realization.
On June 19, 2026, the Patrick board met to continue discussing the LCI June 12 Term Sheet and the parties’
ongoing negotiations. Following the meeting, Patrick delivered to LCI a written counterproposal reflecting the
economic and governance terms authorized by the Patrick board on June 15, 2026 (the “Patrick June 19 Term
Sheet”), including pro forma ownership of approximately 53% by pre-closing Patrick shareholders and
approximately 47% by pre-closing LCI stockholders, a combined company board consisting of six Patrick designees
and five LCI designees, Mr. Cleveland serving as chair, Mr. Sirpilla serving as vice chair and Mr. Nemeth serving as
chief executive officer. The Patrick June 19 Term Sheet also provided for the LCI-designated vice chair to chair the
Capital Allocation & Strategy Committee, oversee integration and capital allocation and collaborate with the chair in
setting board agendas, and contemplated that the name of the combined company would be mutually agreed by the
parties following announcement of the transaction.
On June 19, 2026, Mr. Nemeth called Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla and provided an overview of the Patrick
June 19 Term Sheet. Ms. Henkels and Mr. Sirpilla observed that Patrick’s counterproposal would in their view
provide Patrick with disproportionate governance rights in the combined company and that LCI would need to
consider whether additional economic value, potentially including a premium or other consideration, would be
required for LCI to continue engaging on such basis.
On June 19, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E
and PWP. Ms. Henkels reported on her discussion with Mr. Nemeth, and the LCI board discussed that governance
terms proposed by Patrick should warrant a premium to the implied price of shares of LCI common stock. As part of
this discussion, the LCI board discussed the possibility of introducing a cash component to the merger consideration.
The LCI board also discussed the possibility of conducting outreach to other potential counterparties should the
parties not be able to reach agreement on the governance and economic terms. Representatives of K&E reviewed the
86
LCI board’s fiduciary duties in connection with its evaluation of the potential business combination, including with
respect to outreach to alternative strategic acquirors.
On June 22, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E
and PWP. The LCI board discussed the Patrick June 19 Term Sheet, including potential synergies and the
appropriate amount of net synergies to be publicly committed to in connection with the announcement of the
transaction. Following discussion, the LCI board authorized a counterproposal providing for (i) 49% pro forma
ownership for LCI stockholders, (ii) a 12-member combined company board split evenly between the parties, (iii)
Mr. Cleveland as chair of the combined company board, (iv) Mr. Sirpilla as vice chair of the combined company
board, (v) Mr. Nemeth as chief executive officer of the combined company and (vi) LCI having the right to
designate three of the four committee chairs, with Patrick designating the Compensation Committee Chair.
Following the meeting, LCI delivered such counterproposal to Patrick (the “June 22 Term Sheet”).
On June 23, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting with members of Patrick management and representatives of
each of J.P. Morgan, Baird and McDermott. Representatives of J.P. Morgan reviewed preliminary valuation
materials with the Patrick board. Following discussion, the Patrick board authorized delivery of a counterproposal to
LCI (the “June 23 Term Sheet”) that contemplated pro forma ownership of approximately 52% by pre-closing
Patrick shareholders and approximately 48% by pre-closing LCI stockholders, a twelve member combined company
board with six directors designated by each party, Mr. Cleveland serving as chair of the combined company board,
Mr. Sirpilla serving as vice chair of the combined company board, Mr. Nemeth serving as chief executive officer of
the combined company, Patrick having the right to designate two of the four committee chairs, with LCI designating
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chair and Capital Allocation & Strategy Committee chair and
that the parties enter into a fourteen day exclusivity agreement. The revised ownership terms reflected the Patrick
board’s assessment of then-current relative trading prices and updated preliminary financial analyses prepared by
J.P. Morgan and Baird.
On June 24, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E
and PWP. The LCI board discussed the June 23 Term Sheet and approved accepting 48% pro forma ownership for
LCI stockholders in the combined company. The LCI board discussed potential synergies and the appropriate
amount of net synergies to be publicly committed to in connection with the announcement of the transaction, and
directed LCI management to discuss LCI’s views regarding potential synergies with Patrick management. The LCI
board also discussed committee chairs, and determined that LCI would accept designating two committee chairs if
LCI designated the chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Capital Allocation & Strategy
Committee (with Mr. Sirpilla chairing such committee). Following discussion of transaction timing with
representatives of K&E and PWP, the LCI board determined to target execution and announcement of the
transaction before market open on June 30, 2026. The LCI board determined that the parties should not negotiate a
formal exclusivity agreement, but instead that LCI should convey to Patrick the urgency of the timeline.
Representatives of K&E also updated the LCI board on the status of the legal and regulatory workstreams.
On June 24, 2026, Ms. Henkels informed Mr. Nemeth that LCI was prepared to proceed on the basis of the
principal terms reflected in Patrick's counterproposal, and the parties re-engaged in negotiations toward a definitive
agreement.
On June 25, 2026, the parties reopened access to their virtual data rooms and the parties continued reciprocal
diligence through the signing of the definitive transaction documentation.
On June 26, 2026, representatives of McDermott delivered a revised draft of the merger agreement (the “June
26 Merger Agreement”) to representatives of K&E. The June 26 Merger Agreement provided, among other things,
(i) a termination fee equal to 4% of LCI’s equity value, together with reimbursement of the other party’s transaction
expenses, payable by either party in certain circumstances, and (ii) that the merger agreement would be governed by
Indiana law. In addition, during this time and until the execution of the merger agreement on June 30, 2026,
representatives of K&E and McDermott discussed on multiple occasions an appropriate antitrust efforts covenant,
including limitations on the parties’ efforts obligations with respect to obtaining regulatory clearances.
87
On June 27, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E
and PWP. Representatives of PWP reported that LCI management and Patrick management continued to evaluate
synergy opportunities, with LCI management identifying potential net synergies of approximately $150 million.
Representatives of PWP also reported that business diligence was substantially complete. Representatives of K&E
reviewed with the LCI board the key open items in the transaction documentation, including the termination fee, the
regulatory efforts provisions, the treatment of equity awards and governing law. The LCI board authorized the
representatives of K&E to continue progressing transaction documentation.
On June 29, 2026, representatives of K&E delivered a revised draft of the merger agreement (the “June 29 K&E
Merger Agreement”) to representatives of McDermott. The June 29 K&E Merger Agreement provided, among other
things, (i) a termination fee equal to 3.50% of LCI’s equity value payable by either party in certain circumstances
and (ii) that the merger agreement would be governed by Delaware law. The parties subsequently exchanged
multiple drafts of the merger agreement while finalizing it prior to execution on June 30, 2026.
On June 29, 2026, representatives of PWP and J.P. Morgan had a call to discuss the exchange ratios to be used
in the definitive transaction documentation to reflect a pro forma ownership of the combined company of 48% for
LCI stockholders and 52% for Patrick shareholders (the “Agreed Pro Forma Ownership Ratio”). The representatives
of PWP and J.P. Morgan agreed that, based on the capitalization information provided by both parties, the Agreed
Pro Forma Ownership Ratio corresponded to the then-calculated exchange ratio of 1.2351 shares of Patrick common
stock for each share of LCI common stock (the “Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio”).
On June 29, 2026, the Patrick board held a meeting with members of Patrick management and representatives of
each of J.P. Morgan, Baird and McDermott. The Patrick board reviewed the proposed transaction terms, including
the parties’ agreement that, immediately following completion of the merger, pre-closing Patrick shareholders would
own approximately 52% and pre-closing LCI stockholders would own approximately 48% of the combined
company on a fully diluted basis, and the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio, which remained subject to finalization of
the share-count calculation. The Patrick board also reviewed the implied value and premium to LCI stockholders,
the historical exchange ratio between Patrick common stock and LCI common stock, relative valuation analyses,
selected public company and discounted cash flow analyses, potential cost synergies, expected costs to achieve
synergies and the proposed governance arrangements for the combined company. The Patrick board also discussed
the strategic rationale for the transaction, potential benefits to Patrick shareholders and risks and countervailing
considerations, including integration risk, regulatory risk, and the risk that anticipated synergies might not be
achieved and the fixed exchange ratio and market risks associated with an all-stock transaction.
At this meeting, J.P. Morgan reviewed its financial analyses of the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio. Following its
presentation, J.P. Morgan delivered to the Patrick board its oral opinion to the effect that, as of such date, and based
upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review
undertaken by J.P. Morgan in preparing its opinion, the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio was fair, from a financial
point of view, to Patrick. A representative of Baird then reviewed Baird’s financial analyses of the Initial Agreed
Exchange Ratio and, following discussion, Baird delivered to the Patrick board its oral opinion to the effect that, as
of such date, and based upon and subject to the assumptions, qualifications, limitations and other matters undertaken
in preparing its opinion, the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick. For a
description of the opinions of J.P. Morgan and Baird, see the sections titled “Opinions of Patrick’s Financial
Advisors—Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC” and “Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors—Opinion of
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated.”
On June 29, 2026, the LCI board held a meeting with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E
and PWP. At this meeting, PWP reviewed its financial analyses of the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio.
Representatives of K&E also, among other things, outlined the LCI board’s fiduciary duties and reviewed the key
terms of the merger agreement and other transaction documents, including the transaction structure, the Initial
Agreed Exchange Ratio, termination fees, regulatory provisions, equity award treatment, and governance
arrangements. At this meeting PWP also confirmed it had no material prior relationships with Patrick during the
prior two-year period. Ms. Henkels noted the LCI board would reconvene that evening for PWP to deliver its formal
oral fairness opinion and for the LCI board to vote on transaction approval resolutions.
88
After the close of market on June 29, 2026, the Patrick board reconvened to consider approval of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. At the meeting, members of Patrick management and
representatives of McDermott reviewed the terms of the merger agreement and related matters, including the
transaction structure, shareholder approval requirements, regulatory approval requirements, fiduciary-out provisions,
termination provisions, governance arrangements and closing conditions. A representative of McDermott also
reviewed with the Patrick board its fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed transaction and the interests of
certain Patrick directors and executive officers in the transaction, as described under “Interests of Patrick Directors
and Executive Officers in the Merger.” The Patrick board was advised that the then-calculated Initial Agreed
Exchange Ratio remained subject to final confirmation of the share-count calculations. Prior to a portion of the
Patrick board’s final deliberations, Mr. Nemeth and Mr. Cleveland, each of whom had been designated for
leadership roles in the combined company, were excused from the meeting. Following further deliberations by the
remaining directors, Messrs. Nemeth and Cleveland rejoined the meeting. The Patrick board then unanimously
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, on the principal terms presented to
the Patrick board, including the Agreed Pro Forma Ownership Ratio, were advisable and in the best interests of
Patrick and its shareholders. The Patrick board approved the merger agreement substantially in the form presented,
authorized Patrick’s officers to finalize and execute the merger agreement consistent with the principal terms
approved by the Patrick board, including the Agreed Pro Forma Ownership Ratio, and resolved to recommend that
Patrick shareholders approve the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal.
The Patrick board also directed management to inform the Patrick board of the final agreed exchange ratio prior to
execution of the merger agreement. For a discussion of the factors considered by the Patrick board in reaching its
determination, see the section titled “Recommendation of the Patrick Board of Directors and Reasons for the
Merger.”
Later on June 29, 2026, after the close of market, the LCI board reconvened with members of LCI management
and representatives of K&E and PWP. Representatives of K&E confirmed that final documents, including a
substantially final merger agreement, had been received from Patrick’s counsel and were consistent with the terms
discussed at the earlier session. Representatives of PWP then rendered PWP’s oral opinion to the LCI board to the
effect that, as of June 29, 2026, and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors
considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by PWP, the Merger Consideration,
consisting of the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio, to be received by the holders of outstanding shares of LCI common
stock (other than any such shares held by LCI, Patrick or any of their respective subsidiaries (the “Excluded
Shares”)) in the merger pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.
Following discussion, including as to the matters described below in the section titled “Recommendation of the
LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger,” the LCI board unanimously (i) determined that the merger
agreement and the merger were advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, LCI and the LCI stockholders, (ii)
approved (A) the form, terms and conditions of the merger agreement, (B) the execution, delivery and performance
by LCI thereof and (C) subject to the adoption of the merger agreement at the LCI special meeting, the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (iii) resolved to
recommend that the LCI stockholders adopt the merger agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the merger agreement and (iv) directed that the adoption of the merger agreement be submitted to the LCI
stockholders at the LCI special meeting.
Following the Patrick board meeting and the LCI board meeting, when determining the final agreed exchange
ratio, Patrick’s financial advisors determined that, based on updated capitalization information, the Initial Agreed
Exchange Ratio presented to the Patrick board would not precisely implement the Agreed Pro Forma Ownership
Ratio. Representatives of J.P. Morgan provided the updated Patrick capitalization information to representatives of
PWP, and the representatives aligned on revising the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio to a ratio of 1.2440 shares of
Patrick common stock for each share of LCI common stock (the “Final Agreed Exchange Ratio”) in order to
implement the Agreed Pro Forma Ownership Ratio. The recalculation reflected the updated capitalization
information and did not alter the Agreed Pro Forma Ownership Ratio or any other principal term of the transaction.
On the morning of June 30, 2026, following confirmation of the Final Agreed Exchange Ratio and before
execution of the merger agreement, Patrick received the written opinions of J.P. Morgan and Baird, each to the
effect that, as of the respective dates thereof and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures
89
followed, matters considered and limitations and qualifications on the review undertaken in preparing their
respective written opinions, the Final Agreed Exchange Ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick. For
a description of the opinions of J.P. Morgan and Baird, see the sections titled “Opinions of Patrick’s Financial
Advisors—Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC” and “Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors—Opinion of
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated.” Each member of the Patrick board was informed of the Final Agreed
Exchange Ratio and provided written confirmation that Patrick should proceed with the transaction on the basis of
the Final Agreed Exchange Ratio.
On June 30, 2026, following confirmation of the Final Agreed Exchange Ratio, the LCI board held a meeting
with members of LCI management and representatives of K&E and PWP for the purpose of considering the Final
Agreed Exchange Ratio in light of updated Patrick capitalization information. Representatives of PWP reviewed
with the LCI board the circumstances giving rise to the revision, noting that the Final Agreed Exchange Ratio was
more favorable to LCI stockholders than the Initial Agreed Exchange Ratio reviewed by the LCI board the prior
evening. Representatives of K&E reviewed with the LCI board the updates to the merger agreement made since the
June 29, 2026 meeting of the LCI board to reflect the Final Agreed Exchange Ratio. Representatives of PWP then
reviewed with the LCI board PWP’s financial analyses of the potential transaction, updated to reflect the Final
Agreed Exchange Ratio, and noted that such updated analyses were consistent with the analyses PWP had presented
to the LCI board on June 29, 2026. Representatives of PWP then rendered PWP’s oral opinion, subsequently
confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated June 30, 2026, to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon
and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered and qualifications and limitations on
the review undertaken by PWP, the Merger Consideration, consisting of the Final Agreed Exchange Ratio, to be
received by the holders of outstanding shares of LCI common stock (other than holders of Excluded Shares) in the
merger pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. The full text of
PWP’s written opinion is attached as Annex F to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and PWP’s opinion is more
fully described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus titled “Opinion of LCI’s Financial Advisor—
Opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP.” Following discussion, including as to the matters described below in the
section titled “Recommendation of the LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger,” the LCI board
unanimously rescinded the resolutions it had adopted on June 29, 2026 and (i) determined that the merger agreement
and the merger were advisable and fair to, and in the best interests of, LCI and the LCI stockholders, (ii) approved
(A) the form, terms and conditions of the merger agreement, (B) the execution, delivery and performance by LCI
thereof and (C) subject to the adoption of the merger agreement at the LCI special meeting, the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (iii) resolved to recommend that the LCI
stockholders adopt the merger agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger
agreement and (iv) directed that the adoption of the merger agreement be submitted to the LCI stockholders at the
LCI special meeting.
Later that morning, Patrick, LCI, Planet First Merger Sub Inc. and Planet Second Merger Sub LLC entered into
the merger agreement, and Patrick and LCI issued a joint press release announcing the execution of the merger
agreement before the opening of trading.
Under the merger agreement, each outstanding share of LCI common stock will be converted into the right to
receive 1.2440 shares of Patrick common stock, with cash in lieu of fractional shares. Immediately following the
closing, pre-closing Patrick shareholders are expected to own approximately 52% of the combined company and
pre-closing LCI stockholders are expected to own approximately 48% of the combined company. The merger
agreement provides that the combined company board will consist of 12 directors, six designated by Patrick and six
designated by LCI, with Mr. Nemeth continuing as chief executive officer, Mr. Cleveland serving as chair of the
combined company board and Mr. Sirpilla serving as vice chair of the combined company board.
Merger Consideration to LCI Stockholders
At the first effective time, each issued and outstanding share of LCI common stock (other than shares of LCI
common stock held by LCI, Patrick or any of their respective subsidiaries immediately prior to the first effective
time) will be converted into the right to receive 1.2440 fully paid and nonassessable shares of Patrick common stock
(which we refer to as the “share consideration”). Following the merger, LCI common stock will be delisted from the
NYSE, will be deregistered under the Exchange Act and will cease to be publicly traded.
90
LCI stockholders that would have otherwise been entitled to receive a fractional share of Patrick common stock
will instead be entitled to receive cash (without interest) in an amount equal to such fractional amount multiplied by
the volume-weighted average trading price for Patrick common stock on the Nasdaq on each of the five consecutive
trading days ending on (and including) the last trading day immediately prior to the closing date, rounded to the
nearest cent (with 0.5 of a cent being rounded upward) (which cash consideration in lieu of a fractional share we
refer to as the “fractional share cash consideration” and, together with the share consideration, the “merger
consideration”). No LCI stockholder will be entitled by virtue of the right to receive consideration with respect to
fractional shares to any dividends, voting rights or any other rights in respect of any fractional share of Patrick
common stock.
Closing and Effective Time of the Merger
The closing of the merger will take place at 7:45 a.m. Eastern Time on the third business day after all conditions
set forth in the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived (other than those conditions that by their terms are to
be fulfilled at the closing, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver of such conditions), by way of electronic exchange
of documents, unless another time, date or manner of closing is agreed in writing by the parties. For a description of
the conditions to the closing, see the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the
Merger.”
If the merger is consummated, the first merger will become effective upon the due filing of the certificate of
merger relating to the first merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such later time as Patrick
and LCI will agree and specify in such certificate of merger (which we refer to as the “effective time”). The second
merger will become effective upon the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware and articles of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Indiana, or at such later time as Patrick
and LCI agree and specify in those filings (which we refer to as the “closing effective time”).
Governance of the Combined Company Following the Consummation of the Merger
Name and Ticker Symbol of the Combined Company
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Patrick and LCI are required to mutually agree upon a proposed new
corporate name for Patrick, and Patrick is required to take the actions contemplated by the merger agreement to seek
to cause the new name to become effective in connection with the completion of the merger. Patrick and LCI have
agreed upon the proposed new corporate name “[ ].” If the Patrick articles amendment and restatement
proposal is approved by Patrick shareholders, Patrick’s corporate name will be changed to “[ ]” in
connection with the completion of the merger.
Patrick common stock, including the shares of Patrick common stock to be issued to LCI stockholders in
connection with the merger, will continue to be listed on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “PATK” following
completion of the merger.
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Combined Company
If the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal is approved by Patrick shareholders, Patrick’s
articles of incorporation will be amended and restated in the form attached as Annex B to this joint proxy statement/
prospectus in connection with the completion of the merger, and, as so amended and restated, will be the articles of
incorporation of the combined company until subsequently amended in accordance with their terms and applicable
law. Approval of the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal is not a condition to completion of the
merger. If the proposal is not approved and the merger is otherwise completed, Patrick’s existing articles of
incorporation will remain in effect, subject to the separate amendment increasing the number of authorized shares of
Patrick common stock contemplated by the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal and any subsequent
amendments adopted in accordance with applicable law.
Prior to closing, the Patrick board will take all actions necessary to cause the bylaws of Patrick (which we refer
to as the “Patrick bylaws”), as in effect immediately prior to the first effective time, to be amended and restated as of
the first effective time as set forth in Annex C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and as so amended and
91
restated, will be the combined company bylaws, until thereafter amended as provided therein, in the articles of
incorporation of the combined company or by applicable law.
Board of Directors of the Combined Company
The combined company board will have 12 members, comprised of
•six directors designated by Patrick, which shall consist of (the “Patrick designees”):
•Andy L. Nemeth, the current Chief Executive Officer of Patrick and Chairman of the Patrick board;
•Todd M. Cleveland, a current director on the Patrick; and
•four directors from among the other members of the Patrick board as of immediately prior to the first
effective time, each of whom will be designated by the Patrick board prior to the first effective time of
the merger;
•six directors designated by LCI, which shall consist of (the “LCI designees”):
•John A. Sirpilla, the current Interim Chief Executive Officer of LCI and a current director on the LCI
board; and
•five directors from among the members of the LCI board as of immediately prior to the first effective
time, each of whom will be designated by the LCI board prior to the first effective time of the merger.
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, other than as set forth above, the individuals to serve on
the board of directors of the combined company at the first effective time have not been determined.
From the closing of the merger until the second anniversary of the closing, any vacancy on the board of
directors of the combined company may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in
office and shall be based upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board.
Committees of the Board of Directors of the Combined Company
Patrick has agreed to take all actions necessary to cause, as of the first effective time of the merger, the board of
directors of the combined company to have the following standing committees: (i) an Audit Committee, (ii) a
Compensation Committee, (iii) a Nominating and Governance Committee and (iv) a Capital Allocation and Strategy
Committee (collectively, the “Committees” and each a “Committee”). Each Committee will consist of four (4)
directors comprised of two (2) Patrick designees and two (2) LCI designees (unless a greater number of directors is
mutually agreed by the parties), subject to applicable law and applicable stock exchange listing standards (including
applicable independence requirements). The chairperson of each of the Audit Committee and the Compensation
Committee will be a Patrick designee and the chairperson of each of the Capital Allocation and Strategy Committee
and the Nominating and Governance Committee will be an LCI Designee.
Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Combined Company; Management of the
Combined Company
As of the first effective time of the merger, the Chairman of the board of the combined company will be Mr.
Cleveland, who is a current director on the Patrick board. If Mr. Cleveland is not then serving as a director of Patrick
or is unwilling or unable to serve as the Chairman of the combined company board at the closing effective time, as a
result of death, removal, resignation or any other reason, then the Vice Chairman (as described below) shall serve as
the Chairman of the combined company board at the closing effective time, and Patrick (acting through the Patrick
board) shall select and designate (after consultation with LCI) an alternative member of the Patrick board to serve as
the Vice Chairman of the combined company board at the closing effective time.
As of the first effective time of the merger, the Vice Chairman of the board of the combined company will be
Mr. Sirpilla, who is the current Interim Chief Executive Officer and a director of LCI. If Mr. Sirpilla is not then
serving as a director of LCI or is unwilling or unable to serve as the Vice Chairman of the combined company board
92
at the closing effective time, as a result of death, removal, resignation or any other reason, then LCI (acting through
the LCI board) shall select and designate (after consultation with Patrick) an alternative member of the LCI board to
serve as the Vice Chairman of the combined company board at the closing effective time.
As of the first effective time of the merger, Mr. Nemeth, the current Chief Executive Officer of Patrick, shall
serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company. If Mr. Nemeth is not then serving as the Chief
Executive Officer of Patrick or is unwilling or unable to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the combined
company at the closing effective time, as a result of death, removal, resignation or any other reason, then Patrick
(acting through the Patrick board) shall select and designate the individual who will serve as the Chief Executive
Officer of the combined company.
From the closing of the merger until the second anniversary of the closing, the board of directors of the
combined company may not remove the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company without the affirmative
vote of at least 75% of the total number of authorized directors of the combined company (excluding the directorship
of the Chief Executive Officer, if then serving as a director).
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, other than as set forth above, the individuals to serve as
executive officers of the combined company at the first effective time have not been determined.
Ownership of the Combined Company
Immediately after the closing of the merger, it is expected that Patrick shareholders as of immediately prior to
the merger will own approximately 52%, and LCI stockholders as of immediately prior to the merger will own
approximately 48%, of the issued and outstanding shares of the combined company’s stock, in each case calculated
based on the fully diluted market capitalizations of Patrick and LCI as of the date of signing of the merger
agreement. The exact ownership interests of Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders in the combined company
immediately following the merger will depend on the number of shares of Patrick common stock and the number of
shares of LCI common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the first effective time and the number of
issued and outstanding LCI equity awards to be settled in shares of Patrick common stock in connection with the
merger, as provided in the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Merger Consideration.”
Recommendation of the Patrick Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger
At its meeting on June 29, 2026, the Patrick board unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, the issuance of shares of Patrick common stock to LCI
stockholders in connection with the merger and the amendment to Patrick’s articles of incorporation to increase the
number of authorized shares of Patrick common stock, were advisable and in the best interests of Patrick and its
shareholders; approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby; and resolved to
recommend that Patrick shareholders approve the Patrick share issuance proposal and the Patrick authorized stock
increase proposal. At its meeting on September 23, 2026, the Patrick board unanimously resolved to recommend that
Patrick shareholders approve the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal.
The Patrick board unanimously recommends that Patrick shareholders vote “FOR” the Patrick share
issuance proposal, “FOR” the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal “FOR” the Patrick articles
amendment and restatement proposal and “FOR” the Patrick adjournment proposal.
In evaluating the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the Patrick board held numerous
meetings, consulted with Patrick management and Patrick’s legal and financial advisors, and considered a number of
factors, including the perceived benefits, risks, uncertainties and other potentially negative factors associated with
the merger. The following discussion includes the principal factors considered by the Patrick board and is not
intended to be exhaustive. The factors are not necessarily presented in order of relative importance.
Strategic, Financial and Other Factors Supporting the Merger
•Strategic fit and complementary product portfolios. The complementary nature of Patrick’s and LCI’s
product portfolios, capabilities and customer relationships would fill gaps in each company’s portfolio,
93
create a broader, solutions-oriented component platform serving outdoor enthusiast, housing, transportation
and other markets, and enable the combined company to offer more integrated solutions to customers. The
product overlap of Patrick and LCI’s products represented less than 10% of combined revenue on a pro
forma basis in 2025 based on the information presented to the Patrick board.
•Greater diversification and resilience. The expected diversification of the combined company across end
markets, products, customers and channels should increase the combined company’s ability to perform
through industry cycles and reduce reliance on any single market or product category. Based on the
information presented to the Patrick board, the combined company’s revenue mix by end market on a pro
forma basis in 2025 was expected to include approximately 50% recreational vehicle, 17% housing, 12%
marine, 10% transportation, 6% truck and offroad and 5% powersports revenue, with aftermarket revenue
representing approximately 16% of pro forma 2025 revenue.
•Broader innovation and commercial capabilities. Patrick’s integrated design-to-delivery capabilities
combined with LCI’s expertise in highly engineered structural, original equipment and aftermarket
components are expected to enhance research and development and commercialization capabilities, and
create cross-selling and other organic growth opportunities.
•Aftermarket opportunity. Patrick’s access to LCI’s established aftermarket distribution capabilities would
expand Patrick’s aftermarket sales opportunities. The combined company’s expected aftermarket platform
represented more than $1.3 billion of revenue on a pro forma basis in 2025, based on the information
presented to the Patrick board. The Patrick board also considered the large installed base of approximately
8.1 million recreational vehicles and 10 million boats identified in the materials presented to it when
assessing the aftermarket sales potential and the fact that aftermarket demand is expected to be less
dependent on new unit production when assessing the potential aftermarket opportunities.
•Scale and financial profile. The expected scale of the combined company, including approximately $8.1
billion of pro forma revenue, approximately $1.0 billion of adjusted EBITDA and approximately $508
million of free cash flow on a pro forma basis in the twelve months trailing March 2026 based on the
financial information reviewed by the Patrick board, should enhance the combined company’s capacity to
invest in organic growth, innovation and strategic acquisitions.
•Synergies and accretion. The merger is expected to generate approximately $150 million of net annual
run-rate cost synergies within three years, principally from general and administrative efficiencies, facility
and operational optimization and procurement opportunities, which should cause the merger to be accretive
to adjusted earnings per share in the first full year following closing.
•Balance sheet and capital allocation. The combined company is expected to generate strong cash flow
generation and pro forma net leverage of approximately 2.1x in the first full year following closing, which
was below Patrick’s stated leverage target of approximately 2.5x based on the information presented to the
Patrick board. The Patrick board believed this financial profile would support continued investment in
organic growth and innovation, disciplined strategic acquisitions, capital returns and financial flexibility.
•Continued participation in upside by Patrick shareholders. Patrick shareholders’ ownership of
approximately 52% of the combined company will allow them to participate in the expected synergies,
growth opportunities and potential future appreciation of the combined company without Patrick funding
cash consideration in the merger.
•Exchange ratio and relative valuation. The Patrick board believed that the 1.2440 exchange ratio
appropriately reflected the relative values of Patrick and LCI, taking into account the movement in the
parties’ relative trading prices during the process, current and historical trading prices, financial
performance and prospects, and provided Patrick shareholders with an appropriate economic interest in the
combined company, including approximately 52% ownership of the combined company immediately
following the merger.
94
•Leadership and governance continuity. The leadership and governance arrangements for the combined
company are expected to provide continuity of leadership and strategic direction and facilitate integration
of the two companies, including through Patrick remaining the publicly traded parent, continued trading
under the PATK ticker symbol, Mr. Nemeth serving as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Cleveland serving as
Chair, and Mr. Sirpilla serving as Vice Chair.
•Management depth and cultural alignment. The companies’ complementary management capabilities,
shared commitments to customer service and partnership, innovation, operational execution and disciplined
growth, and depth of management talent are expected to facilitate integration of the two companies and
support long-term value creation.
•Negotiation process and evolution of terms. The negotiation process, including Patrick’s decision to
discontinue discussions in May 2026 when the parties had not reached agreement on acceptable relative
valuation and other material terms and the subsequent evolution of the economic and governance terms
after discussions resumed in June 2026, resulted in an agreed approximately 52%/48% ownership
allocation and governance arrangements that preserved important elements of Patrick’s leadership and
strategic continuity, including Mr. Cleveland serving as Chair.
•Alternatives and standalone prospects. The merger offered a more attractive opportunity for long-term
shareholder value creation than Patrick’s standalone plan or the other strategic alternatives reasonably
available to Patrick, based on the Patrick board’s assessment of those alternatives and Patrick’s standalone
prospects.
•Due diligence and knowledge of the businesses. The Patrick board’s knowledge of Patrick’s business,
financial condition, strategy and prospects, together with its review of publicly available and nonpublic
information regarding LCI and the results of Patrick’s business, legal, financial, accounting, tax, regulatory
and other diligence, provided the Patrick board with a substantial information base for evaluating the
expected benefits and risks of the merger.
•Opinion of J.P. Morgan. The financial analyses presented by J.P. Morgan to the Patrick board and J.P.
Morgan’s oral opinion delivered on June 29, 2026, which was subsequently confirmed by delivery of its
written opinion dated June 30, 2026, provided the Patrick board with additional financial information
relevant to its evaluation of the exchange ratio, including J.P. Morgan’s opinion that, as of the date of its
opinion and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by J.P. Morgan in preparing its opinion, the exchange ratio in the
proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick, as more fully described below in the
section titled “—Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors—Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.” The
full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, dated June 30, 2026, which sets forth, among other things,
the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken
by J.P. Morgan in preparing its opinion, is attached as Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
is incorporated herein by reference. The summary of the opinion of J.P. Morgan set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion.
•Opinion of Baird. The financial analyses presented by Baird to the Patrick board and Baird’s oral opinion
rendered on June 29, 2026, which was subsequently confirmed by delivery on June 30, 2026 of its written
opinion, provided the Patrick board with additional financial information relevant to its evaluation of the
exchange ratio, including Baird’s opinion that, as of the date of its opinion and based upon and subject to
the qualifications, limitations, assumptions and other matters undertaken in preparing its written opinion,
the exchange ratio in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick, as more fully described
below in the section titled “—Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors—Opinion of Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated.” The full text of Baird’s written opinion is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/
prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference.
•Terms of the merger agreement. The representations, warranties, covenants, closing conditions,
reciprocal no-solicitation and board recommendation provisions, termination rights and fees, regulatory
95
efforts provisions and other terms of the merger agreement provide a framework that the Patrick board
considered reasonable and that appropriately allocates transaction risk between the parties while supporting
completion of the merger.
•Transaction structure and likelihood of completion. The absence of a financing condition, the use of a
transaction structure designed to avoid triggering change-of-control provisions under Patrick’s existing
indebtedness and the reciprocal obligations to seek the required regulatory approvals are expected to reduce
execution risk and enhance the likelihood that the merger will be completed on the contemplated terms.
•Shareholder approval. The requirement that Patrick shareholders approve the issuance of Patrick common
stock to LCI stockholders in connection with the merger and the amendment to Patrick’s articles of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Patrick common stock gives Patrick
shareholders the opportunity to vote directly on matters that are conditions to completion of the merger.
Risks, Uncertainties and Other Potentially Negative Factors
•Fixed exchange ratio and market risk. Because the exchange ratio is fixed and will not adjust for changes
in the relative market prices of Patrick common stock and LCI common stock before closing, changes in
those market prices could affect the relative value of the merger consideration and the economic interests of
Patrick shareholders in the combined company.
•Dilution to Patrick Shareholders. The issuance of Patrick common stock to LCI stockholders will dilute
the ownership and voting interests of pre-closing Patrick shareholders, who are expected to own
approximately 52% of the combined company immediately following completion of the merger.
•Integration and synergy risk. The integration of two large public companies will involve significant
operational and organizational complexity and costs, and there is a risk that expected synergies, operational
efficiencies, accretion and other anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized in the anticipated
amounts or time frames, or at all.
•Regulatory and litigation risk. The requirement to obtain antitrust and other regulatory approvals creates
a risk of delay, governmental challenge, litigation or the imposition of remedies or commitments that could
adversely affect the anticipated benefits of the merger, particularly in light of the public regulatory scrutiny
that had already arisen during the process. In addition, the merger could give rise to stockholder or other
private litigation that could result in additional costs, management distraction or delay in completing the
merger.
•Closing risk and consequences of noncompletion. The merger is subject to Patrick shareholder approvals,
LCI stockholder approval, regulatory approvals and other closing conditions that may not be obtained or
satisfied, and any delay in or failure to complete the merger could adversely affect Patrick’s business,
employees, customer relationships, market price and strategic plans.
•Business disruption and transaction costs. The implementation of the merger may divert management
attention, restrict certain aspects of Patrick’s operations and result in significant transaction, integration and
other costs, some of which may be incurred regardless of whether the merger is completed.
•Stakeholder reactions. Customers, suppliers, employees, competitors and other business partners may
react adversely to the merger or alter their relationships with Patrick or LCI, which could adversely affect
the companies’ businesses or the anticipated benefits of the merger.
•Deal protection provisions. The restrictions on soliciting alternative transactions, procedures governing
unsolicited proposals and changes in recommendation, and obligation to pay a termination fee in specified
circumstances could discourage another party from making an alternative proposal or otherwise limit
Patrick’s flexibility to pursue a competing transaction.
•Shared governance and management execution. Equal representation of Patrick and LCI designees on
the combined company board, together with potential differences in corporate cultures, operating practices
96
or views regarding integration and strategy, could complicate decision-making or impair execution of the
combined company’s business strategy.
•Interests of directors and executive officers. Certain Patrick directors and executive officers have
interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Patrick shareholders
generally, which could create actual or perceived conflicts of interest in connection with the evaluation and
approval of the merger, as described under “—Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger.”
•Other risks. The merger and the combined company will also be subject to the other risks described under
“Risk Factors” and the matters described under “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.”
The Patrick board considered all of the foregoing factors as a whole and concluded that, on balance, the
potential benefits of the merger to Patrick and its shareholders outweighed the risks and potentially negative factors.
The foregoing discussion is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all factors considered by the Patrick
board. In view of the wide variety of factors considered and the complexity of these matters, the Patrick board did
not consider it practical to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative or specific weights to
the factors considered. Individual directors may have given different weights to different factors. The Patrick
board’s determinations and recommendation were based on the totality of the information presented to and
considered by it.
In considering the recommendation of the Patrick board, Patrick shareholders should be aware that certain
Patrick directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the
interests of Patrick shareholders generally. The Patrick board was aware of and considered these interests in
approving the merger agreement and recommending approval of the Patrick share issuance proposal, the Patrick
authorized stock increase proposal and the Patrick articles amendment and restatement proposal. See “—Interests of
Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.”
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the Patrick board is forward looking in
nature and should be read in light of the factors described under “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking
Statements.”
Opinions of Patrick’s Financial Advisors
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Pursuant to an engagement letter, Patrick retained J.P. Morgan as its lead financial advisor in connection with
the proposed merger.
At the meeting of the Patrick board on June 29, 2026, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral opinion to the Patrick board
to the effect that, as of such date, and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters
considered and limitations on the review undertaken by J.P. Morgan in preparing its opinion, the exchange ratio in
the proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick. J.P. Morgan confirmed its June 29, 2026
oral opinion by delivering its written opinion dated June 30, 2026 to the Patrick board, that, as of such date, the
exchange ratio in the proposed merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, dated June 30, 2026, which sets forth, among other things,
the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by J.P.
Morgan in preparing its opinion, is attached as Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated
herein by reference. The summary of the opinion of J.P. Morgan set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. Patrick’s shareholders are urged to read the
opinion in its entirety. J.P. Morgan’s opinion was addressed to the Patrick board (in its capacity as such) in
connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the proposed merger and was limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to Patrick in the proposed merger and did not address any other aspect
of the proposed merger. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the exchange ratio in the proposed
97
merger to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Patrick or as to the underlying
decision by Patrick to engage in the proposed merger. The issuance of J.P. Morgan’s opinion was approved by a
fairness opinion committee of J.P. Morgan. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of
Patrick as to how such shareholder should vote with respect to the proposed merger or any other matter.
In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan, among other things:
•reviewed the merger agreement;
•reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information concerning Patrick and LCI and the
industries in which they operate;
•compared the financial and operating performance of Patrick and LCI with publicly available information
concerning certain other companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and reviewed the current and historical
market prices of the Patrick common stock and LCI common stock and certain publicly traded securities of
such other companies;
•reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts prepared by or at the direction of the
managements of Patrick and LCI relating to their respective businesses, as well as the estimated amount
and timing of cost savings and related expenses and synergies expected to result from the proposed merger
(the “Synergies”); and
•performed such other financial studies and analyses and considered such other information as J.P. Morgan
deemed appropriate for the purposes of its opinion.
In addition, J.P. Morgan held discussions with certain members of the management of Patrick and LCI with
respect to certain aspects of the proposed merger, and the past and current business operations of Patrick and LCI,
the financial condition and future prospects and operations of Patrick and LCI, the effects of the proposed merger on
the financial condition and future prospects of Patrick, and certain other matters J.P. Morgan believed necessary or
appropriate to its inquiry.
In giving its opinion, J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all information
that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed with J.P. Morgan by Patrick and LCI or otherwise
reviewed by or for J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan did not independently verify any such information or its accuracy or
completeness and, pursuant to J.P. Morgan’s engagement letter with Patrick, J.P. Morgan did not assume any
obligation to undertake any such independent verification. J.P. Morgan did not conduct and was not provided with
any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor did J.P. Morgan evaluate the solvency of Patrick or LCI
under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters.
In relying on financial analyses and forecasts provided to J.P. Morgan or derived therefrom, including the
Synergies, J.P. Morgan assumed that they were reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments by management as to the expected future results of operations and
financial condition of Patrick and LCI to which such analyses or forecasts relate. J.P. Morgan expressed no view as
to such analyses or forecasts (including the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were based.
J.P. Morgan also assumed that the proposed merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will have the tax consequences described in discussions with, and materials furnished to J.P. Morgan by,
representatives of Patrick, and will be consummated as described in the merger agreement. J.P. Morgan also
assumed that the representations and warranties made by Patrick and LCI in the merger agreement and the related
agreements were and will be true and correct in all respects material to its analysis. J.P. Morgan is not a legal,
regulatory or tax expert and relied on the assessments made by advisors to Patrick with respect to such issues. J.P.
Morgan further assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the
consummation of the proposed merger will be obtained without any adverse effect on Patrick or LCI or on the
contemplated benefits of the proposed merger.
98
The projections furnished to J.P. Morgan were prepared by Patrick’s management as discussed more fully in the
section titled “Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information” beginning on page 123 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Patrick does not publicly disclose internal management projections of the type provided to J.P.
Morgan in connection with J.P. Morgan’s analysis of the proposed merger, and such projections were not prepared
with a view toward public disclosure. These projections were based on numerous variables and assumptions that are
inherently uncertain and may be beyond the control of Patrick’s management, including, without limitation, factors
related to general economic and competitive conditions, prevailing interest rates and other factors as set forth in the
section titled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 51 of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those set forth in such
projections. For more information regarding the use of projections and other forward-looking statements, please
refer to the section titled “Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information” beginning on page 123 of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
J.P. Morgan’s opinion was necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the
information made available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date of such opinion. J.P. Morgan’s opinion noted that
subsequent developments may affect J.P. Morgan’s opinion and that J.P. Morgan does not have any obligation to
update, revise or reaffirm such opinion.
J.P. Morgan’s opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio in the
proposed merger to Patrick, and J.P. Morgan has expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the exchange ratio in the
proposed merger to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Patrick or as to the
underlying decision by Patrick to engage in the proposed merger. Furthermore, J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion
with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers, directors, or employees of any party to the
proposed merger, or any class of such persons relative to the exchange ratio in the proposed merger or with respect
to the fairness of any such compensation. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the price at which Patrick’s
common stock or LCI’s common stock will trade at any future time.
The terms of the merger agreement, including the exchange ratio, were determined through arm’s length
negotiations between Patrick and LCI, and the decision to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of
Patrick’s board. J.P. Morgan’s opinion and financial analyses were only one of the many factors considered by
Patrick’s board in its evaluation of the proposed merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of
Patrick’s board or Patrick’s management with respect to the proposed merger or the exchange ratio.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice, J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation
methodologies in rendering its opinion to Patrick’s board on June 29, 2026 and in the financial analyses presented to
Patrick’s board on such date in connection with the rendering of such opinion. The following is a summary of the
material financial analyses utilized by J.P. Morgan in connection with rendering its opinion to the Patrick board and
does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by J.P. Morgan. Some of the
summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables are not intended to
stand alone, and in order to more fully understand the financial analyses used by J.P. Morgan, the tables must be
read together with the full text of each summary. Considering the data set forth below without considering the full
narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the
analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of J.P. Morgan’s analyses.
Public Trading Multiples. Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan compared selected financial data
of Patrick and LCI with similar data for selected publicly traded companies engaged in businesses that J.P. Morgan
judged to be sufficiently analogous to Patrick and LCI, respectively. The companies selected by J.P. Morgan were as
follows:
•Polaris Inc.,
•Brunswick Corporation,
•THOR Industries, Inc.,
•Winnebago Industries, Inc.,
99
•Fox Factory Holding Corp. and
•Dometic Group AB.
These companies were selected by J.P. Morgan, among other reasons, because they are publicly traded
companies with operations and businesses that, for the purposes of J.P. Morgan’s analysis, J.P. Morgan considered
to be similar to Patrick and LCI. However, certain of these companies may have characteristics that are materially
different from those of Patrick and LCI, as applicable. The analyses necessarily involve complex considerations and
judgments concerning differences in financial and operational characteristics of the companies involved and other
factors that could affect the selected companies differently than they would affect Patrick or LCI, as applicable.
Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan calculated, for each selected company, the multiple of the
firm value (calculated as equity value, plus or minus, as applicable, net debt or net cash) (the “FV”) to the analyst
consensus estimates of fiscal years 2026 and 2027 adjusted EBITDA for the applicable company (each calculated as
earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, amortization, and post-stock-based compensation) (“FV / 2026E Adj.
EBITDA” and “FV / 2027E Adj. EBITDA,” respectively).
Based on the results of this analysis, J.P. Morgan selected a FV / 2026E Adj. EBITDA multiple reference range
for Patrick and LCI of 7.00x to 11.25x and a FV / 2027E Adj. EBITDA multiple reference range for Patrick and LCI
of 6.25x to 9.50x and applied such reference ranges respectively to LCI’s and Patrick’s estimated 2026 and 2027
projected EBITDA for the fiscal years 2026 and 2027. The analysis derived the following ranges of implied equity
value per share of Patrick common stock and LCI common stock (rounded to the nearest $0.10):
J.P. Morgan compared the range of implied equity value per share of (i) Patrick common stock to the share price
of Patrick common stock of $93.18 on June 29, 2026 and (ii) LCI common stock to the share price of LCI common
stock of $100.12 on June 29, 2026.
Company | Metric | Implied Equity Value Per Share | ||
Patrick ..................................................... | FV / 2026E Adj. EBITDA | $61.20 – $118.40 | ||
FV / 2027E Adj. EBITDA | $63.40 – $113.40 | |||
LCI .......................................................... | FV / 2026E Adj. EBITDA | $107.10 – $190.60 | ||
FV / 2027E Adj. EBITDA | $115.70 – $191.40 |
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. J.P. Morgan conducted a discounted cash flow analysis for the purpose of
determining an implied fully diluted equity value per share for both Patrick common stock and LCI’s common stock.
J.P. Morgan calculated the unlevered free cash flows that Patrick and LCI, respectively, are expected to generate
during the last three quarters of their respective fiscal year 2026 and their respective fiscal year 2027 through 2030
based on the Patrick Standalone Projections and the LCI Standalone Projections, respectively, as discussed more
fully in section titled “Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information” which were discussed with, and
approved by, the Patrick board for use by J.P. Morgan in connection with its financial analyses. J.P. Morgan also
calculated a range of terminal values of Patrick and LCI at the end of this period by applying perpetual growth rates
ranging from 1.5% to 2.5%, based on guidance provided by Patrick’s management, to estimates of terminal
unlevered free cash flow of Patrick and LCI at the end of fiscal year 2030, as provided in Patrick’s forecasts.
J.P. Morgan then discounted the unlevered free cash flows estimates and the range of terminal values to present
value as of March 31, 2026 using a range of discount rates from 8.25% to 9.25% for both Patrick and LCI, which
were chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of both Patrick and LCI.
The present values of the unlevered free cash flow estimates and the range of terminal values were then adjusted by
subtracting Patrick and LCI’s net debt, in each case, as of March 31, 2026, using the aforementioned discount rates
for both companies. This analysis indicated a range of implied per share equity value (rounded to the nearest $0.10)
of approximately (i) $178.50 to $229.20 per share of LCI common stock and (ii) $142.70 to $194.00 per share of
Patrick common stock. The range of the implied per share equity values for (i) Patrick common stock were
compared to the share price of Patrick common stock of $93.18 on June 29, 2026 and (ii) LCI common stock were
compared to the share price of LCI common stock of $100.12 on June 29, 2026.
100
Implied Relative Value Analysis. J.P. Morgan compared the results for Patrick to the results for LCI with respect
to the public trading multiples and the discounted cash flow analyses described above. J.P. Morgan compared the
lowest equity value per share for Patrick to the highest equity value per share for LCI to derive the lowest implied
exchange ratio implied by each pair of results. J.P. Morgan also compared the highest equity value per share for
Patrick to the lowest equity value per share for LCI to derive the highest implied exchange ratio implied by each pair
of results. The ranges of the implied exchange ratios from this analysis were:
Method | Range of Implied Exchange Ratios | ||||
Low | High | ||||
Trading Multiples | FV / 2026E Adj. EBITDA | 0.9048x | 3.1128x | ||
FV / 2027E Adj. EBITDA | 1.0206x | 3.0203x | |||
Discounted Cash Flow | 0.9201x | 1.6062x | |||
The ranges of implied exchange ratios resulting from the foregoing analysis were compared to the exchange
ratio of 1.2440x, as set forth in the merger agreement.
Discounted Cash Flow-Based Value Creation Analysis. J.P. Morgan prepared a value creation analysis that
compared the estimated implied equity value of Patrick on a stand-alone basis, using the midpoint value determined
in J.P. Morgan’s discounted cash flow analysis of Patrick described above, to the estimated Patrick shareholders’
portion of the pro forma combined company equity value. J.P. Morgan determined the Patrick shareholders’ portion
of the pro forma combined equity value by (i) adding the sum of (a) the equity value of Patrick, using the midpoint
value determined in J.P. Morgan’s discounted cash flow analysis of Patrick described above, (b) the equity value of
LCI derived using the midpoint value determined in J.P. Morgan’s discounted cash flow analysis of LCI described
above and (c) the net present value of expected Synergies using the midpoint value determined in J.P. Morgan’s
discounted cash flow analysis of the Synergies described below, (ii) subtracting the estimated one-time transaction
fees based on guidance provided by Patrick’s management and (iii) multiplying such result by the pro forma equity
ownership of the combined company by the existing holders of Patrick common stock of 52%.
J.P. Morgan determined the projected net present value of expected Synergies by conducting a discounted cash
flow analysis. J.P. Morgan calculated the unlevered free cash flows that the projected net Synergies were expected to
generate during fiscal year 2027 through fiscal year 2030 based on estimates by Patrick’s management. J.P. Morgan
also calculated a range of terminal values for the projected net Synergies at the end of this period by applying a
perpetual growth rate of 0.0%, based on guidance provided by Patrick’s management, to the estimated terminal
unlevered free cash flow of the projected net Synergies at the end of fiscal year 2030. The unlevered free cash flows
and the range of terminal values were then discounted to present values as of March 31, 2026 using a range of
discount rates from 8.25% to 9.25%, which range was chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the
weighted average cost of capital of Patrick. This analysis indicated a range of implied net present values of expected
Synergies of approximately $997 million to $1,140 million.
The value creation analysis indicated that the proposed merger represents accretion in value of approximately
6.0%, or $347 million, compared to the stand-alone value of Patrick. There can be no assurance, however, that the
expected Synergies and the estimated one-time transaction-related expenses and other impacts referred to above will
not be substantially greater or less than the estimate described above.
Miscellaneous. The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses or data presented by J.P. Morgan. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. J.P. Morgan believes that the
foregoing summary and its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the foregoing
summary and these analyses, without considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of
the processes underlying the analyses and its opinion. As a result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any
particular analysis or combination of analyses described above were merely utilized to create points of reference for
analytical purposes and should not be taken to be the view of J.P. Morgan with respect to the actual value of either
Patrick or LCI. The order of analyses described does not represent the relative importance or weight given to those
analyses by J.P. Morgan. In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan did not attribute any particular weight to any
101
analyses or factors considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any individual analysis or factor
(positive or negative), considered in isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion. Rather, J.P. Morgan
considered the totality of the factors and analyses performed in determining its opinion.
Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain, as they are subject to numerous factors
or events beyond the control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly, forecasts and analyses used or made by
J.P. Morgan are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable
than suggested by those analyses. Moreover, J.P. Morgan’s analyses are not and do not purport to be appraisals or
otherwise reflective of the prices at which businesses actually could be acquired or sold. None of the selected
companies reviewed as described in the above summary is identical to Patrick or LCI. However, the companies
selected were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes
of J.P. Morgan’s analysis, may be considered similar to those of Patrick and LCI. The analyses necessarily involve
complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operational characteristics of the
companies involved and other factors that could affect the companies compared to Patrick and LCI. As a part of its
investment banking business, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of businesses
and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations
for corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was selected to advise Patrick with respect to the merger and deliver
an opinion to Patrick’s board with respect to the merger on the basis of, among other things, such experience and its
qualifications and reputation in connection with such matters and its familiarity with Patrick, LCI and the industries
in which they operate.
For financial advisory services rendered in connection with the proposed merger, Patrick has agreed to pay J.P.
Morgan a fee of $20 million, $5 million of which became payable to J.P. Morgan at the time J.P. Morgan delivered
its opinion and the remainder of which is contingent and payable upon the consummation of the proposed merger.
In addition, Patrick has agreed to reimburse J.P. Morgan for certain of its expenses incurred in connection with its
services, including the fees and disbursements of counsel, and will indemnify J.P. Morgan against certain liabilities
arising out of J.P. Morgan’s engagement.
During the two years preceding the date of J.P. Morgan’s opinion, neither J.P. Morgan nor its affiliates have had
any other material financial advisory or other material commercial or investment banking relationships with Patrick.
During the two years preceding the date of J.P. Morgan’s opinion, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have had
commercial or investment banking relationships with LCI for which J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have received
customary compensation. Such services during such period for LCI have included acting as lead manager on a notes
offering in March 2025. During the two year period preceding delivery of its opinion ending on May 31, 2026, the
aggregate fees recognized by J.P. Morgan from Patrick and LCI were approximately $100,000 and $6 million,
respectively. In addition, J.P. Morgan’s commercial banking affiliate is an agent bank and a lender under
outstanding credit facilities of LCI, for which it receives customary compensation or other financial benefits. In
addition, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates hold, on a proprietary basis, less than 1% of the outstanding common stock of
each of Patrick and LCI. In the ordinary course of their businesses, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates actively trade the
debt and equity securities or financial instruments (including derivatives, bank loans or other obligations) of Patrick
or LCI for their own accounts or for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, they likely hold long or short
positions in such securities or other financial instruments.
Opinion of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated
The Patrick board retained Baird in connection with the merger and to render an opinion as to the fairness, from
a financial point of view, to Patrick of the exchange ratio provided for in the merger pursuant to the merger
agreement.
On June 29, 2026, Baird delivered its oral opinion (which opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing on
June 30, 2026) to the effect that, as of the date of its opinion and based upon and subject to the assumptions,
procedures, matters and limitations set forth therein, the exchange ratio provided for in the merger pursuant to the
merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to Patrick.
102
The full text of Baird’s written opinion, dated June 30, 2026 which sets forth the assumptions made,
general procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Baird in
rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated
herein by reference. Baird’s opinion is limited only to the fairness, as of the date of the opinion and from a
financial point of view, to Patrick of the exchange ratio and does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder as to how any shareholder should act or vote with respect to the merger. The summary of Baird’s
opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of its opinion included as an
annex to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Patrick shareholders are urged to read the opinion carefully
in its entirety.
In conducting its financial analyses and in arriving at its opinion, Baird reviewed information and took into
account financial and economic factors, investment banking procedures and considerations as Baird deemed relevant
under the circumstances. In connection therewith, and subject to the various assumptions, qualifications and
limitations set forth therein, Baird, among other things: (i) reviewed certain internal information, primarily financial
in nature, including (A) financial forecasts concerning the business and operations of Patrick, as furnished to Baird,
and prepared and certified, by Patrick’s management for purposes of Baird’s analysis, and LCI, as prepared by
management of LCI and furnished to Baird and certified by management of Patrick for purposes of Baird’s analysis
(together, the “Forecasts”) and the contemplated strategic, operating and cost benefits and/or synergies associated
with the merger (the “Expected Synergies”), as furnished to Baird, and prepared and certified, by Patrick’s
management for purposes of Baird’s analysis, (B) financial statements of Patrick for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2023 through December 31, 2025 and for the three-month period ended March 29, 2026, which
Patrick’s management prepared and identified as being the most current financial statements for Patrick available,
and (C) financial statements of LCI for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 through December 31, 2025 and
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2026, which LCI’s management prepared and identified as being the
most current financial statements for LCI available; (ii) reviewed certain publicly available information, including,
but not limited to, Patrick’s and LCI’s recent filings with the SEC; (iii) reviewed the principal financial terms of the
draft dated June 29, 2026 of the merger agreement as they related to Baird’s analysis; (iv) compared the financial
position and operating results of Patrick and LCI with those of certain other publicly traded companies Baird
deemed relevant; (v) compared the historical market prices, trading activity and market trading multiples of Patrick
common stock and LCI common stock with those of certain other publicly traded companies Baird deemed relevant;
(vi) reviewed certain potential pro forma financial effects of the merger, including those reflected in the Expected
Synergies furnished to Baird, and prepared, by Patrick’s management and LCI’s management; and (vii) considered
the present values of the forecasted cash flows of Patrick and LCI. Baird held discussions with members of Patrick’s
senior management and LCI’s senior management concerning the historical and current financial condition and
operating results of each of Patrick and LCI, as well as the future prospects of Patrick and LCI, respectively. Baird
was not engaged or requested to, and Baird did not, solicit third party indications of interest in acquiring all or any
part of Patrick. Baird was not involved in assisting Patrick in obtaining any financing in connection with the merger.
Baird also considered other information, financial studies, analyses, investigations and financial, economic and
market criteria which it deemed relevant for the preparation of its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Baird assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and
completeness of all of the financial and other information that was publicly available or provided to Baird by or on
behalf of Patrick or LCI. Baird did not independently verify any publicly available information or information
supplied to it by or on behalf of Patrick or LCI. Baird was not engaged to independently verify, did not assume any
responsibility to verify, assumed no liability for, and expressed no opinion on, any of this information, and Baird
assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, that Patrick was not aware of any information that might
be material to Baird’s opinion that had not been provided to Baird. Baird assumed and relied upon, without
independent verification, that: (i) all material assets and liabilities (contingent or otherwise, known or unknown) of
Patrick and LCI were as set forth in their respective most recent financial statements provided to Baird, and there
was no information or facts that would make any of the information reviewed by Baird incomplete or misleading;
(ii) the financial statements of Patrick and LCI provided to Baird presented fairly the results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition of Patrick and LCI, respectively, for the periods, and as of the dates, indicated and
were prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied; (iii) the
Forecasts and the Expected Synergies were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best available estimates and
103
good faith judgments of Patrick’s and LCI’s senior management as to the future performance of Patrick and LCI,
respectively, and Baird relied, without independent verification, upon the Forecasts and Expected Synergies in the
preparation of its opinion, although Baird expressed no opinion with respect to the Forecasts and Expected
Synergies or any judgments, estimates, assumptions or basis on which they were based, and Baird assumed, without
independent verification, that the Forecasts and the strategic, operating and cost benefits and/or synergies reflected
in the Expected Synergies then-contemplated by Patrick’s management and LCI’s management used in Baird’s
analysis would be realized in the amounts and on the time schedule then-contemplated; (iv) in all respects material
to Baird’s analysis, the merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement without any amendment or modification thereto and without waiver by any party of any of the conditions
to their respective obligations thereunder; (v) in all respects material to Baird’s analysis, the representations and
warranties contained in the merger agreement were true and correct and that each party would perform all of the
covenants and agreements required to be performed by it under the merger agreement; (vi) all corporate,
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals (contractual or otherwise) required to consummate the
merger had been, or would be, obtained without the need for any divestitures or material changes to the exchange
ratio or other material financial terms or conditions of the merger or that would otherwise materially affect Patrick or
LCI or Baird’s analysis; and (vii) the merger would be treated as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Baird relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that the final form of any draft
documents referred to above would not differ in any material respect from such draft documents. Baird relied,
without independent verification, as to all legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance and tax matters regarding the
merger, on the advice of Patrick and its professional advisors, and Baird assumed that all of this advice was correct,
and Baird did not express an opinion on these matters as they related to the merger. In conducting Baird’s review,
Baird did not undertake or obtain an independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (contingent
or otherwise, known or unknown) or solvency of Patrick or LCI nor did Baird make a physical inspection of the
properties or facilities of Patrick or LCI. Baird did not consider any expenses or potential adjustments to the
exchange ratio relating to the merger as part of its analysis. Baird expressed no opinion with respect to the impact of
the merger on Patrick’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, or on the price or trading range of the
Patrick common stock. In each case above, Baird made the assumptions and took the actions or inactions described
above with Patrick’s knowledge and consent.
Baird’s opinion necessarily was based upon economic, monetary and market conditions as they existed and
could be evaluated on the date of its opinion, and its opinion did not predict or take into account any changes which
may have occurred, or information which may have become available, after the date of its opinion. Baird was under
no obligation to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events
occurring after the date of its opinion. Furthermore, Baird expressed no opinion as to the prices or trading ranges at
which any of Patrick’s securities or LCI’s securities (including Patrick common stock and LCI common stock)
would trade following the date of its opinion or as to the effect of the merger on these prices or trading ranges, or
any earnings or ownership dilutive impact that may have resulted from Patrick’s issuance of its common stock as
part of the merger. These prices and trading ranges may have been affected by a number of factors, including but not
limited to (i) dispositions of the common stock of Patrick by shareholders within a short period of time after, or
other market effects resulting from, the announcement and/or effective date of the merger; (ii) changes in prevailing
interest rates and other factors which generally influence the price of securities; (iii) adverse changes in the current
capital markets; (iv) the occurrence of adverse changes in the financial condition, business, assets, results of
operations or prospects of Patrick or LCI or in Patrick’s or LCI’s industries; (v) any necessary actions by, or
restrictions of, federal, state or other governmental agencies or regulatory authorities; and (vi) timely completion of
the merger on terms and conditions that are acceptable to all parties at interest.
Baird’s opinion was prepared at the request and for the information of the Patrick board for its use in connection
with its evaluation of the merger, and may not be used for any other purpose or disclosed to any other party without
Baird’s prior written consent; provided, however, that its opinion may be reproduced in full in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus provided to Patrick’s shareholders in connection with the merger. Baird’s opinion did not
address the relative merits or risks of: (i) the merger, the merger agreement or any other agreements or other matters
provided for, or contemplated by, the merger agreement; (ii) any other transactions that may be, or might have been,
available as an alternative to the merger; or (iii) the merger compared to any other potential alternative transactions
or business strategies considered by the Patrick board and, accordingly, Baird relied upon its discussions with the
104
senior management of Patrick with respect to the availability and consequences of any alternatives to the merger.
Baird’s opinion did not and does not constitute a recommendation to any director, the Patrick board, any security
holder or any other person as to how any person should vote or act with respect to the merger.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by Baird in connection with
rendering its opinion, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of its opinion attached as
Annex E and to the other disclosures contained in this section. The following summary, however, does not
purport to be a complete description of the financial analyses performed by Baird. The order of analyses
described does not represent relative importance or weight given to the analyses performed by Baird. Some of
the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in a tabular format. These tables must
be read together with the full text of each summary and alone are not a complete description of Baird’s
financial analyses. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information is based on market and
financial data as it existed on or before June 29, 2026 and is not necessarily indicative of current market
conditions.
Implied Valuation and Transaction Multiples. Baird calculated the implied equity value of the shares of
Patrick’s fully diluted outstanding common stock using the closing price of Patrick common stock on June 29, 2026,
which resulted in an implied equity value of $3,108 million. Baird calculated the implied enterprise value of Patrick
to be $4,455 million by adding Patrick’s net debt of $1,347 million to the implied equity value of Patrick’s fully
diluted outstanding common stock. Based on Patrick’s shareholders holding 52.0% of the pro forma entity, Baird
calculated the implied equity value of the pro forma entity to be $5,977 million and the implied equity value of LCI
stockholders’ 48.0% stake in the pro forma entity to be $2,869 million. Baird calculated the implied enterprise value
of LCI by adding LCI’s net debt of $803 million to the implied equity value of LCI’s stake in the pro forma entity
resulting in an implied enterprise value of LCI of $3,672 million. Baird then calculated the multiples of the implied
enterprise value of Patrick and LCI compared to Patrick’s and LCI’s respective 2025, projected 2026 and projected
2027 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (which is referred to as EBITDA for purposes of
this section), and earnings before interest and taxes (which is referred to as EBIT for purposes of this section), as
provided by the senior management of each of Patrick and LCI, respectively.
Patrick Selected Publicly Traded Company Analysis. In order to assess the valuation of Patrick, Baird reviewed
certain publicly available financial information for certain publicly traded companies that Baird deemed relevant.
For each of these companies, Baird calculated and compared the enterprise value (which is referred to as EV for
purposes of this section) of each such company to its EBITDA and EBIT for each of 2025 and projected 2026 and
2027. The group of selected publicly traded companies reviewed is listed below.
•Brunswick Corporation
•Dometic Group
•Fox Factory Holding
•Polaris
•Winnebago Industries
•THOR Industries
Baird chose these companies based on a review of publicly traded companies that possessed general business,
operating and financial characteristics representative of companies in the industries in which Patrick operates. Baird
noted that none of the companies reviewed was identical to Patrick and that, accordingly, the analysis of these
companies necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in the business,
operating and financial characteristics of each company and other factors that affect the public market values of
these companies.
For each company, Baird calculated the “market capitalization” (calculated as the market price per share of each
company’s common stock multiplied by the total number of fully diluted common shares outstanding of each
105
company, including net shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants), and enterprise
value. Baird calculated the enterprise value of each selected public company by adding such company’s preferred
stock outstanding, debt, tax-affected pension and other post-employment liabilities and minority interest to and
subtracting such company’s cash from such company’s market capitalization. Baird calculated the multiples of each
company’s enterprise value to its Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT for the twelve months ended December 31,
2025, projected 2026 and projected 2027. Baird then compared the enterprise value multiples for Patrick implied in
the merger based on its Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT with the corresponding trading multiples for the
selected companies. Stock market and historical financial information for the selected companies was based on
publicly available information as of June 29, 2026 (including the closing market price per share of each company’s
common stock as of such date), and projected financial information was based on consensus equity analyst research
estimates available as of this date. A summary of the range of valuation multiples for the selected companies is
provided in the table below.
Selected Valuation Multiples(1) | |||||||||||
Low | Average | Median | High | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | |||||||||||
CY 2025 | 7.6 | x | 9.9 | x | 9.2 | x | 13.2 | x | |||
CY projected 2026 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 9.0 | 10.9 | |||||||
CY projected 2027 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 9.4 | |||||||
Adjusted EBIT | |||||||||||
CY 2025 | 11.5 | x | 22.4 | x | 19.7 | x | 30.5 | x | |||
CY projected 2026 | 11.5 | 18.4 | 16.3 | 22.3 | |||||||
CY projected 2027 | 10.1 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 15.4 | |||||||
__________________
(1)Valuation Multiples based on EBIT and EBITDA for selected companies. The low and the high represent first and third quartile valuations,
respectively. Quartiles were calculated as percentiles using linear interpolation, such that the first and third quartiles represent the 25th and
75th percentiles of the data and may fall between observed values rather than equal discrete data points.
In addition, Baird calculated the implied enterprise values of Patrick by multiplying Patrick’s Adjusted
EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT by the trading multiples of the selected public companies. The implied enterprise
values, based on the multiples set forth above, as well as the implied equity values (calculated by subtracting debt of
Patrick (net of cash) from the implied enterprise values of Patrick) are summarized in the table below.
Implied Patrick Enterprise Value | |||||||
($ in millions, except implied share price) | Low | Average | Median | High | |||
Adjusted EBITDA | |||||||
CY 2025 | $3,403.8 | $4,458.6 | $4,159.2 | $5,925.8 | |||
CY projected 2026 | 3,986.5 | 4,437.1 | 4,297.2 | 5,226.8 | |||
CY projected 2027 | 4,211.0 | 4,441.8 | 4,337.4 | 5,164.9 | |||
Adjusted EBIT | |||||||
CY 2025 | $3,216.1 | $6,276.9 | $5,523.5 | $8,535.6 | |||
CY projected 2026 | 3,511.8 | 5,625.4 | 4,988.9 | 6,808.2 | |||
CY projected 2027 | 3,764.7 | 4,850.7 | 4,880.6 | 5,736.8 | |||
Implied Enterprise Value(1) | $3,638.3 | $4,654.6 | $4,609.0 | $5,831.3 | |||
Implied Equity Value | $2,291.0 | $3,307.4 | $3,261.8 | $4,484.1 | |||
Implied Share Price | $68.68 | $99.15 | $97.78 | $134.42 | |||
__________________
(1)Calculated as the median of each column.
106
Baird compared the implied enterprise values in the table above with the enterprise value of Patrick of $4,455
million implied in the merger.
Patrick Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Baird performed a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing Patrick’s
projected unlevered free cash flows (defined as net income excluding after-tax net interest, plus depreciation and
amortization, less capital expenditures and increases in net working capital) from 2026 to 2030, as provided by
Patrick’s senior management in the Forecasts. In this analysis, Baird calculated the present values of the unlevered
free cash flows from 2026 to 2030 by discounting these amounts at rates ranging from 10.0% to 11.0%. Baird
calculated the present values of the free cash flows beyond 2030 by assuming perpetuity growth rates ranging from
3.0% to 2.0%. The summation of the present values of the unlevered free cash flows and the present values of the
terminal values implied enterprise values ranging from $5,403.5 million to $6,784.0 million. Baird compared these
enterprise values with the enterprise value of Patrick of $4,455 million in the merger.
LCI Selected Publicly Traded Company Analysis. In order to assess the valuation of LCI, Baird reviewed certain
publicly available financial information for certain publicly traded companies that Baird deemed relevant. For each
of these companies, Baird calculated and compared the enterprise value (which is referred to as EV for purposes of
this section) of each such company to its EBITDA and EBIT for each of 2025 and projected 2026 and 2027. The
group of selected publicly traded companies reviewed is listed below.
•Brunswick Corporation
•Dometic Group
•Fox Factory Holding
•Polaris
•Winnebago Industries
•THOR Industries
Baird chose these companies based on a review of publicly traded companies that possessed general business,
operating and financial characteristics representative of companies in the industries in which LCI operates. Baird
noted that none of the companies reviewed was identical to LCI and that, accordingly, the analysis of these
companies necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in the business,
operating and financial characteristics of each company and other factors that affect the public market values of
these companies.
For each company, Baird calculated the “market capitalization” (calculated as the market price per share of each
company’s common stock multiplied by the total number of fully diluted common shares outstanding of each
company, including net shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants), and enterprise
value. Baird calculated the enterprise value of each selected public company by adding such company’s preferred
stock outstanding, debt, tax-affected pension and other post-employment liabilities and minority interest to and
subtracting such company’s cash from such company’s market capitalization. Baird calculated the multiples of each
company’s enterprise value to its Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT for the twelve months ended December 31,
2025, projected 2026 and projected 2027. Baird then compared the enterprise value multiples for LCI implied in the
merger based on its Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBIT with the corresponding trading multiples for the selected
companies. Stock market and historical financial information for the selected companies was based on publicly
available information as of June 29, 2026 (including the closing market price per share of each company’s common
stock as of such date), and projected financial information was based on consensus equity analyst research estimates
available as of this date. A summary of the range of valuation multiples for the selected companies is provided in the
table below.
107
Selected Valuation Multiples(1) | |||||||||||
Low | Average | Median | High | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | |||||||||||
CY 2025 | 7.6 | x | 9.9 | x | 9.2 | x | 13.2 | x | |||
CY projected 2026 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 9 | 10.9 | |||||||
CY projected 2027 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 9.4 | |||||||
Adjusted EBIT | |||||||||||
CY 2025 | 11.5 | x | 22.4 | x | 19.7 | x | 30.5 | x | |||
CY projected 2026 | 11.5 | 18.4 | 16.3 | 22.3 | |||||||
CY projected 2027 | 10.1 | 13.1 | 13.1 | 15.4 | |||||||
__________________
(1)Valuation Multiples based on EBIT and EBITDA for selected companies. The low and the high represent first and third quartile valuations,
respectively. Quartiles were calculated as percentiles using linear interpolation, such that the first and third quartiles represent the 25th and
75th percentiles of the data and may fall between observed values rather than equal discrete data points.
In addition, Baird calculated the implied enterprise values of LCI by multiplying LCI’s Adjusted EBITDA and
Adjusted EBIT by the trading multiples of the selected public companies. The implied enterprise values, based on
the multiples set forth above, as well as the implied equity values (calculated by subtracting debt of LCI (net of
cash) from the implied enterprise values of LCI) are summarized in the table below.
Implied LCI Enterprise Value | |||||||
($ in millions, except implied share price) | Low | Average | Median | High | |||
Adjusted EBITDA | |||||||
CY 2025 | $3,087.8 | $4,044.7 | $3,773.0 | $5,375.6 | |||
CY projected 2026 | 4,104.1 | 4,568.0 | 4,424.0 | 5,381.1 | |||
CY projected 2027 | 4,508.5 | 4,755.6 | 4,643.9 | 5,529.8 | |||
Adjusted EBIT | |||||||
CY 2025 | $3,298.8 | $6,438.4 | $5,665.6 | $8,755.2 | |||
CY projected 2026 | 4,281.0 | 6,857.7 | 6,081.7 | 8,299.5 | |||
CY projected 2027 | 4,815.6 | 6,204.6 | 6,243.0 | 7,338.1 | |||
Implied Enterprise Value(1) | $4,192.6 | $5,480.1 | $5,154.8 | $6,433.9 | |||
Implied Equity Value | $3,389.8 | $4,677.4 | $4,352.0 | $5,631.2 | |||
Implied Share Price | $136.95 | $188.97 | $175.83 | $227.51 | |||
__________________
(1)Calculated as the median of each column.
Baird compared the implied enterprise values in the table above with the enterprise value of LCI of $3,672
million implied in the merger.
LCI Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. In order to assess the relative public market valuation of LCI, Baird
performed a discounted cash flow analysis utilizing LCI’s projected unlevered free cash flows (defined as net
income excluding after-tax net interest, plus depreciation and amortization, less capital expenditures and increases in
net working capital) from 2026 to 2030, as provided by Patrick management. In this analysis, Baird calculated the
present values of the unlevered free cash flows from 2026 to 2030 by discounting these amounts at rates ranging
from 10.0% to 11.0%. Baird calculated the present values of the free cash flows beyond 2030 by assuming
perpetuity growth rates ranging from 3.0% to 2.0%. The summation of the present values of the unlevered free cash
flows, excluding the Expected Synergies, and the present values of the terminal values implied enterprise values
108
ranging from $4,525.0 million to $5,662.4 million. Baird compared these implied enterprise values with the
enterprise value of LCI of $3,672 million implied in the merger.
Implied Merger Exchange Ratio Analyses. Baird prepared an analysis of the implied merger exchange ratio
based on its financial analyses. Baird utilized the selected company analyses and the discounted cash flow analyses
described above to calculate the mean and median exchange ratios (as set forth in the table below). Baird compared
those implied exchange ratios to the exchange ratio of 1.2440 implied by the number of shares of Patrick common
stock to be issued in the merger relative to the number of shares of LCI common stock outstanding on a fully-diluted
basis prior to the merger.
Based upon the indicative ranges of implied equity values derived by Baird for Patrick and LCI based on the
selected company analyses as described above, Baird calculated a range of implied pro forma equity ownership in
the combined company for the pre-merger holders of Patrick common stock. For purposes of the selected publicly
traded company analysis, Baird assumed that the implied pro forma equity value of the combined company was the
sum of the ranges of implied equity values for Patrick and LCI described above. Baird calculated the low end of the
implied pro forma equity ownership range by dividing the lowest implied equity value for Patrick described above
by the sum of the lowest implied equity value for Patrick and the highest implied equity value for LCI, and
calculated the high end of the implied pro forma equity value ownership range by dividing the highest implied
equity value for Patrick described above by the sum of the highest implied equity value for Patrick and the lowest
implied equity value for LCI. Baird observed that this analysis did not reflect the benefit to pre-merger holders of
Patrick common stock of the Expected Synergies.
Based upon the indicative ranges of implied equity values derived by Baird for Patrick and LCI from the
discounted cash flow analyses as described above, Baird calculated a range of implied pro forma equity ownership
in the combined company for the pre-merger holders of Patrick common stock. For purposes of the discounted cash
flow analysis, Baird assumed that the implied pro forma equity value for the combined company was the sum of the
indicative ranges of implied equity values derived by Baird for Patrick and LCI described above. Baird calculated
the low end of the implied pro forma equity ownership range by dividing the lowest implied equity value for Patrick
by the sum of the lowest implied equity value for Patrick and the highest implied equity value for LCI, and
calculated the high end of the implied pro forma equity ownership range by dividing the highest implied equity
value for Patrick by the sum of the highest implied equity value for Patrick and the lowest implied equity value for
LCI.
The range of implied merger exchange ratios and implied equity contributions calculated from the selected
company analyses and discounted cash flow analyses are summarized below.
Implied Merger Exchange Ratio Range | Implied Equity Contribution Analysis | ||||||||||||
High Range | Low Range | ||||||||||||
High | Low | Patrick | LCI | Patrick | LCI | ||||||||
Selected Company Analysis | 1.019 | x | 3.313 | x | 56.9 | 43.1 | 28.9 | 71.1 | |||||
Discounted Cash Flow (without Expected Synergies) | 0.923 | x | 1.615 | x | 59.4 | 40.6 | 45.5 | 54.5 | |||||
Mean | 0.971 | x | 2.464 | x | 58.2% | 41.8% | 37.2% | 62.8% | |||||
Median | 0.971 | x | 2.464 | x | 58.2% | 41.8% | 37.2% | 62.8% | |||||
Exchange Ratio | 1.2440x | ||||||||||||
The foregoing summary does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Baird or its
presentation to the Patrick board. The preparation of financial analyses and a fairness opinion is a complex process
and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analyses or summary description. Baird believes that its analyses (and the
summary set forth above) must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of these analyses and factors
considered by Baird, without considering all of these analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of the
processes and judgments underlying the analyses performed by Baird and its opinion. Baird did not attempt to assign
109
specific weights to particular analyses. Any estimates contained in Baird’s analyses are not necessarily indicative of
actual values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than as set forth therein. Estimates of values of
companies do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily to reflect the prices at which companies may actually be
sold. Because these estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty, Baird does not assume responsibility for their
accuracy.
Additional Information about Baird and Its Engagement
Pursuant to its engagement, Baird will receive a transaction fee of approximately $12.5 million for its services,
all of which is contingent upon the consummation of the merger. Pursuant to this engagement letter, Patrick has also
agreed to pay Baird a fee of $3 million payable upon delivery of its opinion, regardless of the conclusions reached in
its opinion, which fee is creditable against the transaction fee described above. In addition, Patrick has agreed to
reimburse Baird for certain of its expenses and to indemnify Baird against certain liabilities that may arise out of its
engagement. Baird will not receive any other payment of compensation contingent upon the successful completion
of the merger. As part of its investment banking business, Baird is engaged in the evaluation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other
purposes.
Baird has, in the past, provided investment banking and financial advisory services to Patrick for which Baird
received customary compensation. Baird acted as a co-manager in connection with Patrick’s senior notes offering
completed in October 2024 for which Baird received approximately $25,000 in compensation. Except as provided
above, over the past two years, Baird had not provided investment banking or financial advisory services to Patrick
or LCI for which Baird received any compensation. No material relationship between Patrick, LCI or any other party
to the merger was mutually understood to be contemplated in which any compensation was intended to be received
by Baird other than the transaction fee and opinion fee described in the preceding paragraph.
Baird is a full service securities firm and, in the ordinary course of its business, Baird may from time to time
provide investment banking, advisory, brokerage and other services to clients that may be competitors or suppliers
to, or customers or security holders of, Patrick or LCI or any other party that may be involved in the merger and
their respective affiliates or that may otherwise participate or be involved in the same or a similar business or
industries as Patrick or LCI. Baird has also prepared equity analyst research reports from time to time regarding
Patrick and LCI and may continue to do so. Baird also serves as a market maker in the publicly traded securities of
Patrick and LCI.
Recommendation of the LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger
By unanimous vote, the LCI board, at a meeting held on June 30, 2026, (a) approved and declared advisable the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, on the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, (b) determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of,
LCI and the LCI stockholders, (c) resolved to recommend the approval of the merger agreement to the LCI
stockholders and the first merger on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement and (d)
directed that the merger agreement and the first merger be submitted to the LCI stockholders for approval at the LCI
special meeting. The LCI board unanimously recommends that LCI stockholders vote “FOR” the LCI merger
proposal, “FOR” the LCI advisory compensation proposal and “FOR” the LCI adjournment proposal, in each case,
on the terms and subject to the conditions stated in the merger agreement.
In the course of reaching its determination and recommendation, the LCI board met numerous times to consider
a potential transaction with Patrick and consulted with LCI management, legal counsel and financial advisors. In
recommending that LCI stockholders vote their shares of LCI common stock in favor of the merger agreement, the
LCI board also considered a number of factors, including the following factors (not necessarily in order of relative
importance) that the LCI board viewed as being generally positive or favorable in coming to its determination and
recommendation:
110
Benefits of the Combined Company
•Merger of equals. The fact that the business combination would be structured as a “merger of equals” and
the merger consideration will provide LCI stockholders with an approximately 48% ownership stake in the
combined company on a fully diluted basis, which will allow LCI stockholders to participate in the
anticipated realization of synergies resulting from the merger.
•Enhanced scale. The belief that the combined company, with its enhanced scale, diversified end-market
exposure and improved cost structure, would be better positioned to manage industry volatility, cyclical
market conditions, raw material cost pressures, and execution risks relating to cost reduction and growth
initiatives and also to provide cost savings to customers.
•Greater depth of management talent. The belief that the combined company would benefit from an
experienced management and leadership team drawn from both LCI and Patrick, with over 90 years of
combined industry experience and therefore attract additional high-quality management and leadership
talent.
•Increased competitiveness. The belief that the combined company would be a more resilient and
competitive components manufacturer by combining LCI’s experience in highly engineered and innovative
structural components with Patrick’s integrated design-to-delivery expertise and decorative and functional
product capabilities, enabling the combined company to deliver differentiated, competitive, cost-effective
solutions across the outdoor enthusiast, housing and transportation markets.
•Integrated product opportunities. The opportunity for the LCI to move from providing individual
components to delivering higher-value, custom-integrated offerings that improve value for customers and
help address affordability challenges.
•Broader portfolio. The fact that the combined company would be positioned as a diversified outdoor
recreation and industrial platform with a broader portfolio of products better able to serve the combined
company’s diverse and growing end markets.
•Expected Synergies. The expectation that approximately $150 million in identified annual net run-rate cost
synergies could be realized within three years of closing, including procurement and supply chain
efficiencies, facilities and logistics optimization and sales, general and administrative optimization which
are expected to position the combined company to offer customers more competitive pricing and enhanced
value.
•Expanded aftermarket opportunity. The expanded aftermarket opportunity of the combined company,
representing approximately $1.3 billion or 16% of pro forma revenue on a pro forma basis in 2025, creating
more stable demand, better visibility and an expected stronger margin profile.
•Free cash flows. The fact that the combined company would have generated approximately $8.1 billion in
pro forma revenue and approximately $508 million of free cash flow on a pro forma basis in the 12 months
trailing March 2026 and the belief that the combined company’s free cash flow will provide it with balance
sheet strength and strategic flexibility to invest in high-growth opportunities, including organic growth,
innovation, future acquisitions, shareholder returns and other value-creating activities.
•Innovation. The belief that the combined company will benefit from a unified innovation platform
combining engineering, design and technical teams with virtual reality product design technology, enabling
faster speed from concept to commercialization and more rapid innovation across the combined portfolio of
more than 110 brands.
Merger Consideration
•Implied premium. The fact that the implied value of the merger consideration to be received by LCI
stockholders in the merger represented implied share price premiums of approximately 16% based on the
closing price of LCI common stock and Patrick common stock on June 29, 2026 (the last trading day prior
111
to the LCI board’s approval of the merger) and approximately 23% and 18% based on the volume-weighted
average prices of LCI common stock during the 10-trading day and 30-trading day periods prior to and
including June 29, 2026, respectively.
•Form of the merger consideration. The fact that the merger consideration consists of Patrick common
stock, which provides LCI stockholders with the opportunity to participate in the anticipated synergies,
earnings and growth of the combined company, while also providing liquidity to LCI stockholders through
the ability to sell all or a portion of the Patrick common stock received as merger consideration following
the consummation of the merger at their discretion.
•Fixed exchange ratio. The fact that the merger consideration is based on a fixed exchange ratio of 1.2440
shares of Patrick common stock for each share of LCI common stock rather than a fixed value, which
provides LCI stockholders the opportunity to benefit from any increase in the trading price of Patrick
common stock before the closing of the merger.
•Tax considerations. The fact that the merger is intended to qualify for U.S. federal income tax purposes as
a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, with the result that, if the merger so
qualifies, a U.S. holder (as defined in the section titled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
of the Merger”) of shares of LCI common stock generally will not recognize any gain or loss for U.S.
federal income tax purposes on the exchange of its LCI common stock for Patrick common stock in the first
merger, except for any gain or loss that may result from the receipt of cash instead of a fractional share of
Patrick common stock as described in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger.”
Opinion of LCI’s Financial Advisor
•The oral opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP delivered to the LCI board on June 30, 2026,
subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated June 30, 2026, that, as of the date of such
opinion and based upon and subject to the various assumptions and limitations set forth therein, the merger
consideration to be received by holders of LCI common stock (other than holders of Excluded Shares) was
fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders, as described in the section of this joint proxy statement/
prospectus titled “—Opinion of LCI’s Financial Advisor—Opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP.”
Terms of the Merger Agreement
•The terms of the merger agreement, taken as a whole, which, after review and consultation with LCI
management and LCI’s legal counsel, the LCI board concluded are reasonable, including:
◦the customary nature of the representations, warranties, and covenants of Patrick and LCI in the merger
agreement;
◦the fact that the merger agreement provides LCI sufficient operating flexibility to conduct its business
in the ordinary course until the consummation of the merger or termination of the merger agreement;
◦the parties’ covenants to use their respective reasonable best efforts to obtain regulatory approvals,
including the commitment of the parties to agree to divestitures or other remedies, subject to certain
thresholds;
◦the deal protection and termination provisions of the merger agreement, including the termination fee
of $94,200,000 payable under certain circumstances involving the termination of the merger
agreement;
◦the provisions of the merger agreement that permit LCI, in response to certain unsolicited acquisition
proposals, to, under certain circumstances, furnish information or enter into discussions with third
parties in connection with a competing proposal, as further described in the section titled “The Merger
Agreement—No Solicitation of Alternative Transactions”;
112
◦the provisions of the merger agreement allowing the LCI board to change its recommendation to LCI
stockholders prior to obtaining the LCI stockholder approval in specified circumstances, subject to
Patrick’s right to receive payment of the termination fee upon termination as further described in the
section titled “The Merger Agreement—No Solicitation of Alternative Transactions”;
◦that the amount of such termination fee is comparable to termination fees in transactions of a similar
size, is reasonable and should not preclude a third party from making a competing proposal, as further
described in the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Termination”; and
◦other terms and conditions of the merger agreement which were reviewed by the LCI board with LCI’s
financial advisor and legal counsel, and the fact that such terms were the product of arm’s-length
negotiations between the parties.
Governance Matters
•Combined company board composition. The fact that the combined company board will be overseen by
an experienced board consisting of twelve directors, with six directors to be designated by LCI and six
directors designated by Patrick, providing equal representation from both companies.
•Committee composition. The fact that each of the four standing committees of the combined company
board will have equal representation from directors designated by LCI and directors designated by Patrick,
and that the chairs of the capital allocation and strategy committee and nominating and governance
committee will be directors designated by LCI while the chairs of the audit committee and compensation
committee will be directors designated by Patrick.
•Leadership continuity. The fact that (i) Andy L. Nemeth, the current Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Patrick, will serve as Chief Executive Officer of the combined company, (ii) Todd M. Cleveland,
the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Patrick, will serve as Chairman of the combined
company board and (iii) John A. Sirpilla, the current Interim Chief Executive Officer of LCI and a member
of the LCI board, will serve as Vice Chairman of the combined company board.
Other Factors
•Best alternative for maximizing stockholder value. The LCI board’s general awareness of strategic
opportunities available in the market, given the nature of the industry in which participants regularly
engage in dialogue regarding potential transaction opportunities, and LCI’s prior discussions with potential
counterparties, together with the belief of the LCI board and LCI management that (i) no other strategic
alternative available to LCI would provide comparable or superior value to LCI stockholders based on the
complementary fit, strategic alignment and value creation potential of the combination with Patrick and (ii)
the combination with Patrick will provide more long-term value to LCI stockholders than the alternative of
LCI remaining as a standalone company.
•Risks relating to remaining a standalone company. The potential risks and uncertainties associated with
remaining a standalone company, including consideration of (i) LCI’s business, operations, financial
condition, earnings, prospects and competitive position, as well as the broader business, regulatory and
macroeconomic environment, including cyclical end-market exposure, consumer affordability pressures,
and competitive dynamics, (ii) LCI’s long-term strategic plan and financial forecasts as a standalone
company, including the inherent uncertainty of and risks associated with achieving growth and market
diversification objectives on a standalone basis and (iii) challenges of addressing customer affordability
needs and driving long-term stockholder value creation without the scale and synergies available through
the combination.
•Shared culture. LCI’s belief that LCI and Patrick have complementary cultures and operating
philosophies, including a shared commitment to continuing to build strong communities centered around
outdoor recreation.
113
•Probability of consummation of the merger. The likelihood that the merger would be completed,
including the expected closing of the merger in the first half of 2027 subject to the satisfaction of customary
closing conditions, which included consideration of, among other things:
◦the likelihood of obtaining regulatory and other customary approvals required in connection with the
merger, including in light of the complementary nature of the two companies as well as the benefits
this transaction will bring to the companies’ customers and
◦the absence of any financing conditions or other contingencies in the merger agreement, given that the
transaction is structured as an all-stock merger.
The LCI board also considered a number of uncertainties, risks and factors it deemed generally negative or
unfavorable in making its determination, approval and related recommendation, including the following (not
necessarily in order of relative importance):
•Possible failure to achieve the benefits of the combined company. The challenges inherent in the
combination of two independent businesses of the size and scope of LCI and Patrick, including:
◦the possibility that the combined company might not achieve its anticipated financial results, which
could cause the trading price of the combined company’s common stock to decline or experience
unanticipated volatility, adversely affecting the value of the merger consideration received by LCI
stockholders;
◦the possibility that the anticipated strategic and other benefits of the merger, including the anticipated
synergies, might not be achieved in the time frame contemplated or at all;
◦the risk that integration costs may be greater than anticipated, and the possible diversion of
management attention for an extended period of time; and
◦the other numerous risks and uncertainties that, if the merger is completed, could adversely affect the
combined company’s business, operations, financial results and trading price.
•Fixed exchange ratio. The fact that, because the merger consideration is based on a fixed exchange ratio
rather than a fixed value, LCI stockholders bear the risk of a decrease in the trading price of Patrick
common stock during the pendency of the merger.
•Ability to consider competing proposals. The possibility that the (i) $94,200,000 termination fee payable
by LCI to Patrick under certain circumstances involving the termination of the merger agreement and (ii)
“force the vote” provision, which prevents LCI from terminating the merger agreement to accept a superior
proposal unless and until LCI stockholders vote against the LCI merger proposal, could discourage other
potential parties from making a competing offer.
•Influence over combined company. The fact that LCI will not designate a majority of the members of the
combined company board and that (i) the Chief Executive Officer of the combined company will be Andy
L. Nemeth, the current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Patrick, and (ii) the Chairman of the
combined company board will be Todd M. Cleveland, the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Patrick.
•Litigation related to the merger. The risk that LCI or Patrick may be subject to lawsuits or other
challenges to the merger, and that any adverse effects of these challenges, including any adverse rulings in
lawsuits, may delay or prevent the merger from being completed on the currently expected timeline or at all
or that may require LCI or Patrick to incur significant costs to address such challenges, including any costs
to defend or settle any lawsuits.
•Interim operating covenants. The risk that the restrictions on the conduct of LCI’s business during the
period between the execution of the merger agreement and the consummation of the merger as set forth in
the merger agreement, although reciprocal with Patrick and believed to be reasonable and not unduly
114
burdensome, could delay or prevent LCI from undertaking non-ordinary course business opportunities that
may arise, or from undertaking any other non-ordinary course action it would otherwise take with respect to
the operations of LCI absent the pending consummation of the merger.
•Risks associated with the announcement and pendency of the merger. The potential negative effects of
the announcement and pendency of the merger, including the length of time anticipated between the
execution of the merger agreement and the consummation of the merger, and the adverse impact that such
interim period could have on LCI and its business, including:
◦the potential distraction of its workforce and management team from day-to-day operations;
◦the potential negative impact on LCI’s relationships with investors, customers, suppliers, business
partners and other third parties, including the risk of increased competition, such as potential
competition from original equipment manufacturer customers that may respond to the merger by
pursuing vertical integration of the components they currently purchase from LCI and thereby become
new competitors of the combined company;
◦the potential for the pendency of the merger to limit LCI’s ability to pursue strategic alternatives and
other opportunities that could be beneficial to LCI; and
◦the potential negative impact on LCI’s ability to attract, hire and retain key employees, as current and
prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with LCI or the combined
company following the merger.
•Risks associated with failure to consummate the merger on a timely basis or at all. Completion of the
merger is subject to a number of conditions set forth in the merger agreement. Some of the conditions, such
as the LCI stockholder approval and the Patrick shareholder approval and certain regulatory approvals, are
beyond LCI’s and Patrick’s control, which make the completion and timing of the merger uncertain. In
addition, the merger agreement contains certain termination rights for both LCI and Patrick, which if
exercised, will also result in the merger not being consummated. Furthermore, the governmental authorities
from which the regulatory approvals are required may impose conditions on the completion of the merger,
or require changes to the terms of the merger agreement, or require divestitures or other remedies. If the
merger is not completed for any reason, LCI’s ongoing business may be adversely affected without
realizing any of the benefits of having completed the merger, including by incurring certain costs relating to
the merger, including legal, accounting and other fees, whether or not the merger is completed and if the
merger agreement is terminated and LCI seeks another merger or business combination, LCI’s stock price
could decline, which could make it more difficult to find a party willing to offer equivalent or more
attractive consideration than the consideration Patrick has agreed to provide in the merger.
•Interests of LCI’s directors and executive officers. The fact that LCI’s directors and executive officers
may have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, those of LCI stockholders.
For more information about such interests, see below under the heading “The Merger—Interests of LCI
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.”
•Other risks. Risks of the type and nature described under the sections titled “Risk Factors” and
“Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
The LCI board believed that, overall, the potential benefits of the business combination to LCI stockholders
outweighed the risks and uncertainties of the business combination.
The foregoing discussion of factors considered by the LCI board in reaching its conclusions and
recommendation includes the principal factors considered by the LCI board, but is not intended to be exhaustive and
may not include all of the factors considered by the LCI board. In light of the variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the business combination, the LCI board did not find it practicable to, and did not,
quantify or otherwise assign relative or specific weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its
determinations and recommendation. Rather, the LCI board viewed its decisions as being based on the totality of the
115
factors and information it considered. Moreover, each member of the LCI board applied his or her own personal
business judgment to the consideration of different factors and may have given different weight to different factors.
The LCI board based its recommendation on the totality of the information available to it, including discussions with
LCI management and outside legal and financial advisors. In considering the recommendation of the LCI board, LCI
stockholders should be aware that the directors and executive officers of LCI have certain interests in the merger that
may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of LCI stockholders generally. The LCI board was aware of
these interests and considered them when approving the merger agreement and recommending that LCI stockholders
vote to approve the LCI merger proposal, which are described in the section titled “The Merger—Interests of LCI
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger.”
It should be noted that this explanation of the reasoning of the LCI board and certain information presented in
this section is forward-looking in nature and should be read in light of the factors set forth in “Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Opinion of LCI’s Financial Advisor
Opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP
Introduction
LCI retained PWP to act as LCI’s financial advisor and provide an opinion in connection with the merger. The
LCI Board instructed PWP to evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Merger Consideration to be
received by the holders of outstanding shares of LCI Common Stock (other than any shares of LCI Common Stock
held by LCI, Patrick or any of their respective subsidiaries (such shares, the “Excluded Shares”)) in the proposed
merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement.
On June 30, 2026, at a meeting of the LCI Board held to evaluate the merger and the Merger Agreement, PWP
delivered an oral opinion to the effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the assumptions made,
procedures followed, factors considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by PWP as set
forth in the written opinion delivered subsequently and based upon other matters as PWP considered relevant, the
Merger Consideration to be received by the holders of outstanding shares of LCI Common Stock (other than holders
of Excluded Shares) in the proposed merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair, from a financial point of
view, to such holders. PWP delivered its written opinion on June 30, 2026 to the LCI Board.
The PWP opinion speaks only as of the date thereof, and not as of the time the merger may be completed, or
any other time. The PWP opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have occurred after its delivery,
which could significantly alter the value, facts or elements on which the opinion was based.
The full text of PWP’s written opinion, which describes, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures
followed, factors considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by PWP, is attached as
Annex F to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The
summary of PWP’s opinion set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the opinion. LCI stockholders are encouraged to read the PWP opinion carefully in its entirety.
PWP delivered its opinion for the information and assistance of the LCI Board in connection with, and for the
purpose of, its evaluation of the merger, and PWP’s opinion does not address any other term or aspect of the Merger
Agreement or the merger and does not constitute a recommendation as to how the LCI Board, LCI or any other
person (including any holder of LCI Common Stock) should vote or otherwise act with respect to the proposed
merger or any other matter. PWP consented in writing to the inclusion of its opinion in full and the description of
such opinion in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
In connection with rendering its opinion, PWP, among other things:
•reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and other publicly available business and
financial information with respect to LCI and Patrick, including equity research analyst reports;
116
•reviewed certain internal financial statements, analyses and forecasts (for purposes of this section, the
“LCI Standalone Projections”) and other internal financial information and operating data relating to
the business of LCI, in each case, prepared by management of LCI and approved for PWP’s use by the
LCI Board as set forth in the section titled “Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information”;
•reviewed certain internal financial statements, analyses and forecasts (for purposes of this section, the
“Patrick Standalone Projections”) and other internal financial information and operating data relating
to the business of Patrick, in each case prepared by management of Patrick and approved for PWP’s
use by the LCI Board as set forth in the section titled “Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information”;
•discussed the past and current business, operations, financial condition and prospects of LCI and the
combined company with senior management of LCI, the LCI Board, and other representatives and
advisors of LCI;
•discussed the past and current business, operations, financial condition and prospects of Patrick and the
combined company with senior executives of LCI and Patrick, the LCI Board, and other
representatives and advisors of LCI and Patrick;
•discussed with members of the senior managements of LCI and Patrick their assessment of the
strategic rationale for, and the potential benefits of, the merger;
•reviewed certain estimates as to the amount and timing of certain cost savings and related expenses,
operating efficiencies, revenue effects and financial synergies and dis-synergies anticipated by
management of Patrick and LCI to result from the consummation of the merger (as used in this section,
the “Synergy Projections”) approved for PWP’s use by the LCI Board as set forth in the section titled
“Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information”;
•compared the financial performance of LCI and Patrick with that of certain publicly traded companies
which PWP believed to be generally relevant;
•reviewed the historical trading prices and trading activity for the LCI Common Stock and the Patrick
Common Stock and compared such price and trading activity with that of securities of certain publicly-
traded companies which PWP believed to be generally relevant;
•participated in discussions among representatives of LCI and Patrick and their respective advisors;
•reviewed a draft of the Merger Agreement dated June 30, 2026; and
•conducted such other financial studies, analyses and investigations, and considered such other factors,
as it deemed appropriate.
For purposes of its opinion, PWP assumed and relied upon, without assuming any responsibility for independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial, accounting, legal, tax, regulatory and other
information provided to, discussed with or reviewed by PWP (including information that was available from public
sources) and PWP further relied upon the assurances of management of LCI that they were not aware of any facts or
circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading in any material respect. With respect to
the LCI Standalone Projections and the Synergy Projections, PWP was advised by management of LCI and
assumed, with the consent of the LCI Board, that the LCI Standalone Projections and the Synergy Projections were
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of
management of LCI as to the future financial performance of LCI and the other matters covered thereby and PWP
expressed no view as to the reasonableness of the LCI Standalone Projections, the Synergy Projections or the
assumptions on which they were based. With respect to the Patrick Standalone Projections, PWP was advised by
management of Patrick and assumed, with the consent of the LCI Board, that such Patrick Standalone Projections
were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of
management of Patrick as to the future financial performance of Patrick and the other matters covered thereby, and
117
PWP expressed no view as to the reasonableness of the Patrick Standalone Projections or the assumptions on which
they were based. In arriving at its opinion, PWP did not make or was not provided with any independent valuation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities (including any contingent, derivative or off-balance-sheet assets or liabilities) of
LCI, Patrick or any of their respective subsidiaries. PWP did not assume any obligation to conduct, nor did PWP
conduct, any physical inspection of the properties or facilities of LCI, Patrick or any other party. In addition, PWP
did not evaluate the solvency of any party to the Merger Agreement, or the impact of the merger thereon, including
under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters.
PWP assumed that the final Merger Agreement would not differ from the draft of the Merger Agreement
reviewed by PWP in any respect material to its analysis or its opinion. PWP also assumed that (i) the representations
and warranties of all parties to the Merger Agreement and all other related documents and instruments that are
referred to therein were true and correct in all respects material to PWP’s analysis and its opinion, (ii) each party to
the Merger Agreement and such other related documents and instruments would fully and timely perform all of the
covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party in all respects material to PWP’s analysis and its
opinion, and (iii) the merger would be consummated in a timely manner in accordance with the terms set forth in the
Merger Agreement, without any modification, amendment, waiver or delay that would be material to PWP’s
analysis or its opinion. In addition, PWP assumed that in connection with the receipt of all approvals and consents
required in connection with the proposed merger, no delays, limitations, conditions or restrictions would be imposed
that would be material to PWP’s analysis.
The opinion addressed only the fairness from a financial point of view, as of June 30, 2026, to the holders (other
than holders of Excluded Shares) of LCI Common Stock of the Merger Consideration in the proposed merger
pursuant to the Merger Agreement. PWP was not asked to, nor did it, offer any opinion as to any other term of the
Merger Agreement or any other document contemplated by or entered into in connection with the Merger
Agreement, the form or structure of the merger or the likely timeframe in which the merger would be consummated.
In addition, PWP expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be received
by any officers, directors or employees of any party to the Merger Agreement, or any class of such persons, whether
relative to the Merger Consideration or otherwise. PWP expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the merger to the
holders of any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of LCI, as to the underlying decision by LCI
to engage in the merger or as to the relative merits of the merger compared with any alternative transactions or
business strategies. Nor did PWP express any opinion as to any tax or other consequences that may result from the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or any other related document. PWP’s opinion did not address
any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which PWP understood LCI had received such advice as it
deemed necessary from qualified professionals.
PWP’s opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in
effect on, and the information made available to PWP as of, June 30, 2026. PWP assumed no obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm its opinion and expressly disclaimed any responsibility to do so based on subsequent
developments that may affect PWP’s opinion.
The estimates contained in PWP’s analysis and the results from any particular analysis are not necessarily
indicative of future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by any analysis. In
addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or assets neither purport to be appraisals nor do they necessarily
reflect the prices at which businesses or assets may actually be sold. Accordingly, PWP’s analysis and estimates are
inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
In arriving at its opinion, PWP did not attribute any particular weight to any particular analysis or factor
considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and
factor. PWP employed several analytical methodologies in its analyses, and no one single method of analysis should
be regarded as dispositive of PWP’s overall conclusion. Each analytical technique has inherent strengths and
weaknesses, and the nature of the available information may further affect the value of particular techniques.
Accordingly, PWP believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses
and of the factors considered by it, without considering all analyses and all factors in their entirety, could create a
misleading or incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. PWP’s conclusion, therefore, is
118
based upon the application of PWP’s own experience and judgment to all analyses and factors considered by it,
taken as a whole. PWP’s opinion was reviewed and approved by its fairness opinion committee.
The data and analyses summarized below in this joint proxy statement/prospectus are from PWP’s presentation
to the LCI Board delivered on June 30, 2026. The analyses summarized below include information presented in
tabular format. To fully understand the financial analyses performed, the tables must be considered together with the
textual summary of the analyses and full text of PWP’s written opinion, which is included as Annex F of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Summary of PWP’s Financial Analyses
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by PWP and reviewed by the LCI
Board in connection with PWP’s opinion and does not purport to be a complete description of the financial analyses
performed by PWP. The order of analyses described below does not represent the relative importance or weight
given to those analyses by PWP. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in
tabular format. In order to fully understand PWP’s financial analyses, these tables must be read together with the
text of each summary. These tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Considering the data below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the
methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of PWP’s
financial analyses. Future results may differ from those described and such differences may be material.
Selected Public Companies Analysis
PWP reviewed and analyzed certain financial information including market valuation multiples for LCI and
Patrick and the following companies with publicly traded equity securities and recreational vehicle and enthusiast
operations, collectively referenced as “RV and Enthusiast Peers”:
•Brunswick Corporation
•Dometic Group AB
•Fox Factory Holding Corp.
•Polaris Inc.
•Thor Industries Inc.
•Winnebago Industries
•Yeti Holdings Inc.
Additionally, PWP reviewed and analyzed financial information including market valuation multiples for the
following companies with publicly traded equity securities, collectively referenced as “Other Reference Peers”:
•Griffon Corp.
•Hayward Holdings Inc.
•Holley Inc.
•Thule Group AB
•UFP Industries Inc.
The RV and Enthusiast Peers and the Other Reference Peers are referred to in this discussion as the “selected
public companies.” No selected public company or group of companies is identical to LCI or Patrick. Accordingly,
PWP believes that purely quantitative analyses are not, in isolation, determinative in the context of the merger and
that qualitative judgments concerning differences between the financial and operating characteristics and prospects
119
of LCI, Patrick and the selected public companies that could affect the public trading values of each also are
relevant.
For each of LCI, Patrick and the selected publicly-traded companies, PWP reviewed such company’s enterprise
value (referred to as “EV”) as of June 29, 2026, as a multiple of estimated EBITDA for (i) the calendar year ending
2026 (“2026E EBITDA”) and (ii) for the calendar year ending 2027 (“2027E EBITDA”). For each of the selected
companies, PWP calculated and compared financial information and financial market multiples and ratios based on
company filings for historical information and consensus third-party research estimates for forecasted information.
Set forth below are the composite mean and median multiples resulting from this analysis:
Peer Composite(1) | EV / 2026E EBITDA | EV / 2027E EBITDA | ||
Median | ||||
RV and Enthusiast Peers | 9.7x | 8.7x | ||
Other Reference Peers | 12.3x | 11.1x | ||
Mean | ||||
RV and Enthusiast Peers | 9.8x | 8.7x | ||
Other Reference Peers | 10.9x | 10.0x |
__________________
(1)EBITDA figures for Thor, Hayward, Yeti, Fox Factory and Holley were reduced by stock-based compensation to be on a like-for-like basis
with LCI and other peers.
Based on the analysis of the relevant metrics described above and on professional judgments made by PWP,
PWP selected and applied a range of multiples of (i) 7.0x to 9.0x to EV / 2026E EBITDA for LCI using the LCI
Standalone Projections and consensus third-party research estimates, (ii) 6.5x to 8.5x to EV / 2027E EBITDA for
LCI using the LCI Standalone Projections and consensus third-party research estimates, (iii) 9.0x to 11.0x to EV /
2026E EBITDA for Patrick using the Patrick Standalone Projections and consensus third-party research estimates
and (iv) 8.0x to 10.0x to EV/ 2027E EBITDA for Patrick using the Patrick Standalone Projections and consensus
third-party research estimates, in each case reducing Patrick’s EBITDA by stock-based compensation consistent
with the treatment of LCI and the applicable peers. From these analyses, for each of LCI and Patrick, PWP derived
ranges of implied equity values from the enterprise values by adding cash and other investments and subtracting
debt and net non-operating liabilities. PWP calculated implied values per share by dividing the implied equity values
by the applicable diluted shares (based upon the number of issued and outstanding shares and other equity interests
in each case provided by the managements of LCI and Patrick, as applicable, and using the treasury method for
calculation of option dilution). The ranges of implied values per share derived from these calculations are
summarized in the following table:
Implied Value Range Per Share (Using EV / 2026E EBITDA) | Implied Value Range Per Share (Using EV / 2027E EBITDA) | |||
LCI Share Price (Based on LCI Forecast) | $107.09 – $146.96 | $121.63 – $169.04 | ||
LCI Share Price (Based on Consensus Third-Party Research Estimates) | $95.70 – $132.30 | $96.35 – $135.98 | ||
Patrick Share Price (Based on Patrick Forecast) | $88.91 – $117.64 | $91.02 – $123.88 | ||
Patrick Share Price (Based on Consensus Third-Party Research Estimates) | $85.86 – $113.91 | $83.45 – $114.41 |
PWP then calculated the exchange ratio ranges implied by the selected publicly-traded companies analysis. For
each of the foregoing analyses, PWP calculated (i) the ratio of the highest implied value per share for LCI derived
from the selected publicly-traded companies analysis to the lowest implied value per share for Patrick derived from
the selected publicly-traded companies analysis and (ii) the ratio of the lowest implied value per share for LCI
derived from the selected publicly-traded companies analysis to the highest implied value per share for Patrick
120
derived from the selected publicly-traded companies analysis to calculate the following implied exchange ratio
ranges:
Implied Exchange Ratio Ranges | |
2026E EBITDA Multiples Management Forecast | 0.910x – 1.653x |
2026E EBITDA Multiples Consensus Estimates | 0.840x – 1.541x |
2027E EBITDA Multiples Management Forecast | 0.982x – 1.857x |
2027E EBITDA Multiples Consensus Estimates | 0.842x – 1.630x |
PWP compared these implied exchange ratio ranges to the exchange ratio of 1.2440 shares of Patrick Common
Stock to be received for each share of LCI Common Stock as provided for in the Merger Agreement.
Discounted Cash Flow Value Analysis
For each of LCI and Patrick, PWP performed a discounted cash flow analysis, which is a method of deriving an
implied value range for a company’s equity securities based on the sum of the company’s unlevered free cash flows
over a forecast period and the terminal value at the end of the forecast period. In connection with this analysis, PWP
used the LCI Standalone Projections for LCI and the Patrick Standalone Projections for Patrick. In performing this
analysis, PWP:
•calculated the present value of the estimated standalone unlevered free cash flows (calculated as net
operating profit after tax, plus depreciation and amortization, minus capital expenditures, and adjusting
for changes in net working capital and certain other cash flow items set forth in the LCI Standalone
Projections and Patrick Standalone Projections) that each of LCI and Patrick was forecasted to generate
for 2026E through 2030E using discount rates ranging from 8.75% to 9.75% for LCI and 8.75% to
9.75% for Patrick, in each case based on estimates of the weighted average cost of capital of each
company; and
•added terminal values for each of LCI and Patrick, calculated by applying a range of selected terminal
EBITDA exit multiples of 8.0x to 9.0x for LCI and 9.0x to 10.0x for Patrick to the applicable
forecasted 2030E EBITDA, in each case discounted to present value using the same discount rates for
each of LCI and Patrick as set forth above.
PWP selected the terminal EBITDA exit multiple ranges set forth above utilizing its professional judgment and
experience, taking into account current and historical trading multiples for LCI, Patrick and the selected public
companies. The selected terminal EBITDA exit multiple ranges implied perpetuity growth rates ranging from 1.2%
to 2.9% for LCI and 1.3% to 2.9% for Patrick. The terminal EBITDA exit multiple range applied to Patrick was
higher than the range applied to LCI, reflecting the historical trading multiple differential between the two
businesses, which PWP attributed to differences in their respective capital allocation strategies and historical and
projected financial performance.
From the ranges of implied enterprise values generated by the foregoing analysis, for each of LCI and Patrick,
PWP derived ranges of implied equity values by adding cash and other investments and subtracting debt, net of non-
operating liabilities. PWP calculated implied values per share by dividing the implied equity values by the applicable
diluted shares (based upon the number of issued and outstanding shares and other equity interests in each case
provided by the managements of LCI and Patrick, as applicable, and using the treasury method for calculation of
option dilution). The ranges of implied values per share derived from these calculations are summarized in the
following table:
LCI Share Price (based on LCI Standalone Projections) Range | Patrick Share Price (based on Patrick Standalone Projections) Range | ||
Implied Value Range Per Share | $186.00 – $215.00 | $155.00 – $180.00 |
121
PWP then calculated the exchange ratio ranges implied by the discounted cash flow analysis. For each of the
foregoing analyses, PWP calculated (i) the ratio of the highest implied value per share for LCI derived from the
discounted cash flow analysis to the lowest implied value per share for Patrick derived from the discounted cash
flow analysis and (ii) the ratio of the lowest implied value per share for LCI derived from the discounted cash flow
analysis to the highest implied value per share for Patrick derived from the discounted cash flow to calculate the
implied exchange ratio range of 1.033x – 1.387x.
PWP compared these exchange ratio ranges to the exchange ratio of 1.2440 shares of Patrick Common Stock to
be received for each share of LCI Common Stock as provided for in the Merger Agreement.
Summary of Additional Reference Data
In connection with conducting the analyses described above, PWP reviewed the following data, which were
used for reference purposes only and were not used in PWP’s determination of the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the Merger Consideration to be received by the holders of outstanding shares of LCI Common Stock
pursuant to the Merger Agreement.
Historical Trading Prices and Exchange Ratios
PWP reviewed the historical trading prices for shares of LCI Common Stock and Patrick Common Stock since
June 29, 2025 including the current, three-month and twelve month periods, in each case ending on June 29, 2026,
and the corresponding range of historical implied exchange ratios (calculated by dividing the closing per share price
of LCI Common Stock by the closing per share price of Patrick Common Stock on a given date) for such periods.
The implied historical exchange ratio ranges are set forth in the table below.
Implied Historical Exchange Ratio Ranges | ||
Time Period | Implied Exchange Ratio | |
Trading Since Parties Publicly Confirmed Merger Discussions on April 17 | 1.006x – 1.313x | |
Last Three Months | 1.006x – 1.313x | |
Last Twelve Months | 0.873x – 1.313x | |
PWP compared each of the exchange ratios listed above to the exchange ratio of 1.2440 shares of Patrick
Common Stock to be received for each share of LCI Common Stock as provided for in the Merger Agreement.
Equity Research Analysts’ Price Targets
PWP reviewed analyst price targets per share of LCI Common Stock prepared and published since May 5, 2026.
PWP assumed that such price targets generally reflected each analyst’s estimate of the 12-month future public
market trading price per share of LCI Common Stock. The analysts’ range of price targets for shares of LCI
Common Stock was $125 per share to $185 per share.
PWP also reviewed analyst price targets per share of Patrick Common Stock prepared and published since
April 30, 2026. PWP assumed that such price targets generally reflected each analyst’s estimate of the 12-month
future public market trading price per share of Patrick Common Stock. The analyst’s range of price targets for shares
of Patrick Common Stock was $98 per share to $140 per share.
For each equity research analyst with price targets for LCI Common Stock and Patrick Common Stock, PWP
calculated an implied exchange ratio equal to such analyst’s price target per share of LCI Common Stock divided by
such analyst’s price target per share of Patrick Common Stock. Based on these individual analyst-implied exchange
ratios, PWP derived a range of implied exchange ratios of shares of LCI Common Stock to shares of Patrick
Common Stock, representing the lowest and highest of such analyst-implied exchange ratios, of 0.926x to 1.370x.
PWP compared this exchange ratio range to the exchange ratio of 1.2440 shares of Patrick Common Stock to be
received for each share of LCI Common Stock as provided for in the Merger Agreement. The price targets published
by equity research analysts do not necessarily reflect current market trading prices for shares of LCI Common Stock
122
or Patrick Common Stock and these estimates are subject to uncertainties, including the future financial performance
of LCI, Patrick and future financial market conditions.
General
PWP was not requested to, and it did not, solicit third-party indications of interest in the possible acquisition of
all or part of LCI, nor was it requested to consider, and its opinion did not address, the underlying business decision
by LCI to engage in the merger or the relative merits of the merger as compared with any alternative transactions or
business strategies.
PWP and its affiliates, as part of their investment banking business, are regularly engaged in performing
financial analyses with respect to businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and other transactions, as well as for estate, corporate and other purposes.
PWP and its affiliates also engage in securities trading and brokerage, equity research and other financial
services. Except in connection with PWP’s engagement as financial advisor to LCI in connection with the merger,
during the two-year period prior to June 30, 2026, no material relationship existed between PWP or its affiliates, on
the one hand, and LCI, Patrick or any of their respective affiliates, on the other hand, pursuant to which PWP or its
affiliates has received or anticipates receiving compensation. PWP and its affiliates in the future may provide
investment banking and other financial services to Patrick and/or LCI or any of the other parties to the mergers or
their respective stockholders or affiliates and in the future may receive compensation for the rendering of these
services. In the ordinary course of PWP’s business activities, PWP and its affiliates may at any time hold long or
short positions, and may trade or otherwise effect transactions, for PWP’s own account or the accounts of its
customers or clients, in (i) debt, equity or other securities (or related derivative securities) or financial instruments
(including bank loans or other obligations) of LCI, Patrick or any of their respective affiliates and (ii) any currency
or commodity that may be material to LCI and/or Patrick or otherwise involved in the merger.
In addition, PWP and its affiliates and certain of its employees, including members of the team performing
services in connection with the merger, as well as certain private equity funds and investment management funds
associated or affiliated with PWP in which they may have financial interests, may from time to time acquire, hold or
make direct or indirect investments in or otherwise finance a wide variety of companies, including LCI, Patrick or
their respective equityholders or affiliates, other potential participants in the merger or their respective equityholders
or affiliates.
PWP is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that is regularly engaged in the valuation of
businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
The LCI Board selected PWP to act as its financial advisor in connection with the merger on the basis of PWP’s
experience in mergers similar to the merger, its reputation in the investment community and its familiarity with LCI
and its business.
PWP acted as financial advisor to LCI in connection with, and participated in certain negotiations leading to, the
merger. PWP expects to receive aggregate fees of approximately $36 million for its services, $5 million of which
became payable upon the rendering of its opinion and the principal portion of which is contingent upon the
consummation of the merger. Because the contingent fee is determined by reference to LCI's enterprise value at the
effective time of the merger, the amount ultimately payable to PWP may differ from the amount estimated herein.
The estimated fee disclosed herein reflects enterprise value calculations based on market data as of September 15,
2026, and may increase or decrease depending on changes in LCI's share price prior to closing. PWP will also be
entitled to receive a termination fee equal to a portion of any compensation LCI may receive as a result of the
termination of the Merger Agreement. In addition, LCI has agreed to reimburse PWP for its reasonable out-of-
pocket expenses incurred in connection with the engagement, including fees and disbursements of its legal counsel.
LCI also agreed to indemnify PWP, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, partners, members,
employees, consultants and agents and controlling persons for certain liabilities related to or arising out of its
123
rendering of services under its engagement or to contribute to payments that PWP may be required to make in
respect of these liabilities.
The description set forth above constitutes a summary of the analyses employed and factors considered by PWP
in rendering its opinion to the LCI Board. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex, analytical process
involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the
application of those methods to the particular circumstances and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or
summary description.
Certain Unaudited Prospective Financial Information
Neither Patrick nor LCI, as a matter of course, makes public long-term forecasts as to future performance,
revenues, production, earnings or other results due to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. In connection with the merger, the following prospective financial information was
prepared: (i) certain unaudited prospective financial information with respect to Patrick (which we refer to as the
“Patrick Standalone Projections”); (ii) certain unaudited prospective financial information with respect to LCI on a
standalone basis for LCI’s fiscal years 2026 through 2030, prepared by LCI management (which we refer to as the
“LCI Standalone Projections”); and (iii) certain estimates of run-rate synergies expected to be realized following the
completion of the merger, jointly prepared by Patrick’s management and LCI’s management (which we refer to as
the “Synergy Projections”). We refer to the Patrick Standalone Projections, the LCI Standalone Projections, and the
Synergy Projections as the “Forecasted Financial Information.”
The Patrick Standalone Projections and the LCI Standalone Projections were prepared treating Patrick and LCI,
as applicable, on a standalone basis, without giving effect to the merger, and exclude: (i) any impact of the
negotiation or execution of the merger agreement or the merger; (ii) the expenses that have already been and will be
incurred in connection with completing the merger; (iii) the potential synergies and net tax benefits that may be
achieved by the combined company as a result of the merger; (iv) the effect of any restrictions that may be imposed
in connection with the receipt of any necessary governmental or regulatory approvals; (v) the effect of any business,
operations or strategic decisions or actions that have been or will be taken as a result of the merger agreement having
been executed or in anticipation of completing the merger; (vi) certain potential or actual litigation and regulatory
actions to which Patrick or LCI may be parties or may be subject; and (vii) the effect of any business or strategic
decisions or actions that would likely have been taken if the merger agreement had not been executed but that were
instead altered, accelerated, postponed or not taken in anticipation of the merger. Because the Patrick Standalone
Projections and the LCI Standalone Projections were developed for Patrick and LCI, respectively, as independent
companies without giving effect to the merger, the respective projections do not reflect any synergies that may be
realized as a result of the merger or any changes to Patrick’s or LCI’s respective operations or strategy that may be
implemented after completion of the merger.
The forecasted financial information is not included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to influence any
decision on whether to vote for the Patrick proposals or the LCI proposals, as applicable, but rather is included in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus to give Patrick shareholders and LCI stockholders access to certain non-public
information that was provided to the Patrick board and Patrick’s financial advisors and to the LCI board and LCI’s
financial advisor, as applicable. The inclusion of the forecasted financial information should not be regarded as an
indication that the Patrick board, Patrick, the LCI board, LCI or their respective members of management or
financial advisors or any other recipient of this information considered, or now considers, them to be necessarily
predictive of actual future results, or that it should be construed as financial guidance, and they should not be relied
on as such. There can be no assurance that the projected results will be realized or that actual results of Patrick, LCI
or the combined company will not be materially lower or higher than estimated, whether or not the merger is
completed. The forecasted financial information is based solely on information available to Patrick management and
LCI management, as applicable, at the time of its preparation and has not been updated or revised to reflect
information or results after the date it was prepared or as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Patrick
has and may in the future report results of operations for periods included in the Patrick Standalone Projections that
will be completed following the preparation of the Patrick Standalone Projections. LCI has and may in the future
report results of operations for periods included in the LCI Standalone Projections that will be completed following
124
the preparation of the LCI Standalone Projections. Shareholders and investors are urged to refer to Patrick’s and
LCI’s periodic filings with the SEC for information on Patrick’s and LCI’s respective actual historical results.
The forecasted financial information was not prepared with a view toward public disclosure or compliance with
GAAP, published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants for preparation or presentation of prospective financial information, but, in the view of Patrick
management or LCI management, as applicable, was reasonably prepared in good faith on a basis reflecting the best
available estimates and judgments at the time of preparation, and presented as of the time of preparation, to the best
of Patrick management’s or LCI management’s, as applicable, knowledge and belief, the expected future financial
performance of Patrick and LCI, as applicable, and, in the case of the Synergy Projections, the combined company.
However, this information is not fact and should not be relied upon as being necessarily predictive of actual future
results, and readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forecasted financial information. Although Patrick management and LCI management believe there is a reasonable
basis for their respective forecasted financial information, Patrick and LCI caution that actual future results could be
materially different from the forecasted financial information.
The forecasted financial information included in this document has been prepared by, and is the responsibility
of, Patrick management and LCI management. Neither Patrick’s nor LCI’s respective independent registered public
accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants, has audited, reviewed, examined, compiled or performed
any procedures with respect to the forecasted financial information and, accordingly, each of Patrick’s and LCI’s
respective independent registered public accounting firms does not express an opinion or any other form of
assurance on such information or its achievability, and assumes no responsibility for, and disclaims any association
with, the prospective financial information. The report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Patrick’s independent registered
public accounting firm, contained in the Patrick Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2025, which is incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, relates to historical financial
information of Patrick, and such report does not extend to the forecasted financial information and should not be
read to do so. The report of KPMG LLP, LCI’s independent registered public accounting firm, contained in the LCI
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which is incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, relates to LCI’s previously issued financial statements. It does not extend to the
forecasted financial information and should not be read to do so.
The forecasted financial information is subject to estimates and assumptions in many respects and, as a result,
subject to interpretation. While presented with numerical specificity, the forecasted financial information is based
upon a variety of estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain, though considered reasonable by Patrick’s
management and LCI’s management, as applicable, as of the date of their preparation. These estimates and
assumptions may prove to be affected by any number of factors, including the impact of the announcement,
pendency and consummation of the merger, general economic conditions and political or regulatory conditions or
developments globally or in the markets or industries in which Patrick and LCI do business, the risk of litigation or
government or regulatory action, disruptions in the capital and credit markets and other risks and uncertainties
described or incorporated by reference in the sections titled “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements” in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, all of which are difficult to predict and many
of which are beyond the control of Patrick and LCI and will be beyond the control of the combined company
following the completion of the merger. The forecasted financial information also reflects assumptions as to certain
business decisions that are subject to change. There can be no assurance that the forecasted financial information
will be realized, and actual results will likely differ, and may differ materially, from those shown. Generally, the
further out the period to which the forecasted financial information relate, the less predictive the information
becomes.
The forecasted financial information includes non-GAAP financial measures for each of Patrick and LCI. Please
see the tables below for a description of how Patrick and LCI define these non-GAAP financial measures for
purposes of the forecasted financial information in this section. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be
considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information presented in accordance with GAAP, and
non-GAAP financial measures used by Patrick and LCI may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by
other companies. The SEC rules that would otherwise require a reconciliation of a non-GAAP financial measure to a
financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP do not apply to non-GAAP financial measures
125
included in disclosure of financial projections provided to a board of directors or a financial advisor in connection
with a proposed business combination such as the merger if the disclosure is included in a document such as this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures were not relied upon
by the Patrick board, the LCI board or their respective members of management or financial advisors in connection
with their respective evaluation of the merger. Accordingly, no reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures
included in the forecasted financial information to the relevant GAAP financial measures is provided in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
None of Patrick, LCI, the combined company or their respective affiliates, officers, directors, advisors or other
representatives can provide any assurance that actual results will not differ from the forecasted financial information,
and, except as required by applicable law, none of Patrick, LCI, the combined company or their respective affiliates,
officers, directors, advisors or other representatives undertakes any obligation to update, or otherwise revise or
reconcile, the forecasted financial information to reflect circumstances existing after the date the forecasted financial
information was generated or to reflect the occurrence of future events even in the event that any or all of the
assumptions underlying the forecasted financial information are shown to be inappropriate. None of Patrick, LCI,
the combined company or their respective affiliates, officers, directors, advisors or other representatives has made or
makes any representation to any Patrick shareholder, LCI stockholder or any other person regarding Patrick’s or
LCI’s respective ultimate performance compared to the information contained in the forecasted financial information
or that forecasted results will be achieved. Patrick has made no representation to LCI, in the merger agreement or
otherwise, concerning the Patrick Standalone Projections or the Synergy Projections. LCI has made no
representation to Patrick, in the merger agreement or otherwise, concerning the LCI Standalone Projections or the
Synergy Projections.
Patrick Standalone Projections
The Patrick standalone projections reflected prospective financial information for Patrick for fiscal years 2026
through 2030. Patrick management’s forecast methodology incorporated views by end market and a mid-cycle
approach intended to normalize significant year-to-year industry fluctuations. The forecast assumed, among other
things, no pricing increases over the forecast period, upper-mid-single-digit growth in end markets, operating
leverage in labor and overhead, low-single-digit growth in SG&A expenses and capital expenditures generally
ranging from approximately 1% to 2% of revenue.
Summary of Patrick Standalone Projections
($ in millions) | 2026E (2) | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | ||||
Revenue | $4,117 | $4,448 | $4,804 | $5,189 | $5,605 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA (post-SBC) (1) | $479 | $548 | $627 | $720 | $825 | ||||
Unlevered FCF for Discounting (2) | $373 | $378 | $423 | $479 | $546 |
__________________
(1)Adjusted EBITDA (post-SBC) is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as EBITDA, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of property,
plant and equipment, acquisition-related transaction costs and acquisition-related fair-value inventory step-up adjustments, with stock-based
compensation treated as an expense. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as net income plus depreciation and
amortization, net interest expense and income taxes. The use of non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to replace any measures of
performance determined in accordance with GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of
other companies.
(2)Unlevered FCF for Discounting is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as net operating profit after tax, plus depreciation and
amortization, less capital expenditures, plus or minus changes in net working capital, as used in the discounted cash flow analyses presented
to the Patrick Board. The 2026E amount represents projected cash flows for Q2 through Q4 2026; 2026E Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA
are full-year projections.
LCI Standalone Projections
In connection with the evaluation of a potential strategic transaction with Patrick by the LCI board, in April
2026, LCI’s management prepared an update to LCI’s existing long-range plan that was presented to the LCI board
and contained certain non-public, unaudited, standalone financial projections for LCI’s fiscal years 2026 through
2030 (the “LCI Standalone Projections”).
126
The LCI board used the LCI Standalone Projections to assist in its decision-making process in determining
whether to authorize and approve the execution of the merger agreement and whether to recommend that LCI’s
shareholders adopt the merger agreement (as described in further detail in the section titled “—Recommendation of
the LCI Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger”) and the LCI Standalone Projections were approved by the
LCI board for use and were used by PWP in connection with its analyses and opinions described in the section titled
“—Opinion of LCI’s Financial Advisor—Opinion of Perella Weinberg Partners LP.” LCI also shared the forecasts
for fiscal years 2026 through 2030 contained in the LCI Standalone Projections with Patrick and its financial
advisors.
The following table presents a summary of the LCI Standalone Projections prepared by LCI’s management
(except unlevered free cash flow, which was arithmetically calculated by PWP solely using prospective financial
information included in the LCI Standalone Projections) and provided to the LCI board.
Summary of LCI Standalone Projections
($ in millions) | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | ||||
Revenue | $4,374 | $4,734 | $5,016 | $5,310 | $5,621 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) | $493 | $587 | $647 | $688 | $755 | ||||
Unlevered Free Cash Flow (2) | $312 | $355 | $383 | $406 | $449 |
__________________
(1)Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure calculated as EBITDA, plus certain restructuring charges incurred in 2026E, totaling
approximately $5 million. EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure calculated as net income plus depreciation and amortization, net interest
expense and income taxes.
(2)Unlevered Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure calculated as EBITDA, less taxes paid, increases in net working capital and capital
expenditures. The 2026E amount represents projected cash flows for Q2 through Q4 2026; 2026E Revenue and Adjusted EBITDA are full-
year projections.
The LCI Standalone Projections were based on numerous estimates, expectations, beliefs, opinions and
assumptions with respect to LCI’s business, including its results of operations and financial condition, capital costs,
growth rates, and with respect to general business, economic, market, regulatory and financial conditions, including
annual industry wide volumes, market share and pricing assumptions across LCI’s product lines, all of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond LCI’s control and may not be realized. LCI management believes
that the estimates, expectations, beliefs, opinions and assumptions used as a basis for the LCI Standalone Projections
were reasonable based on the information available to LCI management at the time they were prepared. However,
the LCI Standalone Projections are not a guarantee of actual future performance. The future financial results of
LCI’s business may differ materially from those expressed in the LCI Standalone Projections due to various factors,
including factors that are beyond LCI’s ability to control or predict.
Synergy Projections
The Synergy Projections, prepared and agreed by Patrick’s and LCI’s management, contain estimates of certain
synergies expected to be realized following the completion of the merger, including approximately $150 million of
annual net run-rate synergies, which relate primarily to procurement and indirect spend savings, facilities and
logistics optimization and sales, general and administrative rationalization. The Synergy Projections were provided
to the Patrick board and the LCI board and to the Patrick financial advisors and PWP. The estimated cost synergies
assumed that the expected benefits of the merger would be realized.
The Synergy Projections were based upon numerous estimates and expectations, beliefs, opinions and
assumptions with respect to the combined company, including its cost and operating structure, results of operations
and financial condition, customer demand levels and competition, and with respect to general business, economic,
market, regulatory and financial conditions and other future events, all of which are difficult to predict and many of
which are beyond Patrick’s and LCI’s control and may not be realized. Patrick’s and LCI’s management, as
applicable, believe that the estimates, expectations, beliefs, opinions and assumptions used as a basis for the Synergy
Projections were reasonable based on the information available to them at the time they were prepared. However, the
Synergy Projections are not a guarantee of actual future performance or ability to achieve the estimated synergies.
The future financial consequences of the merger may differ materially from those expressed in the Synergy
127
Projections due to various factors, including factors that are beyond Patrick’s or LCI’s ability to control or predict.
Important factors that may affect Patrick’s, LCI’s or the combined company’s actual ability to achieve the Synergy
Projections are further described in the section titled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.” Information regarding the uncertainties associated with realizing the Synergy Projections in connection
with the merger is also described in the section titled “Risk Factors.”
The Synergy Projections are not, and should not be regarded as, a representation that any of the results or
expectations contained in, or forming a part of, the Synergy Projections will be achieved.
Summary of Synergy Projections(3)
($ in millions) | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA Impact (1) | — | — | $15 | $150 | $150 | ||||
Unlevered FCF for Discounting (2) | — | — | $11 | $111 | $112 |
__________________
(1)Adjusted EBITDA Impact represents the modeled net effect of realized cost synergies and costs to achieve the synergies.
(2)Unlevered FCF for Discounting represents the after-tax unlevered cash flow impact of the modeled synergies and costs to achieve the
synergies used in the discounted cash flow analysis.
(3)The synergy projections presented to the Patrick Board assumed an illustrative December 31, 2026 transaction closing date and $150
million of annual run-rate pre-tax cost synergies fully realized by year three.
No Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law, LCI’s stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights for their shares of LCI common
stock in connection with the LCI merger proposal described herein or to any similar rights of dissenters under
Delaware law. Under Indiana law, Patrick shareholders are not entitled to appraisal or dissenters’ rights in
connection with the merger.
Regulatory Approvals
Neither Patrick nor LCI is aware of any material governmental approvals or actions that are required for
consummation of the merger other than as described below. It is presently contemplated that if any such additional
material governmental approvals or actions are required, those approvals or actions will be sought. For additional
information regarding regulatory approvals in connection with the merger, see the section titled “The Merger
Agreement—Covenants and Agreements—Efforts to Complete the Merger.”
U.S. Antitrust Clearance
The consummation of the merger is subject to the receipt of antitrust clearance in the United States. Under the
HSR Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, the merger may not be completed until notification and report forms
have been filed with the FTC and the DOJ, and the applicable waiting period (or any extensions of such waiting
period) has expired or been terminated. For additional information regarding regulatory approvals in connection
with the merger, see the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Covenants and Agreements—Efforts to Complete
the Merger.”
Most transactions notifiable under the HSR Act may not be completed until the expiration of a 30-calendar-day
waiting period following the parties’ filings of their respective HSR notification and report forms. If the Antitrust
Division of the DOJ or the FTC issues a second request, which is a request for additional information and
documentary material, prior to the expiration of the 30-calendar-day waiting period (or after an additional 30-
calendar day waiting period if the parties pull and refile their HSR notification period), the transaction cannot close
until the parties observe a second 30-calendar-day waiting period, which would begin to run only after both parties
have substantially complied with the second request, unless such second waiting period is terminated earlier.
On August 5, 2026, Patrick and LCI each filed their respective HSR Act notifications with the FTC and the DOJ
in connection with the merger. On September 4, 2026, Patrick and LCI each voluntarily withdrew their respective
HSR Act notifications and, on September 9, 2026, refiled their respective HSR Act notifications with the FTC and
the DOJ. The refilings initiated a new waiting period under the HSR Act.
128
Non-U.S. Antitrust Clearance and Regulatory Approvals
Patrick and LCI derive revenues, have assets or other presence in jurisdictions outside the United States where
merger control, foreign investment, or foreign subsidies filings or clearances may be necessary or recommended. In
addition to antitrust approval in the United States, Patrick and LCI will seek the receipt of applicable governmental
consents, approvals, and other clearances required to be obtained under the merger agreement. The merger cannot be
consummated until the closing conditions relating to the applicable filings or clearances in the required jurisdictions
have been satisfied or waived.
Securities and Exchange Commission
In connection with the issuance of Patrick common stock to LCI stockholders, Patrick has filed a registration
statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. Each of Patrick and LCI has
agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective under the Securities Act
as promptly as reasonably practicable after filing.
NASDAQ
The consummation of the merger is subject to approval for listing of the Patrick common stock issuable in the
merger on the Nasdaq, subject to official notice of issuance.
Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the Patrick board with respect to the Patrick proposals, Patrick
shareholders should be aware that the directors and executive officers of Patrick have interests in the merger that
may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of Patrick shareholders generally. The members of the Patrick
board were aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating, negotiating and approving
the merger agreement and in determining to recommend that Patrick shareholders approve the Patrick share issuance
proposal, the Patrick authorized stock increase proposal, and the Patrick articles amendment and restatement
proposal. Such interests are described in more detail below.
Patrick’s executive officers for purposes of the discussion below are: (i) Andy L. Nemeth (Chief Executive
Officer); (ii) Matthew S. Filer (Executive Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer); (iii)
Jeffrey M. Rodino (President); (iv) Hugo E. Gonzalez (President - Powersports and Housing, and Chief Operating
Officer); (v) Joel D. Duthie (Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary); (vi) Jacob R. Petkovich
(President - Marine); (vii) Charles R. Roeder (President - RV); and (viii) Stacey L. Amundson (Executive Vice
President and Chief Human Resources Officer). For purposes of this discussion, unless otherwise indicated,
references to “executive officers” are limited to Patrick’s eight (8) current executive officers listed above.
Patrick’s non-employee directors for purposes of the discussion below are: (i) Blake W. Augsburger, (ii) Natalie
A. Brown, (iii) Joseph M. Cerulli, (iv) Todd M. Cleveland, (v) John A. Forbes, (vi) Michael A. Kitson, (vii) Denis
G. Suggs, and (viii) M. Scott Welch.
In accordance with SEC rules, this discussion also covers former directors and executive officers of Patrick who
served in such capacity at any time since January 1, 2025, which includes: (i) Richard N. Reyenger (former
President – Marine), who ceased to serve as an executive officer of Patrick in May 2025 and currently serves in a
strategic advisor role, (ii) Andrew C. Roeder (former Executive Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer), who ceased to serve as an executive officer of Patrick in February 2026, and (iii) Kip B. Ellis
(former President – Powersports, Technology and Housing), who ceased to serve as an executive officer of Patrick
in December 2025.
Certain Interests of Patrick Directors
Two companies affiliated with M. Scott Welch, a director on the Patrick board, beneficially own an aggregate of
15,700 shares of LCI common stock. One of such companies affiliated with Mr. Welch also engages in ordinary
course business with LCI, which represented approximately 1% of such company’s annual sales in 2025. The
129
companies affiliated with Mr. Welch will receive the same consideration with respect to their owned shares of LCI
common stock as other LCI stockholders.
Two companies affiliated with Todd M. Cleveland, a director on the Patrick board, engage in ordinary course
business with LCI, which represented approximately 0.1% and 33.9% of each such company’s annual sales in 2025
and which consisted of approximately $9.7 million of sales in the aggregate.
Certain Assumptions
As specifically noted below, for purposes of quantifying the potential payments and benefits described in this
section titled “Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger,” the following assumptions were
used:
•the first effective time occurred on August 31, 2026 (which we refer to as the “assumed closing date”),
which is the latest practicable date to determine the amounts described in this section before the filing of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and which is the assumed closing date only for purposes of this
section titled “Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger”;
•solely for the purposes of quantifying any related payments or benefits, the employment of each executive
officer is terminated by the combined company without “cause” (as such term or term of like import is
defined in the relevant plans and agreements) immediately following the assumed closing date;
•solely for the purposes of quantifying any related payments or benefits, the service of each non-employee
member of Patrick’s board is involuntarily terminated immediately following the assumed closing date;
•each executive officer’s base salary rate and target annual bonus opportunity are those as in effect as of the
assumed closing date;
•solely for the purposes of quantifying the prorated annual bonus payable to each executive officer pursuant
to his employment agreement upon a termination by the combined company without “cause,” each
executive would be entitled to payment of an annual bonus equal to his target annual bonus opportunity,
prior to giving effect to any proration that would apply;
•the number of unvested Patrick equity awards held by each executive officer and director is determined as
of the assumed closing date;
•the price per share of Patrick common stock is $85.41 (which we refer to as the “assumed stock price”),
which is the five (5)-day average closing price of Patrick common stock following the first public
announcement of the merger on June 30, 2026, as required by SEC rules;
•all Patrick performance-vesting restricted shares have their performance criteria satisfied at target levels;
and
•the value of each Patrick Option and Patrick SARs Award for which the per-share exercise price is equal to
or greater than the assumed stock price of $85.41 is $0.00.
As the amounts indicated below are estimates based on multiple assumptions that may or may not actually occur
or be accurate as of the date referenced, the actual amounts, if any, that may be paid or become payable may
materially differ from the amounts set forth below.
Treatment of Patrick Equity-Based Awards
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Patrick shall take all actions necessary to cause each vested or unvested
Patrick Option and Patrick SARs Award, and each Patrick Restricted Share and Patrick Performance Share, in each
case, that is outstanding as of immediately prior to the first effective time, to remain outstanding following the first
effective time and to continue to be governed by the same terms and conditions (including, as applicable, terms and
130
conditions related to vesting, forfeiture, exercisability and/or dividends or dividend equivalent rights) as were
applicable to such Patrick equity award immediately prior to the first effective time, provided, that:
•the vesting of each such Patrick Option, Patrick SARs Award, Patrick Restricted Share and Patrick
Performance Share shall be eligible to accelerate in full (and, in the case of each Patrick Performance
Share, without pro-ration) upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by
the holder for “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the governing Patrick equity award documents,
and which we refer to in this section as a “qualifying termination of employment”) that occurs, in each
case, within the 24-month period immediately following the first effective time; and
•the performance-vesting conditions applicable to each such Patrick Performance Share shall be deemed
achieved at the greater of (i) target performance and (ii) actual performance through the first effective time,
with such truncated level of actual performance extrapolated through the end of the applicable performance
period, as reasonably determined by the Patrick board, such that, following the first effective time, each
Patrick Performance Share that remains outstanding pursuant to its terms shall be subject solely to service-
based vesting.
The award agreements governing the treatment of outstanding Patrick Restricted Shares and Patrick
Performance Shares generally provide for full accelerated vesting of such Patrick Restricted Shares and Patrick
Performance Shares upon a “change in control” (as such term is defined in the governing Patrick equity award
agreement). Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Patrick board has adopted resolutions pursuant to which the
Patrick board affirmatively determined that neither the execution, delivery nor performance of the merger
agreement, nor consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, will constitute a “change of control” (as
defined under the Patrick equity plan or any applicable award agreement). Accordingly, the vesting of Patrick
Restricted Shares and/or Patrick Performance Shares will not automatically accelerate in connection with the
merger. The Patrick board determined to adopt the treatment of Patrick equity awards described above so that
Patrick equity awards will generally be treated in a substantially similar manner as the LCI equity awards following
the first effective time.
By virtue of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement governing the treatment of Patrick equity awards,
as a result of the closing, Patrick equity awards that are held by the executive officers will vest in full upon a
termination of such executive officer’s employment by Patrick without “cause” or due to the executive’s resignation
for “good reason” (each, as defined under the Patrick equity plan and/or the governing award agreements) within the
two (2)-year period following the closing.
As a result of the aforementioned treatment of Patrick equity awards contemplated by the merger agreement, all
amounts in respect of Patrick equity awards that are held by executive officers are considered “double-trigger” in
that accelerated vesting will occur only upon the occurrence of two (2) conditions, which are the consummation of
the merger and a qualifying termination of employment during the two (2)-year period following the closing, and no
amounts in respect of Patrick equity awards held by executive officers are “single-trigger” because no vesting or
payment (as applicable) will accelerate solely by virtue of the closing of the merger.
Based on the assumptions described above in “Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger-Certain Assumptions,” the following table sets forth, for each executive officer, former executive officer,
and non-employee director who served in such role at any point since January 1, 2025, the aggregate number of
shares of Patrick common stock subject to unvested Patrick equity-based awards, in each case, as of the assumed
closing date.
Name | Unvested Patrick Options (#)(1) | Unvested Patrick SARs (#)(1) | Patrick Restricted Shares (#)(2) | Patrick Performance Shares (#)(2) | ||||
Executive Officers | ||||||||
Andy L. Nemeth | 63,270 | 63,270 | 26,557 | 106,231 | ||||
Matthew S. Filer | 3,795 | 3,795 | 3,210 | 12,842 | ||||
Jeffrey M. Rodino | 31,635 | 31,635 | 10,734 | 42,939 |
131
Hugo E. Gonzalez | 22,148 | 22,148 | 6,773 | 27,091 | ||||
Joel D. Duthie | 3,165 | 3,165 | 4,689 | 18,762 | ||||
Jacob R. Petkovich | 31,635 | 31,635 | 3,513 | 14,056 | ||||
Stacey L. Amundson | 3,165 | 3,165 | 2,563 | 10,256 | ||||
Charles R. Roeder | 22,148 | 22,148 | 5,778 | 23,116 | ||||
Andrew C. Roeder(3) | — | — | 5,025 | — | ||||
Richard N. Reyenger | — | — | 3,299 | 13,196 | ||||
Kip B. Ellis | — | — | — | — | ||||
Non-Employee Directors | ||||||||
Blake W. Augsburger | — | — | 1,594 | — | ||||
Natalie A. Brown | — | — | 1,594 | — | ||||
Joseph M. Cerulli | — | — | 1,594 | — | ||||
Todd M. Cleveland | — | — | 1,594 | — | ||||
John A. Forbes | — | — | 1,594 | — | ||||
Michael A. Kitson | — | — | 1,594 | — | ||||
Denis G. Suggs | — | — | 1,594 | — | ||||
M. Scott Welch | — | — | 1,594 | — |
__________________
(1)Each unvested Patrick Option and Patrick SARs Award set forth in these columns has a per-share exercise price that is greater than the
assumed stock price of $85.41, such that the aggregate estimated value of each executive officer’s unvested Patrick Options and Patrick
SARs Awards is $0.00.
(2)See the section below titled “Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Patrick’s Named Executive Officers” beginning on
page 133 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus for an estimate of the values ascribed to the Patrick Restricted Shares and Patrick
Performance Shares held by Patrick’s named executive officers. The aggregate values of the Patrick Restricted Shares and Patrick
Performance Shares held by Patrick’s three (3) executive officers who are not named executive officers is estimated as follows: Jacob R.
Petkovich - $300,045 and $1,200,523, respectively; Stacey L. Amundson - $218,906 and $875,965, respectively; and Charles R. Roeder -
$493,499 and $1,974,338, respectively. The aggregate values of the Patrick Restricted Shares and Patrick Performance Shares held by
Patrick’s former executive officer is estimated as follows: Richard N. Reyenger - $281,768 and $1,127,070, respectively. The estimated
aggregate value of each non-employee director’s Patrick Restricted Shares is $136,144.
(3)In connection with his departure, Andrew C. Roeder retained the Patrick Restricted Shares set forth above. Mr. Roeder’s outstanding Patrick
equity awards are not eligible for accelerated vesting, but they will continue to vest in the ordinary course without the requirement of
continued employment.
Patrick Potential Severance Benefits
Each executive officer other than Stacey L. Amundson is party to an employment agreement with Patrick,
pursuant to which the executive officer is entitled to certain severance payments and/or benefits upon a qualifying
termination of employment, which is neither triggered nor enhanced by the occurrence of a “change in control” (or
such term of like meaning). Pursuant to each executive officer’s employment agreement, in the event he is
terminated without “cause” (and not due to death or “disability”) or in the event Andy L. Nemeth resigns for “good
reason” (as all such terms are defined in the applicable employment agreement, and each such termination we refer
to in this subsection as a “qualifying termination of employment”), such executive officer would become entitled to
the following severance payments (which we refer to as “severance”):
•For each of Andy L. Nemeth, Matthew S. Filer, Jeffrey M. Rodino, Hugo E. Gonzalez, Joel D. Duthie and
Jacob R. Petkovich, (i) cash severance in an amount equal to 12 months of such executive officer’s base
salary, payable in the form of continued base salary payments, and (ii) a lump-sum cash payment equal to
the amount of any annual cash incentive payment that the executive officer would have been entitled to
receive in respect of the fiscal year in which his termination occurs, as determined by the Patrick board,
pro-rated to reflect the portion of the fiscal year that the executive officer was employed by Patrick prior to
termination; and
132
•For Charles R. Roeder, (i) cash severance in an amount equal to 24 months of his base salary, payable in
the form of continued base salary payments, and (ii) continuation of health and welfare benefits for a period
of 24 months.
Each executive officer’s employment agreement subjects him to indefinite confidentiality obligations and non-
competition, non-solicitation and non-interference covenants during his period of employment and for two (2) years
following his termination of employment for any reason.
In addition, former executive officer Richard N. Reyenger is party to an employment agreement with Patrick,
pursuant to which Mr. Reyenger would become entitled to the following severance payments and benefits in the
event of the termination of his employment by Patrick without “just cause” or due to Mr. Reyenger’s “disability” or
resignation for “good reason” (each term as defined in the employment agreement): (i) cash severance in an amount
equal to 12 months of his base salary, payable in the form of continued base salary payments, and (ii) continuation
of health and welfare benefits for a period of 12 months. Such severance payments and benefits are neither triggered
nor enhanced by the occurrence of a “change in control.” Mr. Reyenger’s employment agreement subjects him to
indefinite confidentiality obligations and non-competition, non-solicitation and non-interference covenants during
his period of employment and for two (2) years following his termination of employment for any reason.
Patrick Executive Retirement Plan
Mr. Nemeth is a participant in Patrick’s non-qualified Executive Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”).
According to the provisions of the Retirement Plan, Mr. Nemeth became fully vested in his benefits thereunder prior
to the execution of this merger transaction, and the consummation of the merger will not trigger any payout under
the Retirement Plan. Accordingly, no amounts in respect of the Retirement Plan are reflected herein.
Patrick Officers and Directors Membership on the Combined Company Board and Arrangements with the
Combined Company
The merger agreement provides that the combined company board will consist of 12 directors, with six directors
designated by Patrick and six directors designated by LCI. The Patrick designees will consist of Andy L. Nemeth
and Todd M. Cleveland, provided that, in each case, he remains a director of Patrick immediately prior to the closing
effective time, and four additional directors designated by Patrick from its then-current board prior to closing.
The merger agreement provides that Andy L. Nemeth will serve as the chief executive officer of the combined
company and Todd M. Cleveland will be appointed to serve as Chairman of the combined company board as of the
closing effective time, provided that, in the case of Mr. Nemeth, he remains the chief executive officer of Patrick
immediately prior to the closing effective time, and in the case of Mr. Cleveland, he remains a director of Patrick
immediately prior to the closing effective time. The merger agreement also provides that the Patrick board will
appoint the individuals identified in each party’s disclosure letter to specified executive leadership positions
effective as of the closing effective time.
Continuing Employee Benefits
The merger agreement provides for certain customary protections regarding the compensation and benefits of
continuing employees, including the executive officers, during their employment with the combined company
following the first effective time. The relevant provisions are described in more detail in the section titled “The
Merger Agreement—Employee Benefits Matters” beginning on page 161 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Treatment of Annual Bonuses
The merger agreement provides for certain protections for annual bonuses for the year in which the first
effective time occurs, including for the executive officers, The relevant provisions are described in more detail in the
section titled “The Merger Agreement—Employee Benefits Matters” beginning on page 161 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
133
Transaction and Retention Bonuses
Patrick may, after consultation with LCI, provide individuals, including its executive officers, with additional
compensation in the form of a transaction or retention bonus, so long as such additional compensation does not
exceed $13.0 million in the aggregate (with a maximum of $3.0 million in the aggregate for transaction bonuses and
$10.0 million in the aggregate for retention bonuses). This additional compensation may be provided to any
individual. At this time, no such amounts have been allocated.
Indemnification and Insurance
Under the merger agreement, certain present and former directors, officers and fiduciaries of Patrick and their
respective subsidiaries will be entitled to continued indemnification, exculpation, advancement and insurance
protections with respect to matters existing or occurring at or prior to the first effective time. For a more detailed
description, see the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Indemnification, Exculpation and Insurance” beginning
on page 161 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Patrick’s Named Executive Officers
This section sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation of
each of Patrick’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger and that will or may
become payable to such named executive officers at either the consummation of the merger or upon a qualifying
termination of employment upon or following the consummation of the merger. The table below sets forth, for the
purposes of this merger-related compensation disclosure, the amount of payments and benefits that each Patrick
named executive officer would receive at the first effective time based on the assumptions described above in
“Interests of Patrick Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions” (which assumptions
include that the first effective time occurred on the assumed closing date and each named executive officer
experienced a qualifying termination of employment on such date).
The calculations in the table do not include amounts that Patrick’s named executive officers were already
entitled to receive or were vested in as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Moreover, as a result of
the foregoing assumptions, which may or may not actually occur or be accurate on the relevant date, including the
assumptions described in the footnotes to the table, the actual amounts, if any, to be received by a named executive
officer may materially differ from the amounts set forth below.
For the purposes of this disclosure, “double-trigger” refers to amounts and benefits that require the occurrence
of two (2) conditions, which are the consummation of the merger and a qualifying termination of employment
during the relevant period following the closing. “Single-trigger” refers to amounts and benefits that require the
occurrence of the consummation of the merger.
Golden Parachute Compensation(1)
Name | Cash ($)(2) | Equity ($)(3) | Total ($) | |||
Andy L. Nemeth | 2,209,726 | 11,341,423 | 13,551,149 | |||
Matthew S. Filer | 964,110 | 1,371,001 | 2,335,111 | |||
Jeffrey M. Rodino | 1,321,164 | 4,584,211 | 5,905,375 | |||
Hugo E. Gonzalez | 1,238,014 | 2,892,324 | 4,130,338 | |||
Joel D. Duthie | 931,233 | 2,002,949 | 2,934,182 |
__________________
(1)Former executive officer Andrew C. Roeder is also considered a named executive officer by virtue of serving as Patrick’s Principal
Financial Officer during 2026. Mr. Roeder is not entitled to “double-trigger” equity acceleration in respect of his unvested Patrick equity
awards, and he is not otherwise expected to receive any payments or benefits in connection with the merger beyond those provided to
Patrick shareholders, generally. Accordingly, Mr. Roeder is omitted from the Golden Parachute Compensation tables.
(2)Represents the estimated aggregate value of the cash severance that each Patrick named executive officer is entitled to receive pursuant to
his employment agreement upon a qualifying termination that occurs on the assumed closing date. As further described above in the section
titled “Patrick Potential Severance Benefits,” each Patrick named executive officer’s employment agreement entitles him to cash severance
consisting of (i) 12 months of continued base salary payments plus (ii) a pro-rata portion of the annual bonus that the Patrick named
134
executive officer would have earned for the year of his employment termination. The estimated values of the Patrick named executive
officers’ respective cash severance and pro-rata annual bonus payments are set forth below, with the pro-rata annual bonus component
calculated based on the assumption that each Patrick named executive officer would have earned an annual bonus equal to his target annual
bonus opportunity (prior to giving effect to such proration):
Name | Cash Severance ($) | Pro Rata Annual Bonus ($) | Total ($) | |||
Andy L. Nemeth | 950,000 | 1,259,726 | 2,209,726 | |||
Matthew S. Filer | 500,000 | 464,110 | 964,110 | |||
Jeffrey M. Rodino | 625,000 | 696,164 | 1,321,164 | |||
Hugo E. Gonzalez | 575,000 | 663,014 | 1,238,014 | |||
Joel D. Duthie | 550,000 | 381,233 | 931,233 |
(3)Represents the estimated aggregate value of the unvested Patrick equity awards held by each of Patrick’s named executive officers that
would accelerate and vest upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without “cause” or by the holder for “good reason” that
is triggered within the two (2)-year period immediately following the assumed closing date. Amounts in respect of all Patrick equity awards
are considered “double-trigger.” The following table sets forth the estimated aggregate value for each Patrick named executive officer by
Patrick equity award type (for Patrick Performance Shares, with performance deemed achieved at the target level).
Name | Unvested Patrick Stock Options ($)(a) | Unvested Patrick SARs Awards ($)(a) | Unvested Patrick Restricted Shares ($)(b) | Unvested Patrick Performance Shares ($)(b) | Total ($) | |||||
Andy L. Nemeth | — | — | 2,268,233 | 9,073,190 | 11,341,423 | |||||
Matthew S. Filer | — | — | 274,166 | 1,096,835 | 1,371,001 | |||||
Jeffrey M. Rodino | — | — | 916,791 | 3,667,420 | 4,584,211 | |||||
Hugo E. Gonzalez | — | — | 578,482 | 2,313,842 | 2,892,324 | |||||
Joel D. Duthie | — | — | 400,487 | 1,602,462 | 2,002,949 |
(a)Amounts in this column are calculated as the product of (i) (A) the assumed stock price of $85.41 less (B) the per-share exercise price
applicable to such Unvested Patrick Stock Option or Patrick SARs Award, multiplied by (ii) the actual or corresponding number of
shares of Patrick common stock subject to such Patrick Option or Patrick SARs Award, as applicable. Each unvested Patrick Option
and Patrick SARs Award held by Patrick’s named executive officers has a per-share exercise price that is greater than the assumed
stock price of $85.41, such that the aggregate estimated value of each named executive officer’s unvested Patrick Options and Patrick
SARs Awards is $0.00.
(b)Amounts in each of these columns are calculated as the product of (i) the number of unvested Patrick Shares or Patrick Performance
Shares held by each Patrick named executive officer, as applicable, multiplied by (ii) the assumed stock price of $85.41. Pursuant to
the merger agreement, the performance-vesting conditions applicable to each Patrick Performance Share will be deemed achieved at
the greater of (A) target performance and (B) actual performance through the first effective time, with such truncated level of actual
performance extrapolated through the end of the applicable performance period. Thereafter, each Patrick Performance Share will be
subject solely to service-based vesting. For purposes of the unvested Patrick Performance Shares, the amounts assume that the
Performance Shares are deemed achieved at the target level of performance. None of the named executive officers are entitled to any
benefits continuation payable by the combined company.
Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Overview
In considering the recommendation of the LCI board with respect to the LCI merger proposal, LCI stockholders
should be aware that LCI directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that are different from, or
in addition to, the interests of LCI stockholders generally. The LCI board was aware of and considered these
interests, among other matters, in evaluating, negotiating and approving the merger agreement and in determining to
recommend that LCI stockholders approve the merger agreement and the first merger. Such interests are described
in more detail below.
LCI’s executive officers for purposes of the discussion below are: (i) John A. Sirpilla (interim Chief Executive
Officer); (ii) Lillian D. Etzkorn (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer); (iii) Ryan R. Smith (Group
President – North America); and (iv) Jamie M. Schnur (Group President – Aftermarket).
LCI’s non-employee directors for purposes of the discussion below are: (i) Brendan J. Deely, (ii) Virginia L.
Henkels, (iii) Robert P. Hureau, (iv) Stephanie K. Mains, (v) Linda K. Myers and (vi) Kieran M. O’Sullivan.
135
In accordance with SEC rules, this discussion also covers former directors and executive officers of LCI who
served in such capacity at any time since the beginning of the last fiscal year, which consist of (i) Jason D. Lippert
(former Chief Executive Officer and director), who retired as Chief Executive Officer and resigned as a member of
the LCI board effective June 3, 2026, (ii) Andrew J. Namenye (former Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and
HR Officer, and Corporate Secretary), who retired effective July 31, 2025, (iii) Tracy D. Graham (former non-
employee director who resigned as a member of the LCI Board effective as of June 3, 2026) and (iv) James F. Gero
(former non-employee director who did not stand for re-election to the LCI board at LCI’s 2026 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders).
Certain Assumptions
As specifically noted below, for purposes of quantifying the potential payments and benefits described in this
section titled “Interests of LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger,” the following assumptions were
used:
•the first effective time occurred on August 31, 2026 (which we refer to as the “assumed closing date”),
which is the assumed closing date only for purposes of this section titled “Interests of LCI Directors and
Executive Officers in the Merger”;
•the employment of each executive officer is terminated by the combined company without “cause” or due
to the officer’s resignation for “good reason” (or a term of similar import) (as such terms are defined in the
relevant plans and agreements), in each case, immediately following the assumed closing date;
•solely for purposes of quantifying any related payments or benefits, the service of each non-employee
member of the LCI board is involuntarily terminated immediately following the assumed closing date;
•each executive officer’s base salary rate and annual target bonus are those as in effect as of the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus;
•the number of unvested LCI equity awards held by each executive officer and director is determined as of
August 31, 2026 (the latest practicable date to determine such amounts before the filing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus);
•the price per share of LCI common stock is $103.25, which is the five-day average closing price of LCI
common stock following the first public announcement of the merger on June 30, 2026, as required by SEC
rules;
•all LCI performance-vesting restricted stock units have their performance criteria satisfied at target levels;
and
•the value of LCI stock options for which the exercise price is equal to or greater than the assumed stock
price of $103.25 is $0.00.
As the amounts indicated below are estimates based on multiple assumptions that may or may not actually occur
or be accurate as of the date referenced, the actual amounts, if any, that may be paid or become payable may
materially differ from the amounts set forth below.
Treatment of LCI Equity-Based Awards
The merger agreement provides that, at the first effective time of the first merger, each outstanding LCI RSU
Award and LCI PSU Award, whether vested or unvested, will automatically, and without any action on the part of
the holder, convert into a restricted stock unit award with respect to shares of Patrick common stock, on generally
the same terms and conditions as applied immediately prior to the first effective time of the first merger and after
giving effect to the exchange ratio, except that the number of shares underlying each LCI PSU Award will be
determined based on the greater of target performance and actual performance through the first effective time of the
first merger extrapolated through the end of the applicable performance period, and such converted award will vest
solely based on continued service. Additionally, any amounts relating to dividends or dividend equivalent rights
136
granted in respect of any LCI RSU Awards and LCI PSU Awards that are accrued or credited and unpaid as of the
first effective time of the first merger, if any, shall carry over and be paid if and when required by, and in accordance
with the terms and conditions that were applicable to, such LCI RSU Awards or PSU Awards as of immediately
prior to the first effective time of the first merger. Each outstanding cash-settled deferred stock unit of LCI will be
automatically, and without any action on the part of the holder, cancelled and converted into the right to receive a
cash payment based on the closing price of a share of LCI common stock on the NYSE on the last trading day
immediately prior to the closing date, plus any accrued or credited and unpaid dividend or dividend equivalent
amounts, in each case subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement.
Assuming the first effective time of the first merger occurred on August 31, 2026, the following table sets forth,
for each of LCI’s directors and executive officers identified above, the number of shares of LCI common stock
underlying (i) unvested LCI RSU Awards, (ii) unvested LCI PSU Awards and (iii) vested LCI DSU Awards.
Name | LCI RSU Awards as of August 31, 2026(#) | LCI PSU Awards at Target Level as of August 31, 2026(#) | LCI DSU Awards as of August 31, 2026(#) | |||
Jason D. Lippert | 42,536 | 35,225 | — | |||
Andrew J. Namenye | — | 3,974 | — | |||
John A. Sirpilla | 17,854 | — | — | |||
Lillian D. Etzkorn | 8,122 | 18,941 | — | |||
Ryan R. Smith | 20,679 | 48,667 | — | |||
Jamie M. Schnur | 14,126 | 33,247 | — | |||
Brendan J. Deely | 1,351 | — | — | |||
Virginia L. Henkels | 1,351 | — | 6,019 | |||
Robert P. Hureau | 1,133 | — | — | |||
Stephanie K. Mains | 1,351 | — | 2,208 | |||
Linda K. Myers | 1,351 | — | 1,185 | |||
Kieran M. O’Sullivan | 1,351 | — | — | |||
Tracy D. Graham | — | — | — | |||
James F. Gero | — | — | — |
Membership on the Combined Company Board and Arrangements with the Combined Company
The merger agreement provides that the combined company board will consist of 12 directors, with six directors
designated by Patrick and six directors designated by LCI. The LCI designees will consist of John A. Sirpilla,
provided that he remains a director of LCI immediately prior to the closing effective time, and five additional
directors designated by LCI from its then-current board prior to closing. The merger agreement provides that Mr.
Sirpilla will be appointed to serve as Vice Chairman of the combined company board as of the closing effective
time, provided that he remains a director of LCI immediately prior to the closing effective time. The merger
agreement also provides that the Patrick board will appoint the individuals identified in each party’s disclosure letter
to specified executive leadership positions effective as of the closing effective time.
Interim CEO Offer Letter
On June 3, 2026, Jason D. Lippert retired as chief executive officer of LCI and resigned as a member of the LCI
board, and the LCI board appointed Mr. Sirpilla to serve as interim chief executive officer effective immediately.
LCI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Sirpilla effective as of June 4, 2026. The offer letter provides Mr. Sirpilla
with an annual base salary of $1,100,000 and an annual target bonus opportunity equal to 140% of annual base
salary. The offer letter provides for a one-time grant of time-based restricted stock units with a grant date value of
$1,800,000, which cliff vests on the earlier of immediately before LCI’s 2027 annual meeting and the first
anniversary of Mr. Sirpilla’s start date, subject to continued service as interim chief executive officer or as a member
of the LCI board through the first anniversary of the start date. The offer letter provides for full acceleration of the
137
one-time restricted stock unit award upon a termination of Mr. Sirpilla’s employment due to death or disability or
the occurrence of a change in control or a similar transaction, as determined by the LCI board.
Jason Lippert Separation Agreement
LCI and Mr. Lippert are party to a separation agreement and general release that were entered into in connection
with his retirement as chief executive officer of LCI on June 3, 2026. The separation agreement provides that LCI
will pay Mr. Lippert a monthly cash payment of $100,000 until June 3, 2027 (which we refer to as the “Monthly
Cash Payment”). The separation agreement further provides that Mr. Lippert’s outstanding and unvested LCI RSU
Awards and his outstanding and unvested 2024 LCI PSU Awards will remain outstanding and eligible to vest on
June 3, 2027, subject to the board’s determination that Mr. Lippert has fully complied with the separation agreement
and all other restrictive covenant obligations and his execution and non-revocation of a valid release of claims in
favor of LCI and its affiliates as of June 3, 2027.
Potential Severance Payments and Benefits
Messrs. Smith and Schnur and Ms. Etzkorn are each party to employment agreements with LCI (collectively,
the “Employment Agreements”), which provide for severance benefits in the event of the following terminations of
employment: (i) involuntary termination of employment without “Cause” (including, for Ms. Etzkorn, if LCI
terminates such executive officer’s employment without “Cause” within 120 days following the expiration of the
“Employment Period” or any subsequent one-year renewal period); (ii) by the executive officer for “Good
Reason” (each as defined in the applicable employment agreement, with includes an approved retirement for Messrs.
Smith and Schnur); and (iii) in the case of Messrs. Smith and Schnur, in the event of a termination due to death.
Upon the foregoing qualifying terminations of employment of any of Messrs. Smith and Schnur or Ms. Etzkorn,
the applicable executive officer has the right to receive (i) an amount equivalent to two times such executive
officer’s annual base salary at the highest annualized rate in effect at any time within two years of the date of such
qualifying termination of employment; (ii) payment of an amount equivalent to two times such executive officer’s
average bonus or incentive compensation (excluding any equity awards, payments under any long-term or similar
benefit plan, or any other special or one-time payments) actually paid to such executive officer during the 36-month
period immediately preceding such qualifying termination of employment, but no greater than such executive
officer’s then-current annual base salary, (iii) any amounts payable under LCI’s then-current management incentive
plan and acceleration of vesting of any equity awards subject to time-based vesting conditions only; (iv) a lump sum
payment equal to 12 months of the current COBRA premium; and (v) outplacement services for no less than six
months. The Company also provides payment of a pro-rata portion of the annual bonus for the year of termination.
As a condition to the provision of the foregoing severance benefits, a departing executive officer is required to
execute a separation agreement and general release of claims in a form acceptable to LCI.
Additionally, Messrs. Lippert, Smith and Schnur are participants in LCI’s Executive Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plan (the “NQDC Plan”), under which each maintain vested balances of deferred compensation. In
connection with a termination of employment without cause or due to resignation for good reason, Messrs. Lippert,
Smith and Schnur’s balances under the NQDC Plan begin to become payable.
The offer letter for Mr. Sirpilla does not provide for any potential severance payments or benefits.
Section 280G Mitigation Actions
LCI is conducting an ongoing analysis of the potential impact of Sections 4999 and 280G of the Code (which
we refer to collectively as “Section 280G”) in connection with the merger. Although the ultimate impact of Section
280G is contingent on numerous factors, including Patrick’s stock price at the first effective time and the date on
which the first effective time occurs, as a result of the recent hiring of certain LCI executive officers and other senior
positions resulting in individuals with lower-than-normal compensation history (which lowers the threshold to
trigger Section 280G), LCI has identified certain executive officers who may trigger the adverse tax consequences
imposed by Section 280G. These consequences consist of a 20% excise tax on any impacted payments, payable by
the individual, and the inability of the combined company to claim the benefit of a tax deduction with respect to
138
such payments. As a result, it is in the interests of LCI’s executive officers, LCI, the combined company and their
respective stockholders to minimize the impact of Section 280G in connection with the merger.
Therefore, in order to preserve the retention value of the impacted individuals’ equity awards and other
compensation, as well as the ability of the combined company to potentially claim a tax deduction in respect of such
payments, LCI may, after consultation with Patrick, take certain customary actions to mitigate the impact of Section
280G for any impacted individuals, including by (i) accelerating the vesting or payment of compensation (including
annual bonuses) that is scheduled to vest or be paid prior to December 31, 2027 so that it is instead vested and paid
on or prior to December 31, 2026, subject to repayment in the event of a termination prior to the ordinary vesting
date or the failure to satisfy applicable performance metrics (if applicable), and/or (ii) entering into or expanding
non-competition agreements (collectively, the “reasonable mitigation strategies”).
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the amount of any additional compensation that may be
paid to offset the adverse tax consequences of Section 280G is not reasonably determinable, as it will depend on the
value, composition and timing of payments and benefits ultimately made or provided in connection with the merger,
as well as the applicable recipient’s individual tax circumstances at the time of payment.
Transaction and Retention Bonuses
LCI may, after consultation with Patrick, provide certain individuals, including its executive officers, with
additional compensation in the form of a transaction or retention bonus, so long as such additional compensation
does not exceed $13.0 million in the aggregate (with a maximum of $3.0 million in the aggregate for transaction
bonuses and $10.0 million in the aggregate for retention bonuses). This additional compensation may be provided to
any individual. At this time, approximately $0.6 million and approximately $0.9 million have been allocated as
transaction bonuses and retention bonuses, respectively, to certain employees of LCI (none of whom are executive
officers of LCI). Such transaction bonuses vest upon the closing of the merger, and such retention bonuses vest six
months thereafter, subject to the recipient’s continued compliance with restrictive covenants contained in the
applicable award agreements, employment agreement and any other written agreement between the recipient and
LCI, in each case to the extent applicable, and continued employment, in each case, through each vesting date. Any
amounts payable shall be paid shortly following the vesting date, as set forth in the applicable bonus agreements.
Director and Officer Indemnification
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, each director and officer of LCI or any of their respective
subsidiaries at the time of the merger agreement or prior to the consummation of the merger are entitled to continued
indemnification and such LCI directors and officers are entitled to insurance coverage, in each case, through the
combined company for acts or omissions occurring before or at the consummation of the merger. For a more
detailed description of the provisions of the merger agreement relating to director and officer indemnification, please
see the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Indemnification, Exculpation and Insurance.”
Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to LCI’s Named Executive Officers
This section sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation of
each of LCI’s named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger and that will or may
become payable to the named executive officers at either the consummation of the merger or upon a qualifying
termination of employment upon or following the consummation of the merger. The table below sets forth, for the
purposes of this merger-related compensation disclosure, the amount of payments and benefits that each named
executive officer would receive at the first effective time based on the assumptions described above in “Interests of
LCI Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Certain Assumptions” (which assumptions include that the
first effective time occurred on August 31, 2026 and each named executive officer experienced a qualifying
termination of employment on such date).
The calculations in the table do not include amounts that LCI’s named executive officers were already entitled
to receive or were vested in as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, other than the accelerated
distribution of vested account balances under the SSP. Moreover, as a result of the foregoing assumptions, which
may or may not actually occur or be accurate on the relevant date, including the assumptions described in the
139
footnotes to the table, the actual amounts, if any, to be received by a named executive officer may materially differ
from the amounts set forth below.
Golden Parachute Compensation
Name(1) | Cash ($)(2) | Equity ($)(3) | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation ($)(4) | Benefits ($)(5) | Total ($) | |||||
Jason D. Lippert | — | 8,028,823 | — | — | 8,028,823 | |||||
Lillian D. Etzkorn | 2,896,347 | 2,794,255 | — | 86,000 | 5,776,602 | |||||
Ryan R. Smith | 5,370,674 | 7,159,975 | 2,694,283 | 86,000 | 15,310,932 | |||||
Jamie M. Schnur | 4,018,600 | 4,891,262 | 5,713,556 | 86,000 | 14,709,418 | |||||
Andrew J. Namenye | — | 410,316 | — | — | 410,316 | |||||
John A. Sirpilla | — | 1,843,426 | — | — | 1,843,426 |
__________________
(1)Effective June 3, 2026, Mr. Lippert retired as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Sirpilla commenced employment as the
Company’s interim Chief Executive Officer. Effective July 31, 2025, Mr. Namenye resigned from the Company for good reason, and the
Company provided him with the severance compensation set forth in his employment agreement under the scenario of a resignation for
good reason.
(2)Represents the estimated aggregate value of the cash severance payment to each LCI named executive officer is entitled to receive, which,
in the case of Messrs. Smith and Schnur and Ms. Etzkorn is equal to (x) two multiplied by such individual’s annual base salary, at the
highest annualized rate in effect at any time within two years of the date of termination; plus (y) two multiplied by such individual’s average
bonus or incentive compensation actually paid to such individual, if any, during the 36-month period immediately preceding such
individual’s termination, provided that such 36-month average may not exceed such individual’s then-current annual base salary; plus (z)
any amounts payable under LCI’s then-current management incentive plan, assuming a termination date of August 31, 2026. The following
table shows, for each named executive officer, as applicable, the amount of each component part of these cash payments. These amounts are
all “double trigger” in nature other than with respect to Messrs. Smith and Schnur to the extent the closing happens prior to December 19,
2027, in which case the amounts are “modified single-trigger” in nature.
Name | Base Salary Component ($) | Target Bonus Component ($) | Pro-Rata Annual Bonus Component($) | Total ($) | ||||
Jason D. Lippert | — | — | — | — | ||||
Lillian D. Etzkorn | 1,297,800 | 1,181,880 | 416,667 | 2,896,347 | ||||
Ryan R. Smith | 1,971,420 | 1,971,420 | 1,427,833 | 5,370,674 | ||||
Jamie M. Schnur | 1,555,300 | 1,555,300 | 908,000 | 4,018,600 | ||||
Andrew J. Namenye | — | — | — | — | ||||
John A. Sirpilla | — | — | — | — |
__________________
(3)Represents estimated values associated with the full value of outstanding LCI RSU Awards and LCI PSU Awards, which are being
converted and will vest solely based on continued service amounts as described above in the section titled “—Treatment of LCI Equity-
Based Awards.” The following table sets forth the estimated aggregate value payable to each LCI named executive officer in connection
with the consummation of the merger by award type (for LCI PSU Awards, with performance deemed achieved at target level). These
amounts are all “double trigger” in nature and will accelerate and vest upon a qualifying termination of employment (including a
termination of Messrs. Smith or Schnur for any reason other than for Cause to the extent the closing happens prior to December 19, 2027).
Name | Value of Unvested LCI RSU Awards ($) | Value of Unvested LCI PSU Awards at Target Level ($) | Total ($) | |||
Jason D. Lippert | 4,391,842 | 3,636,981 | 8,028,823 | |||
Lillian D. Etzkorn | 838,597 | 1,955,658 | 2,794,255 | |||
Ryan R. Smith | 2,135,107 | 5,024,868 | 7,159,975 | |||
Jamie M. Schnur | 1,458,510 | 3,432,753 | 4,891,262 | |||
Andrew J. Namenye | — | 410,316 | 410,316 | |||
John A. Sirpilla | 1,843,426 | — | 1,843,426 |
140
__________________
(4)Represents the estimated aggregate value of benefits payable under LCI’s Executive Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as of July
31, 2026, under which Messrs. Lippert, Smith and Schnur maintain a vested balance. In accordance with the terms of LCI’s Executive Non-
Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, Mr. Lippert’s vested benefit became payable upon his separation from service on June 3, 2026,
without regard to the transaction, and the amount thereof is excluded from the table above on this basis. For Messrs. Smith and Schnur,
payments will be triggered by the transaction, and as such, these amounts are considered “single trigger” in nature.
(5)Represents the estimated aggregate value of benefits continuation for 12 months and six months of outplacement services for each named
executive officer, except Messrs. Lippert, Sirpilla and Namenye, each of whom either is not entitled or is no longer entitled, as applicable, to
any benefits continuation or outplacement services. The following table shows, for each named executive officer, the amount of the health
insurance contribution payment payable by the Company. These amounts are all “double trigger” in nature other than with respect to
Messrs. Smith and Schnur to the extent the closing happens prior to December 19, 2027, in which case the amounts are “modified single-
trigger” in nature.
Name | Benefits Continuation ($) | Outplacement Services ($) | Total ($) | |||
Jason D. Lippert | — | — | — | |||
Lillian D. Etzkorn | 36,000 | 50,000 | 86,000 | |||
Ryan R. Smith | 36,000 | 50,000 | 86,000 | |||
Jamie M. Schnur | 36,000 | 50,000 | 86,000 | |||
Andrew J. Namenye | — | — | — | |||
John A. Sirpilla | — | — | — |
Indemnification and Insurance
Under the merger agreement, each present and former director and officer of LCI or Patrick or any of their
respective subsidiaries are entitled to continued indemnification and such LCI directors and officers are entitled to
insurance coverage, in each case, through the combined company for acts or omissions occurring before or at the
consummation of the merger. For a more detailed description, see the section titled “The Merger Agreement—
Indemnification, Exculpation and Insurance” beginning on page 161 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Listing of Patrick Common Stock; Delisting and Deregistration of LCI Common Stock
If the merger is completed, the shares of Patrick common stock to be issued in the merger will be listed for
trading on the Nasdaq, shares of LCI common stock will be delisted from the NYSE and deregistered under the
Exchange Act and LCI will no longer be required to file periodic reports with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange
Act.
Accounting Treatment of the Merger
Patrick and LCI prepare their respective financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The merger will be
accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”) under GAAP. Under this method
of accounting, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination are recognized and
measured at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of the purchase
consideration to be transferred by Patrick over the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, if any, will be recognized as goodwill.
Patrick will be the acquirer for financial accounting purposes and LCI will be treated as the acquiree based on
consideration of facts and circumstances at the time of preparation of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Factors
supporting the identification of Patrick as the accounting acquirer include: (i) Patrick is the legal acquirer and will
issue shares of Patrick common stock as consideration in the merger; (ii) holders of Patrick common stock
immediately prior to the merger are expected to hold approximately 52% of the voting interests of the combined
company immediately following the merger, compared with approximately 48% expected to be held by former LCI
stockholders; and (iii) the senior leadership of the combined company will include significant continuing leadership
from Patrick, including Andy L. Nemeth, Patrick's current Chief Executive Officer, who will serve as Chief
Executive Officer of the combined company, and Todd M. Cleveland, a current Patrick director, who will serve as
Chairman of the combined company board. Under this method of accounting, the identifiable assets acquired and
141
liabilities assumed in the business combination are recognized and measured at their estimated fair values as of the
acquisition date. The excess of the fair value of the purchase consideration to be transferred by Patrick over the
estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, if any, will be recognized as goodwill.
The financial condition and results of operations of Patrick will include LCI’s balances and results after completion
of the merger.
Treatment of LCI Indebtedness
As of June 30, 2026, LCI had approximately $853 million of outstanding indebtedness, consisting primarily of
amounts outstanding under the 2030 Notes and the LCI term loan.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Patrick is obligated to pay off, or cause to be paid off, substantially
contemporaneously with the first effective time of the first merger, all amounts outstanding under the LCI credit
facility, and the commitments under the LCI credit facility will be terminated in connection therewith. This joint
proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute a notice of termination, repayment or prepayment under the LCI
credit facility.
Under the merger agreement, prior to or at the first effective time, LCI is required to take all actions required of
it by the indenture governing the 2030 Notes to cause each 2030 Note that is issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the first effective time to remain issued and outstanding but to represent a right to convert into shares of
Patrick common stock in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the 2030 Notes. Patrick and LCI are
reviewing potential additional actions with respect to LCI's existing indebtedness, and Patrick may, but is not
obligated to, refinance, repurchase, redeem, exchange or otherwise terminate all or a portion of the 2030 Notes in
connection with or following the consummation of the merger. Patrick and/or LCI may also conduct one or more
exchange offers, offers to purchase and/or consent solicitations in relation to the 2030 Notes, subject to the terms of
the merger agreement and applicable law. The terms and timing of any such exchange offers, offers to purchase and/
or consent solicitations have not been determined as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint
proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any debt
securities of Patrick or LCI. It does not constitute a prospectus or prospectus equivalent document for any such
securities. No offering of any debt securities of Patrick or LCI shall be made except by means of a prospectus
meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act or an exemption therefrom.
For a description of LCI's existing indebtedness, please refer to LCI's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2026, filed with the SEC on August 5, 2026, which is incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Litigation Related to the Merger
Securities class action lawsuits and derivative lawsuits are often brought against public companies that have
entered into acquisition, merger or other business combination agreements like the merger agreement. Although
neither Patrick nor LCI is aware of any pending lawsuits relating to the merger contemplated by the merger
agreement as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, lawsuits arising out of or in connection with the
merger contemplated by the merger agreement could be filed in the future. Among other remedies, claimants could
seek damages and/or to enjoin the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The
outcome of any litigation is uncertain, and any such lawsuits could prevent or delay the consummation of the merger
and result in significant costs. Any such actions could create uncertainty relating to the merger and could be costly
and distracting to Patrick and LCI management.
142
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following summarizes material provisions of the merger agreement. This summary does not purport to be
complete and may not contain all of the information about the merger agreement that is important to you. The rights
and obligations of the parties are governed by the express terms and conditions of the merger agreement and not by
this summary or any other information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. LCI stockholders and
Patrick shareholders are urged to read the merger agreement carefully and in its entirety, as well as this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, before making any voting decisions. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is
incorporated by reference herein.
In reviewing the merger agreement and this summary, please remember that each has been included to provide
you with information regarding the terms of the merger agreement and is not intended to provide any other factual
information about LCI, Patrick or any of their respective subsidiaries. The merger agreement contains
representations and warranties and covenants by each of the parties to the merger agreement, which are summarized
below. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the merger
agreement and:
•were not intended as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if
those statements prove to be inaccurate;
•have been qualified by certain confidential disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with
the negotiation of the merger agreement, which disclosures are not reflected in the merger agreement; and
•may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material by you
or other investors.
Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties in the merger
agreement and described below may have changed since the date of the merger agreement and subsequent
developments or new information qualifying a representation or warranty may have been included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Accordingly, the representations and warranties and other provisions of the merger agreement
should not be read alone, but instead should be read together with the information provided elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/
prospectus. See the section titled “Where You Can Find More Information.”
Structure of the Merger
The merger agreement provides for, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger
agreement, a two-step merger transaction. In the first step (which we refer to as the “first merger”), First Merger
Sub, a newly formed Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick, will be merged with
and into LCI, with LCI surviving the first merger as the initial surviving entity and a direct wholly owned subsidiary
of Patrick. Immediately following the first merger, in the second step (which we refer to as the “second merger” and,
together with the first merger, the “merger”), the initial surviving entity will be merged with and into Second Merger
Sub (Second Merger Sub, Patrick and First Merger Sub, collectively the “Patrick parties”), a newly formed Indiana
limited liability company and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick, with Second Merger Sub surviving the
second merger as the final surviving entity and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick.
The first merger will be effected in accordance with the DGCL and the second merger will be effected in
accordance with the DGCL and the Indiana Business Flexibility Act (which we refer to as the “IBFA”).
Closing and Effectiveness of the Merger
The closing of the merger will take place at 7:45 a.m. Eastern Time on the third business day after all conditions
set forth in the merger agreement have been satisfied or waived (other than those conditions that by their terms are to
be fulfilled at the closing, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver of such conditions), by way of electronic exchange
of documents, unless another time, date or manner of closing is agreed in writing by the parties. For a description of
143
the conditions to the closing, see the section titled “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the
Merger.”
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement and in accordance with the
DGCL, First Merger Sub will be merged with and into LCI at the first effective time. Following the first effective
time, the separate legal existence of First Merger Sub will cease, and LCI will continue as the initial surviving entity
and as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Subject to the provisions of the merger agreement, as soon as
possible on the closing date, the parties will cause the first merger to be consummated by LCI and First Merger Sub
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of Merger (which we refer to as the “first
certificate of merger”) with respect to the first merger, duly executed and completed in accordance with the relevant
provisions of the DGCL, and will make all other filings or recordings required under the DGCL. The first merger
will become effective at the time when the first certificate of merger has been duly filed with the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware, or such other time as may be mutually agreed by the parties and specified in the first
certificate of merger.
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement and in accordance with the
DGCL and the IBFA, and immediately following the first effective time, the initial surviving entity will be merged
with and into Second Merger Sub at the closing effective time. Following the closing effective time, the separate
legal existence of the initial surviving entity will cease, and Second Merger Sub will continue as the final surviving
entity in the second merger and as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick. Immediately following the first
effective time, the parties will cause the second merger to be consummated by the initial surviving entity and Second
Merger Sub (a) filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of Merger (which we refer to
as the “second Delaware certificate of merger”) and (b) filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Indiana
Articles of Merger (the “Indiana Articles of Merger” and, together with the second Delaware certificate of merger,
the “second merger filing documents”) with respect to the second merger, duly executed and completed in
accordance with the relevant provisions of the DGCL and the IBFA, as applicable, and will make all other filings or
recordings required under the DGCL and the IBFA. The second merger will become effective at the time specified
in the second merger filing documents filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the Secretary of
State of the State of Indiana, as applicable, or such other time as may be mutually agreed by the parties and specified
in the second merger filing documents.
Merger Consideration
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the merger agreement, at the first effective time, each share of
LCI common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the first effective time (other than shares held by
LCI, Patrick or any of their respective subsidiaries, which will be canceled without consideration) will be converted
automatically into the right to receive 1.2440 fully paid and nonassessable shares of Patrick common stock, together
with cash in lieu of fractional shares of Patrick common stock, without interest (such shares, together with such
cash, the “merger consideration”). LCI stockholders will not receive any fractional shares of Patrick common stock
in the merger. Instead, each LCI stockholder who would otherwise have been entitled to receive a fraction of a share
of Patrick common stock will receive cash (without interest) in an amount equal to such fractional amount
multiplied by the volume-weighted average trading price for Patrick common stock on the Nasdaq on each of the
five consecutive trading days ending on (and including) the last trading day immediately prior to the closing date,
rounded to the nearest cent (with 0.5 of a cent being rounded upward).
No Appraisal Rights
No dissenters’ or appraisal rights are available to holders of shares of LCI common stock or shares of Patrick
common stock in connection with the merger.
Exchange Ratio Adjustments to Prevent Dilution
If between the date of the merger agreement and the first effective time, the outstanding shares of LCI common
stock or shares of Patrick common stock are changed into a different number or type of shares as a result of any
reclassification, recapitalization, exchange, stock split (including a reverse stock split), combination, consolidation,
reorganization or readjustment (or other similar transaction) of shares or any stock dividend or stock distribution
144
with a record date during such period, the exchange ratio, the merger consideration and any other similarly
dependent items, as the case may be, will be appropriately adjusted to provide the same economic effect as
contemplated by the merger agreement prior to any such transaction; provided, that no party may take any action
that is otherwise prohibited or restricted by any other provision of the merger agreement.
The high and low trading prices for the LCI common stock as of June 29, 2026, the last trading day immediately
before the public announcement of the merger, were $100.87 and $94.25, respectively. The high and low trading
prices for the Patrick common stock as of June 29, 2026, the last trading day immediately before the public
announcement of the merger, were $95.01 and $91.25, respectively. We urge you to obtain current market
quotations before voting your shares.
Treatment of LCI Equity-Based Awards in the Merger
LCI RSU Awards
At the first effective time, each outstanding LCI RSU Award, whether vested or unvested, will automatically
cease to represent a restricted stock unit denominated in shares of LCI common stock and will be converted into a
number of restricted stock units denominated in Patrick common stock (which award we refer to as an “Assumed
RSU Award”). The number of shares of Patrick common stock subject to each such Assumed RSU Award will equal
the product (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number of shares of LCI common stock subject to
such LCI RSU Award as of immediately prior to the first effective time and (ii) the exchange ratio. Following the
first effective time, each such Assumed RSU Award will continue to be governed by the same terms and conditions
(including vesting conditions, forfeiture terms and terms relating to dividends or dividend equivalent rights) as were
applicable to the corresponding LCI RSU Award immediately prior to the first effective time; provided, that any
amounts relating to dividends or dividend equivalent rights granted in respect of a LCI RSU Award that are accrued
or credited and unpaid as of the first effective time, if any, will carry over and be paid if and when required by, and
in accordance with the terms and conditions that were applicable to, such LCI RSU Award immediately prior to the
first effective time.
LCI PSU Awards
At the first effective time, each outstanding LCI PSU Award, whether vested or unvested, will automatically
cease to represent a restricted stock unit denominated in shares of LCI common stock and will be converted into an
Assumed RSU Award. The number of shares of Patrick common stock subject to each such Assumed RSU Award
will equal the product (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number of shares of LCI common stock
subject to such LCI PSU Award and (ii) the exchange ratio. The number of shares of LCI common stock subject to
each LCI PSU Award will be determined based on the greater of (A) target performance and (B) actual performance
through the first effective time extrapolated through the end of the applicable performance period, as reasonably
determined by the LCI board or the appropriate committee thereof. Following the first effective time, each such
Assumed RSU Award will continue to be governed by the same terms and conditions (including vesting conditions,
forfeiture terms and terms relating to dividends or dividend equivalent rights) as were applicable to the
corresponding LCI PSU Award, except that as of the first effective time, the performance-vesting conditions will no
longer apply and each Assumed RSU Award will be subject solely to service-based vesting. For the avoidance of
doubt, with respect to any Assumed RSU Awards for which the corresponding LCI PSU Award was outstanding as
of the date of the merger agreement, such awards will not be subject to pro-ration upon a qualifying termination of
employment. Any amounts relating to dividends or dividend equivalent rights granted in respect of a LCI PSU
Award that are accrued or credited and unpaid as of the first effective time will carry over and be paid if and when
required by, and in accordance with the terms and conditions that were applicable to, such LCI PSU Award
immediately prior to the first effective time.
Cash-Settled Deferred Stock Units of LCI
At the first effective time, each outstanding LCI DSU Award, whether vested or unvested, will automatically be
canceled and will entitle the holder thereof to receive (without interest), as soon as reasonably practicable after the
first effective time (but in any event no later than 10 business days thereafter), (i) a cash payment equal to the
product of (A) the number of shares of LCI common stock underlying such LCI DSU Award as of immediately prior
145
to the first effective time and (B) the closing price of a share of LCI common stock on the NYSE as reported by
Bloomberg L.P. on the last trading day immediately prior to the closing date, plus (ii) any amounts relating to
dividend or dividend equivalent rights granted in respect of such LCI DSU Award that are accrued or credited and
unpaid as of the first effective time, if any; less applicable taxes required to be withheld with respect thereto;
provided, that any LCI DSU Award that is not permitted to be settled at the first effective time without triggering a
tax or penalty under Section 409A of the Code will instead be settled at the earliest time permitted under the
applicable plan and award agreement that will not trigger such a tax or penalty.
Treatment of Patrick Equity-Based Awards in the Merger
Patrick Options
At the first effective time, each Patrick Option, whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding as of
immediately prior to the first effective time will remain outstanding following the first effective time and will
continue to be governed by the same terms and conditions (including vesting conditions, forfeiture and exercisability
terms) as were applicable to the corresponding Patrick Option immediately prior to the first effective time; provided,
that each Patrick Option will be eligible to vest upon the holder’s termination of employment by Patrick without
“cause” or by the holder for “good reason” (as defined in the applicable award agreement) that occurs, in each case,
within the 24-month period immediately following the first effective time (each such termination, a “qualifying
termination of employment”).
Patrick Restricted Shares
At the first effective time, each Patrick Restricted Share that is outstanding as of immediately prior to the first
effective time will remain outstanding following the first effective time and will continue to be governed by the
same terms and conditions (including vesting conditions, forfeiture terms and terms relating to dividends or dividend
equivalent rights) as were applicable to the corresponding Patrick Restricted Share immediately prior to the first
effective time; provided, that the Patrick Restricted Shares will be eligible to vest upon a qualifying termination of
employment.
Patrick Performance Shares
At the first effective time, each Patrick Performance Share that is outstanding as of immediately prior to the first
effective time will remain outstanding following the first effective time and will continue to be governed by the
same terms and conditions (including vesting conditions, forfeiture terms and terms relating to dividends or dividend
equivalent rights) as were applicable to the corresponding Patrick Performance Share immediately prior to the first
effective time; provided, that as of the first effective time, the performance-vesting conditions will be deemed
achieved at the greater of (i) target performance and (ii) actual performance through the first effective time
extrapolated through the end of the applicable performance period, as reasonably determined by the Patrick board or
the appropriate committee thereof, and each such Patrick Performance Share will be subject solely to service-based
vesting following the first effective time; provided, further, that the Patrick Performance Shares will be eligible to
vest (without pro-ration) upon a qualifying termination of employment.
Patrick SARs
At the first effective time, each Patrick SAR Award, whether vested or unvested, that is outstanding as of
immediately prior to the first effective time will remain outstanding following the first effective time and will
continue to be governed by the same terms and conditions (including vesting conditions, forfeiture and exercisability
terms) as were applicable to the corresponding Patrick SAR Award immediately prior to the first effective time;
provided, that the Patrick SAR Awards will be eligible to vest upon a qualifying termination of employment.
Governance
The merger agreement sets forth certain post-closing governance arrangements for Patrick.
146
Headquarters
Following the closing, Patrick will have its headquarters in Elkhart, Indiana.
Board of Directors
Patrick will take all actions necessary prior to the closing so that the Patrick board as of the closing effective
time will be comprised of 12 directors: (i) six directors designated by Patrick, which will consist of Andy L. Nemeth
and Todd M. Cleveland and four additional directors designated by Patrick from its then current Patrick board prior
to closing, without approval by LCI (the “Patrick designees”), and (ii) six directors designated by LCI, which will
consist of John A. Sirpilla and five additional directors designated by LCI from its then current LCI board prior to
closing, without approval by Patrick (the “LCI designees”). Patrick will take all actions necessary to cause all
Patrick designees and LCI designees to be appointed, elected and approved as directors of the Patrick board effective
as of the closing effective time and all Patrick board members prior to the closing not designated as Patrick
designees to resign from the Patrick board effective as of the closing effective time.
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Vice Chairman
Andy L. Nemeth, the current Chief Executive Officer of Patrick, will continue to serve as the Chief Executive
Officer of Patrick (provided that he remains Chief Executive Officer of Patrick as of immediately prior to the closing
effective time). If Mr. Nemeth is unwilling or unable to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of Patrick at the closing
effective time, then the Patrick board will designate a replacement Chief Executive Officer. Todd M. Cleveland will
be appointed to serve as the Chairman of the Patrick board (provided that he remains a director of Patrick as of
immediately prior to the closing effective time). If Mr. Cleveland is unwilling or unable to serve as the Chairman of
the Patrick board at the closing effective time, then John A. Sirpilla will serve as the Chairman of the Patrick board
at the closing effective time and the Patrick board will (in consultation with LCI) designate and select a replacement
Vice Chairman of the Patrick board. Mr. Sirpilla will be appointed to serve as the Vice Chairman of the Patrick
board at the closing effective time (provided that he remains a director of LCI as of immediately prior to the closing
effective time). If Mr. Sirpilla is unwilling or unable to serve as the Vice Chairman of the Patrick board, then the
LCI board (in consultation with Patrick) will designate an alternate member of the LCI board as replacement Vice
Chairman of the Patrick board.
Other Officers and Executive Team
The Patrick board will appoint, or cause to be appointed, certain individuals agreed at signing between the
parties to leadership positions, effective as of the first effective time.
Committees
Patrick will take all actions necessary to cause, as of the closing effective time, the Patrick board to have the
following standing committees: (i) an Audit Committee, (ii) a Compensation Committee, (iii) a Nominating and
Governance Committee and (iv) a Capital Allocation and Strategy Committee. Each committee will consist of four
(4) directors comprised of two (2) Patrick designees and two (2) LCI designees (unless a greater number of directors
is mutually agreed by the parties), subject to applicable law and applicable stock exchange listing standards
(including applicable independence requirements). The chairperson of each of the Audit Committee and the
Compensation Committee will be a Patrick designee, and the chairperson of each of the Capital Allocation and
Strategy Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee will be a LCI designee.
Name
Prior to the closing, Patrick and LCI will mutually agree upon a new corporate name for Patrick, and Patrick
will take all actions necessary to cause such new name to become effective concurrently with the closing; provided
that the trading symbol of Patrick’s common stock on the Nasdaq prior to the closing will remain the trading symbol
of Patrick’s common stock following the closing.
147
Exchange Fund
Prior to the first effective time, LCI and Patrick will mutually designate a bank, trust company or nationally
recognized stockholder services provider (which we refer to as the “exchange agent”) for the purpose of exchanging
certificates representing outstanding shares of LCI common stock (each, a “certificate”) and shares in book-entry
form of LCI common stock (each, a “book-entry share”) for the merger consideration. In addition, at or prior to the
closing, Patrick will (i) deposit or cause to be deposited or made available with the exchange agent for the benefit of
the holders of shares of LCI common stock evidence of shares of Patrick common stock representing the aggregate
amount of shares of Patrick common stock sufficient to deliver the merger consideration payable in the form of
shares of Patrick common stock and (ii) when and as needed, cash sufficient to pay cash in lieu of fractional shares
(such shares and cash, together with any dividends or distributions with respect thereto, the “exchange fund”). The
exchange agent will deliver the merger consideration out of the exchange fund.
With respect to holders of record of certificates immediately prior to the first effective time, Patrick will cause
the exchange agent to, as promptly as practicable after the closing, mail to each holder of record of a certificate:
•a letter of transmittal (which will specify that delivery will be effected, and risk of loss and title to the
certificates will pass, only upon delivery of the certificates to the exchange agent, and which will be in such
form and have such other provisions as may be mutually agreed by Patrick and LCI) and
•instructions for use in effecting the surrender of the certificates in exchange for the merger consideration.
Upon surrender of a certificate for cancellation to the exchange agent, or to such other agent or agents as may be
appointed by Patrick, together with such letter of transmittal, duly executed, and such other documents as may
reasonably be required by the exchange agent, the holder of such certificate will be entitled to receive in exchange
therefor that number of whole shares of Patrick common stock and cash in lieu of fractional shares of Patrick
common stock, as applicable, that such holder has the right to receive pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement,
and the certificate so surrendered will forthwith be canceled.
With respect to holders of record (other than DTC) of book-entry shares immediately prior to the first effective
time, Patrick will cause the exchange agent to, as promptly as practicable after the closing, mail to each such holder
of record (A) a statement reflecting the number of whole shares of Patrick common stock that such holder is entitled
to receive and (B) a check in the amount of any cash in lieu of fractional shares (after giving effect to any required
tax withholding). With respect to book-entry shares held through DTC, Patrick will cause the exchange agent to
establish procedures with DTC to ensure that the exchange agent will transmit to DTC or its nominees as soon as
practicable on or after the closing, upon surrender of book-entry shares in accordance with DTC’s customary
surrender procedures, the merger consideration (including any cash in lieu of fractional shares).
Until surrendered, each certificate or book-entry share will be deemed at any time after the first effective time to
represent only the right to receive upon such surrender the merger consideration. No interest will be paid or will
accrue for the benefit of holders of certificates or book-entry shares on the merger consideration payable upon the
surrender of certificates or book-entry shares.
Any portion of the merger consideration made available to the exchange agent that remains undistributed to the
holders of the certificates or book-entry shares for nine (9) months after the closing effective time will be delivered
to Patrick, upon demand, and any holders of the certificates or book-entry shares who have not theretofore complied
with the merger agreement will thereafter be entitled to look only to Patrick for payment of their claim for any
shares of Patrick common stock, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Patrick common stock and any dividends or
distributions with respect to Patrick common stock.
Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Stock Certificates
If any certificate will have been lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the
person claiming such certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if required by Patrick or the exchange agent, the
posting by such person of a bond in such reasonable amount as Patrick or the exchange agent, as applicable, may
direct as indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such certificate, the exchange agent
148
will deliver in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate, the merger consideration with respect to the
LCI common stock formerly represented thereby, any cash in lieu of fractional shares of Patrick common stock and
any cash in respect of unpaid dividends and distributions on shares of Patrick common stock deliverable in respect
thereof, pursuant to the merger agreement.
Withholding Rights
Each of LCI, Patrick, the initial surviving entity, the final surviving entity, First Merger Sub, Second Merger
Sub, the exchange agent and any other applicable withholding agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from
any amounts otherwise payable pursuant to the merger agreement such amounts as are required to be deducted or
withheld with respect to the making of such payment under applicable law. Any amounts so deducted and withheld
will be timely paid over to the appropriate governmental entity and will be treated for all purposes of the merger
agreement as having been paid to the person in respect of which such deduction or withholding was made.
Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged Shares
No dividends or other distributions with respect to Patrick common stock with a record date after the first
effective time will be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered certificate or book-entry share with respect to any
shares of Patrick common stock represented thereby, and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares shall be paid to
any such holder until the surrender of such certificate or book-entry share in accordance with the merger agreement.
Subject to the effect of applicable laws, following surrender of any such certificate or book-entry share, there
will be paid to the holder of shares of Patrick common stock issued in exchange therefor, without interest, (i) at the
time of such surrender, the amount of any cash payable in lieu of a fractional share of Patrick common stock to
which such holder is entitled pursuant to the merger agreement and the amount of dividends or other distributions
with a record date after the first effective time theretofore payable with respect to such shares of Patrick common
stock and (ii) at the appropriate payment date, the amount of any dividends or other distributions with a record date
after the first effective time but prior to such surrender and a payment date subsequent to such surrender payable
with respect to such shares of Patrick common stock.
No Further Ownership Rights in LCI Common Stock
All shares of Patrick common stock issued upon the surrender for exchange of certificates or book-entry shares
in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement shall be deemed to have been issued (and paid) in full
satisfaction of all rights pertaining to shares of LCI common stock theretofore represented by such certificates or
book-entry shares, subject, however, to the obligation of Patrick to pay any dividends or make any other
distributions with a record date prior to the first effective time that may have been declared or made by LCI on such
shares of LCI common stock in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement and that remain unpaid at the
first effective time, and there shall be no further registration of transfers on the stock transfer books of the initial
surviving entity of the shares of LCI common stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the first effective
time. If, after the first effective time, certificates are presented to Patrick or the exchange agent for any reason, or, in
the case of book-entry shares, upon adherence to the procedures set forth in the merger agreement and letter of
transmittal, they shall be canceled and exchanged as provided in the merger agreement, except as otherwise provided
by law.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties made by LCI to the Patrick parties, and by
Patrick and the other Patrick parties to LCI. Certain of the representations and warranties in the merger agreement
are subject to materiality or material adverse effect qualifications (that is, they will not be deemed to be untrue or
incorrect unless their failure to be true or correct is material or would result in a material adverse effect). In addition,
certain of the representations and warranties in the merger agreement are subject to knowledge qualifications, which
means that those representations and warranties would not be deemed untrue or incorrect as a result of matters of
which certain officers of the party making the representation did not have actual knowledge.
149
The merger agreement provides that a “material adverse effect” means, on Patrick or LCI, any fact,
circumstance, effect, change event or development, which we refer to as an “effect,” that has had or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate with all other effects, a material adverse effect on
the business, properties, financial condition or results of operations of such party and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole. However, no effect resulting from or arising out of the following will be taken into account in determining
whether there has been a material adverse effect:
•general economic or political conditions or securities, credit, financial or other capital markets conditions,
in each case in the United States or any foreign jurisdiction (in each case, other than any effect that affects
either LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as applicable, in a disproportionate manner as
compared to other companies that participate in the businesses that LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and
its subsidiaries, as applicable, operate, but, in such event, only the incremental disproportionate impact of
any such effect will be taken into account in determining whether a “material adverse effect” has occurred);
•any failure, in and of itself, by LCI or Patrick to meet any internal or published projections, forecasts,
estimates or predictions in respect of revenues, earnings or other financial or operating metrics for any
period (it being understood that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure may be
deemed to constitute, or be taken into account in determining whether there has been or will be, a material
adverse effect on LCI or Patrick, respectively, if such facts or occurrences are not otherwise excluded in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred);
•the execution and delivery of the merger agreement or the public announcement or pendency of the merger
or any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including, solely to the extent
arising out of the foregoing, the impact thereof on the relationships of the party and its subsidiaries with
employees, customers, suppliers or partners (provided, that the foregoing exclusion will not apply to any
representation or warranty that is intended to address the consequences of the negotiation, execution,
announcement or pendency of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or with respect to
any condition to closing to the extent such condition relates to any such representation or warranty);
•any change, in and of itself, in the market price or trading volume of LCI’s or Patrick’s, respectively,
securities or credit ratings (it being understood that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to
such change may be taken into account in determining whether there has been or will be, a material adverse
effect on LCI or Patrick, respectively, if such facts or occurrences are not otherwise excluded in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred);
•any change in applicable law, regulation or GAAP (or authoritative interpretation thereof) (in each case,
other than any effect that affects either LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as applicable,
in a disproportionate manner as compared to other companies that participate in the businesses that LCI and
its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as applicable, operate, but, in such event, only the
incremental disproportionate impact of any such effect will be taken into account in determining whether a
“material adverse effect” has occurred);
•geopolitical conditions, the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, any acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, or
any escalation or worsening of any such acts of war, sabotage or terrorism threatened or underway (in each
case, other than any effect that affects either LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as
applicable, in a disproportionate manner as compared to other companies that participate in the businesses
that LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as applicable, operate, but, in such event, only
the incremental disproportionate impact of any such effect will be taken into account in determining
whether a “material adverse effect” has occurred);
•any hurricane, tornado, flood, earthquake or other natural disaster or act of God, epidemic, pandemic or
contagious disease outbreak or other similar force majeure events in the United States or any other country
or region in the world (or any worsening of any of the foregoing), including, in each case, the response of
governmental entities thereto (in each case, other than any effect that affects either LCI and its subsidiaries
or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as applicable, in a disproportionate manner as compared to other companies
150
that participate in the businesses that LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as applicable,
operate, but, in such event, only the incremental disproportionate impact of any such effect will be taken
into account in determining whether a “material adverse effect” has occurred);
•any action taken (or not taken) by such party or any of its subsidiaries that is expressly required to be taken
(or not to be taken) by the merger agreement (other than the carrying of their respective business in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice and, to the extent consistent therewith, using reasonable best
efforts to preserve intact their current business organizations, preserve their assets and properties in good
repair and condition, using reasonable best efforts to keep available the services of their current officers and
other key employees and preserve their relationships with those persons having business dealings with
them);
•any action taken by LCI or any of its subsidiaries, or Patrick and its subsidiaries, respectively, at the
express written request of the other party or with the other party’s written consent; or
•effects that are the result of factors generally affecting the industries in which such party and its subsidiaries
operate (in each case, other than any effect that affects either LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and its
subsidiaries, as applicable, in a disproportionate manner as compared to other companies that participate in
the businesses that LCI and its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries, as applicable, operate, but, in
such event, only the incremental disproportionate impact of any such effect will be taken into account in
determining whether a “material adverse effect” has occurred).
In the merger agreement, each party has made representations and warranties regarding, among other topics:
•organization, corporate power, good standing and qualification to do business of the party and its
subsidiaries;
•authority to execute and deliver and perform its obligations under, and to consummate the transactions
contemplated by, the merger agreement and the enforceability of the merger agreement against the party;
•capital structure, including the number of shares of common stock, preferred stock, stock options and other
stock-based awards outstanding and the ownership of the capital stock or other equity interests in each of
its subsidiaries;
•the consents and approvals required in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
•SEC documents, financial statements, internal controls and accounting or auditing practices;
•the absence of undisclosed liabilities and off-balance sheet arrangements;
•the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, organizational documents, applicable law and certain
contracts as a result of entering into the merger agreement and consummating the merger;
•accuracy of information supplied or to be supplied in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or the Form S-4
of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part;
•the absence of a material adverse effect since January 1, 2026;
•the conduct of business in the ordinary course from January 1, 2026 through the date of the merger
agreement;
•compliance with applicable laws and the absence of certain litigation and governmental orders;
•existence of litigation;
•employee benefit matters, including matters related to employee benefit plans;
151
•labor and employment matters, including matters related to collective bargaining agreements and
agreements with works councils and labor practices;
•tax matters;
•applicable stockholder vote required in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
•the inapplicability of state takeover statutes to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
•intellectual property matters and data privacy and cybersecurity matters;
•certain contracts;
•environmental matters;
•compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended;
•owned and leased real property;
•customers and suppliers;
•receipt of opinions from the party’s financial advisors;
•broker’s fees and expenses payable in connection with the merger; and
•no other representations or warranties beyond those expressly made.
In addition, Patrick made certain representations regarding the formation, organization, standing, corporate
power and capitalization of, and certain other matters with respect to, each of First Merger Sub and Second Merger
Sub.
Covenants and Agreements
Conduct of Business
Each of Patrick and LCI has undertaken certain covenants in the merger agreement restricting, or requiring
maintenance of certain standards related to, the conduct of their respective businesses between the date of the merger
agreement and the closing effective time. In general, each of Patrick and LCI has agreed to, and to cause their
respective subsidiaries to, carry on their respective businesses in all material respects in the ordinary course and, to
the extent consistent therewith, use reasonable best efforts to preserve intact their current business organizations,
preserve their assets and properties in good repair and condition, use reasonable best efforts to keep available the
services of their current officers and other key employees and preserve their relationships with those persons having
business dealings with them.
In addition to these agreements regarding conduct of business generally, each of Patrick and LCI has agreed to
various specific restrictions relating to the conduct of its business, including with respect to the following (subject in
each case to exceptions specified in the merger agreement or previously disclosed in writing to the other party as
provided in the merger agreement):
•other than (i) dividends and distributions by a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Patrick to its
parent and (ii) quarterly cash dividends on shares of Patrick common stock with timing that is consistent
with past practice and in an amount per share not to exceed $0.47 with respect to fiscal year 2026,
declaring, setting aside or paying any dividends on, or making any distributions in respect of, any of its
capital stock;
•other than (i) dividends and distributions by a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of LCI to its
parent and (ii) quarterly cash dividends on shares of LCI common stock with timing that is consistent with
152
past practice and in an amount per share not to exceed $1.15 with respect to fiscal year 2026, declaring,
setting aside or paying any dividends on, or making any distributions in respect of, any of its capital stock;
•splitting, combining or reclassifying any of its equity securities or issuing or authorizing the issuance of any
other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for any of its existing equity securities;
•purchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring any shares of its or its subsidiaries’ equity securities (other
than the acquisition of shares from a holder of a LCI equity award or Patrick equity award outstanding as of
the date of the merger agreement or granted on or after the date of the merger agreement not in violation of
the merger agreement, in satisfaction of withholding obligations or in payment of the exercise price in
accordance with the terms thereof, or in connection with the forfeiture of any of LCI or Patrick’s respective
equity awards that are outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement or granted on or after the date of
the merger agreement and not in violation of the merger agreement);
•issuing, delivering, selling, pledging or otherwise encumbering any shares of its equity securities (other
than (i) in connection with the settlement of equity compensation granted under the applicable LCI Equity
Plan or Patrick Equity Plan, and outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement and (ii) in connection
with the conversion of the 2030 Notes or the Patrick convertible notes);
•other than in the ordinary course of business, amending, renewing, terminating or waiving any material
provision of certain specified contracts except in connection with any amendments to, and normal renewals
of, such contracts without materially adverse changes, additions or deletions of terms;
•entering into certain new agreements or contracts containing (i) material restrictions on the ability of LCI or
its subsidiaries or Patrick and its subsidiaries to conduct its business as it is presently being conducted or
currently contemplated to be conducted after the merger, (ii) other than in the ordinary course of business,
with respect to any material agreement, contract or other binding obligation, any restrictions granting “most
favored nation” status that, would impose obligations on Patrick following the closing effective time, or
(iii) any non-competition agreement or any other agreement or obligation which purports to limit in any
material respect the manner in which, or the localities in which, all or any material portion of the
businesses, taken as a whole, is or would be conducted, including contracts with “most favored nations”
provisions, any preferential rights or rights of first or last offer or refusal to any third party, or limitations
on sales, or supply or distribution of any services or product or to acquire any person;
•(i) merging or consolidating LCI or any of its Subsidiaries or Patrick or any of its Subsidiaries with any
other person, or (ii) restructuring, reorganizing or completely or partially liquidating (other than for
transactions solely among wholly owned subsidiaries of LCI or Patrick);
•(i) acquiring any equity securities in, or making any investment in or any capital contribution to, any
person, or acquiring a substantial portion of the assets or business of any person (or any division or line of
business thereof), including in each case by merger or consolidation or (ii) otherwise acquiring any material
assets (other than acquisitions of equipment, supplies, raw materials and inventory in the ordinary course of
business) (other than, in each case of (i) and (ii), (a) transactions solely between LCI or Patrick,
respectively, and its wholly owned subsidiaries or solely among LCI’s or Patrick’s, respectively, wholly
owned subsidiaries, (b) acquisitions or investments in any person in one or more transactions in which the
aggregate consideration does not exceed $20,000,000 for any single transaction or $150,000,000 in the
aggregate for all such transactions (provided, that each of LCI and Patrick, as applicable, will consult in
good faith with the other a reasonable period of time in advance of entering into a binding agreement with
respect to any such acquisition or investment, and will consider in good faith any reasonable comments
timely provided by LCI or Patrick, as applicable, regarding such transaction);
•(i) transferring, selling, leasing, subleasing, licensing, sublicensing, abandoning, waiving, relinquishing,
assigning, swapping or otherwise disposing of any assets or properties of LCI or Patrick, respectively, or
any of their subsidiaries or (ii) mortgaging or pledging any assets or properties of LCI or Patrick,
respectively, or any of their subsidiaries, or subjecting any such assets or properties to any other lien not
otherwise permitted by the merger agreement, subject to certain exceptions, including (w) with respect to
153
intellectual property assets, non-exclusive licenses or sublicenses of intellectual property granted to
customers, contractors or suppliers in the ordinary course or business, (x) sales of inventory, products or
services in the ordinary course of business and (y) pursuant to one or more such transactions with respect to
which the aggregate consideration does not exceed $5 million for any single transaction or $25,000,000 in
the aggregate for all such transactions, and (z) solely with respect to clause (ii), as may be required in
connection with the terms of Patrick’s credit facility in effect on the date of the merger agreement, Patrick’s
senior notes and indentures in effect on the date of the merger agreement, LCI’s credit facility in effect on
the date of the merger agreement or the 2030 Notes;
•creating, incurring, assuming or otherwise becoming liable for any indebtedness or obligations for
borrowed money, or issuing, selling or granting any debt securities or any right to acquire debt securities,
assuming, guaranteeing, endorsing or otherwise becoming liable or responsible (whether directly,
contingently or otherwise) for the indebtedness of another person, entering into any agreement to maintain
any financial statement condition of another person or entering into any arrangement having the economic
effect of any of the foregoing, subject to certain exceptions, including (i) indebtedness and guarantees (a)
incurred in the ordinary course of business under the LCI credit facility or the Patrick credit facility, as
applicable, as in effect as of the date of the merger agreement, (b) incurred in connection with the
replacement or refinancing of the indebtedness or other obligations outstanding under any indenture
existing as of the date of the merger agreement with a maturity date prior to December 31, 2028 (provided
that such replacement financing or indebtedness will (1) be on terms substantially the same or better terms,
taken as a whole, than the terms of such existing indenture, as determined in good faith by the replacing
party, and (2) not exceed the aggregate original principal amount of such existing indenture plus any
accrued and unpaid interest or premiums thereon or any fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection
with such replacement or refinancing) or (c) assumed in connection with the transactions involving the
acquisition of equity securities of another person otherwise permitted by the merger agreement, (ii) for any
inter-company indebtedness solely involving LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or any of their direct or indirect
wholly owned subsidiaries, (iii) indebtedness for borrowed money not exceeding $50,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount outstanding at any time incurred by LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or any of their
subsidiaries other than in accordance with clauses (i), (ii), or (iii), or (iv) credit support or guarantees by
LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or their subsidiaries of indebtedness for borrowed money of LCI or Patrick,
as applicable, or their subsidiaries, which indebtedness is incurred in compliance with these requirements
(except clause (iv) will not restrict or limit the debt financing contemplated by the merger agreement or
certain other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
•waiving, releasing, assigning, settling or compromising any pending or threatened action which (i) is
material to its and its subsidiaries’ business, taken as a whole, (ii) is in respect of taxes or (iii) otherwise
involves the payment by such party of an amount in excess of $5,000,000 (excluding any amounts that may
be paid under existing insurance policies) (except that no settlement of any pending or threatened action
will involve (a) any material injunctive or equitable relief or impose material restrictions on the business
activities of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or their subsidiaries, taken as a whole (other than customary non-
disclosure obligations) or (b) any admission of wrongdoing by LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or any of their
subsidiaries);
•(i) making, changing or revoking any material tax election, (ii) settling or compromising any material tax
audit, examination, investigation or other similar administrative or judicial proceeding for a material
amount of taxes, (iii) adopting or changing any material tax accounting method or any annual accounting
period for tax purposes, (iv) requesting or agreeing to any extension or waiver of the statute of limitations
with respect to a material amount of taxes, (v) entering into any “closing agreement” within the meaning of
Section 7121 of the Code (or any similar provision of state, local, or non-U.S. tax law) (vi) requesting any
tax ruling from any governmental entity or (vii) filing any material amended tax return;
•increasing or changing the compensation or benefits of any current or former officer, director, employee or
other individual service provider, other than in the ordinary course of business, except that LCI and Patrick
will not and will not permit any of their respective subsidiaries to, except as required by any of LCI’s or
Patrick’s benefit plans in effect as of the date of the merger agreement or as amended after the date of the
154
merger agreement, (i) grant any equity awards or other long-term incentive or equity-based awards, or
amend or modify (other than in a de minimis respect) the terms of any outstanding equity awards, (ii) grant
any transaction or retention bonuses, (iii) increase or change the compensation or benefits payable or due to
any executive officer, (iv) pay annual bonuses, other than for completed periods based on actual
performance through the end of the applicable performance period, (v) increase or change the severance,
termination pay or similar terms applicable to any current or former employee or individual service
provider, (vi) hire any employee or individual service provider with annual base cash compensation in
excess of $300,000 or terminate the employment of any executive officer (in each case, other than
terminations for cause), or (vii) adopt, establish, enter into, materially amend, or terminate any material LCI
or Patrick benefit plans;
•changing any of its material financial accounting policies or procedures currently in effect, except as
required by generally accepted accounting principles, Regulation S-X of the Exchange Act, or a
governmental entity or quasi-governmental authority (including the Financial Accounting Standards Board
or any similar organization);
•entering into interest rate swaps, foreign exchange or commodity arrangements or other similar hedging
arrangements other than for purposes of offsetting a bona fide exposure (including counterparty risk);
•making aggregate capital expenditures in a fiscal year greater than 120% of the aggregate amount of
budgeted capital expenditures with respect to such fiscal year in LCI’s or Patrick’s long range plan, each as
disclosed to the other party;
•amending the LCI certificate, LCI bylaws, Patrick articles, Patrick bylaws or organizational documents of
First Merger Sub and Second Merger Sub;
•implementing any broad-based cost reduction initiative (including employee layoffs, reductions in force,
plant closings or other similar actions that trigger notice obligations under the WARN Act);
•(i) modifying, negotiating, extending, amending, terminating or entering into any collective bargaining
agreement, works council agreement or similar labor agreement, (ii) recognizing or certify any labor union,
labor organization, works council, employee representative or group of employees as the bargaining
representative for any employees of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or any of their subsidiaries, (iii) entering
into any material agreement, arrangement, consent, waiver or understanding with, or making any material
commitment to, any labor union, labor organization, works council, employee representative or other
employee representative body or under any collective bargaining agreement, works council agreement or
similar labor agreement, or (iv) entering into any agreement, arrangement, consent, waiver or understanding
with, or make any commitment to, any labor union, labor organization, works council, employee
representative or other employee representative body or under any collective bargaining agreement, works
council agreement or similar labor agreement, in each case, in connection with or relating to the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
•taking any action, or failing to take any action, which action or failure to act could be reasonably expected
to prevent the merger from qualifying for the intended tax treatment; and
•affirmatively waiving or releasing any non-competition, nonsolicitation, nondisclosure, or other restrictive
covenant obligation of any current or former employee or independent contractor of LCI or Patrick, as
applicable, or any of their subsidiaries.
The merger agreement contains certain other covenants and agreements, including covenants relating to:
•cooperation between Patrick and LCI in the preparation of this Form S-4 and this joint proxy statement/
prospectus;
•confidentiality and access by each party to certain information about the other party during the period prior
to the closing effective time;
155
•cooperation between Patrick and LCI in connection with public announcements;
•Patrick’s reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of Patrick common stock to be issued as merger
consideration to be approved for listing on the Nasdaq, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the
closing date;
•each party’s reasonable best efforts to take or cause to be taken all actions, and do or cause to be done all
things, reasonably necessary to enable the deregistration of the LCI common stock under the Exchange Act
and delisting from the NYSE as promptly as practicable after the closing date (and in no event more than
ten days after the closing date), including (i) directing the NYSE to file with the SEC a Form 25 on the
closing date and (ii) filing a Form 15 on the first business day that is at least ten calendar days after the date
the Form 25 is filed;
•cooperation on certain tax matters, including each party’s use of reasonable best efforts (i) to cause (A) the
first merger and the second merger to be treated as a single integrated transaction that qualifies as a
“reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, (B) Patrick, First Merger Sub, and LCI
each to be treated as a party to the reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code and (C)
the merger agreement to constitute a “plan of reorganization” for purposes of Sections 354, 361 and 368 of
the Code, and (ii) to obtain the applicable tax opinions, including any tax opinion requested or required by
the SEC in connection with this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the required closing tax opinion
referenced in the closing conditions described below under “—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger,”
and the parties’ delivery of customary tax representation letters in connection therewith;
•actions to consummate the merger and eliminate or minimize the effects of any antitakeover or similar
statute or regulation that is or becomes applicable to the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
•cooperation between LCI and Patrick in connection with certain debt financing arrangements, including the
arrangement and implementation of financing in connection with the transactions, the payoff and
termination of the LCI credit facility and the treatment of the 2030 Notes, call options and warrants in
connection with the merger, including causing the 2030 Notes to remain outstanding and become
convertible into Patrick common stock;
•cooperation between LCI and Patrick in taking all such steps as are reasonably necessary to cause the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and any other dispositions of LCI equity securities or
acquisitions of Patrick equity securities by directors or officers of LCI or Patrick to be exempt under Rule
16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act;
•keeping the other party reasonably informed, and promptly advised, regarding stockholder litigation
commenced after the date of the merger agreement relating to the merger agreement or the transactions
contemplated thereby, and giving such other party the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement
of such litigation (provided that no such settlement will be agreed without the other party’s prior consent,
which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed);
•coordination with respect to dividends declared or paid by Patrick and LCI;
•notification to the other party upon obtaining knowledge of the occurrence or existence of any fact, event or
circumstance that is reasonably likely to result in any of the conditions precedent not being able to be
satisfied prior to the outside date; and
•obligations of Patrick with respect to compliance, performance and satisfaction of covenants and
obligations relating to First Merger Sub, Second Merger Sub, initial surviving entity and final surviving
entity, including Patrick’s approval of the merger agreement in its capacity as sole stockholder of First
Merger Sub.
156
Efforts to Obtain Required Stockholder Votes
LCI has agreed to establish a record date for, duly give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of LCI
stockholders as promptly as practicable after the registration statement on Form S-4 of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus forms a part is declared effective for the purpose of obtaining LCI stockholder approval of the
merger agreement and the first merger. Patrick has agreed to establish a record date for, duly give notice of, convene
and hold a meeting of Patrick shareholders as promptly as practicable after the registration statement on Form S-4 of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part is declared effective for the purpose of obtaining Patrick
shareholder approval of the issuance of shares of Patrick common stock to LCI stockholders in connection with the
merger (the “share issuance”) and the amendment and restatement of the Patrick articles of incorporation to reflect
the Patrick charter amendment (as defined below) and reflect those other matters and terms mutually agreed in good
faith by LCI and Patrick prior to mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus (the “final charter amendment”). The
parties will use reasonable best efforts to schedule and convene the LCI stockholders meeting and the Patrick
shareholders meeting on the same date and time. Each party may postpone or adjourn its meeting to solicit
additional proxies, for the absence of a quorum, or to allow additional time for the filing or mailing of any
supplemental or amended disclosure. Postponements or adjournments are limited to up to ten (10) business days per
postponement and twenty (20) business days in the aggregate from the original meeting date, unless required by
applicable law or consented to by the other party.
Subject to the ability of the LCI board or the Patrick board to effect a recommendation change as described
below, the LCI board is required to recommend to its stockholders that they approve the merger agreement and the
first merger, and the Patrick board is required to recommend to its stockholders that they approve the share issuance
and the final charter amendment.
Efforts to Complete the Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, each of Patrick and LCI, and their respective
subsidiaries, have agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or
cause to be done, and to assist and cooperate with each other in doing, all things necessary, proper or advisable to
consummate and make effective, in the most expeditious manner practicable, the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including using reasonable best efforts for:
•the obtaining of all necessary actions or non-actions, waivers, consents and approvals from governmental
entities that are necessary in connection with the consummation of the merger and other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including any required action or non-action under specified
antitrust laws prior to the closing effective time, and the making of all necessary registrations and filings;
•the obtaining of all necessary consents, approvals or waivers;
•the defending of any lawsuits or other legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging the
merger agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement,
including seeking to have any stay or temporary restraining order entered by any court or other
governmental entity vacated or reversed; and
•the execution and delivery of any additional instruments necessary to consummate the transactions
contemplated by, and to fully carry out the purposes of, the merger agreement.
In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, each of Patrick and LCI agreed to (i) refrain from making
any acquisition or entering into any contractual agreement that would reasonably be expected to impede, interfere
with, prevent or materially delay the consummation of the merger and (ii) make (a) an appropriate filing of a
Notification and Report Form pursuant to the HSR Act with respect to the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement as promptly as practicable and in any event within 25 business days of the date of the merger agreement
(unless otherwise agreed by the parties), (b) appropriate filings, if any are required, pursuant to any other specified
antitrust laws as promptly as practicable, and (c) all other necessary filings with other governmental entities relating
to the merger, and in each case, to supply as promptly as practicable any additional information and documentary
material that may be formally or informally requested pursuant to laws by such authorities, including antitrust laws,
157
such as a second request under the HSR Act, and to use reasonable best efforts to cause the expiration or termination
of any applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act and any other specified antitrust laws and the receipt of the
required consents as soon as practicable. The parties agreed to use their respective reasonable best efforts to certify
substantial compliance with any second request pursuant to the HSR Act as promptly as practicable, but in no event
later than six months from the date of such request.
Each of LCI and Patrick, and their respective subsidiaries, will use their reasonable best efforts to take or cause
to be taken any and all steps, and to make or cause to be made any and all undertakings necessary (i) to resolve such
objections that a governmental entity asserts under any antitrust law with respect to the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement and (ii) to avoid or eliminate each and every impediment under any applicable antitrust law
asserted by any such governmental entity with respect to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, in each case to the extent necessary so as to enable the closing to occur no later than the outside
date, which reasonable best efforts shall include (a) proposing, negotiating, committing to and effecting, by consent
decree, hold separate order or otherwise, the sale, divestiture, disposition, license or other disposition of any
subsidiaries, operations, divisions, businesses, product lines, contracts, customers, assets or other interests of LCI or
Patrick or any of their respective subsidiaries, (b) taking or committing to take such other actions that may limit or
impact LCI’s or Patrick’s or any of their respective subsidiaries’ freedom of action with respect to, or its ability to
retain, their operations, divisions, businesses, product lines, contracts, customers, assets or other interests,
(c) entering into any orders, settlements, undertakings, contracts, consent decrees, stipulations or other agreements to
effectuate any of the foregoing or in order to vacate, lift, reverse, overturn, settle or otherwise resolve any legal
restraint or prohibition that prevents, prohibits, restricts or delays the consummation of the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, in any case, that may be issued by any court or other
governmental entity, and (d) creating, terminating or divesting relationships, contractual rights or obligations of LCI,
Patrick or their respective subsidiaries, in each case in connection with obtaining all, or eliminating any requirement
to obtain any, waiting period expirations or terminations, consents, clearances, waivers, exemptions, licenses, orders,
registrations, approvals, permits, and authorizations for the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
under the HSR Act or any other antitrust law or from any governmental entity so as to enable to the closing to occur
no later than the outside date (any such action, a “remedy action”). LCI, Patrick or their respective subsidiaries will
not be required, or be construed to be required, to take any action or enter into any agreement with respect to any of
the operations, divisions, businesses, product lines, contracts, customers, assets or other interests of LCI, Patrick or
any of their respective subsidiaries that would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in
any burdensome condition described in the merger agreement. Any determination as to which party’s (or its
subsidiaries’) operations, divisions, businesses, product lines, contracts, customers, assets or other interests will be
subject to a particular remedy action requires the prior written consent of both LCI and Patrick, which consent may
not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.
In connection with the foregoing, each of LCI and Patrick will (a) negotiate in good faith with the other party
and with any applicable governmental entity to identify and agree upon a remedy action that minimizes the adverse
impact on the combined company following the closing; (b) if the parties are unable to reach mutual agreement on
the selection of a remedy action within 15 business days following written notice from either party requesting such
determination (or such shorter period as may be required to meet any applicable regulatory deadline or the outside
date), promptly escalate the dispute to their respective chief executive officers, or their designated representatives,
for resolution; and (c) if the parties remain unable to reach agreement within five business days following such
escalation (or such shorter period as may be required to meet any applicable regulatory deadline or the outside date),
and the failure to agree would reasonably be expected to prevent the closing from occurring on or before the outside
date, promptly and jointly engage an independent financial advisor to provide a non-binding recommendation as to
the remedy action that minimizes the adverse impact on the combined company, which recommendation the parties
have agreed to consider in good faith. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event are LCI, Patrick or any of their
respective subsidiaries required to agree to take, or to refrain from taking, any action that is not conditioned upon the
consummation of the merger.
Additionally, each of LCI and Patrick have agreed to jointly develop, and consult and cooperate in all respects
with the other, and consider in good faith the views of the other, in connection with the form and content of any
analyses, appearances, communications, presentations, memoranda, briefs, arguments, opinions and proposals made
158
or submitted by or on behalf of any party in connection with proceedings under or relating to the HSR Act or any
other specified antitrust laws or any other applicable law related to any required consent. Each of LCI and Patrick
have agreed to (a) promptly notify the other party of any non-ministerial communication, inquiry or investigation
received by that party from, or given by it to, any governmental entity and, subject to applicable law, permit the
other party a reasonable opportunity to review in advance any proposed communication to any such governmental
entity and consider in good faith the other party’s reasonable comments, (b) not agree to participate in any material
or substantive meeting or discussion with any such governmental entity in respect of any filing, investigation or
inquiry concerning the merger agreement or the merger unless, to the extent reasonably practicable, it consults with
the other party in advance and, to the extent permitted by such governmental entity, gives the other party a
reasonable opportunity to attend and participate therein, and (c) promptly furnish the other party with copies of all
non-ministerial correspondence, filings and written communications between them and their affiliates and their
respective officers, directors, employees and representatives, on one hand, and any such governmental entity or its
respective staff on the other hand, with respect to the merger agreement and the merger in order for such other party
to meaningfully consult and participate in accordance with the preceding clauses (a) and (b), which materials may be
redacted as necessary to address valuation, competitive sensitivities, attorney-client or other privilege or
confidentiality concerns and may be deemed “Outside Counsel Only.”
Each of LCI and Patrick have also agreed to jointly develop, consult and cooperate with the other, and consider
in good faith the views of the other, with respect to (1) the strategy, timing and form for obtaining any necessary
approval of, for responding to any request from, inquiry or investigation by, or execution of any remedy required by,
any governmental entity that has authority to enforce the HSR Act or any other specified antitrust laws or any other
applicable law related to any required consent (including directing the timing, nature and substance of all such
responses, including any analyses, appearances, presentations, memoranda, briefs, arguments, opinions and
proposals made or submitted by or on behalf of any party in connection with any required approvals or consents)
and (2) the defense and settlement of any action brought by or before any governmental entity that has authority to
enforce the HSR Act or any other specified antitrust laws or any other applicable law related to any required
consent.
In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, if any administrative or judicial action or proceeding by a
governmental entity is instituted challenging the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, each of LCI
and Patrick shall use its reasonable best efforts to (i) oppose, including by defending through litigation, any such
action or proceeding, (ii) pursue all available avenues of administrative and judicial appeal and (iii) seek to have
vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any restraint that is in effect that prohibits, prevents or restricts consummation
of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
No Solicitation of Alternative Transactions
Pursuant to the merger agreement, each of Patrick and LCI has agreed not to, and not to authorize or permit any
of its subsidiaries or any of its or their officers, directors or employees to, and to use its reasonable best efforts to
cause any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other representative retained by it or its
controlled affiliates not to, directly or indirectly:
•solicit, initiate or knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing information), or take any other
action designed to facilitate, any inquiries regarding, or the making of, any proposal or offer of (i) the
acquisition by a person of beneficial ownership of more than 20% of the outstanding common stock, or
securities representing 20% or more of the voting power, of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, (ii) a merger or
similar transaction in which any third party acquires 20% or more of the revenues, net income or assets of
LCI or Patrick, as applicable, (iii) any transaction in which a third party acquires assets constituting 20% or
more of the revenues, net income or assets of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or (iv) any disposition of assets
representing 20% or more of the revenues, net income or assets of LCI or Patrick, as applicable (in the case
of LCI, a “LCI alternative transaction,” and in the case of Patrick, a “Patrick alternative transaction”);
•engage in, continue or otherwise participate in any discussions or negotiations, or cooperate in any way
with any person (or group of persons), with respect to any inquiries regarding, or the making of, any
159
proposal or offer the consummation of which would constitute a LCI alternative transaction or Patrick
alternative transaction, as applicable; or
•otherwise publicly propose, resolve or agree to do any of the foregoing (other than, solely in response to an
unsolicited inquiry, to refer the inquiring person to the nonsolicitation provisions of the merger agreement,
provided such communication is limited exclusively to such referral).
Each of LCI and Patrick will, and will cause its affiliates and representatives to, (i) immediately cease and cause
to be terminated all existing discussions or negotiations with any person conducted before entry into the merger
agreement with respect to any LCI alternative transaction or Patrick alternative transaction, as applicable, (ii)
promptly request the return or destruction of all confidential information previously furnished to such person or its
Representative and (iii) not release any third party from, or waive any provisions of, any existing confidentiality or
standstill agreement to which LCI, Patrick or any of their subsidiaries is a party with respect to any LCI alternative
transaction or Patrick alternative transaction, as applicable, subject to the applicable board’s right to waive any
standstill or similar provision if it determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and a financial
advisor of nationally recognized reputation) that the failure to waive such provision would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under applicable law. Notwithstanding these restrictions, the merger agreement provides that, if at
any time prior to obtaining the applicable stockholder approval, a party receives an unsolicited bona fide written
proposal (with respect to a LCI alternative transaction or Patrick alternative transaction, as applicable) that its board
of directors determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor of nationally
recognized reputation) constitutes or is reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal (as defined below) and which
did not result from a material breach of the non-solicitation obligations set forth in the merger agreement, then such
party may (i) furnish information with respect to itself and its subsidiaries to the person (or group of persons)
making such proposal and its representatives and financing sources pursuant to a customary confidentiality
agreement containing terms as to confidentiality generally no less restrictive than the terms of the confidentiality
agreement entered into between LCI and Patrick (provided that (x) such information must have been previously
provided to the other party or must be provided to the other party prior to or substantially concurrently with the time
it is provided to such person and (y) such confidentiality agreement need not contain any “standstill” term) and (ii)
participate in discussions or negotiations regarding such proposal. Neither LCI nor Patrick will (i) withdraw, qualify,
modify or propose to withdraw, qualify or modify, or fail to make, the LCI recommendation or the Patrick
recommendation, as applicable, (ii) approve, recommend or propose publicly to approve or recommend any LCI
alternative transaction or Patrick alternative transaction, as applicable or (iii) fail to include the recommendation of
the LCI board that LCI stockholders adopt and approve the merger agreement and the first merger (which we refer
to as the “LCI recommendation”) or the recommendation of the Patrick board that Patrick shareholders approve the
issuance of shares as merger consideration and the amendment of Patrick’s articles increasing the number of
authorized shares of Patrick common stock (which we refer to as the “Patrick recommendation”), as applicable, in
each case, in the joint proxy statement/prospectus, (iv) fail to publicly reaffirm the LCI recommendation or Patrick
recommendation, as applicable, within five business days after LCI or Patrick, as applicable, requests in writing that
such approval be reaffirmed publicly following the public announcement of any LCI alternative transaction or
Patrick alternative transaction, as applicable, (v) fail to recommend against acceptance by LCI stockholders or
Patrick shareholders, as applicable, of any third party tender offer or exchange offer relating to shares of LCI
common stock or Patrick common stock, as applicable, and reaffirm the LCI recommendation or Patrick
recommendation, as applicable, in connection therewith, in each case within five business days after the
commencement of such tender offer or exchange offer, or (vi) permit LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or any of their
controlled affiliates, to enter into any letter of intent, agreement in principle, acquisition agreement or other similar
agreement (a) related to any LCI alternative transaction or Patrick alternative transaction, as applicable, or (b) that
requires, or is reasonably likely to require, LCI or Patrick, as applicable, to terminate, delay or fail to consummate,
or that would otherwise impede or interfere in any way with or be inconsistent with, the consummation of the
merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (any action in clause (i) through (vi)
above, in the case of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, a “recommendation change”).
Each of Patrick and LCI has also agreed (i) to promptly notify the other party orally and in writing, and in any
event within 24 hours of receipt, of any request for information or of any proposal relating to a LCI alternative
transaction or Patrick alternative transaction, as applicable, the material terms and conditions of such request or
160
proposal (including any changes thereto) and the identity of the person making such request or proposal, (ii) keep
the other party reasonably informed of the status and details (including amendments or proposed amendments) of
any such request or proposal on a reasonably current basis and (iii) provide the other party, as soon as reasonably
practicable following delivery and receipt, copies of all correspondence and other written materials exchanged with
the person making the proposal.
Changes in Board Recommendation
Each of Patrick and LCI will, through their respective boards of directors, recommend to its respective
stockholders the approval of the applicable stockholder proposals in connection with the merger and to include such
recommendation in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The merger agreement provides that, subject to the exceptions described below, neither the Patrick board nor
any committees thereof, nor the LCI board nor any committees thereof, will (i) effect a recommendation change, or
(ii) cause Patrick or LCI, or any of their controlled affiliates, to enter into any letter of intent, agreement in principle,
acquisition agreement or other agreement related to any Patrick alternative transaction or LCI alternative transaction,
as applicable, requiring, or reasonably likely to cause, the other party to terminate, delay or fail to consummate, or
that would otherwise impede, interfere in any way with or be inconsistent with, the consummation of the merger or
any of the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (other than a confidentiality agreement
otherwise permitted by the merger agreement).
Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions, at any time prior to obtaining the applicable stockholder approval, a
party’s board of directors may, if it determines in good faith that (i) it received a bona fide written proposal made by
a third party to LCI or Patrick, as applicable, to enter into a LCI alternative transaction or Patrick alternative
transaction, as applicable, (with all references to 20% in the definition of “LCI alternative transaction” and “Patrick
alternative transaction,” as applicable, being treated as references to 80%) that (a) did not result from a material
breach of either party’s non-solicitation obligations and (b) is on terms that the LCI board or the Patrick board, as
applicable, determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor, and taking in all
relevant considerations) is more favorable to the LCI stockholders or Patrick shareholders, as applicable, from a
financial point of view than the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, taking into account all relevant
factors (including any changes to the merger agreement that may be proposed by the other party in response to such
proposal) (in the case of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, a “superior proposal”) and (ii) that the failure to take action
would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law, effect a recommendation change in response to
a superior proposal. However, the board may not effect a recommendation change in response to any superior
proposal unless it has given the other party at least five business days’ written notice specifying the material terms
and conditions of such superior proposal, identifying the person making such proposal and stating that it intends to
make a recommendation change, or in the event of a subsequent modification to the material terms and conditions of
such superior proposal, at least four business days’ written notice advising the other party of the modification;
provided that during such notice period, the party engages (to the extent requested by the other party) in good faith
negotiations to amend the merger agreement in such a manner that the proposal no longer constitutes a superior
proposal.
In addition, at any time prior to obtaining the applicable stockholder approval, the LCI board or Patrick board,
as applicable, may, if it determines in good faith (after consultation with outside counsel and a financial advisor of
nationally recognized reputation) that the failure to do so would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under
applicable law, effect a board recommendation change in response to a material event, fact or change in
circumstance that arises or occurs after the date of the merger agreement with respect to LCI or Patrick, as
applicable, that materially affects the business, assets or operations of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, or their
subsidiaries, taken as a whole (other than resulting from breach) that, prior to the date of the merger agreement, was
not known or reasonably foreseeable to the LCI board or Patrick board, as applicable, (subject to certain enumerated
exceptions, in the case of LCI or Patrick, as applicable, an “intervening event”). However, the LCI board or the
Patrick board, as applicable, may not effect a board recommendation change in response to any LCI intervening
event or Patrick intervening event, as applicable, unless it has given the other party at least five business days
written notice advising the other party of all material information with respect to any such LCI intervening event or
Patrick intervening event, as applicable, and stating that it intends to make a board recommendation change and
161
providing its rationale therefor; provided that during such notice period, the party engages (to the extent requested
by the other party) in good faith negotiations to adjust or modify the merger agreement in response to such
intervening event.
Indemnification, Exculpation and Insurance
The merger agreement requires Patrick to cause the final surviving entity, for a period of six years following the
closing effective time, to indemnify and hold harmless each individual who is, as of the date of the merger
agreement or becomes prior to the closing effective time, a director or officer of LCI or any of its subsidiaries, or
who, at the request of LCI or its subsidiaries, serves as a director or officer of another person in which LCI or any of
its subsidiaries has an equity investment (the “LCI Indemnified Parties”), against all claims, losses, liabilities,
damages, judgments, inquiries, fines and reasonable fees, costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and
disbursements, incurred in connection with any claim, action, suit or proceeding arising out of or pertaining to the
fact that the Indemnified Party is or was an officer or director of LCI or any of its subsidiaries or was serving at the
request of LCI or its subsidiaries, to the same extent as such LCI Indemnified Parties were indemnified as of the date
of the merger agreement pursuant to the organizational documents of LCI or any of its subsidiaries, or any
indemnification agreements in existence as of the date of the merger agreement. Neither Patrick nor the final
surviving entity will be liable for any settlement effected without its prior written consent or for any indemnification
that a court deems, in a final and non-appealable order, is prohibited by applicable law.
Each LCI Indemnified Party will be entitled to advancement of expenses incurred in the defense of any such
claim, action, suit or proceeding from the final surviving entity to the same extent as such LCI Indemnified Parties
are entitled to advancement of expenses as of the date of the merger agreement by LCI; however, any person to
whom expenses are advanced provides an undertaking, if and to the extent required by the DGCL, to repay such
advances if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification.
The merger agreement also requires Patrick for six years following the closing effective time either to cause to
be maintained the policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance currently
maintained by LCI or to provide substitute policies for not less than the existing coverage and having other terms not
less favorable to the insured persons, except that in no event will Patrick be required to pay an annual premium
greater than 300% of the annual premium paid by LCI for such insurance for the prior 12 months (which we refer to
as the “Maximum Amount”). LCI may obtain a six-year “tail” policy under its existing directors’ and officers’
insurance policy in lieu of the foregoing, for a cost not to exceed the Maximum Amount.
Employee Benefits Matters
For employees who remain employed by Patrick or its subsidiaries following the first effective time, the
following provisions will apply with respect to the compensation and benefits provided to such employees:
•Patrick will recognize each such employee’s credited years of service with LCI or Patrick, as applicable, for
all purposes under each employee benefit plan, program, policy, agreement or arrangement sponsored,
maintained or contributed to by Patrick or any of its subsidiaries following the first effective time (the
“New Plans”), to the same extent such employee was entitled to credited service under the applicable
predecessor plans, except to the extent such credit would result in a duplication of benefits and except with
respect to defined benefit pension plans and equity-based or other incentive compensation;
•Patrick will use its reasonable best efforts to cause each such employee to be eligible for participation in
Patrick welfare plans without any waiting time to the extent coverage under a Patrick welfare plan replaces
coverage under comparable predecessor welfare plans in which such employee participated immediately
prior to the first effective time;
•Patrick will use reasonable best efforts to cause all pre-existing condition exclusions and actively-at-work
requirements of Patrick medical, dental, pharmaceutical and/or vision benefit plans to be waived for such
employees and their covered dependents; and
162
•Patrick will use reasonable best efforts to provide credit for any copayments and deductibles paid by such
employees (or their covered dependents) prior to the first effective time in satisfying any similar deductible,
coinsurance and maximum out-of-pocket requirements under any corresponding New Plan.
The merger agreement also requires that the terms and conditions of employment for any LCI or Patrick
employee covered by a labor agreement will be governed by the applicable labor agreement until the expiration,
modification or termination of such labor agreement in accordance with its terms or applicable law.
Patrick and LCI agreed that, during any such employee’s period of employment following the first effective
time and for the period beginning at the first effective time and ending on the 12-month anniversary of the first
effective time, (i) the base salaries or wage rates of such employees will not be reduced from those in effect
immediately prior to the first effective time, (ii) the target incentive compensation opportunities (including equity-
based incentives but excluding any retention, transaction or change in control bonus arrangements) of such
employees will not be reduced from those in effect immediately prior to the first effective time, and (iii) each such
employee will be provided employee benefits (excluding defined benefit plans, nonqualified deferred compensation
plans and retiree welfare plans) that are substantially similar in the aggregate to either those provided to such
employee immediately before the first effective time or those provided from time to time to similarly situated
employees of the other party.
The merger agreement also provides that the employee benefits provisions described in this section will not (i)
be construed to establish, amend or modify any benefit or compensation plan, (ii) limit the ability of Patrick, LCI, or
any of their respective subsidiaries to amend, modify or terminate any benefit or compensation plan, (iii) create any
third-party beneficiary rights or obligations in any person other than the parties to the merger agreement or any right
to employment or continued employment, or (iv) limit the right of Patrick, LCI or any of their subsidiaries to
terminate the employment of any employee following the first effective time at any time and for any or no reason.
Conditions to the Closing of the Merger
The obligations of each of Patrick and LCI to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver, in
whole or in part (to the extent permitted by applicable law) of the following mutual conditions on or prior to the
closing date:
•the approval by LCI stockholders of the merger agreement and the first merger;
•the approval by Patrick shareholders of the share issuance and the amendment of Patrick’s articles of
incorporation to increase the number of shares of Patrick common stock available for issuance (the “Patrick
charter amendment”);
•the termination or expiration of any applicable waiting period under the HSR Act and the termination,
expiration or obtainment of any applicable waiting period or any applicable consents, authorizations or
approvals under certain antitrust laws;
•the absence of governmental restraints or prohibitions preventing the consummation of the merger;
•the SEC having declared effective the registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus
forms a part, and the absence of a stop order or proceedings seeking a stop order;
•the approval for listing by Nasdaq of the shares of Patrick common stock issuable as merger consideration,
subject to official notice of issuance;
•certain representations and warranties of the other party relating to capitalization and other equity securities
being true and correct as of the closing date (except to the extent such representations and warranties
expressly relate to a specific date or as of the date of the merger agreement, in which case such
representations and warranties must be true and correct as of such date), except that any inaccuracies that in
the aggregate are de minimis in nature may be disregarded;
163
•certain representations and warranties of the other party relating to organization, standing, corporate power,
authority, agreements with respect to equity securities, voting requirements, takeover statutes and charter
provisions, financial advisor opinions, brokers and, in the case of Patrick, merger subs (x) that are qualified
by materiality or material adverse effect being true and correct as of the closing date as though made on the
closing date (except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to a specific date or
the date of the merger agreement, in which case such representations and warranties must be true and
correct as of such date) and (y) that are not qualified by materiality or material adverse effect being true and
correct in all material respects as of the closing date (except to the extent such representations and
warranties expressly relate to a specific date or the date of the merger agreement, in which case such
representations and warranties must be true and correct in all material respects as of such date);
•the representation and warranty of the other party relating to no material adverse effect being true and
correct as of the closing date;
•each other representation and warranty of the other party (without giving effect to any limitation as to
materiality, material adverse effect or any provisions contained therein relating to preventing or materially
delaying the consummation of any of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement) being true
and correct as of the closing date (except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate
to a specific date or the date of the merger agreement, in which case such representations and warranties
must be true and correct as of such date), except where the failure of such representations and warranties to
be so true and correct does not have, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate with respect to all such failures, a material adverse effect on such party;
•LCI or the Patrick parties, as applicable, having performed in all material respects their respective
obligations required to be performed under the merger agreement;
•the absence of a material adverse effect on the other party since the date of the merger agreement; and
•the receipt by each party of a certificate executed by the chief executive officer or chief financial officer of
the other party certifying the satisfaction of the applicable conditions relating to representations and
warranties, performance of obligations and absence of a material adverse effect.
The obligations of LCI to effect the merger are additionally subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following
condition:
•the receipt by LCI of a tax opinion from its counsel (or if LCI’s counsel is unable to issue such an opinion,
from Patrick’s counsel or another nationally recognized law firm reasonably acceptable to LCI) to the effect
that, on the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the
first merger and the second merger, taken together, will be treated as a single integrated transaction that will
qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code (the “closing tax opinion”).
In rendering the closing tax opinion, counsel will have received the tax representation letters from Patrick
and LCI and may rely upon such representation letters and such other representations, information and
assumptions as counsel reasonably deems relevant. The failure of counsel to deliver such opinion shall not
cause a failure of this condition, however, to the extent such failure results from any breach by LCI of
certain covenants related to tax matters under the merger agreement.
We cannot be certain when, or if, the conditions to the merger will be satisfied or waived, or that the merger will
be completed.
Termination of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the closing effective time, whether before or after
receipt of the LCI stockholder approval or the Patrick shareholder approval, under the following circumstances:
•by mutual written consent of Patrick and LCI; or
164
•by either Patrick or LCI:
◦if the merger is not consummated by March 30, 2027 (the “outside date”); provided that if the
closing has not occurred by such date and all conditions have been satisfied or waived (other than the
antitrust conditions and those that by their terms are to be fulfilled at closing but are capable of being
satisfied), then the outside date will automatically be extended to June 30, 2027, and if the merger
has not been consummated by June 30, 2027 for the same reason, the outside date will automatically
be further extended to September 30, 2027; provided, further, that this right to terminate will not be
available to a party whose failure to perform any of its material obligations under the merger
agreement has been the primary cause of, or primarily resulted in, the failure of the merger to be
consummated by such time;
◦if the approval of the LCI stockholders of the merger agreement and the first merger has not been
obtained at a duly convened LCI stockholders meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof;
◦if the approval of the Patrick shareholders of the share issuance or the Patrick charter amendment has
not been obtained at a duly convened Patrick shareholders meeting or any adjournment or

